Skip to main content
Log in

Dynamic allocation of promotional budgets based on maximizing customer equity

  • Original paper
  • Published:
Operational Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Marketing managers allocate extraordinary amounts of budgets for supporting their organization’s marketing plans. Choosing the right measure for allocation of promotional budgets to customers has always been a challenging issue and consequently has drawn considerable attention in the past few years. Related studies emphasize using Customer Lifetime Value or Customer Equity (CE) as a measure of customer’s profitability, based on which a firm can efficiently allocate its marketing budget to customers. In this study, the focus is on allocating the limited promotion budgets to customers to maximize CE. Using Markov decision process (MDP), the firm’s actions are linked to the customers’ behavior and the corresponding values. To solve MDP with a budget constraint, a heuristic method is proposed for finding the optimal or near-optimal policies for each customer segment. To confirm the validity of the method, the decision model is implemented in a business-to-business context to maximize CE by determining the optimal sales promotions to customers. The result of the proposed heuristic method is compared with a stochastic dynamic programming model. The result of experiments shows that the discount factor increases the difference between the obtained solutions becomes more significant. The difference approves the importance of accounting the optimal level of promotional budget for each customer segment. The average improvement gained by the optimal budget allocation ranges from 2 to 5.5%. The findings of this research indicate the essential of adopting different marketing policies for each customer segment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbad M, Boustique H (2003) A decomposition algorithm for limiting average Markov decision problems. Oper Res Lett 31:473–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albadvi A, Koosha H (2011) A robust optimization approach to allocation of marketing budgets. Manag Decis 49:601–621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker JU, Greve G, Albers S (2009) The impact of technological and organizational implementation of CRM on customer acquisition, maintenance, and retention. Int J Res Mark 26:207–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger PD, Bechwati NN (2001) The allocation of promotion budget to maximize customer equity. Omega 29:49–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bitran G, Mondschein S (1997) A comparative analysis of decision making procedures in the catalog sales industry. Eur Manag J 15:105–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blattberg RC, Deighton J (1996) Manage marketing by the customer equity test. Harvard Bus Rev 74:136

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolton RN, Lemon KN, Verhoef PC (2004) The theoretical underpinnings of customer asset management: a framework and propositions for future research. J Acad Mark Sci 32:271–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buhl HU, Klein R, Kolb J, Landherr A (2011) CR8M—an approach for capacity control considering long-term effects on the value of a customer for the company. J Manag Control 22:187–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr A, Drennan J, Andrews L (2016) Measuring customer equity and managing the customer asset: an explanatory study in the Australian hotels. J Mark Manag 32:1670–1700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cetin F, Alabas-Uslu C (2017) Heuristic solution to the product targeting problem based on mathematical programming. Int J Prod Res 55:3–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan SL, Ip WH, Cho V (2010) A model for predicting customer value from perspectives of product attractiveness and marketing strategy. Expert Syst Appl 37:1207–1215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng C-J, Chiu S, Cheng C-B, Wu J-Y (2012) Customer lifetime value prediction by a Markov chain based data mining model: application to an auto repair and maintenance company in Taiwan. Sci Iran 19:849–855

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiang L-LL, Yang C-S (2018) Does country-of-origin brand personality generate retail customer lifetime value? A big data analytics approach. Technol Forecast Soc Change 130:177–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ching W-K, Ng MK, Wong K-K, Altman E (2004) Customer lifetime value: stochastic optimization approach. J Oper Res Soc 55:860–868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahana WD, Miwa Y, Morisada M (2019) Linking lifestyle to customer lifetime value: an exploratory study in an online fashion retail market. J Bus Res 99:319–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong W, Swain SD, Berger PD (2007) The role of channel quality in customer equity management. J Bus Res 60:1243–1252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drèze X, Bonfrer A (2009) Moving from customer lifetime value to customer equity. QME 7:289–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekinci Y, Ülengin F, Uray N, Ülengin B (2014) Analysis of customer lifetime value and marketing expenditure decisions through a Markovian-based model. Eur J Oper Res 237:278–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer M, Albers S, Wagner N, Frie M (2011) Practice prize winner—dynamic marketing budget allocation across countries, products, and marketing activities. Mark Sci 30:568–585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta S, Lehmann DR (2003) Customers as assets. J Interact Mark 17:9–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta S, Hanssens D, Hardie B, Kahn W, Kumar V, Lin N, Ravishanker N, Sriram S (2006) Modeling customer lifetime value. J Serv Res 9:139–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonker J-J, Piersma N, van den Poel D (2004) Joint optimization of customer segmentation and marketing policy to maximize long-term profitability. Expert Syst Appl 27:159–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalani E, Elhami A, Mashreghi M, Kazem-Zadeh RB, Kamrani E (2018) Customer strategy for implementing customer relationship management in corporation with the value-based network analysis approach. Am J Ind Bus Manag 8:537

    Google Scholar 

  • Karimi F, Sajedinejad A, Hassannayebi E (2014) An empirical evaluation of the service profit chain model in banking industry of Iran. Asian J Res Bank Finance 4:90–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koosha H, Albadvi A (2015) Allocation of marketing budgets to customer acquisition and retention spending based on decision calculus. J Model Manag 10:179–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koosha H, Albadvi A (2017) Allocation of marketing budgets to maximize customer equity. Oper Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-017-0356-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma M, Li Z, Chen J (2008) Phase-type distribution of customer relationship with Markovian response and marketing expenditure decision on the customer lifetime value. Eur J Oper Res 187:313–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mak K, Lau J, Wei C (2005) A Markov chain analysis of genetic algorithms with individuals having different birth and survival rates. Eng Optim 37:571–589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer-Waarden L (2008) The influence of loyalty programme membership on customer purchase behaviour. Eur J Mark 42:87–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narteh B (2018) Brand equity and financial performance: the moderating role of brand likeability. Mark Intell Plan 36:381–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ovchinnikov A, Boulu-Reshef B, Pfeifer PE (2014) Balancing acquisition and retention spending for firms with limited capacity. Manag Sci 60:2002–2019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perdikaki O, Kumar S, Sriskandarajah C (2017) Managing retail budget allocation between store labor and marketing activities. Prod Oper Manag 26:1615–1631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen JA, Kumar V, Polo Y, Sese FJ (2018) Unlocking the power of marketing: understanding the links between customer mindset metrics, behavior, and profitability. J Acad Mark Sci 46:813–836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeifer PE, Carraway RL (2000) Modeling customer relationships as Markov chains. J Interact Mark 14:43–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeifer PE, Ovchinnikov A (2011) A note on willingness to spend and customer lifetime value for firms with limited capacity. J Interact Mark 25:178–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puterman ML (2014) Markov decision processes: discrete stochastic dynamic programming. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinartz WJ, Kumar V (2003) The impact of customer relationship characteristics on profitable lifetime duration. J Mark 67:77–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinartz W, Thomas JS, Kumar V (2005) Balancing acquisition and retention resources to maximize customer profitability. J Mark 69:63–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rust RT, Lemon KN, Zeithaml VA (2004) Return on marketing: using customer equity to focus marketing strategy. J Mark 68:109–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulze C, Skiera B, Wiesel T (2012) Linking customer and financial metrics to shareholder value: the leverage effect in customer-based valuation. J Mark 76:17–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simester DI, Sun P, Tsitsiklis JN (2006) Dynamic catalog mailing policies. Manag Sci 52:683–696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas JS (2001) A methodology for linking customer acquisition to customer retention. J Mark Res 38:262–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tirenni G, Labbi A, Berrospi C, Elisseeff A, Bhose T, Pauro K, Pöyhönen S (2007) The 2005 ISMS practice prize winner—customer equity and lifetime management (CELM) finnair case study. Mark Sci 26:553–565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesan R, Kumar V (2004) A customer lifetime value framework for customer selection and resource allocation strategy. J Mark 68:106–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber JA (2002) Managing the marketing budget in a cost-constrained environment. Ind Mark Manag 31:705–717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao QH, Brimberg J, Mladenović N (2010) A variable neighborhood search based algorithm for finite-horizon Markov decision processes. Appl Math Comput 217:3480–3492

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erfan Hassannayebi.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Memarpour, M., Hassannayebi, E., Fattahi Miab, N. et al. Dynamic allocation of promotional budgets based on maximizing customer equity. Oper Res Int J 21, 2365–2389 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-019-00510-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-019-00510-3

Keywords

Navigation