Skip to main content
Log in

Roller ski rolling resistance and its effects on elite athletes’ performance

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sports Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Modern ski-treadmills allow cross-country skiers, biathletes and ski-orienteers to test their physical fitness in a laboratory environment whilst performing classical and freestyle (skating) techniques on roller skis. For elite athletes, the differences in performance between test occasions are quite small, thus emphasising the importance of knowing the roller skis’ rolling resistance in order to allow the correct comparison between the results of different test occasions. In this study, the roller skis’ rolling resistance was measured on the ski-treadmill’s surface using a roller ski rolling resistance measurement system specially produced for this purpose. The study investigated the influence of significant changes in rolling resistance on physiological variables. The results showed that during submaximal exercise, power, oxygen uptake, heart rate and blood lactate were significantly changed by different rolling resistances, while there were no significant or only small changes to cycle rate, cycle length and ratings of perceived exertion. Incremental maximal tests showed that time to exhaustion was significantly changed by different rolling resistances and this occurred without significant changes in maximal power, maximal oxygen uptake, maximal heart rate and blood lactate, and that the influence on ratings of perceived exertion were insignificant or small.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Calbet JA, Holmberg HC, Rosdahl H, van Hall G, Jensen-Urstad M, Saltin B (2005) Why do arms extract less oxygen than legs during exercise? Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 289:1448–1458

    Google Scholar 

  2. Holmberg HC, Lindinger S, Stoggl T, Eitzlmair E, Muller E (2005) Biomechanical analysis of double poling in elite cross-country skiers. Med Sci Sports Exerc 37:807–818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Rundell KW (1995) Treadmill roller ski test predicts biathlon roller ski race results of elite U.S. biathlon women. Med Sci Sports Exerc 27:1677–1685

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Hoffman DM, Clifford SP, Bota B, Mandli M, Jones MG (1990) Influence of body mass on energy cost of roller skiing. Int J Sport Biomech 6:374–385

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hoffman DM, Clifford SP, Watts BP, O’Hagan PK, Mittelstadt WS (1995) Delta efficiency of uphill roller skiing with the double pole and diagonal stride techniques. Can J Appl Physiol 20:465–479

    Google Scholar 

  6. Millet YG, Hoffman DM, Candau BR, Buckwalter BJ, Clifford SP (1998) Effect of rolling resistance on poling forces and metabolic demands of roller skiing. Med Sci Sports Exerc 30:755–762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ainegren M, Carlsson P, Tinnsten M (2008) Rolling resistance for treadmill roller skiing. Sports Eng 11:23–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hoffman DM, Clifford SP, Snyder SP, O’Hagan PK, Mittelstadt WS, Roberts MM, Drummond AH, Gaskill ES (1998) Physiological effects of technique and rolling resistance in uphill roller skiing. Med Sci Sports Exerc 30:311–317

    Google Scholar 

  9. Padilla S, Mujika I, Orbananos J, Angulo F (2000) Exercise intensity during competition time trials in professional road cycling. Med Sci Sports Exerc 32:850–856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jensen K, Jörgensen S, Johansen L (2002) A metabolic cart for measurement of oxygen uptake during human exercise using inspiratory flow rate. Eur J Appl Physiol 87:202–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Borg G (1998) Borg’s perceived exertion and pain scales. Human Kinetics, Champaign

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gore CJ (2000) Physiological tests for elite athletes. Australian Sports Commission. Human Kinetics, Champaign, pp 50–65

    Google Scholar 

  13. Åstrand PO, Rodahl K (1986) Textbook of work physiology. Physiological bases of exercise. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  14. Allen DG, Lamb GD, Westerblad H (2008) Skeletal muscle fatigue: cellular mechanisms. Physiol Rev 88:287–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. McArdle WD, Katch FI, Katch VL (2001) Exercise physiology. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  16. Roffey DM, Byrne NM, Hills AP (2007) Effect of stage duration on physiological variables commonly used to determine maximum aerobic performance during cycle ergometri. J Sports Sci 25:1325–1335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang YY, Johnson M, Chow N, Wasserman K (1991) Effect of exercise testing protocol on parameters of aerobic function. Med Sci Sports Exerc 23:625–630

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Professor Bengt Saltin (Copenhagen Muscle Research Centre and Mid Sweden University) for his support during the development of testing methods. Many thanks also go to the athletes who participated in the study. The authors would also like to thank Glenn Björklund (Mid Sweden University) and Robin Johansson (Swedish X-country Ski Association) for their goodwill in warming up the roller skis in the freestyle part of the study. Finally, thanks are also due to the European Union’s regional development fund, which provided financial support for the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mats Ainegren.

Appendix

Appendix

Results from physiological tests using freestyle (n = 10) and classical (n = 10) techniques in two submaximal workloads and an incremental maximal test. T1 and T2 represent test occasions one and two, with the same pair of roller skis, and T3 is the test occasion with a pair of roller skis with a significantly lower (freestyle, 47%) and higher (classical, 50%) rolling resistance (Mean, SD). T1 vs T2, T2 vs T3 and T1 vs T3 represent the differences (d) and statistics (p) between the three test occasions.

Table 2 Results on oxygen uptake (VO2), heart rate (HR) and blood lactate (B-Hla)
Table 3 Results on power (P w), cycle rate (CR), cycle length (CL) and time to exhaustion (TTE)
Table 4 Results for ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) for breathing, arms and legs

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ainegren, M., Carlsson, P. & Tinnsten, M. Roller ski rolling resistance and its effects on elite athletes’ performance. Sports Eng 11, 143–157 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12283-009-0016-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12283-009-0016-5

Keywords

Navigation