Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Friction and wear characteristics of UHMWPE against Co-Cr alloy under the wide range of contact pressures in lumbar total disc replacement

  • Published:
International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) and Co-Cr alloy are still commonly used bearing materials for total disc replacement (TDR) as well as total joint replacement (TJR). Compared to TJR, in TDR, there are different articulating conditions such as higher contact pressure, shorter sliding distance, and less lubricant, unlike hip and knee joints. In this study, friction and wear phenomena between UHMWPE and Co-Cr alloy were characterized under the wide range of contact pressures including the extremely high contact pressure with limited amount of lubricant in lumbar TDR. All friction and wear tests were conducted by using a Pin-on-Disk type tribo-tester under normal contact pressures of 5, 10, 20, 40, 60 and 80MPa in the repeat pass rotational and the linear reciprocal sliding motions, respectively. UHMWPE cylindrical pins slid against Co-Cr alloy disks in three different kinds of dry, rarely and fully immersed lubricated conditions for friction tests and in a fully immersed lubricated condition for wear tests. For all lubricated conditions, mean coefficients of friction decreased as contact pressure increased. There were statistically significant differences in the mean coefficients of friction among six levels of contact pressures and among three kinds of lubricated conditions. The amount of wear linearly increased as number of sliding cycles increased for all contact pressures, and also it increased as the contact pressure increased. There were statistically significant differences in the wear rates of UHMWPE among six levels of contact pressures. Coefficients of friction of UHMWPE against Co-Cr alloy under very high contact pressure such as 40–80MPa in the lubricated condition were so low as to induce no clinical problem at the bearing surface. For reducing wear of UHMWPE component in TDR, it is necessary to decrease the contact pressure in design as much as possible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Errico, T. J., “Why a mechanical disc?” Spine J., Vol. 4, No. 6, pp. 151S–157S, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. O’Beirne, J., O’Neill, D., Gallagher, J. and Williams, D. H., “Spinal fusion for back pain: a clinical and radiological review,” J. Spinal Disord., Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 32–38, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fritzell, P., Hagg, O., Wessberg, P. and Nordwall, A., “Chronic low back pain and fusion: a comparison of three surgical techniques: a prospective multicenter randomized study from the Swedish Lumbar spine study group,” Spine, Vol. 27, No. 11, pp. 1131–1141, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. West, J. L., Bradford, D. S. and Ogilvie, J. W., “Results of spinal arthrodesis with pedicle screw-plate fixation,” J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., Vol. 73, No. 8, pp. 1179–1184, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lee, C. K., “Accelerated degeneration of the segment adjacent to a lumbar fusion,” Spine, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 375–377, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cinotti, G., David, T. and Postacchini, F., “Results of disc prosthesis after a minimum follow-up period of 2 years,” Spine, Vol. 21, No. 8, pp. 995–1000, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Huang, R. C., Girardi, F. P., Cammisa, F. P., Tropiano, P. and Marnay, T., “Long-term flexion-extension range of motion of the prodisc total disc replacement,” J. Spinal Disord. Tech., Vol. 16, No. 5, pp. 435–440, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Moumene, M. and Geisler, F. H., “Comparison of biomechanical function at ideal and varied surgical placement for two lumbar artificial disc implant designs: mobile-core versus fixed-core,” Spine, Vol. 32, No. 17, pp. 1840–1851, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bono, C. M. and Garfin, S. R., “History and evolution of disc replacement,” Spine J., Vol. 4, No. 6, pp. 145S–150S, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kurtz, S. M., “The UHMWPE handbook: ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene in total joint replacement, 2nd Edition,” Academic Press, 2004.

  11. Harris, W. H., “The problem is osteolysis,” Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res., Vol. 311, pp. 46–53, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Amstutz, H. C., Campbell, P., Kossovsky, N. and Clarke, I. C., “Mechanism and clinical significance of wear debris-induced osteolysis,” Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res., Vol. 276, pp. 7–18, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Goldring, S. R., Clark, C. R. and Wright, T. M., “The problem in total joint arthroplasty: Aseptic loosening,” J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., Vol. 75, No. 6, pp. 799–801, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gupta, S. K., Chu, A., Ranawat, A. S., Slamin, J. and Ranawat, C. S., “Osteolysis after total knee arthroplasty,” J. Arthroplasty, Vol. 22, No. 6, pp. 787–799, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Billi, F., Benya, P., Ebramzadeh, E., Campbell, P., Chan, F. and McKellop, H. A., “Metal wear particles: What we know, what we do not know, and why,” SAS J., Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 133–142, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kurtz, S. M., Peloza, J., Siskey, R. and Villarraga, M. L., “Analysis of retrieved polyethylene total disc replacement component,” Spine J., Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 344–350, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Serhan, H. A., Dooris, A. P., Parsons, M. L., Ares, P. J. and Gabriel, S. M., “In vitro wear assessment of the Charité artificial disc according to ASTM recommendations,” Spine, Vol. 31, No. 17, pp. 1900–1910, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kurtz, S. M., van Ooij, A., Ross, R., de Waal Malefijt, J., Peloza, J., Ciccarelli, L. and Villarraga, M. L., “Polyethylene wear and rim fracture in total disc arthroplasty,” Spine J., Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 12–21, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kurtz, S. M., Patwardhan, A., MacDonald, D., Ciccarelli, L., van Ooij, A., Lorenz, M., Zindrick, M., O’Leary, P., Isaza, J. and Ross, R., “What is the correlation of in vivo wear and damage patterns with in vitro TDR motion response?” Spine, Vol. 33, No. 5, pp. 481–489, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kafer, W., Clessienne, C. B., Daxle, M., Kocak, T., Reichel, H. and Cakir, B., “Posterior component impingement after lumbar total disc replacement: a radiographic analysis of 66 ProDisc-L prostheses in 56 patients,” Spine, Vol. 33, No. 22, pp. 2444–2449, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kurtz, S. M., Steinbeck, M., Ianuzzi, A., van Ooij, A., Punt, I. M., Isaza, J. and Ross, E. R. S., “Retrieval analysis of motion preserving spinal devices and periprosthetic tissues,” SAS J., Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 161–177, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Harper, M. L., Dooris, A. and Paré, P. E., “The fundamentals of biotribology and its application to spine arthroplasty,” SAS J., Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 125–132, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Saikko, V., “Wear and friction properties of prosthetic joint materials evaluated on a reciprocating pin-on-flat apparatus,” Wear, Vol. 166, No. 2, pp. 169–178, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Yao, J. Q., Laurent, M. P., Johnson, T. S., Blanchard, C. R. and Crowninshield, R. D., “The influences of lubricant and material on polymer/CoCr sliding friction,” Wear, Vol. 255, No. 1, pp. 780–784, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gispert, M. P., Serro, A. P., Coląo, R. and Saramago, B., “Friction and wear mechanisms in hip prosthesis: Comparison of joint materials behavior in several lubricants,” Wear, Vol. 260, No. 1–2, pp. 149–158, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Tetreault, D. M. and Kennedy, F. E., “Friction and wear behavior of ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene on Co-Cr AND Titanium alloys in dry and lubricated environments,” Wear, Vol. 133, No. 2, pp. 295–307, 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Turell, M., Wang, A. and Bellare, A., “Quantification of the effect of cross-path motion on the wear rate of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene,” Wear, Vol. 255, No. 2, pp. 1034–1039, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Shaheen, A. and Shepherd, D. E., “Lubrication regimes in lumbar total disc arthroplasty,” Proc. of the Inst. Mech. Eng. Part H, Vol. 221, No. 6, pp. 621–627, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Sutula, L. C., Collier, J. P., Saum, K. A., Currier, B. H., Currier, J. H., Sanford, W. M., Mayor, M. B., Wooding, R. E., Sperling, D. K., Williams, I. R., Kasprzak, D. J. and Surprenant, V. A., “The Otto Aufranc Award: Impact of gamma sterilization on clinical performance of polyethylene in the hip,” Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res., Vol. 319, pp. 28–40, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Premnath, V., Harris, W. H., Jasty, M. and Merrill, E. W., “Gamma sterilization of UHMWPE articular implants: an analysis of the oxidation problem,” Biomaterials, Vol. 17, No. 18, pp. 1741–1753, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Lee, K. Y. and Lee, K. H., “Wear of shelf-aged UHMWPE acetabular liners,” Wear, Vol. 225, No. 2, pp. 728–733, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Lee, K. Y., Kim, S. Y., Shin, D., Lee, S. J. and Kim, S. Y., “Wear of Retrieved UHMWPE hip liners,” Yonsei Medical J., Vol. 45, No. 2, pp. 293–299, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Chen, W. M., “Lumbar spinal adaptations in response to disc arthroplasty with total disc replacement: A finite element model analysis,” M.Sc. Thesis, Biomedical Engineering, Inje University, 2007.

  34. Chen, W. M., Park, C. K., Lee, K. Y. and Lee, S. J., “In situ contact analysis of the prosthesis components of Prodisc-L in lumbar spine following total disc replacement,” Spine, Vol. 34, No. 20, pp. E716–E723, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Bragdon, C. R., O’Connor, D. O., Lowenstein, J. D., Jasty, M. and Syniuta, W. D., “The importance of multidirectional motion on the wear of polyethylene,” Proc. of the Inst. Mech. Eng. Part H, Vol. 210, No. 3, pp. 157–165, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Cornwall, G. B., Bryant, J. T. and Hansson, C. M., “The effect of kinematic conditions on the wear of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) in orthopaedic bearing applications,” Proc. of the Inst. Mech. Eng. Part H, Vol. 215, No. 1, pp. 95–106, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Sejong University, 98 Gunja-dong, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul, South Korea, 143-747

    Dong-Wook Kim, Kwon-Yong Lee & Yongtae Jun

  2. Bioengineering Research Center, Sejong University, 98 Gunja-dong, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul, South Korea, 143-747

    Kwon-Yong Lee

  3. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Inje University, 607 Obang-dong, Gimhae, Gyeongnam, South Korea, 621-749

    Sung Jae Lee

  4. Department of Neurosurgery, Kangnam Saint Mary’s Hospital, Catholic University of Korea, 505 Banpo-dong, Seocho-gu, Seoul, South Korea, 137-701

    Chun Kun Park

Authors
  1. Dong-Wook Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kwon-Yong Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yongtae Jun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sung Jae Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Chun Kun Park
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kwon-Yong Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, DW., Lee, KY., Jun, Y. et al. Friction and wear characteristics of UHMWPE against Co-Cr alloy under the wide range of contact pressures in lumbar total disc replacement. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. 12, 1111–1118 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-011-0148-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-011-0148-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation