Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Mapping of landslide hazard zonation using GIS at Golestan watershed, northeast of Iran

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Landslide hazard zonation is essential for planning future developmental activities. At the present study, after the preparation of a landslide inventory of the study area, nine factors as well as sub-data layers of factor class weights were tested for an integrated analysis of landslide hazard in the region. The produced factor maps were weighted with the analytic hierarchy process method and then classified into four classes—negligible, low, moderate, and high. The final produced map for landslide hazard zonation in Golestan watershed revealed that: (1) about 53.85 % of the basin is prone to moderate and high threats of landslides. (2) Landslide events at the Golestan watershed were strongly correlated to the slope angle of the basin. It was observed that the active landslide zones, including moderate to high landslide hazard classes, have a high correlation to slope classes over 30° (R 2 = 0.769). (3) The regions most susceptible to landslide hazard are those located south and southwest of the watershed, which included rock topples, falls, and debris landslides.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akgün A, Bulut F (2007) GIS-based landslide hazard for Arsin–Yomra (Trabzon, North Turkey) region. Environ Geol 51(8):1377–1387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayalew L, Yamagishi H (2005) The application of GIS-based logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Kakuda-Yahiko Mountains, Central Japan. Geomorphology 65(1–2):15–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayalew L, Yamagishi H, Ugawa N (2004) Landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS-based weighted linear combination, the case in Tsugawa area of Agano River, Niigata Prefecture, Japan. Landslides 1(1):73–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrara A, Crosta G, Frattini P (2008) Comparing models of debris-flow susceptibility in the alpine environment. Geomorphology 94(3–4):353–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Çevik E, Topal T (2003) GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping for a problematic segment of the natural gas pipeline, Hendek (Turkey). Environ Geol 44(8):949–962

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai FC, Lee CF, Li J, Xu ZW (2001) Assessment of landslide hazard on the natural terrain of Lantau Island, Hong Kong. Environ Geol 43(3):381–391

    Google Scholar 

  • Eastman JR, Jin W, Kyem PAK, Toledano J (1995) Raster procedures for multi criteria/multiobjective decisions. Photogramm Eng Rem Sens 61(5):539–547

    Google Scholar 

  • Ercanoglu M, Gokceoglu C, Van Asch THWJ (2004) Landslide hazard zoning north of Yenice (NW Turkey) by multivariate statistical techniques. Nat Hazard 32(1):1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S (2005) Application of logistic regression model and its validation for landslide hazard mapping using GIS and remote sensing data. Int J Remote Sens 26(7):1477–1491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malczewski J (1999) GIS and multicriteria decision analysis. Wiley, New York, 408 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansouri Daneshvar MR, Bagherzadeh A (2011) Landslide hazard zonation assessment using GIS analysis at Golmakan watershed, northeast of Iran. Front Earth Sci 5(1):70–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Neaupane KM, Piantanakulchai M (2006) Analytic network process model for landslide hazard zonation. Eng Geol 85:281–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Remondo J, Gonzalez-Diez A, Teran JRD, Cendrero A (2003) Landslide susceptibility models utilising spatial data analysis techniques, a case study from the Lower Deba valley, Guipuzcoa (Spain). Nat Hazard 30(3):267–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth RA (1983) Factors affecting landslide susceptibility in San Mateo County, California. Bull Assoc Eng Geol 4:353–372

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1980) The analytical hierarchy process. McGraw Hill, New York, 350 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL, Vargas LG (2000) Models, methods, concepts, and applications of the analytic hierarchy process. Kluwer, Boston, 352 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Saboya F, Alves MG, Pinto WD (2006) Assessment of failure susceptibility of soil slopes using fuzzy logic. Eng Geol 86(4):211–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Süzen ML, Doyuran V (2004) A comparison of the GIS base landslide susceptibility assessment methods: multivariate versus bivariate. Environ Geol 45(5):665–679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yalcin A (2008) GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping using analytical hierarchy process and bivariate statistics in Ardesen (Turkey): comparisons of results and confirmations. Catena 72(1):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

We thank the Islamic Azad University—Mashhad branch for its generous support of the project. We also thank the anonymous reviewer for constructive suggestions on the data analyses and interpretations.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali Bagherzadeh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bagherzadeh, A., Mansouri Daneshvar, M.R. Mapping of landslide hazard zonation using GIS at Golestan watershed, northeast of Iran. Arab J Geosci 6, 3377–3388 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-012-0583-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-012-0583-9

Keywords

Navigation