Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Abstract

As the United States has intensified surveillance of its southern border with Mexico, unauthorized migrants have become increasingly dependent on hired smugglers when they cross the border and reach their destinations in the US interior. According to the US Immigration and Naturalization Service, tighter border controls have systematically transformed migrant smuggling into a sophisticated and highly profitable industry dominated by large-scale criminal syndicates that prey on migrants desperate to enter the US without official authorization. In this article I argue that despite the rise of larger-scale smuggling organizations, smuggling of migrants across the US-Mexico border is still undertaken by small-scale and/or part-time smugglers who are embedded in the Mexican migrant community itself. Moreover, I suggest that the logic that predicts the elimination of small-scale smugglers from the market is flawed because it is based on an unrealistic assessment of the requirements for mounting a successful smuggling enterprise. I base this claim on preliminary findings from an ongoing ethnographic study of migrant smuggling on the South Texas-Northeast Mexico border that I began in summer 1998.

Résumé

Depuis que les États-Unis ont intensifié la surveillance de leur frontière avec le Mexique, les migrants non autorisés ont de plus en plus recours aux passeurs de clandestins engagés pour traverser la frontière et arriver à leur destination américaine. Selon le United States Immigration and Naturalization Service (service d’immigration et de naturalisation des Etats-Unis), les renforcements du contrôle frontalier ont systématiquement transformé la migration clandestine en une industrie perfectionnée et très rentable dominée par des associations de malfaiteurs qui exploitent les migrants voulant à tout prix rentrer aux Etats-Unis sans autorisation officielle. Dans cet article, nous faisons valoir le point de vue selon lequel une grande part de la migration clandestine entre les Etats-Unis et le Mexique est encore contrôlée par des passeurs dont le travail est d’envergure réduite ou à temps partiel et qui sont intégrés dans la communauté migrante mexicaine et ce, en dépit de la montée des réseaux de passeurs qui oeuvrent à grande échelle. De plus, nous proposons que les prédictions voulant que les passeurs qui travaillent à petite échelle seront éliminés du marché ne sont pas fondées puisqu’elles reposent sur une évaluation peu réaliste de ce qui est nécessaire pour réussir le trafic d’immigrants. Des résultats préliminaires découlant d’une recherche ethnographique en cours entreprise à l’été 1998 et portant sur le passage de clandestins le long de la frontière entre le sud du Texas et le nord-est du Mexique viennent appuyer cet argument.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andreas, P. (2000). Border games: Policing the U.S.-Mexico divide. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andreas, P. (2001). The transformation of migrant smuggling across the US-Mexican border. In D.J. Kyle & R. Koslowski (Eds.), Global human smuggling Comparative perspectives (pp. 107–126). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arreoloa, D., & Curtis, J. (1993). The Mexican border cities: Landscape anatomy and place personality. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basch, L., Glick Schiller, N., & Szanton Blan, C. (1994). Nations unbound: Transnational projects, postcolonial predicaments, and deterritorialized nation-states. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Overseas Publishers Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bean, F.D., Chanove, R., Cushing, R.G., de la Garza, R., Freeman, G.P., Haynes, C.W., & Spener, D. (1994). Illegal Mexican migration and the United States/Mexico border: The effects of Operation Hold the Line on El Paso/Juárez. Washington, DC: US Commission on Immigration Reform.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bibler Coutin, S. (1995). Smugglers or Samaritans in Tucson, Arizona: Producing and contesting legal truth. American Ethnologist, 22 (3), 549–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnett, J. (2001). Immigrant smugglers. Segment broadcast on National Public Radio’s Morning Edition, June 22.

  • Castells, M., & Portes, A. (1989). World underneath: The origins, dynamics, and effects of the informal economy.” In A. Portes, M. Castells, & L.A. Benton The informal economy: Studies in advanced and less developed countries (pp. 1–40). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centro de Estudios Fronteriozos y de Promoción de Derechos Humanos A.C. (CEFPRODHAC). (2000). Frontera Norte: Zona de contrastes. Documentary film. Reynosa, Tamaulipas: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, T.J. (1996). The militarization of the U.S.-Mexico border, 1978–1992: Low-intensity conflict doctrine comes home. Austin, TX: CMAS Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Embajada de los Estados Unidos en México. (2001). Declaración conjunta de los gobiernos de México y Estados Unidos ante la trágica muerte de 14 migrantes en el desierto de Arizona. Press release, May 24.

  • Eschbach, K., Hagan, J., Rodríguez, N., Hernández, R., & Bailey, S. (1999). Death at the border. International Migration Review, 33, 2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eschbach, K., Hagan, J., & Rodríguez, N. (2001). Causes and trends in migrant deaths along the U.S.-Mexico border, 1985–1998. Houston, TX: Center for Immigration Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Escobar Latapí, P.M., López Castro, G., & Donato, K. (1997). Factors that influence migration. In Binational study: Migration between Mexico and the United States (vol. 1, pp. 163–250). Mexican Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the US Commission on Immigration Reform.

  • Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halsell, G. (1978). The illegals. New York: Stein and Day.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, K. (2001). INS sting nets 21 guilty pleas. San Antonio Express-News. May 15. Electronic edition.

  • Lewis, S.G. (1979). Slave trade today. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • López Castro, G. (1997). Covotes and alien smuggling. in Binational study: Migration between Mexico and the United States. Vol. 3: Research reports and background materials (pp. 965–974). Mexican Ministry of Foreign Relations and the U.S. Immigration on Immigration Reform.

  • Martínez, O.J. (1994). Border people. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D.S. (1999). Why does immigration occur? A theoretical synthesis. In C. Hirschman, P. Kasinitz, & J. DeWind. The handbook of international migration: The American experience (pp. 34–52). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D.S., Durand, J., & Malone, N.J. (2002). Beyond smoke and mirrors: Mexican immigration in an era of economic integration. New York: Russel Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nevins, J. (2001). Operation gatekkeper: The rise of the “illegal alien” and the making of the U.S.-Mexico boundary. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novarro, L. (1998). U.S. Offers $5,000 reward for immigrant smugglers after Mexicans’ deaths. Rocky Mountain News, August 15, p. 15B.

    Google Scholar 

  • Portes, A. (1994). The informal economy and its paradoxes. In N.J. Smelser & R. Swedberg (Eds.), The handbook of economic sociology (pp. 426–449). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Portes, A. (1995). Economic sociology and the sociology of immigration: A conceptual overview. In A. Portes (Ed.), The economic sociology of immigration: Essays on networks, ethnicity, and entrepreneurship (pp. 1–14). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Portes, A. (1996). Transnational communities: Their emergence and significance in the contemporary world-system. In R.P. Korzeniewica & W.C. Smith (Eds.), Latin America in the world economy (pp. 151–168). Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez, N. (1997). The battle for the border: Notes on autonomous migration, transnational communities, and the state. Social Justice, 23(3), 21–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samora, J. (1971). Los majados: The wetback story. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J.C. (1985). Weapons of the weak: Everyday forms of peasant resistance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, A., & Massey, D.S. (1998). The social process of undocumented border crossing among Mexican migrants. International Migration Review, 32(3), 561–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sistema Internet de la Presidencia. (2001). Entrevista concedida por Vicente Fox, antes de iniciar su gira de trabajo por San Luis Potosí. Mexico City, May 25. Retrieved June 15, 2001 from http://www.presidencia.gob.mx.

  • Spener, D. (1999). This coyote’s life. NACLA report on the Americas, 33(3), 22–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spener, D. (2000). The logic and contradictions of intensified border enforcement in Texas. In P. Andreas & T. Snyder (Eds.), The wall around the West: State borders and immigration controls in North America and Europe (pp. 115–134). Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spener, D. (2001). Smuggling migrants through south Texas: Challenges posed by Operation Rio Grande. In D.J. Kyle & R. Koslowski (Eds.), Global human smuggling: Comparative perspectives (pp. 129–165). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterngold, J. (2001). Devastating picture of immigrants dead in Arizona desert. New York Times, May 24. Electronic edition.

  • Televisa. (2001). Pedirían pena de muerte para “polleros.” Noticieros Televisa, June 8.

  • Turati, M. (2002). Lenta agonía en la “Ruta del Diablo.” El Norte, May 23. p. 12A.

  • United States Bureau of the Census. (2001). Profile of the foreign born population in the United States: 2000. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of State and Mexican Ministry of Foreign Affairs. (2001). Joint Communiqué: U.S.-Mexico migration talks and plan of action for cooperation on border safety. Press release, June 22.

  • United States Immigration and Naturalization Service. (2001). Statistical yearbook of the Immigration and Naturalization Service 2000. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Immigration and Naturalization Service. (2002a). Deportable aliens located by status at entry and region and country of nationality: Fiscal year 2002. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved April 8, 2004 from http://uscis.gov/graphics/shared/aboutus/statistics/enf02yrbk/table58.xls

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Immigration and Naturalization Service. (2002b). Principal activities and accomplishments of the Border Patrol, fiscal years 1993–2002. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved April 8, 2004 from http://uscis.gov/graphics/shared/aboutus/statistics/enf02yrbk/table60.xls

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Immigration and Naturalization Service. (2002c). Principal activities and accomplishments of the INS investigations program, fiscal years 1992–2002. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved April 8, 2004 from http://uscis.gov/graphics/shared/aboutus/statistics/enf02yrbk/table61.xls

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S.tries spy tactics to stop human smugglers. (2000). Christian Science Monitor, August 30, p. 1.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Spener, D. Mexican migrant-smuggling: A cross-border cottage industry. Int. Migration & Integration 5, 295–320 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12134-004-1016-8

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12134-004-1016-8

Key Words

Mots-clefs

Navigation