Abstract
When constructing structures receiving high vertical and horizontal force such as port facilities, caissons and breakwaters on a soft ground on the sea or seashore, it is very important to increase the strength of the ground and inhibit excessive settlement. Recently, there have been numerous studies on the method of wrapping the outer wall of granular piles with geotextile or geogrid that has a certain level of tensile strength. Since the geotextile increases the strength of granular piles by confinement effects, those confined granular piles more advantages than the Conventional Sand Compaction Piles (SCP) in terms of the bearing capacity and settlement. Furthermore, this method consumes less aggregate compared to the conventional Sand Compaction Pile (SCP) or Gravel Compaction Pile (GCP) method. This study proposed to determine the characteristics of mechanical behaviors such as bearing capacity and stress concentration ratio of a composite ground improved using SCPs reinforced with geotextile (Geotextile-Encased Sand Pile, GESP) as an alternative to the conventional SCP method. With this purpose, several loading tests were conducted on the artificially sedimented clay grounds reinforced using conventional SCPs and GESPs with geotextiles of three different tensile strengths with various replacement ratios. Based on the results of this study, the bearing capacity of the soft clay ground reinforced by the GESPs is larger than that of the soft ground reinforced by the conventional SCPs and the failure mode of the GESPs is buckling different from the bulging of the SCPs. The tensile strength of the geotextile has little effect on the bearing capacity in the buckling failure of GESPs.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Al-Joulani, M. A. (1995). Laboratory and analytical investigation of sleeve reinforced stone columns, PhD Thesis, Carleton Univ., Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Ayadat, T. and Hanna, A. M. (2005). “Encapsulated stone columns as a soil improvement technique for collapsible soil.” Ground Improvement, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 127–147.
Barskdale, R. D. and Bachus, R. C. (1983). Design and construction of stone columns, Vol. 1, Report No. FHWA/RD-83/026, National Technical Imformation Service, Springfield, Verginia.
Bergado, D. T., Anderson, L. R., Miura, N., and Balasubramaniam, A. S. (1996). Soft ground improvement in lowland and other environments, ASCE Press, New York.
Broms, B. B. (1977). “Triaxial tests with fabric-reinforced soil.” Proc. Int. Conf. on Use of Fabrics in Geotechnics, Vol. 3, pp. 129–133
Di Prisco, C., Galli, A. E., and Bongiorno, D. (2006). “Geo-reinforced sand columns: Small scale experimental tests and theoretical modelling.” Procceeding of the 8th International Conference on Geosynthetics, Sep., Yokohama, Japan, pp. 1685–1688.
Gray, D. H. and Ohashi, H. (1983). “Mechanics of fiber reinforcement in sand.” Journal of Geotech. Eng., ASCE, Vol. 109, No. 3, pp. 335–353.
Hughes, J. M. O. and Withers, N. J. (1974). “Reinforcing of soft cohesive soil with stone columns.” Ground Engineering, Vol. 7, pp. 42–49.
Katsumi, K. and Masaaki, T. (1990). Practical formula for the composite ground improved by sand compaction pile method, Technical Note of the Port and Harbour Research Institute, No. 669, Ministry of Transport of Japan.
Katti, R. K., Katti, A. R., and Naik, S. (1993). Monograph to analysis of stone columns with and without geosynthetic encasement, CBIP Publication, New Delhi.
Kimura, T., Nakase, A., Kusakabe, O., and Saith, K. (1985). “Behavior of soil improvemed by sand compaction piles.” Proc. 11th International Conf. Soils and Foundations Journal, Vol. 2, pp. 1109–1112.
Lo, S. R., Mak, J., and Zhang, R. (2007). “Geosynthetic encased stone columns in soft clay.” Proc. of International Symposium on Earth Reinforcement, Taylor and Francis, Kyushu, pp. 751–756.
Lo, S. R., Zhang, R., and Mak, J. (2010). “Geosynthetic-encased stone columns in soft clay: A numerical study.” Journal of the Geotextile and Geomembranes, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 292–302.
Madhav, M., Miura, M., and Alagmir, M. (1994). Improving granular column capacity by geogrids reinforcement, 5th Int. Conf. on Geotextiles, Geomembranesand Elated Product, Singapore.
Malarvizhi, S. N. and Ilamparuthi, K. (2004). “Load versus settlement of clay bed stabilized with stone and reinforced stone columns.” International Proceeding of GeoAsia.
Malarvizhi, S. N. and Ilamparuthi, K. (2008). “Numerical analysis of encapsulated stone columns.” The 12 th International Conference of IACMAG, GoA, Oct., India, 3719–3726.
Matsuo, M. and Suzuki, H. (1983). “Study on reliability-based design of improvement of clay layer by sand compaction piles.” Japanese Geotechnical Society, Vol. 23, No. 3, pp. 112–122.
Murugesan, S. and Rajagopal, K. (2006). “Geosynthetic-encased stone columns: Numerical evaluation.” Journal of the Geotextiles and Geomembranes, Vol. 24, No. 6, pp. 349–358.
Murugesan, S. and Rajagopal, K. (2007). “Model tests on geosynthetic-encased stone columns.” Journal of the Geosynthetic International, Vol. 14, No. 6, pp. 346–354.
Raithel, M. and Kempfert, H. G. (2000). “Calculation models for dam foundations with geotextiile coated sand columns.” Proceeding of the International Conference on Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, Melbourne.
Raithel, M., Kempfert, K. G., and Kirchner, A. (2002). “Geotextile-Encased Columns (GEC) for foundation of a dike on very soft soils.” Int. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Geosynthetics, Nice, France, pp.1025–1028.
Raithel, M., Kuster, V., and Lindmark, A. (2004). Geotextile encased columns — A foundation system for earth structures, illustrated by a dyke project for a works extension in Hamburg, Nordic Geotechnical Meeting NGM 2004, Ystad, Sweden.
Raithel, M. and Kirchner, A. (2008). “Caculation techniques and dimensioning of encased columns — Design and state of the art.” Proceeding of the 4th Asian Regional Conference on Geosynthetics, June 17–20, Sanghai, China.
Schlosser, F. and Long, N. T. (1974). “Recent results in French research on reinforced earth.” Journal of Const. Div., ASCE, Vol. 100, No. 3, pp. 223–237.
Sharma, J. S. (1998). “A study on the behavior of geogrid reinforced stone column.” Int. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Geosynthetics, Atlanta, pp. 877–882.
Sharma, S. R., Phanikumar, B. R., and Nagendra, G. (2004). “Compressive load response of granular piles reinforced with geogrids.” Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 41, No. 1, pp. 187–192.
The Japanese Geotechnical Society (1988). Soft ground improvement; from exploration and design to construction, Committee of Editors of Soft Ground Improvement, The Japanese Geotechnical Society, Maruzen Publishing Company, Japan.
Yang, Z, (1972). Strength and deformation characteristics of reinforced sand, PhD Thesis, UCLA, California, USA.
Yoo, N. J., Jeong, G. S., Kim, J. S., Park, B. S., and Koh, K. H. (2005). “Characteristics of bearing capacity and stress concentration of clay ground improved with sand compaction piles.” Journal of the Korean Geotechnical Society, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 81–91.
Yoo, W. K. (2011). An experimental study on the behavior of sand-claypack composite soil, PhD Thesis, Myongji Univ., Yongin, Republic of Korea.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yoo, W., Kim, BI. & Cho, W. Model test study on the behavior of geotextile-encased sand pile in soft clay ground. KSCE J Civ Eng 19, 592–601 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-012-0473-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-012-0473-4