Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Improved Sugar Conversion and Ethanol Yield for Forage Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) Lines with Reduced Lignin Contents

  • Published:
BioEnergy Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Lignin is known to impede conversion of lignocellulose into ethanol. In this study, forage sorghum plants carrying brown midrib (bmr) mutations, which reduce lignin contents, were evaluated as bioenergy feedstocks. The near-isogenic lines evaluated were: wild type, bmr-6, bmr-12, and bmr-6 bmr-12 double mutant. The bmr-6 and bmr-12 mutations were equally efficient at reducing lignin contents (by 13% and 15%, respectively), and the effects were additive (27%) for the double mutant. Reducing lignin content was highly beneficial for improving biomass conversion yields. Sorghum biomass samples were pretreated with dilute acid and recovered solids washed and hydrolyzed with cellulase to liberate glucose. Glucose yields for the sorghum biomass were improved by 27%, 23%, and 34% for bmr-6, bmr-12, and the double mutant, respectively, compared to wild type. Sorghum biomass was also pretreated with dilute acid followed by co-treatment with cellulases and Saccharomyces cerevisiae for simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) into ethanol. Conversion of cellulose to ethanol for dilute-acid pretreated sorghum biomass was improved by 22%, 21%, and 43% for bmr-6, bmr-12, and the double mutant compared to wild type, respectively. Electron microscopy of dilute-acid treated samples showed an increased number of lignin globules in double-mutant tissues as compared to the wild-type, suggesting the lignin had become more pliable. The mutations were also effective for improving ethanol yields when the (degrained) sorghum was pretreated with dilute alkali instead of dilute acid. Following pretreatment with dilute ammonium hydroxide and SSF, ethanol conversion yields were 116 and 130 mg ethanol/g dry biomass for the double-mutant samples and 98 and 113 mg/g for the wild-type samples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barrière Y, Ralph J, Méchin V, Guillaumie S, Grabber JH, Argillier O et al (2004) Genetic and molecular basis of grass cell wall biosynthesis and degradability. II. Lessons from brown-midrib mutants. Comptes Rendus Biologies 327:847–860

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bout S, Vermerris W (2003) A candidate-gene approach to clone the sorghum brown midrib gene encoding caffeic acid O-methyltransferase. Mol Genet Genomics 269:205–214

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Chang VS, Holtzapple MT (2000) Fundamental factors affecting biomass enzymatic reactivity. Appl Biochem Biotechnol - Part A Enzyme Eng Biotechnol 84–86:5–37

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chen F, Dixon RA (2007) Lignin modification improves fermentable sugar yields for biofuel production. Nat Biotechnol 25:759–761

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Corredor DY, Salazar JM, Hohn KL, Bean S, Bean B, Wang D (2008) Evaluation and characterization of forage sorghum as feedstock for fermentable sugar production. Appl Biochem Biotechnol, 1–16

  6. Dien BS, Iten LB, Skory CD (2005) Converting herbaceous energy crops to bioethanol: a review with emphasis on pretreatment processes. In: Hou CT (ed) Handbook of industrial biocatalysis. CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton, FL pp 1–11

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dien BS, Jung HJG, Vogel KP, Casler MD, Lamb JFS, Iten L et al (2006) Chemical composition and response to dilute-acid pretreatment and enzymatic saccharification of alfalfa, reed canarygrass, and switchgrass. Biomass Bioenergy 30:880–891

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Dien BS, Nagle N, Hicks KB, Singh V, Moreau RA, Tucker MP et al (2004) Fermentation of “Quick Fiber” produced from a modified corn-milling process into ethanol and recovery of corn fiber oil. Appl Biochem Biotechnol-Part A Enzyme Eng Biotechnol 115:937–949

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dien BS, Ximenes EA, O’Bryan PJ, Moniruzzaman M, Li XL, Balan V et al (2008) Enzyme characterization for hydrolysis of AFEX and liquid hot-water pretreated distillers’ grains and their conversion to ethanol. Bioresour Technol 99:5216–5225

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Donohoe BS, Decker SR, Tucker MP, Himmel ME, Vinzant TB (2008) Visualizing lignin coalescence and migration through maize cell walls following thermochemical pretreatment. Biotechnol Bioeng 101:913–925

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Dowe N, McMillan J (2001) SSF experimental protocols—lignocellulosic biomass hydrolysis and fermentation laboratory analytical procedure (LAP). In: DOE (ed) National renewable energy laboratory, p 19

  12. Farrell AE, Plevin RJ, Turner BT, Jones AD, O’Hare M, Kammen DM (2006) Ethanol can contribute to energy and environmental goals. Science 311:506–508

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Grabber JH (2005) How do lignin composition, structure, and cross-linking affect degradability? A review of cell wall model studies. Crop Sci 45:820–831

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hall MB (2001) Factors affecting starch analysis of feeds. Cooperative extension service. Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences. University of Florida, Gainesville, FL

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hennessey S, Friend J, Dunson J, Tucker MP, Elander R, Hames B (2006) Integration of alternative feedstreams in biomass treatment utilization. In: E.I.D.d.N.a. Company (ed) U.S.

  16. Jeoh T, Ishizawa CI, Davis MF, Himmel ME, Adney WS, Johnson DK (2007) Cellulase digestibility of pretreated biomass is limited by cellulose accessibility. Biotechnol Bioeng 98:112–122

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Jung H-JG, Varel VH, Weimer PJ, Ralph J (1999) Accuracy of klason lignin and acid detergent lignin methods as assessed by bomb calorimetry, pp 2005–2008

  18. Li L, Popko JL, Umezawa T, Chiang VL (2000) 5-Hydroxyconiferyl aldehyde modulates enzymatic methylation for syringyl monolignol formation, a new view of monolignol biosynthesis in angiosperms, pp 6537–6545

  19. Mosier N, Wyman C, Dale B, Elander R, Lee YY, Holtzapple M (2005) Features of promising technologies for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour Technol 96:673–686

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Oliver AL, Pedersen JF, Grant RJ, Klopfenstein TJ (2005) Comparative effects of the sorghum bmr-6 and bmr-12 genes: I. Forage sorghum yield and quality. Crop Sci 45:2234–2239

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Oliver AL, Pedersen JF, Grant RJ, Klopfenstein TJ, Jose HD (2005) Comparative effects of the sorghum bmr-6 and bmr-12 genes: II. Grain yield, stover yield, and stover quality in grain sorghum. Crop Sci 45:2240–2245

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Padmore JM (1990) Protein (crude) in animal feed - dumas method, method no. 968.06. In: Herlich K (ed) Official methods of analysis of the association of official analytical chemists, 15th edn. AOAC Inc., Arlington, VA, pp 71–72

    Google Scholar 

  23. Palmer N, Sattler S, Saathoff A, Funnell D, Pedersen J, Sarath G (2008) Genetic background impacts soluble and cell wall-bound aromatics in brown midrib mutants of sorghum. Planta 229:115–127

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Pedersen JF, Toy JJ, Funnell DL, Sattler SE, Oliver AL, Grant RA (2008) Registration of BN611, AN612, BN612, and RN613 sorghum genetic stocks with stacked bmr-6 and bmr-12 genes. J Plant Reg 2:258–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Perlack R, Wright L, Turhollow A, Graham R, Stokes B, Erbach D (2005) Biomass as feedstock for a bioenergy and bioproducts industry: the technical feasibility of a billion-ton annual supply. In: DOE (ed). Oak Ridge National Laboratory, pp 78

  26. Porter KS, Axtell JD, Lechtenberg VL, Colenbrander VF (1978) Phenotype, fiber composition, and in vitro dry matter disappearance of chemically induced brown midrib (bmr) mutants of sorghum. Crop Sci 18:205–208

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Saballos A, Vermerris W, Rivera L, Ejeta G (2008) Allelic association, chemical characterization and saccharification properties of brown midrib mutants of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench). BioEnergy Res 1:193–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sarath G, Mitchell RB, Sattler SE, Funnell D, Pedersen JF, Graybosch RA (2008) Opportunities and roadblocks in utilizing forages and small grains for liquid fuels. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 35:343–354

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Sattler SE, Saathoff AJ, Haas EJ, Palmer NA, Funnell-Harris DL, Sarath G et al (2009) A nonsense mutation in a cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase gene is responsible for the sorghum brown midrib 6 phenotype. Plant Physiol 150(2):584–595

    Google Scholar 

  30. Selig M, Weiss N, Ji Y (2008) Enzymatic saccharification of lignocellulosic biomass; laboratory analytical procedure. In: DOE (ed) National Renewable Research Laboratory, p 8

  31. Sluiter A, Hames B, Ruiz R, Scarlata C, Sluiter J, Templeton D et al (2008) Determination of structural carbohydrates and lignin in biomass; laboratory analytical procedure. In: DOE (ed) National Renewable Energy Laboratory, p 16

  32. van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA (1991) Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition, pp 3583–3597

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Vermerris W, Saballos A, Ejeta G, Mosier NS, Ladisch MR, Carpita NC (2007) Molecular breeding to enhance ethanol production from corn and sorghum stover. Crop Sci 47:S-142-153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Vogel J (2008) Unique aspects of the grass cell wall. Curr Opinion Plant Biol 11:301–307

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Vogel KP, Jung H-JG (2001) Genetic modification of herbaceous plants for feed and fuel. Critical Rev Plant Sci 20:15–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Weng J-K, Li X, Bonawitz ND, Chapple C (2008) Emerging strategies of lignin engineering and degradation for cellulosic biofuel production. Curr Opin Biotechnol 19:166–172

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Wescott PC (2007) Ethanol expansion in the United States. How will the agricultural sector adjust? Economic Research Service of the U.S.D.A., pp 1–18

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Ms. Patricia J. O’Bryan, Mr. Loren Iten, and John J. Toy for their fine technical assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Fermentation Biotechnology Research Unit, National Center for Agricultural Utilization Research, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, 1815 N. University Street, Peoria, IL, 61604, USA

    Bruce S. Dien, Nancy N. Nichols & Michael A. Cotta

  2. Grain, Forage, and Bioenergy Research Unit, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Biochemistry Hall, University of Nebraska, East Campus, Lincoln, NE, 68583-0737, USA

    Gautam Sarath, Jeffrey F. Pedersen, Scott E. Sattler & Deanna L. Funnell-Harris

  3. Microscopy Facility, E-119 Beadle, Center for Biotechnology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, 68588-0665, USA

    Han Chen

Authors
  1. Bruce S. Dien
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gautam Sarath
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jeffrey F. Pedersen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Scott E. Sattler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Han Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Deanna L. Funnell-Harris
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Nancy N. Nichols
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Michael A. Cotta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bruce S. Dien.

Additional information

Supplier names are necessary to report factually on available data; however, the USDA neither guarantees nor warrants the standard of the product, and the use of the name by USDA implies no approval of the product to the exclusion of others that may also be suitable.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dien, B.S., Sarath, G., Pedersen, J.F. et al. Improved Sugar Conversion and Ethanol Yield for Forage Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) Lines with Reduced Lignin Contents. Bioenerg. Res. 2, 153–164 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-009-9041-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-009-9041-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation