nach oben

International Journal of Social Robotics

Erschienen in:

23.01.2018

The Effects of Humanlike and Robot-Specific Affective Nonverbal Behavior on Perception, Emotion, and Behavior

verfasst von: Astrid M. Rosenthal-von der Pütten, Nicole C. Krämer, Jonathan Herrmann

Erschienen in: International Journal of Social Robotics | Ausgabe 5/2018

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Research demonstrated that humans are able to interpret humanlike (affective) nonverbal behavior (HNB) in artificial entities (e.g. Beck et al., in: Proceedings of the 19th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication, IEEE Press, Piscataway, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2010.5598649; Bente et al. in J Nonverbal Behav 25: 151–166, 2001; Mumm and Mutlu, in: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on human–robot interaction, HRI. ACM Press, New York, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1145/1957656.1957786). However, some robots lack the possibility to produce HNB. Using robot-specific nonverbal behavior (RNB) such as different eye colors to convey emotional meaning might be a fruitful mechanism to enhance HRI experiences, but it is unclear whether RNB is as effective as HNB. We present a review on affective nonverbal behaviors in robots and an experimental study. We experimentally tested the influence of HNB and RNB (colored LEDs) on users’ perception of the robot (e.g. likeability, animacy), their emotional experience, and self-disclosure. In a between-subjects design, users (\(n=80\)) interacted with either (a) a robot displaying no nonverbal behavior, (b) a robot displaying affective RNB, (c) a robot displaying affective HNB or (d) a robot displaying affective HNB and RNB. Results show that HNB, but not RNB, has a significant effect on the perceived animacy of the robot, participants’ emotional state, and self-disclosure. However, RNB still slightly influenced participants’ perception, emotion, and behavior: Planned contrasts revealed having any type of nonverbal behavior significantly increased perceived animacy, positive affect, and self-disclosure. Moreover, observed linear trends indicate that the effects increased with the addition of nonverbal behaviors (control< RNB< HNB). In combination, our results suggest that HNB is more effective in transporting the robot’s communicative message than RNB.

Vorheriger Artikel Preliminary Results on Reducing the Workload of Assistive Vehicle Users: A Collaborative Driving Approach

Nächster Artikel Multiple-Robot Conversational Patterns for Concealing Incoherent Responses

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Banse R, Scherer KR (1996) Acoustic profiles in vocal emotion expression. J Pers Soc Psychol 70:614–636CrossRef

Bartneck C, Kulić D, Croft E, Zoghbi S (2009) Measurement Instruments for the anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence, and perceived safety of robots. Int J Soc Robot 1:71–81CrossRef

Beck A, Canamero L, Bard KA (2010) Towards an affect space for robots to display emotional body language. In: Proceedings of the 19th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication, RO-MAN. IEEE Press, Piscataway, New Jersey, pp 464–469. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2010.5598649

Beck A, Cañamero L, Hiolle A, Damiano L, Cosi P, Tesser F, Sommavilla G (2013) Interpretation of emotional body language displayed by a humanoid robot: a case study with children. Int J Soc Robot 5:325–334CrossRef

Becker-Asano C, Ishiguro H (2011) Evaluating facial displays of emotion for the android robot Geminoid F. In: 2011 IEEE workshop on affective computational intelligence. Piscataway, New Jersey, pp 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/WACI.2011.5953147

Bente G, Krämer NC (2003) Integrierte Registrierung und Analyse verbaler und nonverbaler Kommunikation. In: Herrmann T, Grabowski, J (ed) Sprachproduktion. Enzyklopädie der Psychologie. Themenbereich C Serie 3, Band 1. Hogrefe, Göttingen, pp 219–246

Bente G, Krämer NC, Petersen A, de Ruiter JP (2001) Computer animated movement and person perception: methodological advances in nonverbal behavior research. J Nonverbal Behav 25:151–166CrossRef

Breazeal C, Kidd C, Thomaz A, Hoffman G, Berlin M (2005) Effects of nonverbal communication on efficiency and robustness in human–robot teamwork. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems, IROS, pp 708–713. https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2005.1545011

Burgoon JK, Bacue AE (2003) Nonverbal communication skills. In: Greene JO, Burleson BR (eds) Handbook of communication and social interaction skills. LEA’s communication series. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, pp 179–220

10.

Burgoon JK, Guerrero LK, Manusov V (2011) Nonverbal signals. In: Knapp ML, Daly JA (eds) The sage handbook of interpersonal communication. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 239–282

11.

Cicchetti DV (1994) Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychol Assess 6:284–290CrossRef

12.

Collins EC, Prescott TJ, Mitchinson B (2015) Saying it with light: a pilot study of affective communication using the MIRO robot. In: Wilson SP, Verschure PF, Mura A, Prescott TJ (eds) Biomimetic and biohybrid systems. Lecture notes in computer science. Springer, Cham, pp 243–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22979-9_25 CrossRef

13.

Dael N, Mortillaro M, Scherer KR (2012) Emotion expression in body action and posture. Emotion 12:1085–1101CrossRef

14.

Ekman P (1993) Facial expression and emotion. Am Psychol 48:384–392CrossRef

15.

Embgen S, Luber M, Becker-Asano C, Ragni M, Evers V, Arras KO (2012) Robot-specific social cues in emotional body language. In: The 21st IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication, RO-MAN, pp 1019–1025. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2012.6343883

16.

Häring M, Bee N, André E (2011) Creation and Evaluation of emotion expression with body movement, sound and eye color for humanoid robots. In: The 20th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication, RO-MAN, pp 204–209. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2011.6005263

17.

Hurlbert AC, Ling Y (2007) Biological components of sex differences in color preference. Curr Biol 17:R623CrossRef

18.

Johnson DO, Cuijpers RH, van der Pol D (2013) Imitating human emotions with artificial facial expressions. Int J Soc Robot 5:503–513CrossRef

19.

Kang SH, Gratch J (2010) Virtual humans elicit socially anxious interactants’ verbal self-disclosure. Comput Animat Virt W 21:473–482

20.

Kishi T, Endo N, Nozawa T et al. (2010) Bipedal humanoid robot that makes humans laugh with use of the method of comedy and affects their psychological state actively. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA’10), pp 1965–1970

21.

Krämer NC, Kopp S, Becker-Asano C, Sommer N (2013) Smile and the world will smile with you—the effects of a virtual agent’s smile on users’ evaluation and behavior. Int J Hum Comput St 71:335–349CrossRef

22.

Leite I, Martinho C, Pereira A, Paiva A (2008) iCat: an affective game buddy based on anticipatory mechanisms. In: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems, AAMAS. Estoril, Portugal, pp 1229–1232

23.

Leite I, Mascarenhas S, Pereira A, Martinho C, Prada R, Paiva A (2010) ”Why can’t we be friends?” an empathic game companion for long-term interaction. In: Hutchison D et al (eds) Intelligent virtual agents. Lecture notes in computer science. Springer, Berlin, pp 215–321. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15892-6_32 CrossRef

24.

Li J, Chignell M (2011) Communication of emotion in social robots through simple head and arm movements. Int J Soc Robot 3:125–142CrossRef

25.

Manav B (2007) Color-emotion associations and color preferences: a case study for residences. Color Res App 32:144–150CrossRef

26.

Manstead ASR, Fischer AH, Jakobs EB (1999) The social and emotional functions of facial displays. In: Phillipot P, Feldman RS, Coats EJ (eds) The social context of nonverbal behavior. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 287–316

27.

McGraw KO, Wong SP (1996) Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychol Methods 1:30–46CrossRef

28.

Mumm J, Mutlu B (2011) Human–robot proxemics. In: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on human–robot interaction, HRI. ACM Press, New York, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/1957656.1957786

29.

Mutlu B, Shiwa T, Kanda T, Ishiguro H, Hagita N (2009) Footing in human-robot conversations. In: Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction. ACM Press, New York, p 61. https://doi.org/10.1145/1514095.1514109

30.

Mutlu B, Yamaoka F, Kanda T, Ishiguro H, Hagita N (2009) Nonverbal leakage in robots. In: Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction. ACM Press, New York, 69 p. https://doi.org/10.1145/1514095.1514110

31.

Nass C, Moon Y (2000) Machines and mindlessness: social responses to computers. J Soc Issues 56:81–103CrossRef

32.

Nomura T, Suzuki T, Kanda T et al (2006) Measurement of negative attitudes toward robots. Interact Stud 7(3):437–454. https://doi.org/10.1075/is.7.3.14nom CrossRef

33.

Nomura T, Suzuki T, Kanda T et al. (2007) Measurement of anxiety toward robots. In: Proceedings of the 16th IEEE international conference on robot and human interactive communication. IEEE Press; IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, pp 372–377

34.

Pereira A, Leite I, Mascarenhas S, Martinho C, Paiva A (2011) Using empathy to improve human-robot relationships. In: Akan O, Bellavista P, Cao J, Dressler F, Ferrari D, Gerla M, Kobayashi H, Pallazo S, Sahni S, Shen X, Stan M, Xiaohua J, Zomaya A, Coulson G, Lamers MH, Verbeek FJ (eds) Human-robot personal relationships. Lecture notes of the institute for computer sciences, social informatics and telecommunications engineering. Springer, Berlin, pp 130–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19385-9_17 CrossRef

35.

Press C (2011) Action observation and robotic agents: learning and anthropomorphism. Neurosci Biobehav R 35:1410–1418CrossRef

36.

Rosenthal-von der Pütten AM, Krämer NC, Hoffmann L, Sobieraj S, Eimler SC (2013) An experimental study on emotional reactions towards a robot. Int J Soc Robot 5:17–34CrossRef

37.

Rosenthal-von der Pütten AM, Schulte FP, Eimler SC, Sobieraj S, Hoffmann L, Maderwald S, Brand M, Krämer NC (2014) Investigations on empathy towards humans and robots using fMRI. Comput Hum Behav 33:201–212.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.004 CrossRef

38.

Salem M, Eyssel F, Rohlfing K, Kopp S, Joublin F (2011) Effects of gesture on the perception of psychological anthropomorphism: a case study with a humanoid robot. In: Hutchison D et al (eds) Social robotics. Lecture notes in computer science. Springer, Berlin, pp 31–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25504-5_4 CrossRef

39.

Scheutz M, Schermerhorn P, Kramer J (2006) The utility of affect expression in natural language interactions in joint human–robot tasks. In: Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCHI/SIGART conference on human robot interaction, HRI, https://doi.org/10.1145/1121241.1121281

40.

Suzuki Y, Galli L, Ikeda A et al (2015) Measuring empathy for human and robot hand pain using electroencephalography. Sci Rep 5:15924CrossRef

41.

Terada K, Yamauchi A, Ito A (2012) Artificial emotion expression for a robot by dynamic color change. In: The 21st IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication, RO-MAN, pp 314–321. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2012.6343772

42.

Tsai J, Bowring E, Marsella S, Wood W, Tambe M (2012) A study of emotional contagion with virtual characters. In: Proceedings of the 12th international workshop on intelligent virtual agents 7502, IVA. Springer, Berlin, pp 81–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33197-8_8 CrossRef

43.

Valdez P, Mehrabian A (1994) Effects of color on emotions. J Exp Psychol Gen 123:394–409CrossRef

44.

von der Pütten AM, Klatt J, Hoffmann L, Krämer NC (2011) Quid pro quo? Reciprocal self-disclosure and communicative accomodation towards a virtual interviewer. In: Lecture notes in computer science 6895. Springer, Berlin, pp. 183–194

45.

von der Pütten AM, Krämer NC, Gratch J, Kang S-H (2010) It doesn’t matter what you are! Explaining social effects of agents and avatars. Comput Hum Behav 26:1641–1650CrossRef

46.

Wallbott HG (1988) In and out of context: influences of facial expression and context information on emotion attributions. Brit J Soc Psychol 27:357–369CrossRef

47.

Watson D, Tellegen A, Clark LA (1988) Development and validation of brief measure of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol 54:1063–1070CrossRef

48.

Wu Y, Babu SV, Armstrong R, Bertrand JW, Luo J, Roy T, Daily SB, Dukes LC, Hodges LF, Fasolino T (2014) Effects of virtual human animation on emotion contagion in simulated inter-personal experiences. IEEE T Vis Comput Gr 20:626–635CrossRef

49.

Xu J, Broekens J, Hindriks K, Neerincx MA (2014) Robot mood is contagious: effects of robot body language in the imitation game. In: Proceedings of the 2014 international conference on autonomous agents and multi-agent systems. International foundation for autonomous agents and multiagent systems, Paris, France, pp 973–980

50.

Zatsiorsky VM, Prilutsky BI (2012) Biomechanics of skeletal muscles. Human Kinetics, Champaign

51.

Zecca M, Endo N, Momoki S, Itoh K, Takanishi A (2008) Design of the humanoid robot KOBIAN -preliminary analysis of facial and whole body emotion expression capabilities-. In: 2008 8th IEEE-RAS international conference on humanoid robots, Humanoids, pp 487–492. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICHR.2008.4755969

Titel: The Effects of Humanlike and Robot-Specific Affective Nonverbal Behavior on Perception, Emotion, and Behavior
verfasst von: Astrid M. Rosenthal-von der Pütten
Nicole C. Krämer
Jonathan Herrmann
Publikationsdatum: 23.01.2018
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in: International Journal of Social Robotics / Ausgabe 5/2018
Print ISSN: 1875-4791
Elektronische ISSN: 1875-4805
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-018-0466-7

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten

Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen.

Zur Marktübersicht

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2018

Developing Joint Attention for Children with Autism in Robot-Enhanced Therapy

Assistive Robotic Technology to Combat Social Isolation in Acute Hospital Settings

Age- and Gender-Based Differences in Children’s Interactions with a Gender-Matching Robot

Editorial

Design and Impact of a Teacher Training Course, and Attitude Change Concerning Educational Robotics

Preliminary Results on Reducing the Workload of Assistive Vehicle Users: A Collaborative Driving Approach

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten