Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Innovative Work Behaviour in Vocational Colleges: Understanding How and Why Innovations Are Developed

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Vocations and Learning Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In workplaces, innovative products and processes are required to address emerging problems and challenges. Therefore, understanding of employees’ innovative work behaviour, including the generation, promotion, and realisation of ideas as components of this behaviour is important. In particular, what fosters innovation development and what triggers these activities is important for its promotion and adoption in contemporary workplaces. To investigate how and why innovations at work are developed and enacted, an explorative study comprising structured interviews with vocational teachers in the German vocational system was conducted. The teachers reported on activities they undertook during the development of a specific innovation. Furthermore, they provided information on factors that made this innovation necessary and that they were activated by. The study indicates that even when opportunities for innovation development existed in a workplace, the needs and goals of teachers were pivotal for these opportunities to be recognised and teachers’ innovative work behaviour to be triggered. By analysing vocational teachers’ work activities, we found that the development of innovations was a complex, iterative and primarily social process. By encouraging teachers to act on opportunities for change and by establishing a collaborative structure at schools, innovation development can be facilitated. We also found that throughout the development of an innovation, reflection played an important role. If the importance of reflective activities is acknowledged by workplaces such as these participants’ vocational schools, this not only fosters innovations but also the teachers’ professional development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, N. R., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Nijstad, B. A. (2004). The routinization of innovation research: a constructively critical review of the state-of-the-science. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 147–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Attwell, G. (1997). New roles for vocational education and training teachers and trainers in Europe: a new framework. Journal of European Industrial Training, 21, 256–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BMBF (Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung). (2010). Berufsbildungsbericht 2010. Bonn: BMBF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boud, D. (2006). Creating the space for reflection at work. In D. Boud, P. Cressey, & P. Docherty (Eds.), Productive reflection at work. Learning for changing organizations (pp. 158–169). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centre for Educational Research and Innovation. (2009). Working out change. Systemic innovation in vocational education and training. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, J. N. (2007). Change-oriented organizational citizenship behavior: effects of work environment characteristics and intervening psychological processes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28, 467–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, J. P. J., & Kemp, R. (2003). Determinants of co-workers’ innovative behaviour: an investigation into knowledge intensive services. International Journal of Innovation Management, 7, 189–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deutscher Bildungsrat. (1970). Strukturplan für das Bildungswesen. Stuttgart: Klett Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowling, M. J., & Ruefli, T. W. (1992). Technological innovation as a gateway to entry: the case of the telecommunications equipment industry. Research Policy, 21, 63–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eraut, M. (2000). Non-formal learning of tacit knowledge in professional work. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 113–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, J. C. (1954). The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin, 51, 327–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. G. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). London: Cassell Educational Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geijsel, F., Sleegers, P., Van den Berg, R., & Kelchtermans, G. (2001). Conditions fostering the implementation of large-scale innovation programs in schools: teachers’ perspectives. Educational Administration Quaterly, 37, 130–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghaith, G., & Yaghi, H. (1997). Relationships among experience, teacher efficacy, and attitudes toward the implementation of instructional innovation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 13, 451–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, A. (1997). From reform to renewal: A new deal for a new age. In A. Hargreaves & R. Evans (Eds.), Beyond educational reform. Bringing teachers back in (pp. 105–125). Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, O. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort-reward fairness and innovative work behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, 287–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R. M. (1988). When a thousand flowers bloom: structural, collective and social conditions for innovation in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, 169–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, N. (1990). Innovation at work: The research literature. In M. A. West & J. L. Farr (Eds.), Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organizational strategies (pp. 15–59). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwakman, K. (2003). Factors affecting teachers’ participation in professional learning activities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19, 149–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative content analysis. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1, http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1089.

  • Meirink, J. A., Meijer, P. C., Verloop, N., & Bergen, T. C. M. (2009). Understanding teacher learning in secondary education: the relations of teacher activities to changed beliefs about teaching and learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 89–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messmann, G., & Mulder, R. H. (2009). Zusammenhänge zwischen Lernmotivation und Lernumgebungsmerkmalen an beruflichen Schulen. Jugendliche ohne Ausbildungsplatz und Auszubildende im Vergleich. Zeitschrift für Berufs- und Wirtschaftspädagogik, 105, 343–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messmann, G., Mulder, R. H., & Gruber, H. (2010). Relations between vocational teachers’ characteristics of professionalism and their innovative work behaviour. Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training, 2, 21–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, E. W., & Phelps, C. C. (1999). Taking charge at work: extra role efforts to initiate workplace change. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 403–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulder, R. H. (2004). Conditions for instructional design and innovation in vocational education: successful design and implementation of complex learning environments. Oxford Studies in Comparative Education, 13, 59–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nijhof, W. J., & Streumer, J. N. (1994). Flexibility in vocational education and training: An introduction. In W. J. Nijhof & J. N. Streumer (Eds.), Flexibility in training and vocational education (pp. 1–12). Utrecht: Lemma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, S. K., Turner, N., & Williams, H. M. (2006). Modeling the antecedents of proactive behavior at work. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 636–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pugh, K. J., & Zhao, Y. (2003). Stories of teacher alienation: a look at the unintended consequences of efforts to empower teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19, 187–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Randi, J., & Corno, L. (1997). Teachers as innovators. In B. J. Biddle, T. L. Good, & I. F. Goodson (Eds.), International handbook of teachers and teaching (Vol. II, pp. 1163–1221). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: a path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 580–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simons, P. R.-J., & Ruijters, M. C. P. (2004). Learning professionals: Towards an integrated model. In H. P. A. Boshuizen, R. Bromme, & H. Gruber (Eds.), Professional learning: Gaps and transitions on the way from novice to expert (pp. 207–229). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

  • Smith, G. F. (2003). Towards a logic of innovation. In L. V. Shavinina (Ed.), The international handbook on innovation (pp. 347–365). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1999). The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 3–15). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Berg, R., Vandenberghe, R., & Sleegers, P. (1999). Management of innovation from a cultural-individual perspective. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 10, 321–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Woerkom, M., Nijhof, W. J., & Nieuwenhuis, L. F. M. (2002). Critical reflective working behaviour: a survey research. Journal of European Industrial Training, 26, 375–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Hippel, E. (1995). The sources of innovations. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, M. A. (2002). Sparkling fountains or stagnant ponds: an integrative model of creativity and innovation implementation in work groups. Applied psychology: An International Review, 51, 355–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, M. A., & Farr, J. L. (1990). Innovation at work. In M. A. West & J. L. Farr (Eds.), Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organizational strategies (pp. 3–13). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gerhard Messmann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Messmann, G., Mulder, R.H. Innovative Work Behaviour in Vocational Colleges: Understanding How and Why Innovations Are Developed. Vocations and Learning 4, 63–84 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-010-9049-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-010-9049-y

Keywords

Navigation