Skip to main content
Log in

An Evidence-Based Adoption of Technology Model for Remote Monitoring of Elders’ Daily Activities

  • Published:
Ageing International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

What benefit will new technologies offer if they are inadequately or not used? This work presents a meta-synthesis of adoption of technology related findings from four innovative monitoring intervention research studies with older adults and their informal and/or formal caregivers. Each study employed mixed methods analyses that lead to an understanding of the key variables that influenced adoption of telephone and Internet based wireless remote monitoring technologies by elders and their caregivers. The studies were all conducted in “real world” homes ranging from solo residences to multi-story independent living residential buildings. Insights gained came from issues not found in controlled laboratory environments but in the complex interplay of family-elder-staff dynamics around balancing safety and independence. Findings resulted in an adoption of technology model for remote monitoring of elders’ daily activities derived from evidence based research to advance both practical and theoretical development in the field of gerontechnology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alwan, M., & Mahoney, D. F. (2006). Federal Government Grants for Aging Services Technology Research: Problems and Recommendations. Center for Aging Services Technology (CAST), Funding Aging Services Technology (FAST) publication. Available via American Association of Homes and Services for Aging www.agingtech.org/resourcelink.aspx, Cited 14 April 2010

  • Czaja, S. J., & Sharit, J. (2003). Practically relevant research: capturing real world tasks, environments, and outcomes. The Gerontologist, 43(1), 9–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czaja, S. J., Charness, N., Fisk, A. D., Hertzog, C., Nair, S. N., Rogers, W. A., et al. (2006). Factors predicting the use of technology: findings from the Center for Research and Education on Aging and Technology Enhancement (CREATE). Psychology and Aging, 21(2), 333–352. doi:10:1037/0882-7974.21.2.333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, E. R., & Allaire, A. J. (1999). Modeling computer interest in older adults: the role of age, education, computer knowledge, and computer anxiety. Human Factors, 41, 345–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, P., & Wyatt, J. C. (1997). Evaluation methods in medical informatics, p 9. NY: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gitlin, L. N., Belle, S. H., Burgio, L. D., Czaja, S. J., Mahoney, D., Gallagher-Thompson, D., et al. (2003). Effect of multicomponent interventions on caregiver burden and depression: The REACH multisite initiative at six month follow-up. Psychology and Aging, 18(3), 361–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopinsak, G., Knirsch, C. A., Jain, N. L., & Pablos-Mendez, A. (1997). Automated tuberculosis detection. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 4(5), 376–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jay, G., & Willis, S. L. (1992). Influence of direct computer experience on older adults’ attitude toward computers. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 47, P250–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, D. F. (1998). A content analysis of an Alzheimer’s family caregivers virtual focus group. American Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease, 13(6), 309–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, D. (2000). Developing technology applications for intervention research: a case study. Computers in Nursing, 18(6), 260–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, D. (2003). Vigilance: evolution and definition for caregivers of family members with Alzheimer’s Disease. Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 29(8), 24–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, D. (2004). Linking home care and the workplace through innovative wireless technology: the Worker Interactive Networking (WIN) project. Home Health Care Management and Practice, 16(5), 417–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, D., & Goc, K. (2009). Tensions in independent living facilities for elders: a model of connected disconnections. Journal of Housing for the Elderly, 23(3), 166–184. doi:10.1080/02763890903035522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, D., Tarlow, B., & Sandaire, J. (1998). A computer mediated intervention for Alzheimer’s caregivers. Computers in Nursing, 16(4), 208–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, D., Tennstedt, S., Friedman, R., & Heeren, T. (1999). An automated telephone system for monitoring the functional status of community-residing elders. The Gerontologist, 39(2), 229–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, D., Tarlow, B., Jones, R., Tennstedt, S., & Kasten, L. (2001). Factors affecting the use of a telephone-based computerized intervention for caregivers of people with Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 7, 139–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, D., Jones, R., Coon, D., Mendelsohn, A., Gitlin, L., & Ory, M. (2003a). The caregiver vigilance scale: application and validation in the Resources for Enhancing Alzheimer’s Caregiver Health (REACH) project. American Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease and Other Dementias, 18(1), 39–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, D., Tarlow, B., & Jones, R. (2003b). Effects of an automated telephone support system on caregiver burden and anxiety: findings from the REACH for Telephone-Linked Care intervention study. The Gerontologist, 43(4), 556–567.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, D., Purtilo, R., Webbe, F., Alwan, M., Bharucha, A., & Becker, A. (2007). In-home monitoring of persons with dementia: ethical guidelines for technology research and development. Alzheimer’s and Dementia, 3(3), 217–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, D., Mutchler, P., Tarlow, B., & Liss, E. (2008). Real world” implementation lessons and outcomes from the worker interactive networking (WIN) project: Workplace based online caregiver support and remote monitoring of elders at home. Telemedicine and e-Health, 14(3), 224–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mair, F., & Whitten, P. (2000). Systematic review of studies of patient satisfaction with telemedicine. British Medical Journal, 320, 1517–1520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prochaska, J. O. (1997). A revolution in health promotion: Smoking cessation as a case study. In R. J. Resnick & R. H. Rozensky (Eds.), Health psychology through the lifespan: Practice and research opportunities (pp. 361–375). Washington, DC: APA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, B., & Gross, N. C. (1943). The diffusion of hybrid seed corn in two Iowa communities. Rural Sociology, 8, 15–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulz, R., Burgio, L., Burns, R., Eisodorfer, C., Gallagher-Thompson, D., Gitlin, L., et al. (2003). Resources for Enhancing Alzheimer’s Caregiver Health (REACH): overview, site-specific outcomes, future directions. The Gerontologist, 43(4), 514–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulz, R., Lustig, A., & Handler, S. (2002). Technology-based caregiver intervention research: current status and future directions. Gerontechnology, 2(1), 15–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Southon, F., Sauer, C., & Dampney, C. (1997). Fit failure and the house of horrors: toward a configurational theory of IS project failure. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 4, 349–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarlow, B., & Mahoney, D. (2000). The cost of recruiting Alzheimer’s disease caregivers for research. Journal of Aging and Health, 12(4), 490–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zafar, A., Overhage, J. M., & McDonald, C. J. (1999). Continuous speech recognition for clinicians. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 6(3), 195–204.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This paper was supported through the Jacque Mohr Research Professorship at the MGH Institute of Health Professions. Credit is shared with the variety of research teams who participated in the development and testing of the monitoring technologies. Funding for the original studies was provided by the Boston Foundation for ElderCare (1993–4), National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Aging (U01AG13255, 1995–2002) for REACH for TLC-Telephone Linked Care, Department of Commerce, Technology Opportunity Program (2001–2004) for Worker Interactive Networking, and Automated Technology for Elder Assessment, Safety, and Environment by the Alzheimer’s Association Sensors for Seniors with Alzheimer’s Disease (ETAC, 2004–2007), and by the National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Nursing Research, for Nursense: Caregiver Vigilance Through Elder E-Monitoring (R21NR009262, 2005–2008). All the studies had received full board approval by a nationally certified Institutional Review Board (IRB) for human studies in accordance with the ethical standards promulgated in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki prior to commencing and received ongoing reviews and annual IRB approvals over the course of their study periods.

The author reports no conflict of interest or disclosure of other sources of financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Diane Feeney Mahoney.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mahoney, D.F. An Evidence-Based Adoption of Technology Model for Remote Monitoring of Elders’ Daily Activities. Ageing Int 36, 66–81 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12126-010-9073-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12126-010-9073-0

Keywords

Navigation