Skip to main content
Log in

GIS model-based morphometric evaluation of Tamiraparani subbasin, Tirunelveli district, Tamil Nadu, India

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A morphometric evaluation of Tamiraparani subbasin was carried out to determine the drainage characteristics using GIS model technique. Extraction of the subbasin and stream network model has been developed to quantify the drainage parameters in the study area. The input parameters required to run this model are: a pour point, a minimum upstream area in hectares, and a digital elevation model. After execution, the model provides a drainage basin with Strahler’s classified stream network supported by thematic layers like aspect, slope, relief, and drainage density. The developed model reveals that the drainage area of this subbasin is 2,055 km2 and shows subdendritic to dendritic drainage pattern. The basin includes seventh order stream and mostly dominated by lower stream order. The slope of the study area varies from 0° in the east to 61° towards west. The presence of Western Ghats is the chief controlling factor for slope variation. Moreover, the slope variation is controlled by the local lithology and erosion cycles. The bifurcation ratio indicates that the geological structures have little influence on the drainage networks and the drainage density reveals that the nature of subsurface strata is permeable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrahams AD (1984) Channel networks: a geomorphological perspective. Water Resour Res 20:161–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angillieri MYE (2008) Morphometric analysis of Colangüil river basin and flash flood hazard, San Juan, Argentina. Environ Geol 55:107–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhagwat TN, Shetty A, Hegde VS (2011) Spatial variation in drainage characteristics and geomorphic instantaneous unit hydrograph (GIUH); implications for watershed management—a case study of the Varada River basin, Northern Karnataka. Catena 87:52–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boulton AG (1968) Morphometric analysis of river basin characteristics. Water Resource Board, U.K, p 227

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrough PA (1986) Principles of geographical information systems for land resources assessment. Oxford University Press, New York, p 50

    Google Scholar 

  • CGWB (2009) District groundwater brochure Tirunelveli district, Tamil Nadu. Technical Report Series, p 5

  • Clarke JI (1966) Morphometry from maps, essays in geomorphology. Elsevier Publication Co., New York, pp 235–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa JE (1987) Hydraulics and basin morphometry of the largest flash floods in the conterminous United States. J Hydrol 93:313–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardiner V (1975) Drainage basin morphometry. British Geomorphological Research Group, Technical Bulletin no. 14, p 48

  • Gregory KJ, Walling DE (1973) Drainage basin form and process: a geomorphological approach. Wiley, New York, p 456

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadley RF, Schumm SA (1961) Sediment sources and drainage basin characteristics in upper Cheyenne River Basin. USGS Water-Suppl Pap 1531-B:198

    Google Scholar 

  • Horton RE (1932) Drainage basin characteristics. Trans Am Geophys Union 13:350–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horton RE (1945) Erosional development of streams and their drainage basins: hydrophysical approach to quantitative morphology. Bull Geol Soc Am 56:275–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huggett R, Cheesman J (2002) Topography and the environment. Prentice Hall, Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River, NJ, p 274

    Google Scholar 

  • John Wilson JS, Chandrasekar N, Magesh NS (2012) Morphometric analysis of major sub-watersheds in Aiyar and Karai Pottanar Basin, Central Tamil Nadu, India using remote sensing and GIS techniques. Bonfring International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management Science 2(1):8–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishnan MS (1953) The structural and tectonic history of India. Mem Geol Surv Ind 81:1–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Macka Z (2001) Determination of texture of topography from large scale contour maps. Geogr Bull 73(2):53–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Magesh NS, Chandrasekar N, Soundranayagam JP (2011) Morphometric evaluation of Papanasam and Manimuthar watersheds, parts of Western Ghats, Tirunelveli district, Tamil Nadu, India: a GIS approach. Environ Earth Sci 64:373–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magesh NS, Jitheshlal KV, Chandrasekar N, Jini KV (2012) GIS based morphometric evaluation of Chimmini and Mupily watersheds, parts of Western Ghats, Thrissur District, Kerala, India. Earth Sci Inform 5(2):111–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maidment DR (2002) ArcHydro GIS for water resources. ESRI Press, Redlands, 220

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesa LM (2006) Morphometric analysis of a subtropical Andean basin (Tucuman, Argentina). Environ Geol 50(8):1235–1242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller VC (1953) A quantitative geomorphologic study of drainage basin characteristics in the Clinch Mountain area, Virginia and Tennessee, Project NR 389042, Tech Report 3. Columbia University Department of Geology, ONR Geography Branch, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Moussa R (2003) On morphometric properties of basin, scale effects and hydrological response. Hydrol Processes 17:33–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nag SK, Chakraborty S (2003) Influence of rock types and structures in the development of drainage network in hard rock area. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 31(1):25–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narayanasamy S, Lakshmi P (1990) Charnockitic rocks of Tinnelveli district, Madras. In: Granulates of South India, (Ed.) BP Radakrishnan: Geol Soc India 17: 300–305

  • Ozdemir H, Bird D (2009) Evaluation of morphometric parameters of drainage networks derived from topographic maps and DEM in point floods. Environ Geol 56:1405–1415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitchamuthu CS (1979) Physical geography of India. National Book Trust India, New Delhi, p 235

    Google Scholar 

  • Rastogi RA, Sharma TC (1976) Quantitative analysis of drainage basin characteristics. J Soil Water Conserv India 26(1& 4):18–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravichandran S, Ramanibai R, Pundarikanthan NV (1996) Ecoregions for describing water quality patterns in Tamiraparani basin, South India. J Hydrol 178:257–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rinaldo A, Rodriguez-Iturbe I, Rigon R (1998) Channel networks. In: Jeanloz R, Albee AL, Burke KC (eds) Annual review of earth and planetary sciences, vol 26. Annual Reviews, Palo Alto, pp 289–327

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumm SA (1956) Evolution of drainage systems and slopes in badlands at Perth Amboy, New Jersey. Bull Geol Soc Am 67:597–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumm SA (1963) Sinuosity of alluvial rivers in the Great Plains. Bull Geol Soc Am 74:1089–1100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sethupathi AS, Lakshmi Narasimhan C, Vasanthamohan V, Mohan SP (2011) Prioritization of miniwatersheds based on morphometric analysis using remote sensing and GIS in a drought prone Bargur-Mathur subwatersheds, Ponnaiyar River basin, India. International Journal of Geomatics and Geosciences 2(2):403–414

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh S, Singh MC (1997) Morphometric analysis of Kanhar river basin. National Geographical Journal of India 43(1):31–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith KG (1950) Standards for grading texture of erosional topography. Am J Sci 248:655–668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sreedevi PD, Subrahmanyam K, Shakeel A (2005) The significance of morphometric analysis for obtaining groundwater potential zones in a structurally controlled terrain. Environ Geol 47(3):412–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strahler AN (1952) Dynamics basis of geomorphology. Bull Geol Soc Am 63:923–938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strahler AN (1957) Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology. Trans Am Geophys Union 38:913–920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strahler AN (1964) Quantitative geomorphology of drainage basins and channel networks. In: Te Chow V (ed) Hand book of applied hydrology. McGraw Hill Book Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Topaloglu F (2002) Estimation of instantaneous peak flows in Seyhan river basin using regional regression procedures. Turk J Agric For 26:47–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Verstappen H (1983) The applied geomorphology. International Institute for Aerial Survey and Earth Science (I.T.C), Enschede

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. S. Magesh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Magesh, N.S., Chandrasekar, N. GIS model-based morphometric evaluation of Tamiraparani subbasin, Tirunelveli district, Tamil Nadu, India. Arab J Geosci 7, 131–141 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-012-0742-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-012-0742-z

Keywords

Navigation