Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Landslide susceptibility assessment using frequency ratio, statistical index and certainty factor models for the Gangu County, China

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to produce a reliable susceptibility mapping using frequency ratio (FR), statistical index (SI), and certainty factor (CF) models with the aid of geographic information system (GIS) for the Gangu County, Gansu Province, China. First, a total of 328 landslide locations were detected by literatures, aerial photographs and field surveys; meanwhile, a landslide inventory map was constructed mainly based on landslide locations. Then, 230 (70 %) landslides were randomly selected for modeling, and the remaining 98 (30 %) landslides were used for the model validation. In order to produce a susceptibility map, 12 landslide influencing factors were selected from the database: slope angle, slope aspect, plan curvature, profile curvature, altitude, distance to faults, distance to rivers, distance to roads, NDVI, land use, rainfall, and lithology. Whereafter, the landslide susceptibility maps were mapped using landslide influencing factors based on the FR, SI, and CF models. Finally, the accuracy of the landslide susceptibility maps developed from the three models was validated using area under the curve (AUC) analysis. Through the analysis, it is seen that the prediction accuracy of the three models was 75.62 % for FR model, 75.71 % for SI model, and 75.56 % for CF model, respectively. According to the results, three models show almost similar results, while SI model performs slightly better than other models and the map produced by SI model represents the most appropriate properties. In addition, the study area was classified into five classes, such as very low, low, moderate, high, and very high. The landslide susceptibility maps can be helpful to select site and mitigate landslide hazards in the study area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aleotti P, Chowdhury R (1999) Landslide hazard assessment: summary review and new perspectives. Bull Eng Geol Environ 58(1):21–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Althuwaynee OF, Pradhan B, Park HJ, Lee JH (2014) A novel ensemble bivariate statistical evidential belief function with knowledge-based analytical hierarchy process and multivariate statistical logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping. Catena 114:21–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayalew L, Yamagishi H (2005) The application of GIS-based logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Kakuda-Yahiko Mountains, Central Japan. Geomorphology 65(1):15–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binaghi E, Luzi L, Madella P, Pergalani F, Rampini A (1998) Slope instability zonation: a comparison between certainty factor and fuzzy Dempster–Shafer approaches. Nat Hazards 17(1):77–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourenane H, Bouhadad Y, Guettouche MS, Braham M (2014) GIS-based landslide susceptibility zonation using bivariate statistical and expert approaches in the city of Constantine (Northeast Algeria). Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 1–19

  • Bui DT, Lofman O, Revhaug I, Dick O (2011) Landslide susceptibility analysis in the Hoa Binh province of Vietnam using statistical index and logistic regression. Nat Hazards 59(3):1413–1444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrara A, Guzzetti F, Cardinali M, Reichenbach P (1999) Use of GIS technology in the prediction and monitoring of landslide hazard. Nat Hazards 20(2–3):117–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cevik E, Topal T (2003) GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping for a problematic segment of the natural gas pipeline, Hendek (Turkey). Environ Geol 44(8):949–962

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung CJF, Fabbri AG (1993) The representation of geoscience information for data integration. Nonrenewable Resources 2(2):122–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung CJF, Fabbri AG (2003) Validation of spatial prediction models for landslide hazard mapping. Nat Hazards 30(3):451–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Constantin M, Bednarik M, Jurchescu MC, Vlaicu M (2011) Landslide susceptibility assessment using the bivariate statistical analysis and the index of entropy in the Sibiciu Basin (Romania). Environ Earth Sci 63(2):397–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai FC, Lee CF, Li J, Xu ZW (2001) Assessment of landslide susceptibility on the natural terrain of Lantau Island, Hong Kong. Environ Geol 40(3):381–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai FC, Lee CF, Ngai YY (2002) Landslide risk assessment and management: an overview. Eng Geol 64(1):65–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demir G, Aytekin M, Akgün A, İkizler SB, Tatar O (2013) A comparison of landslide susceptibility mapping of the eastern part of the North Anatolian Fault Zone (Turkey) by likelihood-frequency ratio and analytic hierarchy process methods. Nat Hazards 65(3):1481–1506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dou J, Oguchi T, Hayakawa YS, Uchiyama S, Saito H, Paudel U (2014) GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping using a certainty factor model and its validation in the Chuetsu area, Central Japan. In Landslide Science for a Safer Geoenvironment (pp. 419–424). Springer International Publishing

  • Ercanoglu M, Gokceoglu C (2004) Use of fuzzy relations to produce landslide susceptibility map of a landslide prone area (West Black Sea Region, Turkey). Eng Geol 75(3):229–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ercanoglu M, Gokceoglu C, Van Asch TW (2004) Landslide susceptibility zoning north of Yenice (NW Turkey) by multivariate statistical techniques. Nat Hazards 32(1):1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falaschi F, Giacomelli F, Federici PR, Puccinelli A, Avanzi GA, Pochini A, Ribolini A (2009) Logistic regression versus artificial neural networks: landslide susceptibility evaluation in a sample area of the Serchio River valley, Italy. Nat Hazards 50(3):551–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glade T (2001) Landslide hazard assessment and historical landslide data—an inseparable couple?. In the use of historical data in natural hazard assessments (pp. 153–168). Springer Netherlands

  • Greco R, Sorriso-Valvo M, Catalano E (2007) Logistic regression analysis in the evaluation of mass movements susceptibility: the Aspromonte case study, Calabria, Italy. Eng Geol 89(1):47–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guzzetti F, Carrara A, Cardinali M, Reichenbach P (1999) Landslide hazard evaluation: a review of current techniques and their application in a multi-scale study, Central Italy. Geomorphology 31(1):181–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guzzetti F, Reichenbach P, Ardizzone F, Cardinali M, Galli M (2006) Estimating the quality of landslide susceptibility models. Geomorphology 81(1):166–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ilia I, Koumantakis I, Rozos D, Koukis G, Tsangaratos P (2015) A geographical information system (GIS) based probabilistic certainty factor approach in assessing landslide susceptibility: the case study of Kimi, Euboea, Greece. In Engineering Geology for Society and Territory-Volume 2 (pp. 1199–1204). Springer International Publishing

  • Jade S, Sarkar S (1993) Statistical models for slope instability classification. Eng Geol 36(1):91–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanungo DP, Sarkar S, Sharma S (2011) Combining neural network with fuzzy, certainty factor and likelihood ratio concepts for spatial prediction of landslides. Nat Hazards 59(3):1491–1512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kayastha P, Dhital MR, De Smedt F (2013) Application of the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) for landslide susceptibility mapping: a case study from the Tinau watershed, west Nepal. Comput Geosci 52:398–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lan HX, Zhou CH, Wang LJ, Zhang HY, Li RH (2004) Landslide hazard spatial analysis and prediction using GIS in the Xiaojiang watershed, Yunnan, China. Eng Geol 76(1):109–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S (2005) Application of logistic regression model and its validation for landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS and remote sensing data. Int J Remote Sens 26(7):1477–1491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S, Min K (2001) Statistical analysis of landslide susceptibility at Yongin, Korea. Environ Geol 40(9):1095–1113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S, Talib JA (2005) Probabilistic landslide susceptibility and factor effect analysis. Environ Geol 47(7):982–990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S, Choi J, Min K (2004) Probabilistic landslide hazard mapping using GIS and remote sensing data at Boun, Korea. Int J Remote Sens 25(11):2037–2052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S, Ryu JH, Kim IS (2007) Landslide susceptibility analysis and its verification using likelihood ratio, logistic regression, and artificial neural network models: case study of Youngin, Korea. Landslides 4(4):327–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu C, Li W, Wu H, Lu P, Sang K, Sun W, Li R (2013) Susceptibility evaluation and mapping of China’s landslides based on multi-source data. Nat Hazards 69(3):1477–1495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohammady M, Pourghasemi HR, Pradhan B (2012) Landslide susceptibility mapping at Golestan Province, Iran: a comparison between frequency ratio, Dempster–Shafer, and weights-of-evidence models. J Asian Earth Sci 61:221–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nandi A, Shakoor A (2008) Application of logistic regression model for slope instability prediction in Cuyahoga River Watershed, Ohio, USA. Georisk 2(1):16–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Nefeslioglu HA, Duman TY, Durmaz S (2008) Landslide susceptibility mapping for a part of tectonic Kelkit Valley (Eastern Black Sea region of Turkey). Geomorphology 94(3):401–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nefeslioglu HA, Sezer E, Gokceoglu C, Bozkir AS, Duman TY (2010) Assessment of landslide susceptibility by decision trees in the metropolitan area of Istanbul, Turkey. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2010

  • Ohlmacher GC, Davis JC (2003) Using multiple logistic regression and GIS technology to predict landslide hazard in northeast Kansas, USA. Eng Geol 69(3):331–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oztekin B, Topal T (2005) GIS-based detachment susceptibility analyses of a cut slope in limestone, Ankara—Turkey. Environ Geol 49(1):124–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park S, Choi C, Kim B, Kim J (2013) Landslide susceptibility mapping using frequency ratio, analytic hierarchy process, logistic regression, and artificial neural network methods at the Inje area, Korea. Environ Earth Sci 68(5):1443–1464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paudits P, Bednarik M (2002) Using GIS in evaluation of landslide susceptibility in Handlovská kotlina basin. In Proceedings of the 1st European conference on landslides, Prague. Balkema, Rotterdam (pp. 437–441)

  • Pourghasemi HR, Mohammady M, Pradhan B (2012a) Landslide susceptibility mapping using index of entropy and conditional probability models in GIS: Safarood Basin, Iran. Catena 97:71–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pourghasemi HR, Pradhan B, Gokceoglu C (2012b) Application of fuzzy logic and analytical hierarchy process (AHP) to landslide susceptibility mapping at Haraz watershed, Iran. Nat Hazards 63(2):965–996

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pourghasemi HR, Moradi HR, Aghda SF (2013a) Landslide susceptibility mapping by binary logistic regression, analytical hierarchy process, and statistical index models and assessment of their performances. Nat Hazards 69(1):749–779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pourghasemi HR, Pradhan B, Gokceoglu C, Mohammadi M, Moradi HR (2013b) Application of weights-of-evidence and certainty factor models and their comparison in landslide susceptibility mapping at Haraz watershed, Iran. Arab J Geosci 6(7):2351–2365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pourghasemi HR, Jirandeh AG, Pradhan B, Xu C, Gokceoglu C (2013c) Landslide susceptibility mapping using support vector machine and GIS at the Golestan Province, Iran. J Earth System Sci 122(2):349–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B, Lee S (2010) Delineation of landslide hazard areas on Penang Island, Malaysia, by using frequency ratio, logistic regression, and artificial neural network models. Environ Earth Sci 60(5):1037–1054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B, Sezer EA, Gokceoglu C, Buchroithner MF (2010) Landslide susceptibility mapping by neuro-fuzzy approach in a landslide-prone area (Cameron Highlands, Malaysia). Geoscience Remote Sensing, IEEE Trans 48(12):4164–4177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raman R, Punia M (2012) The application of GIS-based bivariate statistical methods for landslide hazards assessment in the upper Tons river valley, Western Himalaya, India. Georisk: Assessment Manag Risk Engineered Systems Geohazards 6(3):145–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Rautela P, Lakhera RC (2000) Landslide risk analysis between Giri and Tons rivers in Himachal Himalaya (India). Int J Appl Earth Observation Geoinformation 2(3):153–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Regmi AD, Devkota KC, Yoshida K, Pradhan B, Pourghasemi HR, Kumamoto T, Akgun A (2014) Application of frequency ratio, statistical index, and weights-of-evidence models and their comparison in landslide susceptibility mapping in Central Nepal Himalaya. Arab J Geosci 7(2):725–742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saadatkhah N, Kassim A, Lee LM (2014) Susceptibility assessment of shallow landslides in Hulu Kelang area, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia using analytical hierarchy process and frequency ratio. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 1–15

  • Saha AK, Gupta RP, Sarkar I, Arora MK, Csaplovics E (2005) An approach for GIS-based statistical landslide susceptibility zonation—with a case study in the Himalayas. Landslides 2(1):61–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sidle RC, Ochiai H (2006) Landslides: processes, prediction, and land use (Vol. 18). American Geophysical Union

  • Solaimani K, Mousavi SZ, Kavian A (2013) Landslide susceptibility mapping based on frequency ratio and logistic regression models. Arab J Geosci 6(7):2557–2569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Süzen ML, Doyuran V (2004) A comparison of the GIS based landslide susceptibility assessment methods: multivariate versus bivariate. Environ Geol 45(5):665–679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tay LT, Lateh H, Hossain MK, Kamil AA (2014) Landslide hazard mapping using a poisson distribution: a case study in Penang Island, Malaysia. In Landslide Science for a Safer Geoenvironment (pp. 521–525). Springer International Publishing

  • Van Westen CJ (1997) Statistical landslide hazard analysis. ILWIS 2:73–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Westen CJ (2004) Geo-information tools for landslide risk assessment: an overview of recent developments. Landslides: Evaluation Stabilization 1:39–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Wan S, Lei TC (2009) A knowledge-based decision support system to analyze the debris-flow problems at Chen-Yu-Lan River, Taiwan. Knowl-Based Syst 22(8):580–588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wan S, Lei TC, Chou TY (2009) Anovel data mining technique of analysis and classification for landslide problems. Nat Hazards 52:211–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang L, Zhang CS, Yang WM, Sun WF, Qiu ZL, Wang T (2011) Risk assessment of geohazards by using GIS in Gangu County, Gansu Province. J Geomechanics 4:010

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieczorek GF (1984) Preparing a detailed landslide-inventory map for hazard evaluation and reduction. Bull As Eng Geol 21(3):337–342

    Google Scholar 

  • Yalcin A, Bulut F (2007) Landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS and digital photogrammetric techniques: a case study from Ardesen (NE-Turkey). Nat Hazards 41(1):201–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yalcin A, Reis S, Aydinoglu AC, Yomralioglu T (2011) A GIS-based comparative study of frequency ratio, analytical hierarchy process, bivariate statistics and logistics regression methods for landslide susceptibility mapping in Trabzon, NE Turkey. Catena 85(3):274–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yesilnacar E, Topal T (2005) Landslide susceptibility mapping: a comparison of logistic regression and neural networks methods in a medium scale study, Hendek region (Turkey). Eng Geol 79(3):251–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz I (2009) Landslide susceptibility mapping using frequency ratio, logistic regression, artificial neural networks and their comparison: a case study from Kat landslides (Tokat—Turkey). Comput Geosci 35(6):1125–1138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz C, Topal T, Süzen ML (2012) GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping using bivariate statistical analysis in Devrek (Zonguldak-Turkey). Environ Earth Sci 65(7):2161–2178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zare M, Pourghasemi HR, Vafakhah M, Pradhan B (2013) Landslide susceptibility mapping at Vaz Watershed (Iran) using an artificial neural network model: a comparison between multilayer perceptron (MLP) and radial basic function (RBF) algorithms. Arab J Geosci 6(8):2873–2888

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the State Key Program of National Natural Science of China (Grant No. 41430643) and National Program on Key Basic Research Project (Grant No. 2015CB251601) for the support. Also, the authors would like to express their gratitude to the anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wenping Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wu, Y., Li, W., Wang, Q. et al. Landslide susceptibility assessment using frequency ratio, statistical index and certainty factor models for the Gangu County, China. Arab J Geosci 9, 84 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-015-2112-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-015-2112-0

Keywords

Navigation