Skip to main content
Log in

Why do “Women’s jobs” have low pay for their educational level?

  • Articles
  • Published:
Gender Issues Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Jobs held largely by women have low pay for the amount of education they require. Why is this? One hypothesis is that employers prefer to hire men, and all workers prefer better jobs, so that women can get in only when a job's rewards (relative to its skill requirements) are low enough that men no longer want the job. Thus, wages affect sex composition. Others see the causal arrow to run the other way. In this view, the sex composition of jobs affects the wage that employers offer; employers' biased perceptions lead them to see jobs as less important and less payworthy if they are filled largely by women. These explanations are not mutually exclusive; the causal arrow may run both ways (or neither way). In this paper we use CPS data from 1984 to 1991 and a cross-lag panel model to examine these effects. Jobs are defined with a detailed occupational category within a specific broad industry category. We find that jobs with a higher percentage of females at one point have slower wage growth (or steeper wage decline) for both men and women in the ensuing years. But we find no effect of earlier wage rate on later sex composition. For those interested in reducing gender inequality in earnings, these findings suggest the utility of “comparable worth” policies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allison, Paul. “Change Scores as Dependent Variables in Regression Analysis,” In Sociological Methodology. (Pp. 93–114.) Edited by C.C. Clogg. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, James, and Andrew Newman, “Pay the Man: Effects of Demographic Composition on Prescribed Wage Rates in the California Civil Service,” In Pay Equity: Empirical Inquiries. (Pp. 107–30.) Edited by Robert Michael, Heidi Hartmann, and Brigid O'Farrell. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, E. M., Patrick M. Horan, and Charles M. Tolbert II. “Stratification in a Dual Economy: A Sectoral Model of Earnings Determination,” American Sociological Review 43 (1978): 704–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blau, Francine D. “Trends in the Well-Being of American Women, 1970–1995.” Journal of Economic Literature 36 (1998): 112–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Budig, Michelle J., and Paula England. “The Wage Penalty for Motherhood.” American Sociological Review 66 (2001): 204–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catanzarite, Lisa. “Race-Gender Composition and Occupational Pay Degradation.” Social Problems 50 (2003): 14–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coverdill, James E. “The Dual Economy and Sex Differences in Earnings.” Social Forces 66, no. 4 (1988): 970–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • England, Paula. Comparable Worth: Theories and Evidence. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • England, Paula, Karen Christopher, and Lori R. Reid. “Gender, Race, Ethnicity, and Wages.” In Latinas and African American Women at Work. Edited by Irene Browne. New York: Russell Sage, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • England, Paula, George Farkas, Barbara Stanek Kilbourne, and Thomas Dou. “Explaining Occupational Sex Segregation and Wages: Findings from a Model with Fixed Effects.” American Sociological Review 53 (1988): 544–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Filer, Randall. “Male-Female Wage Differences: The Importance of Compensating Differentials.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 38, no. 3 (1985): 426–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Filer, Randall. “Occupational Segregation, Compensating Differentials, and Comparable Worth.” In Pay Equity. Empirical Inquiries. (Pp. 153–70.) Edited by Robert T. Michael, Heidi I. Hartmann, and Brigid O'Farrell. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Filer, Randall. “Compensating Differentials and the Male-Female Wage Gap: A Comment.” Social Forces 69, no. 2 (1990): 469–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finkel, Steven E. Causal Analysis with Panel Data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, Randy, and Paula England. “Industrial Structure and Sex Differences in Earnings.” Industrial Relations 25, no. 1 (1986): 16–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, Jerry A., and Ronnie J. Steinberg. “Compensating Differentials and the Male-Female Wage Gap: Evidence from the New York State Comparable Worth Study.” Social Forces 69, no. 2, (1990): 439–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, Jerry A., and Ronnie J. Steinberg. “Compensating Differentials and the Male-Female Wage Gap: A Reply.” Social Forces 69, no. 2, (1990): 439–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilbourne, Barbara, Paula England, George Farkas, Kurt Beron, and Dorothea Weir. “Returns to Skills, Compensating Differentials, and Gender Bias: Effects of Occupational Characteristics on the Wages of White Women and Men.” American Journal of Sociology 100 (1994): 689–719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kmec, Julie A. “Minority Job Concentration and Wages,” Social Problems 50 (2003): 38–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macpherson, David A., and Barry T. Hirsch. “Wages and Gender Composition: Why Do Women's Jobs Pay Less?” Journal of Labor Economics 13, no. 3m (1995): 426–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Committee on Pay Equity. “The Wage Gap.” [online]. Available from World Wide Web [cited 1999]: http://www.feminist.com/wagegap/htm

  • Petersen, Trond, and Laurie A. Morgan. “Separate and Unequal: Occupation-Establishment Sex Segregation and the Gender Wage Gap.” American Journal of Sociology 101, no. 2, (1995): 329–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, Jeffrey, and Alison Davis-Blake. “The Effect of the Proportion of Women on Salaries: The Case of College Administrators.” Administrative Science Quarterly 32 (1987): 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reskin, Barbara F., and Patricia Roos. Job Queues, Gender Queues: Explaining Women's Inroads into Male Occupations. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, David, and Paula M. Hudis. “Occupational Income and the Effects of Minority Competition and Segregation: A Reanalysis and Some New Evidence.” American Sociological Review 41 (1976): 209–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorensen, Elaine. Comparable Worth: Is It a Worthy Policy? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, R. J. “Comparable Worth in Gender Studies.” In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, edited by Neil J. Smelser and Paul B. Baltes. Oxford: Cambridge University Press, Vol. 4 (2001): 2393–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strober, Myra H. “Toward a General Theory of Occupational Sex Segregation: The Case of Public School Teaching.” In Sex Segregation in the Workplace: Trends, Explanations, Remedies. (Pp. 144–56). Edited by Barbara F. Reskin. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strober, Myra H., and Carolyn L. Arnold, “The Dynamics of Occupational Segregation Among Bank Tellers.” In Gender in the Workplace. (Pp. 107–48.) Edited by Clair Brown and Joseph A. Pechman. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strober, Myra H., and Lisa M. Catanzarite. “The Relative Attractiveness Theory of Occupational Segregation by Gender.” In Women's Employment, Special Issue of Beiträge zur Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung. (Translation from German: Labor Market and Occupational Research.) 179 (1994): 116–139.

  • Tomaskovic-Devey, Donald. Gender and Racial Inequality at Work: the Sources and Consequences of Job Segregation. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. Current Population Survey: Annual Demographic File, 1983–1991 [Computer file] Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census.

  • Wellington, Allison J. “Changes in the Male-Female Wage Gap, 1976–1985.” Journal of Human Resources 28 (1993): 383–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wellington, Allison J. “Accounting for the Male/Female Wage Gap Among Whites: 1976 and 1985.” American Sociological Review 59 (1994): 839–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, Rosemary and Jerry A. Jacobs. “Male Flight from Computer Work: A New Look at Occupational Resegregation and Ghettoization.” American Sociological Review 59 (1994): 511–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paula England.

Additional information

Carolyn J. Aman Karlin earned her Ph.D. in sociology at the University of Arizona and taught at the University of Central Arkansas. Now pursuing a second career, she is studying veterinary medicine at the University of Minnesota.

Paula England is a professor of sociology at Northwestern University and affiliated with the Institute for Policy Research. Her teaching and research focus on gender in the labor marker and family, and on integrating sociological, economic, and feminist theories.

Mary Richardson earned her M.A. in sociology at Northwestern University, emphasizing economic sociology and gender issues. She now works as a senior financial analyst at Newark InOne in Chicago.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Karlin, C.A., England, P. & Richardson, M. Why do “Women’s jobs” have low pay for their educational level?. Gend. Issues 20, 3–22 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-002-0020-6

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-002-0020-6

Keywords

Navigation