Skip to main content
Log in

Amounts Spent on Engagement Rings Reflect Aspects of Male and Female Mate Quality

  • Published:
Human Nature Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Previous research has shown that the qualities of nuptial gifts among nonhumans and marriage-related property transfers in human societies such as bridewealth and dowry covary with aspects of mate quality. This article explores this issue for another type of marriage-related property transfer: engagement rings. We obtained data on engagement ring costs and other variables through a mail survey sent to recently married individuals living in the American Midwest. This article focuses on survey responses regarding rings that were purchased by men acting alone and using only their own funds who then presented the rings while making surprise proposals of marriage (n = 127). Men marrying younger women spent more on rings, as did men who earned more money and whose fiancées earned more money. These findings suggest that the amounts spent on engagement rings, like bridewealth and dowry payments in other societies, reflect aspects of both male and female mate quality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Blumberg, H. H., Fuller, C., & Hare, A. P. (1974). Response rates in postal surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 38, 113–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgerhoff Mulder, M. (1988). Kipsigis bridewealth payments. In L. L. Betzig, M. Borgerhoff Mulder, & P. W. Turke (Eds.), Human reproductive behaviour (pp. 65–82). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourque, L. B., & Fielder, E. P. (1995). How to conduct self-administered and mail surveys. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinig, M. F. (1990). Rings and promises. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 6, 203–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buunk, B. P., Dijkstra, P., Kenrick, D. T., & Warntjes, A. (2001). Age preferences for mates as related to gender, own age, and involvement level. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22, 241–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camerer, C. (1988). Gifts as economic signals and social symbols. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S180–S214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fedorka, K. M., Zuk, M., & Mousseau, T. A. (2005). Natural selection drives the link between male immune function and reproductive potential. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 83, 1012–1014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. R. (1871). The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaulin, S. J. C., & Boster, J. S. (1990). Dowry as female competition. American Anthropologist, 92, 994–1005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huber, B. A. (2005). Sexual selection research on spiders: Progress and biases. Biology Review, 80, 363–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenrick, D. T., & Keefe, R. C. (1992). Age preferences in mates reflect sex differences in reproductive strategies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 15, 75–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. (2000). The mating mind. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mougeot, F., Arroyo, B. E., & Bretagnolle, V. (2006). Paternity assurance responses to first-year and adult male territorial intrusions in a courtship-feeding raptor. Animal Behaviour, 71, 101–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pawłowski, B., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (1999). Impact of market value on human mate choice decisions. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 266, 281–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perrett, D. I., Lee, K., Penton-Voak, I., Burt, D. M., Rowland, D., Yoshikawa, S., et al. (1998). Sexual dimorphism and facial attractiveness. Nature, 394, 884–886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothman, E. K. (1984). Hands and hearts: A history of courtship in America. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, D. P. (2005). Fundamentals of human mating strategies. In D. M. Buss (Ed.), Handbook of human evolutionary psychology (pp. 258–291). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, J. A., & Gangestad, S. W. (1991). Individual differences in sociosexuality: Evidence for convergent and discriminant validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 870–883.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, D. (1993). Waist-to-hip ratio (WHR): A defining morphological feature of health and female attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 293–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man, 18711971 (pp. 136–179). Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tushnet, R. (1998). Rules of engagement. Yale Law Journal, 107, 2583–2618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vahed, K. (1998). The function of nuptial feeding in insects: A review of empirical studies. Biology Review, 73, 43–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Valen, L. (1962). A study of fluctuating asymmetry. Evolution, 16, 125–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Funding for this project was provided by the Center for Human Evolutionary Studies and the Department of Anthropology at Rutgers University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lee Cronk.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cronk, L., Dunham, B. Amounts Spent on Engagement Rings Reflect Aspects of Male and Female Mate Quality. Hum Nat 18, 329–333 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-007-9018-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-007-9018-9

Keywords

Navigation