Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Customer satisfaction with bus rapid transit: a study of New York City select bus service applying structural equation modeling

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Public Transport Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Like any other transit mode, bus rapid transit (BRT) has a number of service quality and performance attributes that can affect rider satisfaction. However, there is little understanding about BRT rider satisfaction. This study investigates the relationship between riders’ overall satisfaction and underlying driving factors of the BRT service in New York City (NYC), known as select bus service (SBS). Two conceptual structures are developed for three groups of SBS riders based on theoretical review and pilot survey. Hypotheses about relationships between latent variables and observed variables are developed. Survey data obtained from interviewing riders on buses and at bus stops are used to test the hypotheses by applying structural equation modeling (SEM). For each group of riders, one model was built. Acceptable fits were obtained for all three models. In addition, some of the proposed causal relationships were supported in these models. Accepted hypotheses suggest that service quality was the most important factor influencing overall satisfaction for all three kinds of riders, namely, frequency, on-time performance, and speed. The other significant attributes are bus-only lanes, buses with three doors, bus comfort and cleanliness, proximity of bus stops, real-time information, limited stops, and ticket system attributes. Their effects vary among riders on routes with different locations and between rider groups with and without awareness of travel information. The implications of the findings for future planning and system improvement are discussed. In this study, SEM is found to be an appropriate methodology for measuring rider satisfaction levels. The findings are useful for the agencies in NYC and other cities in a similar situation to justify and plan transit service with limited resources.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al-Refaie A (2015) Effects of human resource management on hotel performance using structural equation modeling. Comput Hum Behav 43:293–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andreassen TW (1995) (Dis) satisfaction with public services: the case of public transportation. J Serv Mark 9(5):30–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Elia E, Pace RD, Bifulco GN, Shiftan Y (2013) The impact of travel information’s accuracy on route-choice. Transp Res Part C 26:146–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bollen KA (1989) Structural equations with latent variables. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Boomsma A (1982) Robustness of LISREL against small sample sizes in factor analysis models. In: Jpreskog KG, Wold H (eds) Systems under indirection observation: causality structure, prediction (Part 1). North Holland, Amsterdam, pp 149–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Brakewood C, Barbeau S, Watkins K (2014) An experiment evaluating the impacts of real-time transit information on bus passengers in Tampa, Florida. Transp Res Part A 69:409–422

    Google Scholar 

  • Brakewood C, Macfarlan GS, Watkins K (2015) The impact of real-time information on bus ridership in New York City. Transp Res Part C 53:59–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown MW, Cudech R (1993) Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen KA, Long JS (eds) testing structural equation models. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, pp 136–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Comrey AL, Lee HB (1992) A first course in factor analysis, 2nd edn. Erlbaum, Hillsdale

    Google Scholar 

  • Currie G, Delbosc A (2011) Understanding bus rapid transit route ridership drivers: an empirical study of Australian BRT systems. Transp Policy 18:755–764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Currie G, Wallis I (2008) Effective ways to grow urban bus market—a synthesis of evidence. J Transp Geogr 16:419–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Oña J, de Oña R, Eboli L, Mazzulla G (2013) Perceived service quality in bus transit service: a structural equation approach. Transp Policy 29:219–226. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2013.07.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Del Castillo JM, Benitez FG (2013) Determining a public transport satisfaction index from user surveys. Transp A Transp Sci 9(8):713–741

    Google Scholar 

  • dell’Olio L, Ibeas A, Cecin P (2011) The quality of service desired by public transport users. Transp Policy 18(1):217–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eboli L, Mazzulla G (2007) Service quality attributes affecting customer satisfaction for bus transit. J Public Transp 10(3):21–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eboli L, Mazzulla G (2011) A methodology for evaluating transit service quality based on subjective and objective measures from the passenger’s point of view. Transp Policy 18(1):172–181. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.07.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eboli L, Mazzulla G (2012) Structural Equation modeling for analyzing passengers’ perceptions about Railway services. Soc Behav Sci 54:96–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foote PJ (2004) Making buses better in Chicago: strategic implementation of customer-derived performance measures from 1995–2001. Transp Res Record J Transp Res Board 1884:18–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friman M, Edvardsson B, Gärling T (2001) Frequency of negative critical incidents and satisfaction with public transport service, I. J Retail Consum Serv 8:95–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golob TF (2003) Structural equation modeling for travel behavior research. Transp Res Part B 37:1–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hensher DA, Golob TF (2008) Bus rapid transit systems: a comparative assessment. Transportation 35:501–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hou D, Al-Tabbaa A, Chen H, Mamic I (2014) Factor analysis and structural equation modeling of sustainable behavior in contaminated land remediation. J Clean Prod 84:439–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu L, Bentler PM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model 6:1–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iseki H, Taylor BD (2010) Style versus service? An analysis of user perceptions of transit stops and stations. J Public Transp 13(3):39–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang YP, Zegras C, Mehndiratta S (2012) Walk the line: station context, corridor type and bus rapid transit walk access in Jinan, China. J Transp Geogr 20:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson RA, Wichern DW (2007) Applied multivariate statistical analysis, Six edn. Pearson Pertice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Joreskog KG (1973) Analysis of covariance structures. In: Krishnaiah PR (ed) Multivariate analysis, III edn. Academic Press, New York, pp 263–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Kain JF, Liu Z (1999) Secrets of success: assessing the large increases in transit ridership achieved by Houston and San Diego transit providers. Transp Res Part A 33:601–624

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlaftis MG, Golias J, Papadimitriou E (2001) Transit quality as an integrated traffic management strategy: measuring perceived service. J Public Transp 4(1):27–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Kattan L, de Barros AG, Saeemi H (2013) Travel behavior changes and responses to advanced traveler information in prolonged and large-scale network disruptions: a case study of the west LRT line construction in the city of Calgary. Transp Res Part F 21:90–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonnell S, Zellner M (2011) Exploring the effectiveness of bus rapid transit a prototype agent-based model of commuting behavior. Transp Policy 18:825–835

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metropolitan Transportation Authority (2011) New York city transit market research. M15 Select Bus service (SBS) Study, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouwen A, Rietveld P (2013) Does competitive tendering improve customer satisfaction with public transport? A case study for the Netherlands. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 51:29–45. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2013.03.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • New York City Department of Transportation and Metropolitan Transportation Authority New York City Transit (2016) A full report of select bus service. http://www.nyc.gov/html/brt/downloads/pdf/brt-routes-fullreport.pdf. Accessed 25 July 2016

  • New York City Department of Transportation and MTA New York City Transit (2009) Introduction to bus rapid transit phase II. Executive Summary, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • New York City Planning. Zoning and land use. http://maps.nyc.gov/doitt/nycitymap/template?applicationName=ZOLA (Accessed 03 May 2016)

  • Ngatia GJ, Toshiyuki O, Fumihiko N (2010) The structure of users’ satisfaction on urban public transport service in developing country: the case of Nairobi. J Eastern Asia society Transp Stud 8:1288–1300

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH (1994) Psychometric theory, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill Inc, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandit D, Das S (2013) A framework for determining commuter preference along a proposed bus rapid transit corridor. Soc Behav Sci 104:894–903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qureshi SM, Kang CW (2015) Analysing the organizational factors of project complexity using structural equation modelling. Int J Project Manage 33:165–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redman L, Friman M, Gärling T, Harig T (2013) Quality attributes of public transport that attract car users: a research review. Transp Policy 25:119–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaaban K, Khalil RF (2013) Investigating the customer satisfaction of bus service in Qatar. Soc Behav Sci 104:865–874

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soriguera F (2014) On the value of highway travel time information systems. Transp Res Part A 70:294–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuart KR, Mednick M, Bockman J (2000) Structural equation model of customer satisfaction for the New York City Subway System. Transp Res Rec 1735:133–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang L, Thakuriah P (2012) Ridership effects of real-time information system: a case study in the city of Chicago. Transp Res Part C 22:146–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor BD, Miller D, Iseki H, Fink C (2009) Nature and/or nurture? Analyzing the determinants of transit ridership across US urbanized areas. Transp Res Part A 43:60–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Transportation Research Board (2013) Transit capacity and quality of service manual, 3rd edn

  • Tyrinopoulos Y, Antoniou C (2008) Public transit user satisfaction: variability and policy implications. Transp Policy 15:260–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wan D (2015) Riders’ perceptions of the select bus service in New York City, final report of 911 memorial project submitted to New York City Department of Transportation

  • Wang B, Shao C, Li J, Weng J, Ji X (2015) Holiday travel behavior analysis and empirical study under integrated multimodal travel information service. Transp Policy 39:21–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiley DE (1973) The identification problem for structural equation models with unmeasured variables. In: Goldberger AS, Ducan OD (eds) Structural equation models in the social science. Seminar Press, New York, pp 69–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf EJ, Harrington KM, Clark SL, Miller MW (2013) Sample size requirements for structural equation models: an evaluation of power, bias, and solution propriety. Educ Psychol Measur 73(6):913–934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng Z, Lee J, Saifuzzaman M, Sun J (2015) Exploring association between perceived importance of travel/traffic information and travel behavior in natural disasters: a case study of the 2011 Brisbane floods. Transp Res Part C 51:243–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the fellowship provided by September 11th Memorial Program. This program was established by the New York Metropolitan Transportation Council (NYMTC) to cherish the memory of its three lost employees during the attack on the World Trade Center. The University Transportation Research Center Region II (UTRC) is in responsibility of administration of this program. The authors thank James Rubin for technical supporting. And valuable comments from Dr. Ellen Thorson, Robert Thompson, and Jim Sears are appreciated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, City College of New York, City University of New York, 160 Convent Avenue, Marshak Building, Suite MR-910, New York, NY, 10031, USA

    Dan Wan, Camille Kamga & Wei Hao

  2. Transit Development Group, New York City Department of Transportation, 55 Water St, 6th Floor NW, New York, NY, 10041, USA

    Aaron Sugiura & Eric B. Beaton

Authors
  1. Dan Wan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Camille Kamga
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Wei Hao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Aaron Sugiura
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Eric B. Beaton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dan Wan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wan, D., Kamga, C., Hao, W. et al. Customer satisfaction with bus rapid transit: a study of New York City select bus service applying structural equation modeling. Public Transp 8, 497–520 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12469-016-0135-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12469-016-0135-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation