Skip to main content
Log in

Quantitative characterization to construct hard rock lithological model using dual resistivity borehole logging

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Borehole logging is a very robust tool to accurately locate transitions between weathered layers and fractures in hard rock settings; therefore, it can help substantially in the construction of regional and local hydrogeological models. A simple and low-cost resistivity probe, named dual resistivity logger (DRL), was experimented to map the formation resistivity at two investigation distances by means of three active electrodes. Forward response of DRL was analysed on the synthetic data generated for a conceptual hard rock hydrogeological model as well as tested at two field sites in hard rock aquifers of southern India. The DRL was proven efficient in demarcating the aquifer into successive hydrogeological zones, i.e. the laminated-fissured (L-F), the fissured-semi-fissured (F-SF), and semi-fissured-basement (SF-B) layers. The results were verified by comparison with well lithologs based on rock cuttings and temperature logging. The DRL has proven its ability to locate the hydraulically active fractures as well as contacts between weathered layers. It offers a simple but efficient way to acquire underground data for building hydrogeological models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson MP (2005) Heat as a groundwater tracer. Ground Water 43(6):951–968

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandra S (2006) Contribution of geophysical properties in estimating hydrogeological parameters of an aquifer. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. BHU, Varanasi, pp. 176

  • Chandra S, Ananda Rao V, Singh VS (2004) A combined approach of Schlumberger and axial pole-dipole configurations for groundwater exploration in hard rock areas. Curr Sci 86(10):1437–1443

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandra S, Rao VA, Krishnamurthy NS, Dutta S, Shakeel A (2006) Integrated studies for characterization of lineaments to locate groundwater potential zones in hard rock region of Karnataka, India. Hydrogeol J 14:767–776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandra S, Ahmed S, Ram A, Dewandel B (2008) Estimation of hard rock aquifers hydraulic conductivity from geoelectrical measurements: a theoretical development with field application. J Hydrol 35:218–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandra S, Atal S, Nagaiah E, Mallesh D, Krishnamraju P, Ahmeduddin M, Zaphu V, Seshamma NV, Rao VA, Ahmed S (2009) Electrical resistivity tomography survey to test the performance multi-electrode resistivity systems (Syscals). NGRI-2009-GW-690. p 26

  • Chandra S, Dewandel B, Dutta S, Ahmed S (2010) Geophysical model of geological discontinuities in a granitic aquifer: analyzing small scale variability of electrical resistivity for groundwater occurrences. J Appl Geophys 71:137–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandra S, Ahmed S, Nagaiah E, Singh SK, Chandra PC (2011) Geophysical exploration for lithological control of arsenic contamination in groundwater in Middle Ganga Plains, India. Phys Chem Earth, Elsevier publication (on line published): doi:10.1016/j.pce.2011.05.009

  • Chatelier M, Ruelleu S, Bour O, Porel Gl, Delay F (2011) Combined fluid temperature and flow logging for the characterization of hydraulic structure in a fractured karst aquifer 400(3–4):377–386

  • Christensen NB (2009) Sensitivity function of EM method: a lecture note. Aarhus University, Denmark

    Google Scholar 

  • Dakhnov VN (1959) Geophysical well logging. Q Colo Sch Mines 57(2), 445 p

  • Deng R, Guo H, Xiao C (2013) Apply array induction logging to study the low-resistivity belt zone identification method. Arab J Geosci. doi:10.1007/s12517-013-1049-4

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewandel B, Lachassagne P, Wyns R, Maréchal JC, Krishnamurthy NS (2006) A generalized 3-D geological and hydrogeological conceptual model of granite aquifers controlled by single or multiphase weathering. J Hydrol 330:260–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewandel B, Gandolfi J-M, Zaidi FK, Ahmed S, Subrahmanyam K (2007) A decision support tool with variable agroclimatic scenarios for sustainable groundwater management in semi-arid hard rock areas. Curr Sci 92(8):1093–1102

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewandel B, Perrin J, Ahmed S, Aulong S, Hrkal Z, Lachassagne P, Samad M, Massuel S (2010) Development of a tool for managing groundwater resources in semi-arid hard rock regions. Application to a rural watershed in south India. Hydrol Process 24:2784–2797. doi:10.1002/hyp.7696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewandel B, Maréchal JC, Ladouche B, Bour O, Ahmed S, Chandra S, Pauwels H (2011) A Conceptual hydrodynamic model of a geological discontinuity in hard rock aquifers: example of a quartz reef in granitic terrain in South India. J Hydrol 405:475–487

  • Keller GV, Frischknecht FC (1966) Electrical methods in geophysical prospecting First Edition. Pergamon Press, London, 519 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Klepikova M, Le Borgne T, Bour O, Davy P (2011) A methodology for using borehole temperature-depth profiles under ambient, single and cross-borehole pumping conditions to estimate fracture hydraulic properties. J Hydrol 407:145–152. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.07.018

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishnamurthy NS, Chandra S, Kumar D (2007) Characterization of hard rock aquifer. A chapter in book “Groundwater dynamics in hard rock aquifers”. Capital Publishing Company, pp 64-86

  • Loke MH (2000) Electrical imaging surveys for environmental and engineering studies: a practical guide to 2-D and 3-D surveys, p 67

  • Loke MH, Barker RD (1996) Rapid least-squares inversion of apparent resistivity pseudo sections using a quasi-Newton method. Geophys Prospect 44:131–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch EJ (1962) Formation evaluation. Harper’s Gosciences Services, Harper & Row

  • Maréchal JC, Dewandel B, Subrahmanyam K (2004) Use of Hydraulic test at different scales to characterize fracture network properties in the weathered-fractured layer of hard rock aquifer. Water Resour Res 40(W11508):1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Molz FJ, Morin RH, Hess AE, Melville JG, Guven O (1989) The impeller meter for measuring aquifer permeability variations: evaluation and comparison with other tests. Water Resour Res 25(7):1677–1683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neuman SP (2005) Trends, prospects and challenges in quantifying flow and transport through fractured rocks. Hydrogeol J 13:124–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paillet FL (1998) Flow modeling and permeability estimation using borehole flow logs in heterogeneous fractured formations. Water Resour Res 34(5):997–1010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pehme PE, Parker BL, Cherry JA, Greenhouse JP (2009) Improved resolution of ambient flow through fractured rock with temperature logs. Ground Water 48(2):191–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perrin J, Mohamed W (2008) Borewell drilling report of Hydrogeological Park, Choutuppal. IFCGR-2008, p 20

  • Perrin J, Mascré C, Pauwels H, Ahmed S (2011) Solute recycling: an emerging threat to groundwater resources in southern India? J Hydrol. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.12.024

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy A, Apparao A (1971) Depth of investigation in direct current methods. Geophysics 36:943–959

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sonkamble S, Chandra S, Nagaiah E, Dar FA, Somvanshi VK, Ahmed S (2013) Geophysical signatures resolving hydrogeological complexities over hard rock terrain—a study from Southern India. Arab J Geosci. doi:10.1007/s12517-013-0931-4

    Google Scholar 

  • Telford WM, Geldart LP, Sheriff RE, Keys DA (1976) Applied geophysics. Cambridge University Press, New York, 860 pp

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study has been carried out at the Indo-French Centre for Groundwater Research (IFCGR), a joint centre of NGRI, India and BRGM, France. The authors wish to thank the Ministry of External Affairs of both countries for their kind support and cooperation. We are thankful to the Director, NGRI, Hyderabad for his support, encouragement and according permission to publish this paper. We acknowledge SOERE H+ network for its help on the EHP Choutuppal site development. Special thanks to Sri RSK Srinivasulu, Engineer and Mr. Anil Kumar for fabricating the DRL probe at NGRI. The valuable discussions and support extended by Dr. Jerome Perrin, Dr. D.V Reddy, Dr. Surendra Atal, Dr. E. Nagaiah, W. Mohamed, Mohd Ahmeduddin, P. Raghvendra, and V. Zaphu are sincerely acknowledged. Finally, we would like to express thanks to the anonymous reviewer and editor for their critical reviews and valuable suggestions, which improved the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Subash Chandra.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chandra, S., Boisson, A. & Ahmed, S. Quantitative characterization to construct hard rock lithological model using dual resistivity borehole logging. Arab J Geosci 8, 3685–3696 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-014-1448-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-014-1448-1

Keywords

Navigation