Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Use of satellite data and GIS for assessing the agricultural potentiality of the soils South Farafra Oasis, Western Desert, Egypt

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Overpopulation and food security are the main global problems alert decision makers. In developing countries, such problem put extra pressure for horizontal expansion for agricultural development. The rapid sprawl of urbanized areas on the alluvial land of the River Nile and delta to accommodate the population growth has encouraged governmental and private sector for agricultural expansion in the desert. Unless there are reliable information and accurate studies for land and soil suitability, there will be a collapse of such investment. To evaluate the potential suitability of soil for agriculture development in areas of the western desert, satellite images, geographic information, and field survey including soil profiles and artesian water samples with laboratory analysis were integrated to classify the soils according their suitability for specific crop. The main land qualities of the different mapping units and the crop requirement were rated and matched to obtain the current and potential land suitability using Automated Land Evaluation System “ALES”. The study found that the main physiographic units are plateaus, hilland, mountain, and depression floor. But there are three limiting parameters for land suitability which are the lack of nutrient elements, wind erosion vulnerability, and soil texture. The study concluded that the best crops adapted with the soil conditions and could be feasible for economic use are: (1) native vegetation such as agol, sand trees, sammar, halfaa, bawaal, qordaob, bardi, and qortom; (2) filed crops such as onion, garlic, watermelon and wheat; and (3) fruits such as olive and date palms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adrian B, Manuela D, Alin M, Mirela M (2010) Sustainable development by GIS. Res J Agric Sci 42(1):48–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Aerts, J (2002) Spatial decision support for resource allocation: integration of optimization, uncertainty analysis and visualization techniques. PhD Thesis. Faculty of Science, University of Amsterdam

  • Allan, H (2004). Soil properties for plant growth. Landcare Research Science Series No. 26 Lincoln, Canterbury, New Zealand

  • Amano E, Salvucci GD (1999) Detection and use of three signatures of soil-limited evaporation. Remote Sens Env 67:108–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ASRT (1989). Encyclopedia of the Western Desert of Egypt. Academy of Scientific Research and Technology 4th part, Desert Research Institute

  • Brail RK, Klosterman RE (2001) Planning support systems. ESRI Press, Redlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Briassoulis, H (2003). Analysis of land use change: theoretical and modeling approaches, The Web Book of Regional Science, Regional Research Institute, West Virginia University, http://www.rri.wvu.edu/WebBook/

  • Chapin FS Jr, Kaiser EJ (1979) Urban land use planning. University of Illinois Press, Urbana

    Google Scholar 

  • Church RL (2002) Geographical information systems and location science. Comp Oper Res 29(6):541–562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Climatologically Normal for Egypt (2011) The normal for El-Kharga Oasis station, (1960–2010). Ministry of Civil Aviation: Meteorological Authority, Cairo

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins MG, Steiner FR, Rushman MJ (2001) Land-use suitability analysis in the United States: historical development and promising technological achievements. Environ Manage 28(5):611–621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cova TJ, Church RL (2000) Exploratory spatial optimization and site search: neighborhood operator approach. Comp Environ Urban Syst 21:401–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobos E, Norman B, Bruee W, Luca M, Chris J, and Erika M (2002) The use of DEM and satellite images for regional scale soil database, 17th World Congress of Soil Science (WCSS), 14–21 August 2002, Bangkok, Thailand

  • Durbude DG, Venkatesh B (2004) Site suitability analysis for soil and water conservation structures. Photonirvachak J Indian Soc Remote Sens 32:399–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eastman JR, Kyem PAK, Toledano J, Jin W (1993) GIS and decision making. UNITAR, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • EL-Shazly EM (1976) Geology and ground water potential of Kharga and Dakhla Oases area, Western Desert, Egypt from NASA landsat-1 satellite images. Academy of Scientific Research, Cairo

    Google Scholar 

  • EMA (Egyptian Metrological Authority) (1996) Climatic atlas of Egypt. Arab Republic of Egypt. Ministry of transport, Cairo

    Google Scholar 

  • ESRI (2009) Arc Map version 9.3.1 User Manual, ESRI: ESRI product, California, 92373-8100, USA

  • Ezz EL-Deen, HM (1996) Uses of geophysical, hydrogeological methods and application of geographic information systems for evaluation the development of Paris area, New valley, Egypt. Ph.D. Thesis, Ain Shams University, Egypt

  • FAO (1985) Land evaluation for irrigated agriculture. FAO, Rome, Soils Bulletin 55

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2006) Guidelines for soil description, 4th edn. FAO, Rome. ISBN 92-5-105521-1

    Google Scholar 

  • Gary T (1988) Basic principles of wind erosion control. Agric Ecosys Environ 22/23:103–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ISRIC (1991) FAO—soil—database version 2.0. FAO publication, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • ITT (2009) ITT Corporation ENVI 4.7 software, 1133 Westchester Avenue, White Plains, NY, 10604, USA

  • Kalogirou S (2002) Expert systems and GIS: an application of land suitability evaluation. Comp Environ Urban Syst 26:89–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klute A (ed) (1986) Methods of soil analysis (part—1) physical and Mineralogical methods. American Society of Agronomy and Soil Science Society of America, Madison

    Google Scholar 

  • Lillesand TM, Kiefer RW (2007) Remote sensing and image interpretation, 5th edn. John Wiley, New York, p 820, Paper back September 2007

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran MS (1994) Irrigation management in Arizona using satellites and airplanes. Irrig Sci 15:35–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NCSA (2005) Extracting topographic features from shuttle radar topography mission (SRTM) Images. Technical Report, alg. 05-002, July 18, 2005, National Center for Supercomputing Applications (NCSA), 605 East Springfield Avenue, Champaign, IL 61820

  • Palacios-Orueta A, Ustin SL (1998) Remote sensing of soil properties in the Santa Monica Mountains—I. Spectral analysis. Remote Sens Env 65:170–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajitha K, Mukherjee CK, Vinu CR (2006) Applications of remote sensing and GIS for sustainable management of shrimp culture in India. Aquacult Eng 2006(36):1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossiter DG (1996) A theoretical framework for land evaluation. Geoderma 72:165–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossiter DG (2003) Biophysical models in land evaluation. In: W. Verheye (Ed.), 1.5 Land Use and land cover, Encyclopedia of Life Support System (EOLSSUNESCO), Eolss Publisher, Oxford. http://www.eolss.net

  • Rossiter, DG and van wambeke, AR (1997) Automated Land Evaluation System (ALES) 4.65 user's manual. Cornell Univ., Soil Dept., Crop & Atmosphere Sciences SCAS teaching series no. T93-2 revision 6. Ithaca, NY USA

  • Said R (1993) The River Nile geology and hydrology and utilization. Britain Pergmon Press, Oxford, 320 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma RC, Sazena RK, Verma KS (2000) Reconnaissance mapping and management of salt-affected soils using satellite images. Int J Remote Sens 21(17):3209–3218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sideruis W (1984) Rating of Soil derived land qualities. ITC, Enschede, Lectures Notes

    Google Scholar 

  • Sideruis W (1989) Selective reading in land evaluation. ITC, Enschede, Lectures Notes

    Google Scholar 

  • Sys, C (1985) Land evaluation. Part I, II, III. Publication Agricoles. State University of Ghent

  • Sys, C, Van Ranst E, Delaveye J and Beernaert F (1993) Land evaluation, Part I, II, III. Agriculture publication No. 7 GADC Brussels, Belgium 197 PP

  • Torkomani, GF (1981) A study in regional geography, Farafra Oasia. Ph.D. Thesis, Cairo University

  • UNDP/UNESCO (2001) Joint project for the Capacity Building of The Egyptian Geology Survey and Mining Authority and The National Authority for Remote Sensing Space Science for The Sustainable Develoment of The South Valley and Sinai

  • USDA (2004) Soil survey laboratory methods manual. Soil Survey Investigation Report No. 42 Version 4.0 November 2004

  • USDA (2005) National soil survey handbook. USDA, Natural Resources Conservation Service, revision issued, 430-VI

  • USDA, 2010. Keys to soil taxonomy, United State Department of Agriculture: Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) third edition.

  • Wahba MM, Darwish KhM, Awad F (2007) Suitability of specific crops using micro LEIS Program in Sahal Baraka, Farafra Oasis, Egypt. J Appl Sci Res 3(7):531–539

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhongxin C, Sen Li, Jianqiang R, Gong P, Zhang M, Wang L (2004) Monitoring and management of agriculture with remote sensing. In: Liang S. (ed) Advances in land remote sensing. Springer, 2004, 397–42

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wael Ahmed Mohamed Abdel Kawy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Abdel Kawy, W.A.M., Abou El-Magd, I.H. Use of satellite data and GIS for assessing the agricultural potentiality of the soils South Farafra Oasis, Western Desert, Egypt. Arab J Geosci 6, 2299–2311 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-012-0518-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-012-0518-5

Keywords

Navigation