Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Mechanisms Supporting Transfer of Inhibitory Signals into the Spike Output of Spontaneously Firing Cerebellar Nuclear Neurons In Vitro

  • Published:
The Cerebellum Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cerebellar cortical signals are carried to their principal target, the deep cerebellar nuclear neurons (DCNs), via the inhibitory pathway formed by Purkinje cell (PC) axons. Two different intrinsic properties of DCNs, rebound excitation and automatic firing, have been proposed to support ensuing mechanisms for information transfer via inhibitory synapses. The efficacy of these mechanisms was investigated using whole-cell recordings of spontaneously firing DCNs in cerebellar slices. Results using current injection revealed that both mechanisms are effective in spontaneously firing DCNs but operate at different ranges of membrane potential. Rebound frequency was well correlated to the duration and amplitude of the preceding hyperpolarization. Activation of PC synapses with trains of stimuli few seconds long elicited rebound firing in all tested neurons, demonstrating that inhibition can elicit rebounds in DCNs held at their spontaneous membrane potential. Rebounds could be also elicited by single stimulus in a subset of neurons. The rebound frequency was significantly correlated to the synaptic stimulus strength, supporting the idea that rebound frequency may encode the amplitude of inhibition and thus serve to transfer inhibitory signals in the cerebellar circuit.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ito M, Yoshida M, Obata K, Kawai N, Udo M (1970) Inhibitory control of intracerebellar nuclei by the Purkinje cell axons. Exp Brain Res 10:64–80

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jahnsen H (1986) Electrophysiological characteristics of neurones in the guinea-pig deep cerebellar nuclei in vitro. J Physiol 372:129–147

    Google Scholar 

  3. Llinás R, Mühlethaler M (1988) Electrophysiology of guinea-pig cerebellar nuclear cells in the in vitro brain stem–cerebellar preparation. J Physiol 404:241–258

    Google Scholar 

  4. Aizenman CD, Linden DJ (1999) Regulation of the rebound depolarization and spontaneous firing patterns of deep nuclear neurons in slices of rat cerebellum. J Neurophysiol 82(4):1697–1709

    Google Scholar 

  5. Molineux ML, McRory JE, McKay BE, Hamid J, Mehaffey WH, Rehak R et al (2006) Specific T-type calcium channel isoforms are associated with distinct burst phenotypes in deep cerebellar nuclear neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103(14):5555–5560

    Google Scholar 

  6. Aizenman CD, Manis PB, Linden DJ (1998) Polarity of long-term synaptic gain change is related to postsynaptic spike firing at a cerebellar inhibitory synapse. Neuron 21:827–835

    Google Scholar 

  7. Pugh JR, Raman IM (2006) Potentiation of mossy fiber EPSCs in the cerebellar nuclei by NMDA receptor activation followed by postinhibitory rebound current. Neuron 51(1):113–123

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gardette R, Debono M, Dupont J-L, Crépel F (1985) Electrophysiological studies on the postnatal development of intracerebellar nuclei neurons in rat cerebellar slices maintained in vitro. I. Postsynaptic potentials. Dev Brain Res 19:47–55

    Google Scholar 

  9. Thach WT (1968) Discharge of Purkinje and cerebellar nuclear neurons during rapidly alternating arm movements in the monkey. Journal of Neurophysiology 31:785–797

    Google Scholar 

  10. Armstrong DM, Rawson JA (1979) Responses of neurones in nucleus interpositus of the cerebellum to cutaneous nerve volleys in the awake cat. J Physiol 289:403–423

    Google Scholar 

  11. LeDoux MS, Hurst DC, Lorden JF (1998) Single-unit activity of cerebellar nuclear cells in the awake genetically dystonic rat. Neuroscience 86:533–545

    Google Scholar 

  12. Eccles JC (1973) The cerebellum as a computer: patterns in space and time. J Physiol 229(1):1–32

    Google Scholar 

  13. Braitenberg V, Preissl H (1992) Why is the output of the cerebellum inhibitory? Behav Brain Sci 15:715–717

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sausbier M, Hu H, Arntz C, Feil S, Kamm S, Adelsberger H et al (2004) Cerebellar ataxia and Purkinje cell dysfunction caused by Ca2+-activated K+ channel deficiency. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101(25):9474–9478

    Google Scholar 

  15. Uusisaari M, Obata K, Knopfel T (2007) Morphological and Electrophysiological Properties of GABAergic and Non-GABAergic Cells in the Deep Cerebellar Nuclei. Journal of Neurophysiology 97:901–911

    Google Scholar 

  16. Raman IM, Gustafson AE, Padgett D (2000) Ionic currents and spontaneous firing in neurons isolated from the cerebellar nuclei. J Neurosci 20(24):9004–9016

    Google Scholar 

  17. Alvina K, Walter JT, Kohn A, Ellis-Davies G, Khodakhah K (2008) Questioning the role of rebound firing in the cerebellum. Nat Neurosci 11:1256–1258

    Google Scholar 

  18. Perkel DH, Schulman JH, Bullock TH, Moore GP, Segundo JP (1964) Pacemaker Neurons: Effects of Regularly Spaced Synaptic Input. Science 145:61–63

    Google Scholar 

  19. Pedroarena CM, Schwarz C (2003) Efficacy and short-term plasticity at GABAergic synapses between Purkinje and cerebellar nuclei neurons. J Neurophysiol 89(2):704–715

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rowland NC, Jaeger D (2008) Responses to tactile stimulation in deep cerebellar nucleus neurons result from recurrent activation in multiple pathways. J Neurophysiol 99(2):704–717

    Google Scholar 

  21. De Schutter E, Steuber V (2009) Patterns and pauses in Purkinje cell simple spike trains: experiments, modeling and theory. Neuroscience 162:816–826

    Google Scholar 

  22. Muri R, Knöpfel T (1994) Activity induced elevations of intracellular calcium concentration in neurons of the deep cerebellar nuclei. J Neurophysiol 71:420–428

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gauck V, Thomann M, Jaeger D, Borst A (2001) Spatial distribution of low- and high-voltage-activated calcium currents in neurons of the deep cerebellar nuclei. J Neurosci 21(15):RC158

    Google Scholar 

  24. Molineux ML, Mehaffey WH, Tadayonnejad R, Anderson D, Tennent AF, Turner RW (2008) Ionic factors governing rebound burst phenotype in rat deep cerebellar neurons. J Neurophysiol 100(5):2684–2701

    Google Scholar 

  25. Alvina K, Ellis-Davies G, Khodakhah K (2009) T-type calcium channels mediate rebound firing in intact deep cerebellar neurons. Neuroscience 158(2):635–641

    Google Scholar 

  26. Aman TK, Raman IM (2007) Subunit dependence of Na channel slow inactivation and open channel block in cerebellar neurons. Biophys J 92(6):1938–1951

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Herrmann and Lilly Schilling Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Cognitive Neurology, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, Otfried Müller Str. 27, 72076, Tübingen, Germany

    Christine M. Pedroarena

Authors
  1. Christine M. Pedroarena
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christine M. Pedroarena.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pedroarena, C.M. Mechanisms Supporting Transfer of Inhibitory Signals into the Spike Output of Spontaneously Firing Cerebellar Nuclear Neurons In Vitro. Cerebellum 9, 67–76 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12311-009-0153-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12311-009-0153-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation