Abstract
A morphometric evaluation of Tamiraparani subbasin was carried out to determine the drainage characteristics using GIS model technique. Extraction of the subbasin and stream network model has been developed to quantify the drainage parameters in the study area. The input parameters required to run this model are: a pour point, a minimum upstream area in hectares, and a digital elevation model. After execution, the model provides a drainage basin with Strahler’s classified stream network supported by thematic layers like aspect, slope, relief, and drainage density. The developed model reveals that the drainage area of this subbasin is 2,055 km2 and shows subdendritic to dendritic drainage pattern. The basin includes seventh order stream and mostly dominated by lower stream order. The slope of the study area varies from 0° in the east to 61° towards west. The presence of Western Ghats is the chief controlling factor for slope variation. Moreover, the slope variation is controlled by the local lithology and erosion cycles. The bifurcation ratio indicates that the geological structures have little influence on the drainage networks and the drainage density reveals that the nature of subsurface strata is permeable.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abrahams AD (1984) Channel networks: a geomorphological perspective. Water Resour Res 20:161–168
Angillieri MYE (2008) Morphometric analysis of Colangüil river basin and flash flood hazard, San Juan, Argentina. Environ Geol 55:107–111
Bhagwat TN, Shetty A, Hegde VS (2011) Spatial variation in drainage characteristics and geomorphic instantaneous unit hydrograph (GIUH); implications for watershed management—a case study of the Varada River basin, Northern Karnataka. Catena 87:52–59
Boulton AG (1968) Morphometric analysis of river basin characteristics. Water Resource Board, U.K, p 227
Burrough PA (1986) Principles of geographical information systems for land resources assessment. Oxford University Press, New York, p 50
CGWB (2009) District groundwater brochure Tirunelveli district, Tamil Nadu. Technical Report Series, p 5
Clarke JI (1966) Morphometry from maps, essays in geomorphology. Elsevier Publication Co., New York, pp 235–274
Costa JE (1987) Hydraulics and basin morphometry of the largest flash floods in the conterminous United States. J Hydrol 93:313–338
Gardiner V (1975) Drainage basin morphometry. British Geomorphological Research Group, Technical Bulletin no. 14, p 48
Gregory KJ, Walling DE (1973) Drainage basin form and process: a geomorphological approach. Wiley, New York, p 456
Hadley RF, Schumm SA (1961) Sediment sources and drainage basin characteristics in upper Cheyenne River Basin. USGS Water-Suppl Pap 1531-B:198
Horton RE (1932) Drainage basin characteristics. Trans Am Geophys Union 13:350–361
Horton RE (1945) Erosional development of streams and their drainage basins: hydrophysical approach to quantitative morphology. Bull Geol Soc Am 56:275–370
Huggett R, Cheesman J (2002) Topography and the environment. Prentice Hall, Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River, NJ, p 274
John Wilson JS, Chandrasekar N, Magesh NS (2012) Morphometric analysis of major sub-watersheds in Aiyar and Karai Pottanar Basin, Central Tamil Nadu, India using remote sensing and GIS techniques. Bonfring International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management Science 2(1):8–15
Krishnan MS (1953) The structural and tectonic history of India. Mem Geol Surv Ind 81:1–37
Macka Z (2001) Determination of texture of topography from large scale contour maps. Geogr Bull 73(2):53–62
Magesh NS, Chandrasekar N, Soundranayagam JP (2011) Morphometric evaluation of Papanasam and Manimuthar watersheds, parts of Western Ghats, Tirunelveli district, Tamil Nadu, India: a GIS approach. Environ Earth Sci 64:373–381
Magesh NS, Jitheshlal KV, Chandrasekar N, Jini KV (2012) GIS based morphometric evaluation of Chimmini and Mupily watersheds, parts of Western Ghats, Thrissur District, Kerala, India. Earth Sci Inform 5(2):111–121
Maidment DR (2002) ArcHydro GIS for water resources. ESRI Press, Redlands, 220
Mesa LM (2006) Morphometric analysis of a subtropical Andean basin (Tucuman, Argentina). Environ Geol 50(8):1235–1242
Miller VC (1953) A quantitative geomorphologic study of drainage basin characteristics in the Clinch Mountain area, Virginia and Tennessee, Project NR 389042, Tech Report 3. Columbia University Department of Geology, ONR Geography Branch, New York
Moussa R (2003) On morphometric properties of basin, scale effects and hydrological response. Hydrol Processes 17:33–58
Nag SK, Chakraborty S (2003) Influence of rock types and structures in the development of drainage network in hard rock area. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 31(1):25–35
Narayanasamy S, Lakshmi P (1990) Charnockitic rocks of Tinnelveli district, Madras. In: Granulates of South India, (Ed.) BP Radakrishnan: Geol Soc India 17: 300–305
Ozdemir H, Bird D (2009) Evaluation of morphometric parameters of drainage networks derived from topographic maps and DEM in point floods. Environ Geol 56:1405–1415
Pitchamuthu CS (1979) Physical geography of India. National Book Trust India, New Delhi, p 235
Rastogi RA, Sharma TC (1976) Quantitative analysis of drainage basin characteristics. J Soil Water Conserv India 26(1& 4):18–25
Ravichandran S, Ramanibai R, Pundarikanthan NV (1996) Ecoregions for describing water quality patterns in Tamiraparani basin, South India. J Hydrol 178:257–276
Rinaldo A, Rodriguez-Iturbe I, Rigon R (1998) Channel networks. In: Jeanloz R, Albee AL, Burke KC (eds) Annual review of earth and planetary sciences, vol 26. Annual Reviews, Palo Alto, pp 289–327
Schumm SA (1956) Evolution of drainage systems and slopes in badlands at Perth Amboy, New Jersey. Bull Geol Soc Am 67:597–646
Schumm SA (1963) Sinuosity of alluvial rivers in the Great Plains. Bull Geol Soc Am 74:1089–1100
Sethupathi AS, Lakshmi Narasimhan C, Vasanthamohan V, Mohan SP (2011) Prioritization of miniwatersheds based on morphometric analysis using remote sensing and GIS in a drought prone Bargur-Mathur subwatersheds, Ponnaiyar River basin, India. International Journal of Geomatics and Geosciences 2(2):403–414
Singh S, Singh MC (1997) Morphometric analysis of Kanhar river basin. National Geographical Journal of India 43(1):31–43
Smith KG (1950) Standards for grading texture of erosional topography. Am J Sci 248:655–668
Sreedevi PD, Subrahmanyam K, Shakeel A (2005) The significance of morphometric analysis for obtaining groundwater potential zones in a structurally controlled terrain. Environ Geol 47(3):412–420
Strahler AN (1952) Dynamics basis of geomorphology. Bull Geol Soc Am 63:923–938
Strahler AN (1957) Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology. Trans Am Geophys Union 38:913–920
Strahler AN (1964) Quantitative geomorphology of drainage basins and channel networks. In: Te Chow V (ed) Hand book of applied hydrology. McGraw Hill Book Company, New York
Topaloglu F (2002) Estimation of instantaneous peak flows in Seyhan river basin using regional regression procedures. Turk J Agric For 26:47–55
Verstappen H (1983) The applied geomorphology. International Institute for Aerial Survey and Earth Science (I.T.C), Enschede
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Magesh, N.S., Chandrasekar, N. GIS model-based morphometric evaluation of Tamiraparani subbasin, Tirunelveli district, Tamil Nadu, India. Arab J Geosci 7, 131–141 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-012-0742-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-012-0742-z