Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Cognitive Computation
Erschienen in: Cognitive Computation 1/2009

01.03.2009

On the Role of Emotion in Embodied Cognitive Architectures: From Organisms to Robots

verfasst von: Tom Ziemke, Robert Lowe

Erschienen in: Cognitive Computation | Ausgabe 1/2009

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The computational modeling of emotion has been an area of growing interest in cognitive robotics research in recent years, but also a source of contention regarding how to conceive of emotion and how to model it. In this paper, emotion is characterized as (a) closely connected to embodied cognition, (b) grounded in homeostatic bodily regulation, and (c) a powerful organizational principle—affective modulation of behavioral and cognitive mechanisms—that is ‘useful’ in both biological brains and robotic cognitive architectures. We elaborate how emotion theories and models centered on core neurological structures in the mammalian brain, and inspired by embodied, dynamical, and enactive approaches in cognitive science, may impact on computational and robotic modeling. In light of the theoretical discussion, work in progress on the development of an embodied cognitive-affective architecture for robots is presented, incorporating aspects of the theories discussed.
Vorheriger Artikel Motivational Representations within a Computational Cognitive Architecture

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Fußnoten
1
The term ‘enactive’ is here meant in the broad sense of viewing cognition as grounded in self-maintenance (cf. e.g., Vernon et al. [77]: “The only condition that is required of an enactive system is effective action: that it permit the continued integrity of the system involved.”), not in the narrower sense involving a specific commitment to autopoietic organization [30].
 
2
Such dynamic states might be considered to have a longer temporal trajectory not easily captured by the narrow ‘negative feedback’ sense of homeostasis. The term ‘allostasis’ has been offered to describe more complex regulatory processes which for some advocates of the term constitutes a form of homeostasis, but for others allostasis represents a different type of regulation [72]. Also see Lowe et al. [42] for a discussion.
 
Literatur
1.
Alexander WH, Sporns O. An embodied model of learning, plasticity, and reward. Adapt Behav. 2002;10(3–4):143–59.CrossRef
2.
Arbib M, Fellous J-M. Emotions: From brain to robot. Trend Cognit Sci. 2004;8(12):554–61.CrossRef
3.
Barandiaran X, Moreno A. On what makes certain dynamical systems cognitive: A minimally cognitive organization program. Adapt Behav. 2006;14(2):171–85.CrossRef
4.
Barandiaran X, Moreno A. Adaptivity: From metabolism to behavior. Adapt Behav. 2008;16:325–44.CrossRef
5.
Barnes MB, Beverly JL. Nitric oxide’s role in glucose homeostasis. Am J Physiol Regulat Integr Comp Physiol. 2007;293:R590–1.
6.
Bechara A, Damasio AR. The somatic marker hypothesis: A neural theory of economic decision. Games Econ Behav. 2005;52:336–72.CrossRef
7.
Breazeal C. Designing sociable robots. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2002.
8.
Breazeal C. Emotion and sociable humanoid robots. Int J Human Comput Interact. 2003;59:119–55.
9.
Brooks RA. Achieving artificial intelligence through building robots. Technical report memo 899, MIT AI Lab; 1986
10.
Brooks RA. Cambrian intelligence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1999.
11.
Cañamero L, editor. Proceedings of the symposium on agents that want and like: Motivational and emotional roots of cognition and action. UK: AISB; 2005. ISBN: 1-902956-41-7.
12.
Clark A. Being there. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1997.
13.
Clark A. An embodied cognitive science? Trend Cognit Sci. 1999;9:345–51.CrossRef
14.
Colombetti G, Thompson E. Enacting emotional interpretations with feelings. Behav Brain Sci. 2005;28:200–1.CrossRef
15.
Colombetti G, Thompson E. The feeling body: Towards an enactive approach to emotion. In: Overton WF, Müller U, Newman JL, editors. Developmental perspectives on embodiment and consciousness. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2008. p. 45–68.
16.
Craig AD. Interoception: The sense of the physiological condition of the body. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2003;13(4):500–5.
17.
Craig AD. Human feelings: Why are some more aware than others? Trend Cognit Sci. 2004;8(6):239–41.CrossRef
18.
Damasio AR. Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York: GP Putnam’s Sons; 1994.
19.
Damasio AR. Emotion in the perspective of an integrated nervous system. Brain Res Rev. 1998;26:83–6.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Damasio AR. The feeling of what happens: Body, emotion and the making of consciousness. London: Vintage; 1999.
21.
Damasio AR. Looking for Spinoza: Joy, sorrow and the feeling brain. Orlando, FL: Harcourt; 2003.
22.
Damasio AR. Emotions and feelings: A neurobiological perspective. In Manstead A, Frijda N, Fischer A, editors. Feelings and emotions—The Amsterdam symposium. UK: Cambridge University Press; 2004
23.
Di Paolo EA. Organismically-inspired robotics: Homeostatic adaptation and natural teleology beyond the closed sensorimotor loop. In: Murase K, Asakura T, editors. Dynamical systems approach to embodiment and sociality. Adelaide, Australia: Advanced Knowledge International; 2003. p. 19–42.
24.
Edelman J. The remembered present. New York: Basic Books; 1989.
25.
Ekman P. Universals and cultural differences in facial expression of emotion. In: Cole J, editor. Nebraska symposium on motivation. Lincoln, Nebraska: University of Nebraska Press; 1972. p. 207–83.
26.
Ekman P. Basic emotions. In: Dalgleish T, Power M, editors. Handbook of cognition and emotion. Sussex, UK: Wiley; 1999.
27.
Fellous J-M. Neuromodulatory basis of emotion. The Neuroscientist. 1999;5:283–94.CrossRef
28.
Fellous J-M, Arbib M, editors. Who needs emotions? The brain meets the robot. New York: Oxford University Press; 2005.
29.
Freeman W. How brains make up their minds. New York: Columbia University Press; 2000.
30.
Froese T, Ziemke T. Enactive artificial intelligence. Artif Intel. 2009;173:466–500.
31.
Gibbs R. Embodiment and cognitive science. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2006.
32.
Harnad S. Minds, machines, and Searle. J Exp Theoret Artif Intel. 1989;1(1):5–25.CrossRef
33.
34.
Hudlicka E, Cañamero L, editors. Architectures for modeling emotion: Cross-disciplinary foundations. Papers from the 2004 AAAI symposium. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press; 2004.
35.
Kelley AE. Neurochemical networks encoding emotion and motivation: An evolutionary perspective. In: Fellous J-M, Arbib MA, editors. Who needs emotions? The brain meets the robot. New York: Oxford University Press; 2005.
36.
Lazarus RS. Emotion and adaptation. New York: Oxford University Press; 1991.
37.
LeDoux JE. The emotional brain. New York: Simon & Schuster; 1996.
38.
39.
Lewis MD. Bridging emotion theory and neurobiology through dynamic systems modeling. Behav Brain Sci. 2005;28:169–245.PubMed
40.
Lowe R, Herrera C, Morse T, Ziemke T. The embodied dynamics of emotion, appraisal and attention. In: Paletta L, Rome E, editors. Attention in cognitive systems. Theories and systems from an interdisciplinary viewpoint. Berlin: Springer; 2007.
41.
Lowe R, Philippe P, Montebelli A, Morse A, Ziemke T. Affective modulation of embodied dynamics. In: The role of emotion in adaptive behaviour and cognitive robotics, Electronic proceedings of SAB workshop, Osaka, Japan; 2008. Available from: http://​www.​his.​se/​icea/​emotion-workshop/​.
42.
Lowe R, Morse A, Ziemke T. An enactive approach for modeling cognition, emotion and autonomy: Predictive regulation at different levels of organizational complexity. Submitted for journal publication.
43.
Lowe R, Humphries M, Ziemke T. The dual-route hypothesis: Evaluating a neurocomputational model of fear conditioning in rats. Connect Sci., accepted for publication (in press).
44.
Lowe R, Morse A, Ziemke T. The Iowa gambling task: Key methodological issues for cognitive robotics to address. (forthcoming).
45.
McFarland D. Guilty robots, happy dogs. New York: Oxford University Press; 2008.
46.
McFarland D, Spier E. Basic cycles, utility and opportunism in self-sufficient robots. Robot Autonom Syst. 1997;20:179–90.CrossRef
47.
Melhuish C, Ieropoulos I, Greenman J, Horsfield I. Energetically autonomous robots: Food for thought. Autonom Robot. 2006;21:187–98.CrossRef
48.
Meyer J-A, Guillot A, Girard B, Khamassi M, Pirim P, Berthoz A. The Psikharpax project: Towards building an artificial rat. Robot Autonom Syst. 2005;50(4):211–23.CrossRef
49.
Moreno A, Etxeberria A, Umerez J. The autonomy of biological individuals and artificial models. BioSystems. 2008;91(2):309–19.PubMedCrossRef
50.
51.
Morse A, Lowe R, Ziemke T. Towards an enactive cognitive architecture. In: Proceedings of the first international conference on cognitive systems, CogSys 2008, Karlsruhe, Germany; April 2008.
52.
Morrison I, Ziemke T. Empathy with computer game characters: A cognitive neuroscience perspective. In: AISB’05: Proceedings of the joint symposium on virtual social agents. UK: AISB; 2005. p. 73–9.
53.
Ortony A, Norman D, Revelle W. Affect and Proto-affect in effective functioning. In: Fellous J-M, Arbib MA, editors. Who need emotions? New York: Oxford University Press; 2005.
54.
Panksepp J. Affective neuroscience: The foundations of human and animal emotions. New York: Oxford University Press; 1998.
55.
Panksepp J. The neurodynamics of emotions: An evolutionary-neurodevelopmental view. In: Lewis MD, Granic I, editors. Emotion, development, and self-organization: Dynamic systems approaches to emotional development. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2000.
56.
Panksepp J. Affective consciousness and the origins of human mind: A critical role of brain research on animal emotions. Impuls. 2004;57:47–60.
57.
Panksepp J. Affective consciousness: Core emotional feelings in animals and humans. Conscious Cogn. 2005;14:30–80.PubMedCrossRef
58.
59.
Pessoa L. On the relationship between emotion and cognition. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008;9:148–58.PubMedCrossRef
60.
Petta P. The role of emotion in a tractable architecture for situated cognizers. In: Trappl R, Petta P, Payr S, editors. Emotions in humans and artifacts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2003.
61.
Pfeifer R, Bongard J. How the body shapes the way we think: A new view of intelligence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2006.
62.
Pfeifer R, Scheier C. Understanding intelligence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1999.
63.
Phelps E. Emotion and cognition: Insights from studies of the human amygdala. Annu Rev Psychol. 2006;24(57):27–53.CrossRef
64.
Prescott TJ, Redgrave P, Gurney K. Layered control architectures in robots and vertebrates. Adapt Behav. 1999;7:99–127.CrossRef
65.
Prinz JJ. Gut reactions–A perceptual theory of emotion. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2004.
66.
Rolls E. The brain and emotion. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1999.
67.
Rolls E. Emotion explained. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005.
68.
69.
Sloman A. Beyond shallow models of emotion. Cognit Process. 2001;2(1):177–98.
70.
Sloman A. How many separately evolved emotional beasties live within us? In: Trappl R, Petta P, Payr S, editors. Emotions in humans and artifacts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2002. p. 35–114.
71.
Steels L, Brooks RA, editors. The artificial life route to artificial intelligence. Building situated embodied agents. New Haven: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1995.
72.
Sterling P. Principles of allostasis: Optimal design, predictive regulation, pathophysiology and rational therapeutics. In: Schulkin J, editor. Allostasis, homeostasis and the costs of adaptation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2004.
73.
Thompson E. Mind in life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 2007.
74.
Trappl R, Petta P, Payr S, editors. Emotions in humans and artifacts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2003.
75.
Varela FJ, Depraz N. At the source of time: Valence and the constitutional dynamics of affect. J. Conscious. Stud.. 2005;12(8–10):61–81.
76.
Varela FJ, Thompson E, Rosch E. The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1991.
77.
Vernon D, Metta G, Sandini G. A survey of artificial cognitive systems: Implications for the autonomous development of mental capabilities in computational agents. IEEE Trans Evol Comput. 2007;11(2):151–80.CrossRef
78.
Ziemke T. Rethinking grounding. In: Riegler A, Peschl M, von Stein A, editors. Understanding representation in the cognitive sciences. New York: Plenum Press; 1999. p. 177–90.
79.
Ziemke T. Are robots embodied? In: Balkenius C, Zlatev J, Breazeal C, Dautenhahn K, Kozima H, editors. Proceedings of the first international workshop on epigenetic robotics: Modelling cognitive development in robotic system; Lund University cognitive studies, vol. 85, Lund, Sweden; 2001. p. 75–83.
80.
Ziemke T. What’s that thing called embodiment? In: Alterman R, Kirsh D, editors. Proceedings of the 25th annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2003. p. 1305–10.
81.
Ziemke T. Embodied AI as science: Models of embodied cognition, embodied models of cognition, or both? In: Iida F, Pfeifer R, Steels L, Kuniyoshi Y, editors. Embodied artificial intelligence. Heidelberg: Springer; 2004. p. 27–36.
82.
Ziemke T. What’s life got to do with it? In: Chella A, Manzotti R, editors. Artificial consciousness. Exeter: Imprint Academic; 2007. p. 48–66.
83.
Ziemke T. The embodied self: Theories, hunches and robot models. J Conscious Stud. 2007;14(7):167–79.
84.
Ziemke T. On the role of emotion in biological and robotic autonomy. BioSystems. 2008;91:401–8.PubMedCrossRef
85.
Ziemke T, Sharkey NE. A stroll through the worlds of robots and animals. Semiotica. 2001;134(1–4):701–46.CrossRef
86.
Ziemke T, Frank R, Zlatev J, editors. Body, language and mind. Volume 1: Embodiment. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter; 2007.
Metadaten
Titel
On the Role of Emotion in Embodied Cognitive Architectures: From Organisms to Robots
verfasst von
Tom Ziemke
Robert Lowe
Publikationsdatum
01.03.2009
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Cognitive Computation / Ausgabe 1/2009
Print ISSN: 1866-9956
Elektronische ISSN: 1866-9964
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-009-9012-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2009

Cognitive Computation 1/2009 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

Cognitive Processes in Eye Guidance: Algorithms for Attention in Image Processing

OriginalPaper

Cognitive Computation with Autonomously Active Neural Networks: An Emerging Field

OriginalPaper

Designing Conscious Systems

OriginalPaper

Motivational Representations within a Computational Cognitive Architecture

OriginalPaper

Cognitive Computation

OriginalPaper

Is a Machine Realization of Truly Human-Like Intelligence Achievable?