Skip to main content
Log in

Contested memory: Notes on Robert K. Merton’s“the Thomas Theorem and the Matthew Effect”

  • Article
  • Published:
The American Sociologist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Conclusion

Merton’s 1995 article shows the sociological complexity of a question that appears on the surface to be a simple one: Who wrote,“ If men define situations as real, they are real in their consequences”? Yet, simple things can be stated simply: the evidence for W. I. Thomas’s authorship of this sentence is far from conclusive; therefore I believe it should be attributed to both authors of the book in which it appears. It is ironic that Merton, having spent much of his professional career studying the role of citations in science, bears some responsibility for the lack of credit Dorothy Swaine Thomas has received regarding these words. This incident should therefore act as a cautionary tale about what happens when we stray too far from the scholarly practice of documenting our sources, even though we may believe we have good reasons for doing so. I am averse, however, to conclude my response to Merton’s article on a strident note. My hope is that this episode will help us move toward a“new era” of not the politically but the scholarly correct citation. It would be a pity if this issue leads to citation wars where old scores are settled and political correctness wins out over scholarly civility. On this point, I am sure Merton and I can both agree.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Becker, Howard P. 1932. Systematic Sociology. On the Basis of the Beziehungslehre and Gebildelehre of Leopold von Wiese. New York: John Whiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1945.“Interpretative Sociology and Constructive Typology.” Pp. 70–95 in Twentieth Century Sociology, edited by Georges Gurvitch and Wilbert E. Moore. New York: Philosophical Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1950. Through Values to Social Interpretation: Essays on Social Contexts, Actions, Types and Prospects. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumer, Herbert. 1939, 1979. Critiques of Research in the Social Sciences. An Appraisal of Thomas and Znaniecki’s The Polish Peasant in Europe and America. With a new intro. by the author. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, Jon, Celia Modgil, Sohan Modgil. (eds.) 1990. Robert K. Merton: Consensus and Controversy. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, Erika. 1995.“Encounters: A Summation From the Patron Saint of Sociology.” Pp. 1 and 9 in New York Times, Long Island Weekly Desk, Sunday, April 16.

  • Garfield, Eugene. 1980.“Citation Measures of the Influence of Robert K. Merton.” Pp. 61–74 in Science and Social Structure: A Festschrift for Robert K. Merton. New York: The New York Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goetting, Ann and Sarah Fenstermaker. (eds.) 1995. Individual Voices, Collective Visions: Fifty Years of Women in Sociology. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grafton, Anthony. 1997.“The Death of The Footnote (Report on an Exaggeration).” The Wilson Quarterly XXI (1):72–77 (Winter).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, Helen MacGill. (ed.) 1973. Women in Sociology—An ASA Handbook. Washington, D.C.: ASA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, Evelyn Fox. 1985. Reflections on Gender and Science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, Gladys Engel, and Kurt Lang. 1990. Etched in Memory: The Building and Survival of Artistic Reputation. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laslett, Barbara and Barrie Thome, (eds.) Feminist Sociology: Life Histories of a Movement. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

  • Lee, Everett S. 1977.“Dorothy Swaine Thomas (1900-1977).” ASA Footnotes 5(6):12. (August).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopata, Helena Z. 1981.“Widowhood and Husband Sanctification.” Journal of Marriage and the Family (May):439–450.

  • McHugh, Peter. 1968. Defining the Situation. The Organization of Meaning in Social Interaction. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, Robert K. 1938.“Science and the Social Order.” Philosophy of Science 5:321–337. (Reprinted in Merton, 1968).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1948. “The Self-Fulfilling Prophecy.” Antioch Review VIII (2):193–210. (June). (Reprinted in Merton, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1949/1957/1968. Social Theory and Social Structure. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1967/1968.“On the History and Systematics of Sociological Theory.” Pp. 1–38 in Social Theory and Social Structure. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1973. The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Edited and intro. by Norman Storer. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1975.“Social Knowledge and Public Policy: Sociological Perspectives on Four Presidential Commissions.” Pp. 153–177 in Sociology and Public Policy: The Case of Presidential Commissions. Edited and intro. by Mirra Komarovsky. New York: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1975/1976.“Social Knowledge and Public Policy.” Pp. 156–179 in Sociological Ambivalence and Other Essays. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1975/1982.“Social Knowledge and Public Policy.” Pp. 225–247 in Social Research and the Practicing Professions. Edited and intro. by Aaron Rosenblatt and Thomas F. Gieryn. Cambridge, MA: Abt Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1948/1982.“The Self-Fulfilling Prophecy.” Pp. 248–267 in Social Research and the Practicing Professions. Edited and intro. by Aaron Rosenblatt and Thomas F. Gieryn. Cambridge, MA: Abt Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1995.“The Thomas Theorem and The Matthew Effect.” Social Forces 7 4(2):379–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merton, Robert K. [and Harriet Zuckerman] 1968.“The Matthew Effect in Science: The Reward and Communications Systems of Science are Considered.” Science 159:56–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1968/1973.“The Matthew Effect.” Pp. 439–459 in The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Edited and intro. by Norman Storer. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molotch, Harvey. 1994.“Going Out.” Sociological Forum 9 (2):221–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogburn, William F. 1922, 1966. Social Change with Respect to Culture and Original Nature. With new intro. by Hendrik M. Ruitenbeek. New York: Dell Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogburn, William F. and Dorothy Swaine Thomas. 1922.“Are Inventions Inevitable? A Note on Social Evolution.” Political Science Quarterly 37(1):83–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orbach, Harold L. 1993-“Znaniecki’s Contribution to The Polish Peasant.” Pp. 142–158 in The Contribution of Florian Znaniecki to Sociological Theory. Edited and intro. by Renzo Gubert and Luigi Tomasi. Milano (Italy): FrancoAngeli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlans, Kathryn P. Meadow and Ruth A. Wallace, (eds.) 1994. Gender and the Academic Experience: Berkeley Women Sociologists. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roos, Patricia A. 1997.“Occupational Feminization, Occupational Decline? Sociology’s Changing Sex Composition.” The American Sociologist 28(1):75–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld, Rachel A., David Cunningham and Kathryn Schmidt. 1997.“American Sociological Association Elections, 1975-1996: Exploring Explanations for ‘Feminization.’” American Sociological Review 62(5):746–759.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, Alice S. 1973.“Preface.” Pp. xi-xv in Academic Women on the Move. Edited and intro. by Alice Rossi and Ann Calderwood. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossiter, Margaret W. 1993.“The Matthew Matilda Effect in Science.” Social Studies of Science 23:325–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1995. Women Scientists in America: Before Affirmative Action, 1940-1972. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiebinger, Londa. 1989. The Mind Has No Sex? Women in the Origins of Modern Science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, Ruth W. 1995.“The Improbable Adventures of an American Scholar: Robert K. Merton.” The American Sociologist 26(3):68–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schutz, Alfred. 1955, 1962.“Symbol, Reality, and Society.” Pp. 287–356 in The Problem of Social Reality. Collected Papers 1. Edited and intro. by Maurice Natanson. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sills, David L. and Robert K. Merton. (eds.) 1991. Social Science Quotations. The International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences. Vol. 19. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. S. 1995.“Giving Credit Where Credit Is Due: Dorothy Swaine Thomas and the ‘Thomas Theorem’”. The American Sociologist 26(4):9–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swinburne, Algernon Charles. 1891, 1968.“Eton: An Ode.” Pp. 129–131 in The Complete Works of Algernon Charles Swinburne. Vol. XIX. Edited by Sir Edmund Gosse and Thomas James Wise. New York: Russell and Russell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sztompka, Piotr. 1986. Robert K. Merton: An Intellectual Profile. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, Dorothy Swaine. 1952.“Experiences in Interdisciplinary Research.” American Sociological Review 17(6):663–669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1970.“Contribution to the Herman Wold Festschrift.” Pp. 216–277 in Scientists at Work: Festschrift in Honour of Herman Wold. Edited by Tore Dalenious, Georg Karlsson, and Sten Malmquist. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, W. I. 1923, 1967. The Unadjusted Girl, With Cases and Standpoint for Behavior Analysis. Edited with a foreword by Benjamin Nelson. Intro, by Michael Parenti. New York: Harper Torchbooks.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1931.“The Relations of Research to the Social Sciences.” Pp. 175–194 in Essays on Research in the Social Sciences. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1951. Social Behavior and Personality: Contributions of W. I. Thomas to Theory and Social Research. Edited and intro. by Edmund H. Volkart. New York: Social Science Research Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, W. I. and Dorothy Swaine Thomas. 1928. The Child in America. Behavior Problems and Programs. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, W. I. and Florian Znaniecki. 1918, 1927. The Polish Peasant in Europe and America. Vol. 1. New York: Alfred Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waller, Willard W. 1938. The Family: A Dynamic Interpretation. New York: Cordon Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westie, Frank R. 1973.“Academic Expectations for Professional Immortality: A Study of Legitimation.” The American Sociologist 8:19–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, Kimball. 1930, 1944, 1956. Social Psychology. New York: Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. (ed.) 1931. Social Attitudes: A Symposium. New York. Henry Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • —.1995. Kimball Young On Sociology in Transition, 1921-1968. An Oral Account by the 35th President of the ASA. Edited and intro. by Fred B. Lindstrom, Ronald A. Hardert and Laura L. Johnson. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Smith, R.S. Contested memory: Notes on Robert K. Merton’s“the Thomas Theorem and the Matthew Effect”. Am Soc 30, 62–77 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-999-1017-3

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-999-1017-3

Keywords

Navigation