Abstract
Marketing managers allocate extraordinary amounts of budgets for supporting their organization’s marketing plans. Choosing the right measure for allocation of promotional budgets to customers has always been a challenging issue and consequently has drawn considerable attention in the past few years. Related studies emphasize using Customer Lifetime Value or Customer Equity (CE) as a measure of customer’s profitability, based on which a firm can efficiently allocate its marketing budget to customers. In this study, the focus is on allocating the limited promotion budgets to customers to maximize CE. Using Markov decision process (MDP), the firm’s actions are linked to the customers’ behavior and the corresponding values. To solve MDP with a budget constraint, a heuristic method is proposed for finding the optimal or near-optimal policies for each customer segment. To confirm the validity of the method, the decision model is implemented in a business-to-business context to maximize CE by determining the optimal sales promotions to customers. The result of the proposed heuristic method is compared with a stochastic dynamic programming model. The result of experiments shows that the discount factor increases the difference between the obtained solutions becomes more significant. The difference approves the importance of accounting the optimal level of promotional budget for each customer segment. The average improvement gained by the optimal budget allocation ranges from 2 to 5.5%. The findings of this research indicate the essential of adopting different marketing policies for each customer segment.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbad M, Boustique H (2003) A decomposition algorithm for limiting average Markov decision problems. Oper Res Lett 31:473–476
Albadvi A, Koosha H (2011) A robust optimization approach to allocation of marketing budgets. Manag Decis 49:601–621
Becker JU, Greve G, Albers S (2009) The impact of technological and organizational implementation of CRM on customer acquisition, maintenance, and retention. Int J Res Mark 26:207–215
Berger PD, Bechwati NN (2001) The allocation of promotion budget to maximize customer equity. Omega 29:49–61
Bitran G, Mondschein S (1997) A comparative analysis of decision making procedures in the catalog sales industry. Eur Manag J 15:105–116
Blattberg RC, Deighton J (1996) Manage marketing by the customer equity test. Harvard Bus Rev 74:136
Bolton RN, Lemon KN, Verhoef PC (2004) The theoretical underpinnings of customer asset management: a framework and propositions for future research. J Acad Mark Sci 32:271–292
Buhl HU, Klein R, Kolb J, Landherr A (2011) CR8M—an approach for capacity control considering long-term effects on the value of a customer for the company. J Manag Control 22:187–204
Carr A, Drennan J, Andrews L (2016) Measuring customer equity and managing the customer asset: an explanatory study in the Australian hotels. J Mark Manag 32:1670–1700
Cetin F, Alabas-Uslu C (2017) Heuristic solution to the product targeting problem based on mathematical programming. Int J Prod Res 55:3–17
Chan SL, Ip WH, Cho V (2010) A model for predicting customer value from perspectives of product attractiveness and marketing strategy. Expert Syst Appl 37:1207–1215
Cheng C-J, Chiu S, Cheng C-B, Wu J-Y (2012) Customer lifetime value prediction by a Markov chain based data mining model: application to an auto repair and maintenance company in Taiwan. Sci Iran 19:849–855
Chiang L-LL, Yang C-S (2018) Does country-of-origin brand personality generate retail customer lifetime value? A big data analytics approach. Technol Forecast Soc Change 130:177–187
Ching W-K, Ng MK, Wong K-K, Altman E (2004) Customer lifetime value: stochastic optimization approach. J Oper Res Soc 55:860–868
Dahana WD, Miwa Y, Morisada M (2019) Linking lifestyle to customer lifetime value: an exploratory study in an online fashion retail market. J Bus Res 99:319–331
Dong W, Swain SD, Berger PD (2007) The role of channel quality in customer equity management. J Bus Res 60:1243–1252
Drèze X, Bonfrer A (2009) Moving from customer lifetime value to customer equity. QME 7:289–320
Ekinci Y, Ülengin F, Uray N, Ülengin B (2014) Analysis of customer lifetime value and marketing expenditure decisions through a Markovian-based model. Eur J Oper Res 237:278–288
Fischer M, Albers S, Wagner N, Frie M (2011) Practice prize winner—dynamic marketing budget allocation across countries, products, and marketing activities. Mark Sci 30:568–585
Gupta S, Lehmann DR (2003) Customers as assets. J Interact Mark 17:9–24
Gupta S, Hanssens D, Hardie B, Kahn W, Kumar V, Lin N, Ravishanker N, Sriram S (2006) Modeling customer lifetime value. J Serv Res 9:139–155
Jonker J-J, Piersma N, van den Poel D (2004) Joint optimization of customer segmentation and marketing policy to maximize long-term profitability. Expert Syst Appl 27:159–168
Kalani E, Elhami A, Mashreghi M, Kazem-Zadeh RB, Kamrani E (2018) Customer strategy for implementing customer relationship management in corporation with the value-based network analysis approach. Am J Ind Bus Manag 8:537
Karimi F, Sajedinejad A, Hassannayebi E (2014) An empirical evaluation of the service profit chain model in banking industry of Iran. Asian J Res Bank Finance 4:90–104
Koosha H, Albadvi A (2015) Allocation of marketing budgets to customer acquisition and retention spending based on decision calculus. J Model Manag 10:179–197
Koosha H, Albadvi A (2017) Allocation of marketing budgets to maximize customer equity. Oper Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-017-0356-z
Ma M, Li Z, Chen J (2008) Phase-type distribution of customer relationship with Markovian response and marketing expenditure decision on the customer lifetime value. Eur J Oper Res 187:313–326
Mak K, Lau J, Wei C (2005) A Markov chain analysis of genetic algorithms with individuals having different birth and survival rates. Eng Optim 37:571–589
Meyer-Waarden L (2008) The influence of loyalty programme membership on customer purchase behaviour. Eur J Mark 42:87–114
Narteh B (2018) Brand equity and financial performance: the moderating role of brand likeability. Mark Intell Plan 36:381–395
Ovchinnikov A, Boulu-Reshef B, Pfeifer PE (2014) Balancing acquisition and retention spending for firms with limited capacity. Manag Sci 60:2002–2019
Perdikaki O, Kumar S, Sriskandarajah C (2017) Managing retail budget allocation between store labor and marketing activities. Prod Oper Manag 26:1615–1631
Petersen JA, Kumar V, Polo Y, Sese FJ (2018) Unlocking the power of marketing: understanding the links between customer mindset metrics, behavior, and profitability. J Acad Mark Sci 46:813–836
Pfeifer PE, Carraway RL (2000) Modeling customer relationships as Markov chains. J Interact Mark 14:43–55
Pfeifer PE, Ovchinnikov A (2011) A note on willingness to spend and customer lifetime value for firms with limited capacity. J Interact Mark 25:178–189
Puterman ML (2014) Markov decision processes: discrete stochastic dynamic programming. Wiley, New York
Reinartz WJ, Kumar V (2003) The impact of customer relationship characteristics on profitable lifetime duration. J Mark 67:77–99
Reinartz W, Thomas JS, Kumar V (2005) Balancing acquisition and retention resources to maximize customer profitability. J Mark 69:63–79
Rust RT, Lemon KN, Zeithaml VA (2004) Return on marketing: using customer equity to focus marketing strategy. J Mark 68:109–127
Schulze C, Skiera B, Wiesel T (2012) Linking customer and financial metrics to shareholder value: the leverage effect in customer-based valuation. J Mark 76:17–32
Simester DI, Sun P, Tsitsiklis JN (2006) Dynamic catalog mailing policies. Manag Sci 52:683–696
Thomas JS (2001) A methodology for linking customer acquisition to customer retention. J Mark Res 38:262–268
Tirenni G, Labbi A, Berrospi C, Elisseeff A, Bhose T, Pauro K, Pöyhönen S (2007) The 2005 ISMS practice prize winner—customer equity and lifetime management (CELM) finnair case study. Mark Sci 26:553–565
Venkatesan R, Kumar V (2004) A customer lifetime value framework for customer selection and resource allocation strategy. J Mark 68:106–125
Weber JA (2002) Managing the marketing budget in a cost-constrained environment. Ind Mark Manag 31:705–717
Zhao QH, Brimberg J, Mladenović N (2010) A variable neighborhood search based algorithm for finite-horizon Markov decision processes. Appl Math Comput 217:3480–3492
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Memarpour, M., Hassannayebi, E., Fattahi Miab, N. et al. Dynamic allocation of promotional budgets based on maximizing customer equity. Oper Res Int J 21, 2365–2389 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-019-00510-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-019-00510-3