Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
International Journal of Social Robotics
Erschienen in: International Journal of Social Robotics 4/2019

12.02.2019

Physical Analysis of Handshaking Between Humans: Mutual Synchronisation and Social Context

verfasst von: Artem Melnyk, Patrick Hénaff

Erschienen in: International Journal of Social Robotics | Ausgabe 4/2019

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

One very popular form of interpersonal interaction used in various situations is the handshake (HS), which is an act that is both physical and social. This article aims to demonstrate that the paradigm of synchrony that refers to the psychology of individuals’ temporal movement coordination could also be considered in handshaking. For this purpose, the physical features of the human HS are investigated in two different social situations: greeting and consolation. The duration and frequency of the HS and the force of the grip have been measured and compared using a prototype of a wearable system equipped with several sensors. The results show that an HS can be decomposed into four phases, and after a short physical contact, a synchrony emerges between the two persons who are shaking hands. A statistical analysis conducted on 31 persons showed that, in the two different contexts, there is a significant difference in the duration of HS, but the frequency of motion and time needed to synchronize were not impacted by the context of an interaction.
Vorheriger Artikel Editorial
Nächster Artikel Multimodal Integration of Emotional Signals from Voice, Body, and Context: Effects of (In)Congruence on Emotion Recognition and Attitudes Towards Robots

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
1.
Ansermin E, Mostafaoui G, Beausse N, Gaussier P (2016) Learning to synchronously imitate gestures using entrainment effect. In: From animals to animals 14th simulation of adaptative behaviour Proc., pp 219–231CrossRef
2.
Arns M, Laliberte T, Gosselin C (2017) Design, control and experimental validation of a haptic robotic hand performing human–robot handshake with human-like agility. In: IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS), pp 4626–4633
3.
Astrom J, Thorell LH (1996) Greeting behaviour and psychogenic need: interviews on experiences of therapists, clergymen, and car salesmen. Percept Motor Skills 83(3):939–956CrossRef
4.
Astrom J, Thorell LH, Holmlund U, d’Elia G (1993) Handshaking, personality, and psychopathology in psychiatric patients, a reliability and correlational study. Percept Motor Skills 77(3):1171–1186CrossRef
5.
Avraham G, Nisky I, Fernandes HL, Acuna DE, Kording KP, Loeb GE, Karniel A (2012) Toward perceiving robots as humans: three handshake models face the Turing-Like handshake test. IEEE Trans Haptics 5(3):196–207CrossRef
6.
Bates D, Machler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw 67(1):1–48CrossRef
7.
Belkaid M, Lesueur-Grand C, Mostafaoui G, Cuperlier N, Gaussier P (2016) Learning sensorimotor navigation using synchrony-based partner selection. In: Proc. of the Int. Conf. on Artificial Intelligence and Robotics and the Int. Conf. on Automation, Control and Robotics Engineering, ICAIR-CACRE, pp 19:1–19:5
8.
Bernieri FJ, Petty KN (2011) The influence of handshakes on first impression accuracy. Soc Influ 6(2):78–87CrossRef
9.
Buzsaki G, Mizuseki K (2014) The log-dynamic brain: how skewed distributions affect network operations. Nat Rev Neurosci 15(4):264–278CrossRef
10.
Chaplin WF, Phillips JB, Brown JD, Clanton NR, Stein JL (2000) Handshaking, gender, personality, and first impressions. J Pers Soc Psychol 79(1):110–117CrossRef
11.
12.
Daubechies I, Lu J, Wu HT (2011) Synchrosqueezed wavelet transforms: an empirical mode decomposition-like tool. Appl Comput Harmon Anal 30(2):243–261MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
13.
Dautenhahn K, Woods S, Kaouri C, Walters ML, Koay KL, Werry I (2005) What is a robot companion—friend, assistant or butler? In: IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp 1192–1197
14.
Delaherche E, Chetouani M, Mahdhaoui A, Saint-Georges C, Viaux S, Cohen D (2012) Interpersonal synchrony: a survey of evaluation methods across disciplines. IEEE Trans Affect Comput 3(3):349–365CrossRef
15.
Diana C, Thomaz AL (2011) The shape of Simon: creative design of a humanoid robot shell. In: CHI ’11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp 283–298
16.
Duhamel P, Vetterli M (1990) Fast Fourier transforms: a tutorial review and a state of the art. Signal Process 19(4):259–299MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
17.
Falahi M, Shangari TA, Sheikhjafari A, Gharghabi S, Ahmadi A, Ghidary SS (2014) Adaptive handshaking between humans and robots, using imitation: based on genderdetection and person recognition. In: Robotics and Mechatronics RSI/ISM Int. Conf. on, pp 936–941
18.
Giannopoulos E, Wang Z, Peer A, Buss M, Slater M (2011) Comparison of people’s responses to real and virtual handshakes within a virtual environment. Brain Res Bull 85(5):276–282CrossRef
19.
Goldberg LR (1990) An alternative “description of personality”: the big-five factor structure. J Pers Soc Psychol 59(6):1216–1229CrossRef
20.
Gosselin F, Ferlay F, Janot A (2016) Development of a new backdrivable actuator for haptic interfaces and collaborative robots. Actuators 5(2):17CrossRef
21.
Grand C, Mostafaoui G, Hasnain SK, Gaussier P (2014) Synchrony detection as a reinforcement signal for learning: application to human robot interaction. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 126:82–91CrossRef
22.
Haken H, Kelso J, Fuchs A, Pandya A (1990) Dynamic pattern recognition of coordinated biological motion. Neural Netw 3(4):395–401CrossRef
23.
Haken H, Kelso JAS, Bunz H (1985) A theoretical model of phase transitions in human hand movements. Biol Cybern 51(5):347–356MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
24.
Hall PM, Hall DAS (1983) The handshake as interaction. Semiotica 45(3–4):249–264
25.
Hashimoto H, Manoratkul S (1996) Tele-Handshake through the internet. In: Int. Workshop on Robot and Human Communication, pp 90–95
26.
Hasnain SK, Gaussier P, Mostafaoui G (2012) Synchrony as a tool to establish focus of attention for autonomous robots. In: IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp 2423–2428
27.
Huwer J (2003) Understanding handshaking: the result of contextual, interpersonal and social demands. Ph.D. thesis
28.
Jakel R, Schmidt-Rohr S, Ruhl S, Kasper A, Xue Z, Dillmann R (2012) Learning of planning models for dexterous manipulation based on human demonstrations. Int J Soc Robot 4(4):437–448CrossRef
29.
Jindai M, Watanabe T (2007) Development of a handshake robot system based on a handshake approaching motion model. In: IEEE/ASME Int. Conf. on Advanced intelligent mechatronics, pp 1–6
30.
Jindai M, Watanabe T (2008) A handshake robot system based on a shake-motion leading model. In: IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp 3330–3335
31.
Jindai M, Watanabe T (2011) Development of a handshake request motion model based on analysis of handshake motion between humans. In: 2011 IEEE/ASME Int. Conf. on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM), pp 560–565
32.
Jindai M, Watanabe T, Shibata S, Yamamoto T (2006) Development of a handshake robot system for embodied interaction with humans. In: The 15th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2006. ROMAN 2006, pp 710–715
33.
Jung J, Kanda T, Kim MS (2013) Guidelines for contextual motion design of a humanoid robot. Int J Soc Robot 5(2):153–169CrossRef
34.
Kadaba MP, Ramakrishnan HK, Wootten ME, Gainey J, Gorton G, Cochran GV (1989) Repeatability of kinematic, kinetic, and electromyographic data in normal adult gait. J Orthop Res 7(6):849–860CrossRef
35.
Kalegina A, Schroeder G, Allchin A, Berlin K, Cakmak M (2018) Characterizing the design space of rendered robot faces. In: Proceedings of the 2018 ACM/IEEE Int. Conf. on Human–Robot Interaction, pp 96–104
36.
Karniel A, Nisky I, Avraham G, Peles BC, Levy-Tzedek S (2010) A Turing-like handshake test for motor intelligence. In: Kappers AML, van Erp JBF, Bergmann Tiest WM, van der Helm FCT (eds) Haptics: generating and perceiving tangible sensations. EuroHaptics 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6191CrossRef
37.
38.
Lachaux JP, Rodriguez E, Martinerie J, Varela FJ (1999) Measuring phase synchrony in brain signals. Hum Brain Mapping 8(4):194–208CrossRef
39.
Lemaignan S, Ros R, Sisbot Alami R, Beetz M (2012) Grounding the interaction: anchoring situated discourse in everyday human–robot interaction. Int J Soc Robot 4(2):181–199CrossRef
40.
Li D, Rau Li Y (2010) A cross-cultural study: effect of robot appearance and task. Int J Soc Robot 2(2):175–186CrossRef
41.
Lilliefors HW (1967) On the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test for normality with mean and variance unknown. J Am Stat Assoc 62(318):399–402CrossRef
42.
Limpert E, Stahel WA, Abbt M (2001) Log-normal distributions across the sciences: keys and clues. BioScience 51(5):341–352CrossRef
43.
Lorenz T, Weiss A, Hirche S (2016) Synchrony and reciprocity: key mechanisms for social companion robots in therapy and care. Int J Soc Robot 8(1):125–143CrossRef
44.
Massey FJ (1951) The Kolmogorov–Smirnov test for goodness of fit. J Am Stat Assoc 46(253):68–78MATHCrossRef
45.
Mayagoitia RE, Nene AV, Veltink PH (2002) Accelerometer and rate gyroscope measurement of kinematics: an inexpensive alternative to optical motion analysis systems. J Biomech 35(4):537–542CrossRef
46.
Mehdi H, Boubaker O (2012) Stiffness and impedance control using Lyapunov theory for robot-aided rehabilitation. Int J Soc Robot 4(1):107–119CrossRef
47.
Melnyk A, Henaff P (2016) Bio-inspired plastic controller for a robot arm to shake hand with human. In: IEEE Int. Conf. on Electronics and Nanotechnology, pp 163–168
48.
Melnyk A, Henaff P, Khomenko V, Borysenko V (2014) Sensor network architecture to measure characteristics of a handshake between humans. In: IEEE 34th Int. Conf. on Electronics and Nanotechnology, pp 264–268
49.
Moualla A, Karaouzene A, Boucenna S, Vidal D, Gaussier P (2017) Readability of the gaze and expressions of a robot museum visitor: impact of the low level sensory-motor control. In: IEEE Int Symp on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pp 712–719
50.
Ouchi K, Hashimoto S (1997) Handshake telephone system to communicate with voice and force. In: Proceedings of IEEE Int. Workshop on Robot and Human Communication, pp 466–471
51.
Pandey A, Ali M, Alami R (2013) Towards a task-aware proactive sociable robot based on multi-state perspective-taking. Int J Soc Robot 5(2):215–236CrossRef
52.
Papageorgiou D, Doulgeri Z (2015) A kinematic controller for human-robot handshaking using internal motion adaptation. In: IEEE Int Conf on Robotics and Automation, pp 5622–5627
53.
Peng XB, Abbeel P, Levine S, van de Panne M (2018) DeepMimic: example-guided deep reinforcement learning of physics-based character skills. ACM Trans Graph 37(4):1–4
54.
Pugach G, Melnyk A, Tolochko O, Pitti A, Gaussier P (2016) Touch-based admittance control of a robotic arm using neural learning of an artificial skin. In: IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp 3374–3380
55.
56.
Renner E (1971) Mathematisch-statistische methoden in der praktischen anwendung. Anzeiger für Schädlingskunde 44(2):32
57.
Righetti L, Buchli J, Ijspeert AJ (2006) Dynamic Hebbian learning in adaptive frequency oscillators. Phys D Nonlinear Phenom 216(2):269–281MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
58.
Salem M, Kopp S, Wachsmuth I, Rohlfing K, Joublin F (2012) Generation and evaluation of communicative robot gesture. Int J Soc Robot 4(2):201–217CrossRef
59.
Schiffrin D (1974) Handwork as ceremony: the case of the handshake. Semiotica 12(3):189–202CrossRef
60.
Shiomi M, Sakamoto D, Kanda T, Ishi C, Ishiguro H, Hagita N (2011) Field trial of a networked robot at a train station. Int J Soc Robot 3(1):27–40CrossRef
61.
Silveira TMGM, Sousa JBB, Stringhini MLFL, Freitas ATVST, Melo PGG (2014) Nutritional assessment and hand grip strength of candidates for surgery of the gastrointestinal tract. Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva (ABCD) Braz Arch Dig Surg 27(2):104–108CrossRef
62.
Stewart GL, Dustin SL, Barrick MR, Darnold TC (2008) Exploring the handshake in employment interviews. J Appl Psychol 93(5):1139–1146CrossRef
63.
Thakur G, Brevdo E, Fuckar NS, Wu HT (2013) The synchrosqueezing algorithm for timevarying spectral analysis. Signal Process 93(5):1079–1094CrossRef
64.
65.
Troje NF, Westhoff C (2006) The inversion effect in biological motion perception: evidence for a “life detector”? Curr Biol (CB) 16(8):821–824CrossRef
66.
Trovato G, Zecca M, Sessa S, Jamone L, Ham J, Hashimoto K, Takanishi A (2013) Cross-cultural study on human–robot greeting interaction: acceptance and discomfort by Egyptians and Japanese. Paladyn J Behav Robot 4(2):83–93
67.
68.
Walker EJ, Bischof WF, Kingstone A (2013) Take my hand: the temporal and spatial coordination of handshaking. In: Joint Action Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society
69.
Wander P, Iluyomade A, Sanmartin P, Gupta A, O’Sullivana M (2016) A tell tale handshake. Respir Med Case Rep 18:76–77
70.
Xie G, Jin M, Wu D, Hashimoto M (2011) Control for physical human–robot interaction based on online update of dynamics. In: IEEE Int. Conf. on Computer Science and Automation Engineering, vol 2, pp 280–284
71.
Yamato Y, Jindai M, Watanabe T (2008) Development of a shake-motion leading model for human–robot handshaking. In: SICE Annual Conf., pp 502–507
72.
Yonekura K, Kim CH, Nakadai K, Tsujino H, Yokoi K (2015) Prevention of accomplishing synchronous multi-modal human–robot cooperation by using visual rhythms. Adv Robot 29(14):901–912CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Physical Analysis of Handshaking Between Humans: Mutual Synchronisation and Social Context
verfasst von
Artem Melnyk
Patrick Hénaff
Publikationsdatum
12.02.2019
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
International Journal of Social Robotics / Ausgabe 4/2019
Print ISSN: 1875-4791
Elektronische ISSN: 1875-4805
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-019-00525-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2019

International Journal of Social Robotics 4/2019 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

Love and Sex with Robots: A Content Analysis of Media Representations

BriefCommunication

How Robots Influence Humans: A Survey of Nonverbal Communication in Social Human–Robot Interaction

EditorialNotes

Editorial

OriginalPaper

Studying Design Aspects for Social Robots Using a Generic Gesture Method

OriginalPaper

Robot Acceptance at Work: A Multilevel Analysis Based on 27 EU Countries

OriginalPaper

Multimodal Integration of Emotional Signals from Voice, Body, and Context: Effects of (In)Congruence on Emotion Recognition and Attitudes Towards Robots

Premium Partner

    Marktübersichten

    Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen. 

    Zur Marktübersicht
    Bildnachweise