Abstract
When trainers or teachers in the field of initial vocational education explain abstract notions, refer to technical objects or emphasize the specificities of technical skills, they often call forth concepts and practices different from those that are directly salient in the training situations in which they engage. The aim of this paper is to contribute to a better understanding of the empirical realities associated with such phenomena by promoting a discursive and interactional approach of what we propose to term “analogical discourse”. Considering that analogies are performed and shared trough language and speech, we propose that concepts and methodological tools borrowed from the field of linguistics can be profitably applied to the analysis of analogical discourse. Not only can they reveal the dynamic and collective nature of analogies as they are performed, disseminated and sometimes negotiated amongst participants, but they can also help reflect about the complexities of vocational learning as it takes place in specific material, practical and socio-cultural environments. From that standpoint, the paper proposes to see analogies not only as related to conceptual development and cognitive dimensions of learning, but as a substantial contribution to the social, cultural and relational dimensions of it.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Billett, S. (2001). Learning in the workplace: strategies for effective practice. Crows Nest: Allen & Unwin.
Billett, S. (2008). Emergent perspectives on workplace learning. In S. Billett, Ch Harteis, & A. Eteläpelto (Eds.), Emerging perspectives of workplace learning (pp. 1–15). Rotterdam: Sense.
Billett, S. (2009). Modalités de participation sur la place de travail: la dualité constitutive de l’apprentissage par le travail. In M. Durand & L. Filliettaz (Eds.), Travail et formation des adultes (pp. 37–63). Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
Balibar-Mrabati, A. & Corenna, M. (Ed.) (2002). Nouvelles approches de la métaphore. Langue française, 134.
Filliettaz, L., de Saint-Georges, I., Duc, B. (2008). « Vos mains sont intelligentes ! »: interactions en formation professionnelle initiale. Université de Genève: Cahiers de la Section des Sciences de l’éducation, 117.
Filliettaz, L. (2010). Guidance as an interactional accomplishment: practice-based learning within the Swiss VET system. In S. Billett (Ed.), Learning through practice: models, traditions, orientations and approaches. London: Springer.
Gentner, D. (1989). The mechanisms of analogical learning. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 199–241). New York: Cambridge University.
Gonnon, Ph. (2005). Challenges in the Swiss vocational education and training system. bwp@, 7.
Goodwin, C. (2000). Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 1489–1522.
Gumperz, J. (1982). Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
Kress, G., et al. (2001). Multimodal teaching and learning. The rhetorics of the science classroom. London: Continuum.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago.
Lee, Y.-A. (2004). The work of examples in classroom instruction. Linguistics and education, 15, 99–120.
LeVine, P., & Scollon, R. (Eds.). (2004). Discourse and technology. Multimodal discourse analysis. Washington: Georgetown University.
Nonnon, E. (1993). Prenons un exemple: recours aux cas particuliers et problèmes d'intercompréhension dans l'interaction didactique. In J.-F. Halté (Ed.), Interactions: actualité de la recherche et enjeux pédagogiques (pp. 201–245). Nancy-Metz: Presse Universitaire.
Ortony, A. (Ed.). (1979). Metaphor and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
Pugh, S. L., et al. (1997). Metaphorical ways of knowing: the imaginative nature of thought and expression. Urbana: National council of teachers of English.
Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation (Vol. 2). Oxford: Blackwell.
Sander, E. (2002). L’analogie, fondement de nos apprentissages. Recherche, 353, 40–43.
Van Dijk, T. A. (Ed.). (1997). Discourse as social interaction. London: Sage.
Vosniadou, S., & Ortony, A. (Eds.). (1989). Similarity and analogical reasoning. New York: Cambridge University.
Wortham, S. (1996). Some interactional effects of teaching with example. Journal of classroom interaction, 31(2), 31–40.
Acknowledgements
The study presented in this paper is related to a research program sponsored by the Swiss national Science Foundation (SNF), under project numbers PP001-106603 and PP00P1-124650. The authors are very grateful to Prof. Stephen Billett for useful suggestions made about a first draft of this paper. They express their thanks to Jill Ryan for editing this paper. They also express their thanks to the anonymous reviewers who made interesting comments on the submitted manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Transcription Conventions
Transcription Conventions
- CAP:
-
accented segments
- /:
-
raising intonation
- \:
-
falling intonation
- XX:
-
uninterpretable segments
- (hesitation):
-
uncertain sequence of transcription
- ::
-
lengthened syllable
- .:
-
pause lasting less than 1 s
- ..:
-
pause lasting between 1 and 2 s
- >:
-
addressor-addressee relation (TRA > THI)
- ??:
-
unidentifiable speaker
- Underlined :
-
overlapping talk
- ((comments)):
-
comments regarding non verbal behaviour
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Filliettaz, L., de Saint-Georges, I. & Duc, B. Skiing, Cheese Fondue and Swiss Watches: Analogical Discourse in Vocational Training Interactions. Vocations and Learning 3, 117–140 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-010-9035-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-010-9035-4