Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

An overview of soil erosion modelling compatible with RUSLE approach

  • Land Sea Interaction in Campania (Italy)
  • Published:
Rendiconti Lincei Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Different approaches were used to model soil losses in the Sele River basin (southern Italy) characterized by data scarcity. The suitability of models interpolating different sources of data was evaluated with the aim to suggest similar methodologies in other regions where data availability is not sufficient to use the more complex and detailed models. The first approach is based on the concept of the balance between driving and resisting forces. Rainfall is considered as both a driving and resisting factor: the rain erosivity not only increases with its amount and intensity but also enhances the protective effect of vegetation. The long-term erosion rate of the basin resulted mainly affected by local land-cover conditions that showed a more dramatic effect than the variability of rain erosivity. In the period during which soils were protected by natural woodlands, net erosion rates were extremely low, while the elimination of forest (AD 1780–1810) increased erosion that reached annual rates from 20 to 300 Mg km−2. The second approach is a revised and scale-adapted Foster–Meyer–Onstad model suitable for scarce input data (CliFEM = Climate Forcing and Erosion Modelling). This new idea was addressed to develop a monthly Net Erosion model (NER) and gross erosion was estimated from the sediment delivery ratio (SDR). From this approach it is clear that the erosion regime was clearly autumnal with a mean rate of 8 Mg ha−1 per month. The long-term average soil erosion highlighted, since 1990, a more irregular temporal pattern, with the highest annual erosion (200 Mg ha−1) in 2002. The third approach combines the revised universal soil loss equation (RUSLE) with GIS–geospatial technology. Regression Ordinary Kriging (ROK)-based maps of erosive rainfall were made on annual and monthly basis. The months following soil tillage (from August to November) have become even more hazardous for soil erosion, with values higher than 80% of total yearly soil losses, because in this period the highest rainfall erosivity is coupled to the lowest soil cover due to soil tillage at the end of summer. In these conditions soil can be protected only by the agro-environmental measures aimed at reducing soil erodibility and at increasing soil cover, such as conservative soil tillage (i.e. sod seeding) and perennial cover crops in orchards and vineyards.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbaspour KC, Schulin R, van Genuchten MT, Schlappi E (1998) An alternative to cokriging for situations with small sample sizes. Math Geol 30:259–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angeli L (2004) Valutazione del rischio erosione applicazioni del modello RUSLE, Centro Ricerche Erosione Suolo, Report 2004, 21 p. http://www.lamma-cres.rete.toscana.it/rapporti/2004/2.pdf. Accessed 23 Sept 2009

  • Arnold JG, Williams JR (1995) A continuous time water and sediment routing model for large basins. J Hydraul Div–ASCE 121:171–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aronica G, Ferro V (1997) Rainfall erosivity over the Calabrian region. J Hydrol Sci 42:35–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakker MM, Govers G, Van Doorn A, Quetier F, Chouvardas D, Rounsevell M (2008) The response of soil erosion and sediment export to land-use change in four areas of Europe: the importance of landscape pattern. Geomorphology 98:213–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharyya T, Babu R, Sarkar D, Mandal C, Dhyani BL, Nagar AP (2007) Soil loss and crop productivity model in humid subtropical India. Curr Sci India 93:1397–1403

    Google Scholar 

  • Boardman J (1993) The sensitivity of downland arable land to erosion by water. In: Thomas DSG, Allison RJ (eds) Landscape sensitivity. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, pp 211–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Boardman JD, Favis-Mortlock T (2001) How will future climate change and land-use change affect rates of erosion on agricultural land. In: Soil erosion research for the 21st Century. Am Soc Agric Biol Eng, Honolulu, Hawaii, pp 498–501, 3–5 Jan 2001

  • Borselli L (2006) Valutazione dell’erodibilità del suolo in applicazioni a scala di bacino. In: Costantini EAC (ed) Metodi di valutazione dei suoli e delle terre. Cantagalli, Siena, pp 197–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunetti M, Maugeri M, Nanni T (2001) Changes in total precipitation, rainy days and extreme events in northeastern Italy. Int J Climatol 21:861–871

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalal-Clayton B, Dent D (2001) Knowledge of the land. Land resources information and its use in rural development. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • de Santos Loureiro N, de Azevedo Coutinho M (1995) Rainfall changes and rainfall erosivity increase in the Algarve (Portugal). Catena 24:55–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desmet PJJ, Govers G (1996) Comparison of routing algorithms for digital elevation models and their implications for predicting ephemeral gullies. J Geograph Inform Syst 10:311–331

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Gennaro A (2002) I sistemi di terre della Campania. Carta 1:250.000 e Legenda. Selca, Firenze

  • Diodato N (2004a) Local models for rainstorm-induced hazard analysis on Mediterranean river-torrential geomorphological systems. Nat Hazard Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 4:389–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diodato N (2004b) Estimate RUSLE’s rainfall factor in the part of Italy with a Mediterranean rainfall regime. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 8:103–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diodato N (2005) Geostatistical uncertainty modelling for the environmental hazard assessment during single erosive rainstorm events. Environ Monit Assess 105:25–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diodato N (2006) Modelling net erosion responses to enviroclimatic changes recorded upon multisecular timescales. Geomorphology 80:164–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diodato N, Ceccarelli M (2005) Erosive rainfall reconstruction since 1580 AD in Calore River Basin (Southern Italy). SCODA Report, University of Sannio. Available on line at: http://www.scoda.unisannio.it/Papers/Archive/Diodato_R_reconstruction%20in%20CRB.pdf

  • Diodato N, Fagnano M (2011) A simple geospatial model climate–based for designing erosive rainfall pattern. In: Nemr AE (ed) The environmental pollution and its relation to climate change. Nova Science Publishers, New York (in Press)

  • Diodato N, Ceccarelli M, Bellocchi G (2008) Decadal and century-long changes in the reconstruction of erosive rainfall anomalies at a Mediterranean fluvial basin. Earth Surf Proc Land 33:2078–2093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diodato N, Fagnano M, Alberico I (2009) CliFERM—Climate forcing and erosion response modelling at long-term Sele River Research Basin (Southern Italy). Nat Hazard Earth Syst Sci 9:1693–1702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diodato N, Fagnano M, Alberico I, Chirico GB (2011a) Mapping soil erodibility from composed dataset in Sele River Basin, Italy. Nat Hazards 58:445–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diodato N, Fagnano M, Alberico I (2011b) Geospatial–and–visual modeling for exploring sediment source areas across the Sele river landscape Italy. Italian J Agronomy 6:85–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas I (1967) Man, vegetation and sediment yield of rivers. Nature 215:925–928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fagnano M, Mori M, Carone F, Postiglione L (2000) Sistemi colturali per l’Appennino meridionale: Nota II. Deflussi ed erosione, Rivista di Agronomia 34:55–64 (in Italian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster GR, Meyer LD, Onstad CA (1977) A runoff erosivity factor and variable slope length exponents for soil loss estimates. T ASAE 20:683–687

    Google Scholar 

  • González-Hidalgo JC, Peña-Monné JL, de Luis M (2007) A review of daily soil erosion in Western Mediterranean areas. Catena 71:193–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson MF (1989) A new procedure for gridding elevation and stream line data with automatic removal of spurious pits. J Hydrol 106:211–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Illian J, Penttinen A, Stoyan H, Stoyan D (2008) Statistical analysis and modelling of spatial point patterns. John Wiley and Sons Ltd, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones RJA, Montanarella L (2004) Organic matter in the soils of southern Europe. European Soil Bureau Technical Report, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosmas C, Danalatos N, Cammeraat LH, Chabart M, Diamanopoulos J, Farand R, Gutierrez L, Jacob A, Marques H, Martinez-Fernandez J, Mizara A, Moustakas N, Nicolau JM, Oliveros C, Pinna G, Puddu R, Puigdefabregas J, Roxo M, Simao A, Stamou G, Tomasi N, Usai D, Vacca A (1997) The effect of land use on runoff and soil erosion rates under Mediterranean conditions. Catena 29:45–59

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lu H, Moran CJ, Prosser IP, Raupach RM, Olley J, Petheram C (2003) Sheet an rill erosion sediment delivery to streams: a basin wide estimation at hillslope to Medium catchment scale, Report E to Project D10012, CSIRO Technical Report 15/03

  • Märker M, Angeli L, Bottai L, Costantini R, Ferrari R, Innocenti L, Siciliano G (2008) Assessment of land degradation susceptibility by scenario analysis: a case study in Southern Tuscany, Italy. Geomorphology 93:120–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matula S, Spongrovà K (2007) Pedotransfer function application for estimation of soil hydrophysical properties using parametric methods. Plant Soil Environ 53:149–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitasova H, Hofierka J, Zlocha M, Iverson LR (1996) Modeling topographic potential for erosion and deposition using GIS. Int J Geograph Inform Sci 10:629–641

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitasova H, Mitas L, Brown WM, Johnson D (1998) Multidimensional soil erosion/deposition modeling and visualization using GIS. University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Final report for USA CERL

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore ID, Turner AK, Wilson JP, Jenson SK, Band LE (1993) GIS and land-surface-subsurface process modeling. In: Goodchild MFR, Parks BO, Steyaert LT (eds) Environmental modeling with GIS. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 196–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulligan J, Wainwright M (2004) Modeling and model building. In: Mulligan J, Wainwright M (eds) Environmental modelling: finding simplicity in complexity. Jonh Wiley and Sons, Chichester, pp 7–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Nearing MA, Pruski FF, O’Neal MR (2004) Expected climate change impacts on soil erosion rates: A review. J. Soil Water Consevation 59:43–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Regione Campania (1998) Cartografia tecnica regionale. http://www.sito.regione.campania.it/territorio/regionecampania.htm. Accessed 24 Sept 2009

  • Renard KG, Foster GR, Weesies GA, McCool DK, Yoder DC (1997) Predicting soil erosion by water: a guide to conservation planning with the revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE). USDA, Agricultural Handbook 703

  • Rovito PL (2001) From the ‘amusing woods’ to the ‘sterile and slid’ plains. Notes about the environment disaster in Campania. Rivista Storica del Sannio 16:297–338 (in Italian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Salski A (2006) Ecological applications of fuzzy logic. In: Recknagel F (ed) Ecological informatics. Springer, Berlin, pp 3–14

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Thornes JB (1990) The interaction of erosional and vegetational dynamics in land degradation: spatial outcomes. In: Thornes JB (ed) Vegetation and erosion. Jonh Wiley and Sons, Chichester, pp 45–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Torri D, Poesen J, Borselli L (1997) Predictability and uncertainty of the soil erodibility factor using a global dataset. Catena 31:1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toy TJ, Foster GR, Renard KG (2002) Soil erosion; prediction, measurement, and control. John Wiley and Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Knijff JM, Jones RJA, Montanarella L (2000) Soil erosion risk assessment in Italy, European Soil Bureau, JRC—Report EUR 19022EN

  • Vandewiele GL, Xu CY, Lar-Win N (1992) Methodology and comparative study of monthly water balance models in Belgium, China and Burma. J Hydrol 134:315–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang G, Gertner G, Singh V, Shinkareva S, Parysow P, Anderson A (2002) Spatial and temporal prediction and uncertainty of soil loss using the revised universal soil loss equation: a case study of the rainfall-runoff erosivity R factor. Ecol Model 153:143–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wessolek G, Duijnisveld WHM, Trinks S (2008) Hydro-pedotransfer functions (HPTFs) for predicting annual percolation rate on a regional scale. J Hydrol 356:17–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wischmeier WH, Smith DD (1958) Rainfall energy and its relationship to soil loss. Trans Am Geophys Union 39:285–291

    Google Scholar 

  • Wischmeier WH, Smith DD (1978) Predicting rainfall erosion losses: a guide to conservation planning. USDA, Agriculture Handbook No. 537. Government Printing Office, Washington

  • Zhang XC, Nearing MA (2005) Impact of climate change on soil erosion, runoff, and wheat productivity in central Oklahoma. Catena 61:185–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was financially supported by VECTOR Project (line 2 VULCOST—coordinated by Bruno D’Argenio).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dipartimento Ingegneria Agraria e Agronomia del Territorio, Università degli Studi “Federico II” di Napoli, Via Università 100, 80055, Portici, Italy

    Massimo Fagnano & Nunzio Fiorentino

  2. Met European Research Observatory, GEWEX-CEOP Network, World Climate Research Programme, 82100, Benevento, Italy

    Nazzareno Diodato

  3. Centro Interdipartimentale di Ricerca Ambiente, Università degli Studi “Federico II” di Napoli, Via Mezzocannone 16, 80134, Naples, Italy

    Ines Alberico

Authors
  1. Massimo Fagnano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nazzareno Diodato
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ines Alberico
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Nunzio Fiorentino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Massimo Fagnano.

Additional information

This paper is an outcome of the FISR project VECTOR (Vulnerability of the Italian coastal area and marine ecosystem to climate changes and their role in the Mediterranean carbon cycles), subproject VULCOST (Vulnerability of coastal environments to climate changes) on: land–sea interaction and costal changes in the Sele River plain, Campania.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fagnano, M., Diodato, N., Alberico, I. et al. An overview of soil erosion modelling compatible with RUSLE approach. Rend. Fis. Acc. Lincei 23, 69–80 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12210-011-0159-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12210-011-0159-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation