Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The usability of selected base maps for crises management—users' perspectives

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Applied Geomatics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cartography has become an important tool for supporting decision-making processes in the field of crisis management. Maps (or GIS) can be used for solving various problems, e.g. the localization of accident site, the delimitation of endangered areas, the formulation of evacuation plans and others. People involved in decision-making processes use various procedures to solve these problems. However, a suitable and efficient form of cartographic support for particular situations and crisis management cycle stages is still missing. The main goal of the experiment was twofold. First, we wanted to assess the interdisciplinary (cartography–psychology) web-based testing environment and achieve the first usability results. Second, the use of different cartographic base map representations was analysed in order to judge the efficiency for specific situations. Testing was focused on various types of tasks, e.g. simple sign selection, the possibility of memorizing important information from the map and the choice of the optimal evacuation route. The overall testing was performed within the interactive web environment, based on predefined templates, automatically recorded and calibrated against the evaluation of the pretest users’ abilities. Preliminary testing results provide valuable inputs concerning the usability of selected base maps for supporting decision-making processes during various crisis situations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ary D, Jacobs LC, Sorensen C, Razavieh A (2009). Introduction to research in education. Wadsworth : California, America. http://books.google.com/books?id=FqF7n0zGJm0C&pg=PA392&dq=benefit+of+open+ended+questionnaire&cd=4#v=onepage&q=benefit%20of%20open%20ended%20questionnaire&f=false. Accessed 8 April 2010

  • Bandrova T, Nikolova V (2005) Gender Comparison of Understanding and Information Extraction from School Atlases in Bulgarian Schools. Proceedings of the XXII International Cartographic Conference, ISBN 0-958-46093-0, A Coruna, Spain

  • Bandrová TL, Marinova S, Milanova J (2009) Natural disasters mapping for crises management. UACEG, International Conference UACEG 2009: Science & Practice, CD Proceedings. 12 p, Sofia, Bulgaria

  • Blazhenkova O, Kozhevnikov M (2009) The new object–spatial–verbal cognitive style model: theory and measurement. Appl Cogn Psychol 23:638–663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourne L, Yaroush RA (2003) Stress and cognition: a cognitive psychological perspective. http://humansystems.arc.nasa.gov/eas/download/non_EAS/. Accessed 20 December 2009

  • Diehl S, Neuvel J, Zlatanova S, Scholten H (2006) Investigation of user requirements in the emergency response sector: the Dutch case. Proceedings of the Second Gi4DM, 25–26 September, Goa, India, CD ROM, p 6

  • Dror IE, Busemeyer JR, Basola B (1999) Decision making under time pressure: an independent test of sequential sampling models. Mem Cognit 27(4):713–725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dvorský J, Snášel V, Voženílek V (2009) Map similarity testing using matrix decomposition. International Conference on Intelligent Networking and Collaborative Systems, INCoS 2009, art. no. 5368858, pp 290–294

  • Erharuyi N, Fairbairn D (2005) Task-centred adaptation of geographic information to support disaster management. In: van Oosterom P, Zlatanova S, Fendel EM (eds) Geo-information for disaster management. Springer, Berlin, pp 997–1008. ISBN 978-3-540-24988-7

  • Hancock PA, Szalma JL (eds) (2008) Performance under stress. Ashgate Publishing, Hampshire

    Google Scholar 

  • Horak J, Orlik A, Stromsky J (2008) Web services for distributed and interoperable hydro-information systems. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 12:635–644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson L (1966) Contrary imaginations. Penguin, Middlesex

    Google Scholar 

  • International Cartographic Association. (2010) Usability of maps and GI. http://icaci.org/research-agenda/usability-of-maps-and-gi. Accessed 6 April 2010

  • Isaksen SG, Kaufmann G (1992) Mode of symbolic representation and cognitive style. Imagination, Cognition and Personality 1(3):271–277. http://cpsb.com/resources/downloads/public/Symbolic_Representation.pdf. Accessed 20 April 2010

  • Isaksen SG, Puccio GJ (2008) Adaption-innovation and the Torrance tests of creative thinking: the level-style issue revisited. The Creative Problem Solving Group, Inc. http://cpsb.com/research/articles/problem-solving-style/KAI-TTCT.html. Accessed 15 February 2010

  • Kail R (1997) Processing time, imagery, and spatial memory. J Exp Child Psychol 64(1):67–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirton MJ (2003) Adaption-innovation: in the context of diversity and change. Routledge, East Sussex

    Google Scholar 

  • Konečný M, Zlatanova S, Bandrova TL (Eds.). (2010) Geographic information and cartography for risk and crisis management: towards better solutions. Springer, Berlin. ISBN 978-3-642-03441-1

  • Kozel J (2009) Kontextová mapová služba. PhD thesis, Masaryk University, Brno (in Czech)

  • Kozel J, Stampach R (2010) Practical experience with a contextual map service. In: Konecny M, Zlatanova S, Bandrova TL (eds) Geographic information and cartography for risk and crisis management: towards better solutions. Springer, Berlin. ISBN 978-3-642-03441-1, pp 305–316

  • Kubicek P, Kozel J (2010) Cartographic techniques for adaptive emergency mapping, CODATA Germany. Lecture Notes in Information Sciences, a publications series published by CODATA-Germany

  • Kubicek P, Stanek K (2006) Dynamic visualization in emergency management. Proceedings of First International Conference on Cartography and GIS, Sofia University, Sofia. ISBN 954-724-028-5

  • Kubíček P, Charvát K, Capodieci P, Konečný M, Talhofer V, Čerba O, Křivánek Z (2008) Dynamic geospatial infrastructure for forest fires. Proceedings of IST-Africa. IIMC International Information Management Corporation Ltd., Windhoek, pp 60–67, 260. ISBN 978-1-905824-07-6

  • Matthews G, Davies DR, Westerman SJ, Stammers RB (2000) Human performance: cognition, stress, and individual differences. Taylor & Francis, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Montello DR (2002) Cognitive map-design research in the twentieth century: theoretical and empirical approaches. Cartography and Geographic Information Science 29(No. 3):283–304. ISSN 1523-0406

  • Nivala AM, Sarjakoski LT, Sarjakoski T (2007) Usability methods’ familiarity among map application developers. Int J Hum-Comput Stud 65:784–795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reichenbacher T (2003) Adaptive methods for mobile cartography. Paper presented at the 21st International Cartography Conference (ICC), Durban, South Africa

  • Rezaei AR, Katz L (2004) Evaluation of the reliability and validity of the cognitive styles analysis. Personal Individ Differ 36:1317–1327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Řezník T (2010) Metainformation in crisis management architecture— theoretical approaches, INSPIRE solution. In Konecny M, Zlatanova S, Bandrova T L (eds) Geographic information and cartography for risk and crisis management: towards better solutions. Springer, Berlin. ISBN 978-3-642-03441-1, pp 209–219

  • Riding R, Cheema I (1991) Cognitive styles—an overview and integration. Educ Psychol 11:193–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riding RJ, Sadler-Smith E (1997) Cognitive style and learning strategies: some implications for training design. Int J Train Dev 1(3):199–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slocum TA, Blok C, Jiang B, Koussoulakou A, Montello DR, Fuhrmann S, Hedley NR (2001) Cognitive and usability issues in geovisualization. Cartogr Geogr Inf Sci 28:61–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg RJ, Grigorenko EL (1997) Are cognitive styles still in style? Am Psychol 52:700–712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg RJ, Zhang Li-Fang (eds) (2001) Perspectives on thinking. Learning and cognitive styles. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Elzakker CPJM (2004) The use of maps in the exploration of geographic data. PhD thesis, University of Utrecht

  • Vedhara K, Hydeb J, Gilchristb ID, Tytherleighb M, Plummer S (2000) Acute stress, memory, attention and cortisol. Psychoneuroendocrinology 25:535–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wachowicz M, Vullings W, Bulens J, de Groot H, van den Broek M (2005) Uncovering the main elements of Geo-web usability. In: Toppen F, Painho M (eds) Proceeding of the 8th AGILE Conference on Geographic Information Science, Centre for Geo-Information, Wageningen

  • Witkin HA, Moore CA, Goodenough DR, Cox PW (1977) Field-dependent and field-independent cognitive styles and their educational implications. Rev Educ Res 47(1):1–64

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zdeněk Stachoň.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Konečný, M., Kubíček, P., Stachoň, Z. et al. The usability of selected base maps for crises management—users' perspectives. Appl Geomat 3, 189–198 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12518-011-0053-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12518-011-0053-1

Keywords

Navigation