Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Annals of Telecommunications
Erschienen in: Annals of Telecommunications 1-2/2014

01.02.2014

A survey on addressing privacy together with quality of context for context management in the Internet of Things

verfasst von: Sophie Chabridon, Romain Laborde, Thierry Desprats, Arnaud Oglaza, Pierrick Marie, Samer Machara Marquez

Erschienen in: Annals of Telecommunications | Ausgabe 1-2/2014

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Making the Internet of Things (IoT) a reality will contribute to extend the context-aware ability of numerous sensitive applications. We can foresee that the context of users will include not only their own spatio-temporal conditions but also those of the things situated in their ambient environment and at the same time, thanks to the IoT, those that are located in other remote spaces. Consequently, next-generation context managers have to interact with the IoT underlying technologies and must, even more than before, address both privacy and quality of context (QoC) requirements. In this article, we show that the notions of privacy and QoC are intimately related and sometimes contradictory and survey the recent works addressing them. Current solutions usually consider only one notion, and very few of them started to bridge privacy and QoC. We identify some of the remaining challenges that next-generation context managers have to deal with to favour users’ acceptability by providing both the optimal QoC level and the appropriate privacy protection.
Vorheriger Artikel Improving user content privacy on social networks using rights management systems
Nächster Artikel On the uniqueness of Web browsing history patterns

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
1.
Abid Z, Chabridon S, Conan D (2009) A framework for quality of context management. In: First international workshop on quality of context. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 5786. Springer, Berlin
2.
Agrawal R, Srikant R (2000) Privacy-preserving data mining. In: ACM SIGMOD conference
3.
Alcalde Bagüés S, Zeidler A, Fernández-Valdivielso C, Matias I (2007) Disappearing for a while-using white lies in pervasive computing. In: Proceedings of the ACM workshop on privacy in electronic society, ACM, pp 80–83
4.
Arcangeli J-P, et al (2012) INCOME—multi-scale context management for the Internet of Things. In: International conference on ambient intelligence (AmI). Lecture notes in computer science, vol 7683. Springer, Berlin
5.
Ashley P, Hada S, et al (2003) Enterprise privacy authorization language (EPAL 1.2)
6.
Atzori L, Iera A, Morabito G (2010) The Internet of Things: a survey. Comput Netw 54(15):2787–2805CrossRefMATH
7.
Bai G, Gu L, Feng T, Guo Y, Chen X (2010) Context-aware usage control for android. In: Security and privacy in communication networks, Springer, New York, pp 326–343CrossRef
8.
Basseville M, Nikiforov I, et al (1993) Detection of abrupt changes: theory and application, vol 104. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs
9.
Bellavista P, Corradi A, Fanelli M, Foschini L (2012) A survey of context data distribution for mobile ubiquitous systems. ACM Comput Surv 44(24):24:1–24:45
10.
Bettini C, Brdiczka O, Henricksen K, Indulska J, et al (2010) A survey of context modelling and reasoning techniques. Pervasive Mob Comp 6(2):161–180CrossRef
11.
Bisdikian C, Sensoy M, Norman TJ, Srivastava MB (2012) Trust and obfuscation principles for quality of information in emerging pervasive environments. In: IEEE international conference on pervasive computing and communications, PerCom 2012, 19–23 March 2012, Lugano, workshop proceedings, pp 44–49
12.
Borcea-Pfitzmann K, Pfitzmann A, Berg M (2011) Privacy 3.0 := data minimization + user control contextual integrity. Inf Technol 53(1):34–40
13.
Brgulja N, Kusber R, David K, Baumgarten M (2009) Measuring the probability of correctness of contextual information in context aware systems. In: 8th IEEE international conference on dependable, autonomic and secure computing, Washington
14.
Bu Y, Gu T, Tao X, Li J, Chen S, Lu J (2006) Managing quality of context in pervasive computing. In: Sixth international conference on quality software, QSIC 2006
15.
Buchholz T, Kupper A, Schiffers M (2003) Quality of context information: what it is and why we need it. In: 10th international workshop HPOVUA, Geneva
16.
17.
Canny J (2002) Collaborative filtering with privacy via factor analysis. In: 25th ACM SIGIR
18.
Castellucia C, Druschel P, Fischer Hübner S et al. (2011) Privacy, accountability and trust—challenges and opportunities. Technical report MSU-CSE-00-2, ENISA
19.
Cavoukian A, Chibba M (2009) Advancing privacy and security in computing, networking and systems innovations through privacy by design. In: Proceedings conference of the Centre for Advanced Studies on Collaborative Research, Toronto pp 358–360
20.
Cavoukian A, Tapscott D (1996) Who knows: safeguarding your privacy in a networked world. McGraw-Hill, New York
21.
22.
Chakraborty S, Charbiwala Z, Choi H, Raghavan KR, Srivastava MB (2012) Balancing behavioral privacy and information utility in sensory data flows. Pervasive Mob Comput 8(3):331–345CrossRef
23.
Chakraborty S, Choi H, Srivastava MB (2011) Demystifying privacy in sensory data: a QoI based approach In: Percom workshops
24.
Chakraborty S, Raghavan KR, Srivastava MB, Bisdikian C, Kaplan LM (2012) An obfuscation framework for controlling value of information during sharing. In: IEEE statistical signal processing workshop
25.
Chaum D (1981) Untraceable electronic mail, return addresses, and digital pseudonyms. Commun ACM 24(2):84–88CrossRef
26.
Conti M, Das SK, Bisdikian C, Kumar M, et al (2012) Looking ahead in pervasive computing: challenges and opportunities in the era of cyber-physical convergence. Pervasive Mob Comput 8(1):2–21CrossRef
27.
Coutaz J, Crowley JL, Dobson S, Garlan D (2005) Context is key. Commun ACM 48(3):49–53CrossRef
28.
Covington M, Long W, Srinivasan S, Dey A, Ahamad M, Abowd G (2001) Securing context-aware applications using environment roles. In: 6th ACM symposium on access control models and technologies
29.
Covington M, Sastry M (2006) A contextual attribute-based access control model. In: OTM
30.
Danezis G, Gürses S (2010) A critical review of 10 years of privacy technology. In: Surveillance cultures: a global surveillance society?, UK
31.
Danezis G, Mittal P (2009) SybilInfer: detecting sybil nodes using social networks. In: NDSS
32.
de Montjoye Y-A, Hidalgo CA, Verleysen M, Blondel V (2013) Unique in the crowd: the privacy bounds of human mobility. Nat Sci Rep 3:1376
33.
34.
Diaz C (2005) Anonymity privacy in electronic services. PhD thesis, Cath. Univ. Leuven
35.
Dingledine R, Mathewson N, Syverson PF (2004) Tor: the second-generation onion router. In: 13th USENIX security symposium, San Diego
36.
Dwork C (2006) Differential privacy. In: International colloquium on automata, languages and programming (ICALP) Springer, Venice
37.
Filho JB (2010) A family of context-based access control models for pervasive environments. PhD thesis, MSTII Doctoral School, Joseph Fourier University, Grenoble
38.
Filho JB, Agoulmine N (2011) A quality-aware approach for resolving context conflicts in context-aware systems. IEEE/IFIP conference on embedded and ubiquitous computing
39.
Flinn J (2012) Cyber foraging: bridging mobile and cloud computing. Synth Lect Mob Pervasive Comput 7(2):1–103CrossRef
40.
Freytag J-C (2009) Context quality and privacy—friends or rivals? In: First international workshop on quality of context. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 5786. Springer, Berlin
41.
42.
Graf C, Busch M, Schulz T, Hochleitner C, Skeide Fuglerud K (2012) D2.7 updated design guidelines on the security feedback provided by the “Things”. Technical report, uTRUSTit project
43.
44.
Han Q, Hakkarinen D, Boonma P, Suzuki J (2010) Quality-aware sensor data collection. Int J Sens Netw 7(3):127–140CrossRef
45.
Hedbom H (2009) A survey on transparency tools for enhancing privacy. In: The future of identity in the information society, vol 298. Springer, Berlin
46.
Henricksen K, Indulska J (2004) Modelling and using imperfect context information. In: IEEE PERCOM 1st workshop CoMoRea
47.
Huebscher MC, McCann JA (2005) A learning model for trustworthiness of context-awareness services. In: Third IEEE international conference on PerCom workshops, Hawaii
48.
Inglesant P, Sasse MA, Chadwick D, Shi LL (2008) Expressions of expertness: the virtuous circle of natural language for access control policy specification. In: SOUPS
49.
Accuracy ISO (2011) (Trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results—part 1: introduction and basic principles. ISO/WD 15725-1 document
50.
ITU Internet Reports (2005) The Internet of Things, 7th edn. ITU, Geneva
51.
Kelly D, Raines R, Grimaila M, Baldwin R, Mullins B (2008) A survey of state-of-the-art in anonymity metrics. In: 1st ACM workshop on network data anonymization. ACM
52.
Kim Y, Lee K (2006) A quality measurement method of context information in ubiquitous environments, vol 2. In: ICHIT ’06 proceedings of the 2006 international conference on hybrid information technology
53.
Korpipää P, Mäntyjärvi J, Kela J, Keränen H, Malm EJ (2003) Managing context information in mobile devices. IEEE Pervasive Comput 2(3):42–51CrossRef
54.
Krause M, Hochstatter I (2005) Challenges in modelling and using quality of context (QoC). In: Mobility aware technologies and applications, vol 3744. Springer, Berlin
55.
Kulkarni D, Tripathi A (2008) Context-aware role-based access control in pervasive computing systems. In: Proceedings of the 13th ACM symposium on access control models and technologies, SACMAT ’08, ACM, New York, pp 113–122
56.
Kumar A, Karnik NM, Chafle G (2002) Context sensitivity in role-based access control. Oper Syst Rev 36(3):53–66CrossRef
57.
Langheinrich M (2009) Privacy in ubiquitous computing. In: Krumm J (ed) Ubiquitous computing. CRC, Boca Raton, pp 95–160
58.
Lazouski A, Martinelli F, Mori P (2010) Usage control in computer security: a survey. Elsevier Comput Sci Rev 4(2):81–99CrossRef
59.
Lederer S, Hong J, Dey A, Landay J (2004) Personal privacy through understanding and action: five pitfalls for designers. Personal Ubiquit Comput 8(6):440–454CrossRef
60.
Machanavajjhala A, Kifer D, Gehrke J, Venkitasubramaniam M (2007) L-diversity: privacy beyond k-anonymity. ACM Trans Knowl Discov Data 1(3):3:1–3:52
61.
Machara Marquez S, Chabridon S, Taconet C (2013) Models@Run.time for privacy and quality of context level agreements in the Internet of Things. Technical report, UMR SAMOVAR, Télécom SudParis
62.
Manzoor A (2010) Quality of context in pervasive systems: models, techniques, and applications. PhD thesis, School of Computer Science, Wien TU
63.
Manzoor A, Truong H-L, Dustdar S (2012) Quality of context: models and applications for context-aware systems in pervasive environments. Knowl Eng Rev. doi:10.​1017/​S000000000000000​. Special issue on web and mobile information servicesMATH
64.
Manzoor A, Truong HL, Dustdar S (2008) On the evaluation of quality of context. In: Smart sensing and context, Springer, Berlin
65.
Marie P, Desprats T, Chabridon S, Sibilla M (2013) A meta-model for the management of the quality of context information. Technical report, University, Toulouse, IRIT
66.
Marx G (2001) Murky conceptual waters: the public and the private. Ethics Inf Technol 3(3):157–169CrossRef
67.
68.
McKeever S, Ye J, Coyle L, Dobson S (2009) A context quality model to support transparent reasoning with uncertain context. In: First international workshop on quality of context. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 5786. Springer, Berlin
69.
Mehta B (2007) Learning from what others know: privacy preserving cross system personalization. In: 11th conferences on user modeling
70.
Miorandi S, an Sicari D, De Pellegrini F, Chlamtac I (2012) Survey Internet of things: vision, applications and research challenges. Ad Hoc Netw 10(7):1497–1516CrossRef
71.
Narayanan A, Shmatikov V (2008) Robust De-anonymization of large sparse datasets. In: IEEE symposium security and privacy
72.
Neisse R (2012) Trust and privacy management support for context-aware service platforms. PhD thesis, CTIT School, University of Twente, NL
73.
Neisse R, Pretschner A, Di Giacomo V (2011) A trustworthy usage control enforcement framework. In: 6th international conference on ARES
74.
Neisse R, Wegdam M, van Sinderen M (2008) Trustworthiness and quality of context information. In: 9th conference for young computer scientists, Hunan
75.
Nguyen DH, Mynatt ED (2002) Privacy mirrors: understanding and shaping socio-technical ubiquitous computing systems. Technical report GIT-GVU-02-16, Georgia Techniques, Atlanta
76.
77.
OECD (1980) Guidelines on the protection of privacy and transborder flows of personal data
78.
Official Journal of the European Communities (2002) EU Directive 2002/58/ec on the processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector
79.
Official Journal of the European Communities (1995) EU Directive 95/46/ec on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and the free movement of such data
80.
Oglaza A, Laborde R, Zaraté P (2013) Authorization policies: using decision support system for context-aware protection of user’s private data. In: IEEE international symposium on UbiSafe computing
81.
Okagawa T, Nishida K, Miura A (2003) A proposed routing procedure in IP2. In: IEEE 58th VTC, vol 3
82.
83.
84.
Pearson S (2012) Privacy management in global organisations. In: Communications and multimedia security, Springer
85.
Pearson S, Casassa Mont M (2011) Sticky policies: an approach for managing privacy across multiple parties. IEEE Comput 44(9):60–68CrossRef
86.
87.
Pfitzmann A, Waidner M (1985) Networks without user observability: design options. In: Advances in cryptology—EUROCRYPT, workshop on the theory and application of cryptographic techniques, Linz, Austria. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 219. Springer, Berlin, pp 245–253
88.
Preuveneers D, Berbers Y (2006) Quality extensions and uncertainty handling for context ontologies. In: Proceedings of context and ontologies: theory practice and applications, Italy
89.
Preuveneers D, Berbers Y (2007) Architectural backpropagation support for managing ambiguous context in smart environments. In: Fourth conference on universal access in HCI. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 4555. Springer, Berlin
90.
91.
Ranganathan A, Al-Muhtadi J, Campbell RH (2004) Reasoning about uncertain contexts in pervasive computing environments. IEEE Pervasive Comput 3(2):10–18CrossRef
92.
Roman R, Najera P, Lopez J (2011) Securing the Internet of Things. IEEE Comput 44(9):51–58CrossRef
93.
Roman R, Zhou J, Lopez J (2013) On the features and challenges of security and privacy in distributed Internet of Things. Comput Netw 57(10):2266–2279CrossRef
94.
Satyanarayanan M, Bahl P, Caceres R, Davies N (2009) The case for VM-based cloudlets in mobile computing. IEEE Pervasive Comput 8:14–23CrossRef
95.
Schmid S, Eggert L, Brunner M, Quittek J (2005) TurfNet: an architecture for dynamically composable networks. In: Autonomic communication. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 3457. Springer, Berlin
96.
Schmidt A (2006) Ontology-based user context management: the challenges of imperfection and time-dependence. In: Conference on ontologies, databases and applications. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 4275. Springer, Berlin
97.
Schrammel J, Hochleitner C, Tscheligi M (2011) Privacy, trust and interaction in the Internet of Things. In: Ambient intelligence. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 7040. Springer, Berlin, pp 378–379
98.
Sheikh K, Wegdam M, Sinderen MV (2008) Quality-of-context and its use for protecting privacy in context-aware systems. J Softw 3(3):83–93CrossRef
99.
Shen Y, Pearson S (2011) Privacy enhancing technologies: a review. Technical report HPL-2011-113, HP Labs
100.
101.
Solove D (2006) A taxonomy of privacy. Univ Pennsylvania Law Rev 153(3):477CrossRef
102.
Stepien B, Matwin S, Felty A (2011) Advantages of a non-technical XACML notation in role-based models. In: 9th annual international conference on privacy, security and trust (PST), pp 193–200
103.
104.
Toch E, Wang Y, Cranor L (2012) Personalization and privacy: a survey of privacy risks and remedies in personalization-based systems. User Model User-Adap Inter 22(1–2):203–220CrossRef
105.
Twidle K, Dulay N, Lupu E, Sloman M (2009) Ponder2: a policy system for autonomous pervasive environments. In: IEEE workshop on policies for distributed systems and networks
106.
Van Blarkom GW, Borking JJ, Olk JGE (2003) Handbook of privacy and privacy-enhancing technologies: the case of intelligent softwares. College Bescherming Persoonsgegevens, The Hague
107.
108.
Wang Y, Kobsa A (2008) Handbook of research on social and organizational liabilities in information security, chapter privacy enhancing technology. IGI Publishing, Hershey
109.
Warren SD, Brandeis LD (1890) The right to privacy. Harvard Law Rev 4(5):193–220CrossRef
110.
Wishart R, Henricksen K, Indulska J (2005) Context obfuscation for privacy via ontological descriptions. In: 1st international workshop on location and context-awareness (LoCA). Lecture notes in computer science, vol 3479. Springer, Berlin
111.
Yasar A-U-H, Paridel K, Preuveneers D, Berbers Y (2011) When efficiency matters: towards quality of context-aware peers for adaptive communication in VANETs. In: Intelligent vehicles symposium, Germany
112.
Ylitalo J, Nikander P (2006) BLIND: a complete identity protection framework for end-points. In: Security protocols. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 3957. Springer, Berlin
Metadaten
Titel
A survey on addressing privacy together with quality of context for context management in the Internet of Things
verfasst von
Sophie Chabridon
Romain Laborde
Thierry Desprats
Arnaud Oglaza
Pierrick Marie
Samer Machara Marquez
Publikationsdatum
01.02.2014
Verlag
Springer Paris
Erschienen in
Annals of Telecommunications / Ausgabe 1-2/2014
Print ISSN: 0003-4347
Elektronische ISSN: 1958-9395
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12243-013-0387-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1-2/2014

Annals of Telecommunications 1-2/2014 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

Video viewing: do auditory salient events capture visual attention?

OriginalPaper

Human perception-based distributed architecture for scalable video conferencing services: theoretical models and performance

OriginalPaper

Microcell prediction model based on support vector machine algorithm

OriginalPaper

Improving user content privacy on social networks using rights management systems

OriginalPaper

Privacy query rewriting algorithm instrumented by a privacy-aware access control model

Foreword

Privacy-aware electronic society