Skip to main content
Log in

Modified governing equation and numerical simulation of seepage flow in a single fracture with three-dimensional roughness

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Roughness and tortuosity influence groundwater flow through a fracture. Steady flow through a single fracture can be described primitively by the well-known Cubic Law and Reynolds equation with the assumption that the fracture is made of smooth parallel plates. However, ignoring the roughness and tortuosity of the fracture will lead to inaccurate estimations of the flow rate. To obtain a more accurate flow rate through a rough fracture, this paper has derived a modified governing equation, taking into account the three-dimensional effect of the roughness. The equation modifies the Reynolds equation by adding correction coefficients to the terms of the flow rates, which are relative to the roughness angles in both the longitudinal and transverse directions. Experiments of steady seepage flow through sawtooth fractures were conducted. The accuracy of the modified equation has been verified by comparing the experimental data and the theoretical computational data. Furthermore, three-dimensional numerical models were established to simulate the steady flow in rough fractures with the triangular, sinusoidal surfaces and the typical joint roughness coefficient (JRC) profiles. The simulation results were compared with the calculation results of the modified equation and the current equations. The comparison indicates that the flow rate calculated by the modified equation is the closest to the numerical result.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

Q :

Volume flow rate

W :

Apparent width of the fracture perpendicular to the flow direction

D :

Apparent aperture of the fracture

P :

Pressure

Μ :

Fluid viscosity

L :

Apparent length of the fracture in the flow direction

x, y, z :

Global coordinates

Ζ :

Local coordinate in the direction of the intersecting line between the local tiny segment and the x-z plane

Η :

Local coordinate in the direction of the intersecting line between the local tiny segment and the y-z plane

Ξ :

Local coordinate in the direction perpendicular to the local tiny segment ζ-η plane

e ζ, e η , e ξ :

Unit vectors of the local coordinates (ζ, η, ξ)

α x :

Inclination angle of the local tiny segment in the x direction < ζ, x >

α y :

Inclination angle of the local tiny segment in the y direction < η, y >

<α x >:

Effective rough angle in the x direction

<α y >:

Effective rough angle in the y direction

d(x, y):

Apparent aperture at point (x, y)

<d>:

Average apparent aperture

d z :

Apparent aperture of the fracture in the z direction

d ξ :

True aperture of the local tiny segment in the ξ direction

(i, j):

Numbers of the row and column of a tiny segment in the macroscopic fracture

I, J :

Total numbers of the rows and columns of the tiny segments in the macroscopic fracture

JRC:

Joint roughness coefficient

K x :

K y permeability coefficients in the x, y directions

l x :

Apparent length of the tiny segment projected in the x direction

l y :

Apparent width of the tiny segment projected in the y direction

l ζ :

True length of the tiny segment

l η :

True width of the tiny segment

τ x, τ y :

Tortuosity components in the x, y direction

p ζi , p ηi :

Pressure of Section i in the segment of fracture in the ζ, η directions

p xi , p yi :

Pressure of Section i in the segment of fracture in the x, y directions

q ζ , q η :

Local flow rates per unit width in the segment of fracture in the ζ, η directions

q x , q y :

Flow rates per unit width in the x, y directions

Q ζ , Q η :

Local flow rates in the segment of fracture in the ζ, η directions

Q xi , Q yi :

Flow rates of Section i rates in the x, y directions

Q 0x , Q 0y :

Apparent flow rates calculated by the Cubic Law in the x, y directions

Q x (i, j):

j) flow rate in the x direction of the No. i Row and No. j Column tiny segment

Q A :

Flow rate in Fracture A

Q B :

Flow rate in Fracture B

Q C :

Flow rate in Fracture C

Q s :

Flow rate from the numerical simulation

Q CL :

Flow rate calculated from Cubic Law

Q 2D, Q 3D :

Flow rate calculated from the 2D or 3D tortuosity corrected equation

Q JRC :

Flow rate calculated from the 3D equation with JRC

Z 2x , Z 2y :

Root-mean-square slope Z 2 in the x, y directions

A :

Amplitude

Λ :

Wavelength

δ * :

Relative difference

C :

Flow rate correction coefficient to modify Cubic Law

C 2D, 3D :

Flow rate correction coefficient from the 2D, 3D equation to modify Cubic Law

C JRC :

Flow rate correction coefficient from the 3D equation with JRC to modify Cubic Law

References

  • Bae DS, Kim KS, Koh YK, Kim JY (2011) Characterization of joint roughness in granite by applying the scan circle technique to images from a borehole televiewer. Rock Mech Rock Eng 44(4):497–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton N, Choubey V (1977) The shear strength of rock joints in theory and practice. Rock Mech 10(1–2):1–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bear J (1972) Dynamics of fluids in porous media. Elsevier, New York, p 764

    Google Scholar 

  • Belem T, Homand-Etienne F, Souley M (2000) Quantitative parameters for rock joint surface roughness. Rock Mech Rock Eng 33(4):217–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown SR (1987) Fluid flow through rock joints: the effect of surface roughness. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 92(B2):1337–1347, 1978–2012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen SH, Feng XM, Isam S (2008) Numerical estimation of REV and permeability tensor for fractured rock masses by composite element method. Int J Numer Anal Methods 32(12):1459–1477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins RE (1961) Flow of fluids through porous materials. Reinhold, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Crandall D, Ahmadi G, Smith DH (2010a) Computational modeling of fluid flow through a fracture in permeable rock. Transp Porous Media 84(2):493–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crandall D, Bromhal G, Karpyn ZT (2010b) Numerical simulations examining the relationship between wall-roughness and fluid flow in rock fractures. Int J Rock Mech Min 47(5):784–796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drazer G, Koplik J (2000) Permeability of self-affine rough fractures. Phys Rev E 62(6):8076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elsworth D, Goodman RE (1986) Characterization of rock fissure hydraulic conductivity using idealized wall roughness profiles. Int J Rock Mech Min Geomech Abstr Pergamon 23(3):233–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fluent INC (2006) FLUENT 6.3 user’s guide. Fluent documentation

  • Gao Y, Louis NYW (2013) A modified correlation between roughness parameter Z2 and the JRC. Rock Mech Rock Eng, available online: Doi 10.1007/s00603-013-0505-5

  • Ge S (1997) A governing equation for fluid flow in rough fractures. Water Resour Res 33(1):53–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geng K (1994) Research and application of the mechanic–percolating interaction of complex rockhead. PhD thesis, Tsinghua University, Beijing (in Chinese)

  • Grasselli G, Egger P (2003) Constitutive law for the shear strength of rock joints based on three-dimensional surface parameters. Int J Rock Mech Min 40(1):25–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grasselli G, Wirth J, Egger P (2002) Quantitative three-dimensional description of a rough surface and parameter evolution with shearing. Int J Rock Mech Min 39(6):789–800

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang Y, Li B, Tanabashi Y (2006) Estimating the relation between surface roughness and mechanical properties of rock joints. Int J Rock Mech Min 43(6):837–846

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koyama T, Neretnieks I, Jing L (2008) A numerical study on differences in using Navier-Stokes and Reynolds equations for modeling the fluid flow and particle transport in single rock fractures with shear. Int J Rock Mech Min 45(7):1082–1101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lomize GM (1951) Flow in fractured rocks. Gosenergoizdat, Moscow, p 127

    Google Scholar 

  • Louis CA (1969) Study of groundwater flow in jointed rock and its influence on the stability of rock masses. Imperial College of Science and Technology, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Mah J, Samson C, McKinnon SD, Thibodeau D (2013) 3D laser imaging for surface roughness analysis. Int J Rock Mech Min 58:111–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Moharrami A, Hassanzadeh Y, Salmasi F, Moradi G, Moharrami G (2013) Performance of the horizontal drains in upstream shell of earth dams on the upstream slope stability during rapid drawdown conditions. Arab J Geosci 7:1957–1964, 1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mourzenko VV, Thovert JF, Adler PM (1995) Permeability of a single fracture; validity of the Reynolds equation. J Phys II France 5(3):465–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers NO (1962) Characterization of surface roughness. Wear 5(3):182–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nazridoust K, Ahmadi G, Smith DH (2006) A new friction factor correlation for laminar, single-phase flows through rock fractures. J Hydrol 329(1):315–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neuzil CE, Tracy JV (1981) Flow through fractures. Water Resour Res 17(1):191–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petchsingto T, Karpyn ZT (2009) Deterministic modeling of fluid flow through a CT-scanned fracture using computational fluid dynamics. Energy Sources, Part A 31(11):897–905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasouli V, Hosseinian A (2011) Correlations developed for estimation of hydraulic parameters of rough fractures through the simulation of JRC flow channels. Rock Mech Rock Eng 44(4):447–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutqvist J, Wu Y-S, Tsang C-F, Bodvarsson G (2002) A modeling approach for analysis of coupled multiphase fluid flow, heat transfer, and deformation in fractured porous rock. Int J Rock Mech Min 39:429–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanei M, Faramarzi L, Goli S, Fahimifar A, Rahmati A, Mehinrad A (2013) Development of a new equation for joint roughness coefficient (JRC) with fractal dimension: a case study of Bakhtiary Dam site in Iran. Arab J Geosci 1–11

  • Scesi L, Gattinoni P (2007) Roughness control on hydraulic conductivity in fractured rocks. Hydrogeol J 15(2):201–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snow DT (1969) Anisotropic permeability of fractured media. Water Resour Res 5(6):1273–1289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Streltsova TD (1976) Hydrodynamics of groundwater flow in a fractured formation. Water Resour Res 12(3):405–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tatone BS, Grasselli G (2010) A new 2D discontinuity roughness parameter and its correlation with JRC. Int J Rock Mech Min 47(8):1391–1400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tatone BS, Grasselli G (2013) An investigation of discontinuity roughness scale dependency using high-resolution surface measurements. Rock Mech Rock Eng 46(4):657–681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsang YW (1984) The effect of tortuosity on fluid flow through a single fracture. Water Resour Res 20(9):1209–1215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tse R, Cruden DM (1979) Estimating joint roughness coefficients. Int J Rock Mech Min Geomech Abstr Pergamon 16(5):303–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waite ME, Ge S, Spetzler H (1999) A new conceptual model for fluid flow in discrete fractures: an experimental and numerical study. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 104(B6):13049–13059, 1978–2012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh JB, Brace WF (1985) The effect of pressure on porosity and the transport properties of rock. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 89(B11):9425–9431, 1978–2012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh R, McDermott C, Kolditz O (2008) Numerical modeling of stress-permeability coupling in rough fractures. Hydrogeol J 16(4):613–627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiao W, Xia C, Wei W, Bian Y (2013) Combined effect of tortuosity and surface roughness on estimation of flow rate through a single rough joint. J Geophys Eng 10(4):045015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiong X, Li B, Jiang Y, Koyama T, Zhang C (2011) Experimental and numerical study of the geometrical and hydraulic characteristics of a single rock fracture during shear. Int J Rock Mech Min 48(8):1292–1302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Z, Nemcik J (2013) Friction factor of water flow through rough rock fractures. Rock Mech Rock Eng 46(5):1125–1134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Z, Nemcik J, Ma S (2013) Micro- and macro-behaviour of fluid flow through rock fractures: an experimental study. Hydrogeol J 21(8):1717–1729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman RW, Kumar S, Bodvarsson GS (1991) Lubrication theory analysis of the permeability of rough-walled fractures. Int J Rock Mech Min Geomech Abstr Pergamon 28(4):325–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman RW, Chen DW, Cook NGW (1992) The effect of contact area on the permeability of fractures. Hydrogeol J 139(1):79–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman RW, Al-Yaarubi A, Pain CC, Grattoni CA (2004) Non-linear regimes of fluid flow in rock fractures. Int J Rock Mech Min 41:163–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. U1361103, 51479094, and 51009079) and National Basic Research Program of China (Grant No. 2011CB013500).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Enzhi Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

He, G., Wang, E. & Liu, X. Modified governing equation and numerical simulation of seepage flow in a single fracture with three-dimensional roughness. Arab J Geosci 9, 81 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-015-2036-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-015-2036-8

Keywords

Navigation