Conclusion
Merton’s 1995 article shows the sociological complexity of a question that appears on the surface to be a simple one: Who wrote,“ If men define situations as real, they are real in their consequences”? Yet, simple things can be stated simply: the evidence for W. I. Thomas’s authorship of this sentence is far from conclusive; therefore I believe it should be attributed to both authors of the book in which it appears. It is ironic that Merton, having spent much of his professional career studying the role of citations in science, bears some responsibility for the lack of credit Dorothy Swaine Thomas has received regarding these words. This incident should therefore act as a cautionary tale about what happens when we stray too far from the scholarly practice of documenting our sources, even though we may believe we have good reasons for doing so. I am averse, however, to conclude my response to Merton’s article on a strident note. My hope is that this episode will help us move toward a“new era” of not the politically but the scholarly correct citation. It would be a pity if this issue leads to citation wars where old scores are settled and political correctness wins out over scholarly civility. On this point, I am sure Merton and I can both agree.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Becker, Howard P. 1932. Systematic Sociology. On the Basis of the Beziehungslehre and Gebildelehre of Leopold von Wiese. New York: John Whiley and Sons.
—. 1945.“Interpretative Sociology and Constructive Typology.” Pp. 70–95 in Twentieth Century Sociology, edited by Georges Gurvitch and Wilbert E. Moore. New York: Philosophical Library.
—. 1950. Through Values to Social Interpretation: Essays on Social Contexts, Actions, Types and Prospects. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Blumer, Herbert. 1939, 1979. Critiques of Research in the Social Sciences. An Appraisal of Thomas and Znaniecki’s The Polish Peasant in Europe and America. With a new intro. by the author. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
Clark, Jon, Celia Modgil, Sohan Modgil. (eds.) 1990. Robert K. Merton: Consensus and Controversy. London: Falmer Press.
Duncan, Erika. 1995.“Encounters: A Summation From the Patron Saint of Sociology.” Pp. 1 and 9 in New York Times, Long Island Weekly Desk, Sunday, April 16.
Garfield, Eugene. 1980.“Citation Measures of the Influence of Robert K. Merton.” Pp. 61–74 in Science and Social Structure: A Festschrift for Robert K. Merton. New York: The New York Academy of Sciences.
Goetting, Ann and Sarah Fenstermaker. (eds.) 1995. Individual Voices, Collective Visions: Fifty Years of Women in Sociology. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Grafton, Anthony. 1997.“The Death of The Footnote (Report on an Exaggeration).” The Wilson Quarterly XXI (1):72–77 (Winter).
Hughes, Helen MacGill. (ed.) 1973. Women in Sociology—An ASA Handbook. Washington, D.C.: ASA.
Keller, Evelyn Fox. 1985. Reflections on Gender and Science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Lang, Gladys Engel, and Kurt Lang. 1990. Etched in Memory: The Building and Survival of Artistic Reputation. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
Laslett, Barbara and Barrie Thome, (eds.) Feminist Sociology: Life Histories of a Movement. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Lee, Everett S. 1977.“Dorothy Swaine Thomas (1900-1977).” ASA Footnotes 5(6):12. (August).
Lopata, Helena Z. 1981.“Widowhood and Husband Sanctification.” Journal of Marriage and the Family (May):439–450.
McHugh, Peter. 1968. Defining the Situation. The Organization of Meaning in Social Interaction. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.
Merton, Robert K. 1938.“Science and the Social Order.” Philosophy of Science 5:321–337. (Reprinted in Merton, 1968).
—. 1948. “The Self-Fulfilling Prophecy.” Antioch Review VIII (2):193–210. (June). (Reprinted in Merton, 1968).
—. 1949/1957/1968. Social Theory and Social Structure. New York: The Free Press.
—. 1967/1968.“On the History and Systematics of Sociological Theory.” Pp. 1–38 in Social Theory and Social Structure. New York: The Free Press.
—. 1973. The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Edited and intro. by Norman Storer. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
—. 1975.“Social Knowledge and Public Policy: Sociological Perspectives on Four Presidential Commissions.” Pp. 153–177 in Sociology and Public Policy: The Case of Presidential Commissions. Edited and intro. by Mirra Komarovsky. New York: Elsevier.
—. 1975/1976.“Social Knowledge and Public Policy.” Pp. 156–179 in Sociological Ambivalence and Other Essays. New York: The Free Press.
—. 1975/1982.“Social Knowledge and Public Policy.” Pp. 225–247 in Social Research and the Practicing Professions. Edited and intro. by Aaron Rosenblatt and Thomas F. Gieryn. Cambridge, MA: Abt Books.
—. 1948/1982.“The Self-Fulfilling Prophecy.” Pp. 248–267 in Social Research and the Practicing Professions. Edited and intro. by Aaron Rosenblatt and Thomas F. Gieryn. Cambridge, MA: Abt Books.
—. 1995.“The Thomas Theorem and The Matthew Effect.” Social Forces 7 4(2):379–424.
Merton, Robert K. [and Harriet Zuckerman] 1968.“The Matthew Effect in Science: The Reward and Communications Systems of Science are Considered.” Science 159:56–63.
—. 1968/1973.“The Matthew Effect.” Pp. 439–459 in The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Edited and intro. by Norman Storer. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Molotch, Harvey. 1994.“Going Out.” Sociological Forum 9 (2):221–239.
Ogburn, William F. 1922, 1966. Social Change with Respect to Culture and Original Nature. With new intro. by Hendrik M. Ruitenbeek. New York: Dell Publishing Co.
Ogburn, William F. and Dorothy Swaine Thomas. 1922.“Are Inventions Inevitable? A Note on Social Evolution.” Political Science Quarterly 37(1):83–98.
Orbach, Harold L. 1993-“Znaniecki’s Contribution to The Polish Peasant.” Pp. 142–158 in The Contribution of Florian Znaniecki to Sociological Theory. Edited and intro. by Renzo Gubert and Luigi Tomasi. Milano (Italy): FrancoAngeli.
Orlans, Kathryn P. Meadow and Ruth A. Wallace, (eds.) 1994. Gender and the Academic Experience: Berkeley Women Sociologists. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
Roos, Patricia A. 1997.“Occupational Feminization, Occupational Decline? Sociology’s Changing Sex Composition.” The American Sociologist 28(1):75–88.
Rosenfeld, Rachel A., David Cunningham and Kathryn Schmidt. 1997.“American Sociological Association Elections, 1975-1996: Exploring Explanations for ‘Feminization.’” American Sociological Review 62(5):746–759.
Rossi, Alice S. 1973.“Preface.” Pp. xi-xv in Academic Women on the Move. Edited and intro. by Alice Rossi and Ann Calderwood. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Rossiter, Margaret W. 1993.“The Matthew Matilda Effect in Science.” Social Studies of Science 23:325–41.
—. 1995. Women Scientists in America: Before Affirmative Action, 1940-1972. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Schiebinger, Londa. 1989. The Mind Has No Sex? Women in the Origins of Modern Science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Schultz, Ruth W. 1995.“The Improbable Adventures of an American Scholar: Robert K. Merton.” The American Sociologist 26(3):68–77.
Schutz, Alfred. 1955, 1962.“Symbol, Reality, and Society.” Pp. 287–356 in The Problem of Social Reality. Collected Papers 1. Edited and intro. by Maurice Natanson. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
Sills, David L. and Robert K. Merton. (eds.) 1991. Social Science Quotations. The International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences. Vol. 19. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co.
Smith, R. S. 1995.“Giving Credit Where Credit Is Due: Dorothy Swaine Thomas and the ‘Thomas Theorem’”. The American Sociologist 26(4):9–28.
Swinburne, Algernon Charles. 1891, 1968.“Eton: An Ode.” Pp. 129–131 in The Complete Works of Algernon Charles Swinburne. Vol. XIX. Edited by Sir Edmund Gosse and Thomas James Wise. New York: Russell and Russell.
Sztompka, Piotr. 1986. Robert K. Merton: An Intellectual Profile. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Thomas, Dorothy Swaine. 1952.“Experiences in Interdisciplinary Research.” American Sociological Review 17(6):663–669.
—. 1970.“Contribution to the Herman Wold Festschrift.” Pp. 216–277 in Scientists at Work: Festschrift in Honour of Herman Wold. Edited by Tore Dalenious, Georg Karlsson, and Sten Malmquist. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell.
Thomas, W. I. 1923, 1967. The Unadjusted Girl, With Cases and Standpoint for Behavior Analysis. Edited with a foreword by Benjamin Nelson. Intro, by Michael Parenti. New York: Harper Torchbooks.
—. 1931.“The Relations of Research to the Social Sciences.” Pp. 175–194 in Essays on Research in the Social Sciences. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
—. 1951. Social Behavior and Personality: Contributions of W. I. Thomas to Theory and Social Research. Edited and intro. by Edmund H. Volkart. New York: Social Science Research Council.
Thomas, W. I. and Dorothy Swaine Thomas. 1928. The Child in America. Behavior Problems and Programs. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Thomas, W. I. and Florian Znaniecki. 1918, 1927. The Polish Peasant in Europe and America. Vol. 1. New York: Alfred Knopf.
Waller, Willard W. 1938. The Family: A Dynamic Interpretation. New York: Cordon Co.
Westie, Frank R. 1973.“Academic Expectations for Professional Immortality: A Study of Legitimation.” The American Sociologist 8:19–32.
Young, Kimball. 1930, 1944, 1956. Social Psychology. New York: Crofts.
—. (ed.) 1931. Social Attitudes: A Symposium. New York. Henry Holt.
—.1995. Kimball Young On Sociology in Transition, 1921-1968. An Oral Account by the 35th President of the ASA. Edited and intro. by Fred B. Lindstrom, Ronald A. Hardert and Laura L. Johnson. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Smith, R.S. Contested memory: Notes on Robert K. Merton’s“the Thomas Theorem and the Matthew Effect”. Am Soc 30, 62–77 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-999-1017-3
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-999-1017-3