Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison between empirical estimation by JRC-JCS model and direct shear test for joint shear strength

  • Published:
Journal of Earth Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to study the reliability of the empirical estimation of joint shear strength by the JRC (joint roughness coefficient)-JCS (joint compressive strength) model, natural rock joints of different lithologic characteristics and different sizes were selected as samples, and their shear strengths under dry and saturated conditions were measured by direct shear test and compared to those estimated by the JRC-JCS model. Comparison results show that for natural rock joints with joint surfaces closely matched, the average relative error of joint shear strength between empirical estimation and direct shear test is 9.9%; the reliability of the empirical estimation of joint shear strength by the JRC-JCS model is good under both dry and saturated conditions if the JRC is determined accounting for directional statistical measurements, scale effect and surface smoothing during shearing. However, for natural rock joints with joint surfaces mismatched, the average relative error of joint shear strength between empirical estimation and direct shear test is 39.9%; the reliability of empirical estimation of joint shear strength by the JRC-JCS model is questionable under both dry and saturated conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References Cited

  • Amadei, B., Wibowo, J., Sture, S., et al., 1998. Applicability of Existing Models to Predict the Behavior of Replicas of Natural Fractures of Welded Tuff under Different Boundary Conditions. Geotech. Geo. Eng., 16(2): 79–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandis, S., Lumsden, A. C., Barton, N. R., 1981. Experimental Studies of Scale Effects on the Shear Behavior of Rock Joints. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. Geomech. Abstr., 18(1): 1–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton, N., 1973. Review of a New Shear Strength Criterion for Rock Joints. Eng. Geol., 7(4): 287–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton, N., Bandis, S., 1990. Review of Predictive Capabilities of JRC-JCS Model in Engineering Practice. In: Barton, N., Stephansson, O., eds., Rock Joints. Balkema, Rotterdam. 603–610

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton, N., Choubey, V., 1977. The Shear Strength of Rock Joints in Theory and Practice. Rock Mech. Suppl., 10(1–2): 1–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du, S. G., Hu, Y. J., Hu, X. F., 2009. Measurement of Joint Roughness Coefficient by Using Profilograph and Roughness Ruler. Journal of Earth Science, 20(5): 890–896

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fardin, N., Stephansson, O., Jing, L. R., 2001. The Scale Dependence of Rock Joint Surface Roughness. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci., 38(5): 659–669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geertsema, A. J., 2002. The Shear Strength of Planar Joints in Mudstone. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci., 39(8): 1045–1049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grasselli, G., Egger, P., 2003. Constitutive Law for the Shear Strength of Rock Joints Based on Three-Dimensional Surface Parameters. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci., 40(1): 25–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Homand, F., Belem, T., Souley, M., 2001. Friction and Degradation of Rock Joint Surfaces under Shear Loads. Int. J. Numer. Anal. Mech. Geomech., 25(10): 973–999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, Y. J., Li, B., Tanabashi, Y., 2006. Estimating the Relation between Surface Roughness and Mechanical Properties of Rock Joints. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci., 43(6): 837–846

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwon, T. H., Baak, S. H., Cho, G. C., 2004. Shear Behaviour of Idealized Rock Joints: Microscale Analysis. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 19(4–5): 535

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. W., Hong, E. S., Bae, S. I., et al., 2006. Modelling of Rock Joint Shear Strength Using Surface Roughness Parameter, Rs. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 21(3–4): 239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unal, M., Unver, B., 2004. Characterization of Rock Joint Surface Degradation under Shear Loads. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci., 41(3): 380–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J. G., Ichikawa, Y., Leung, C. F., 2003. A Constitutive Model for Rock Interfaces and Joints. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci., 40(1): 41–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wines, D. R., Lilly, P. A., 2003. Estimates of Rock Joint Shear Strength in Part of the Fimiston Open Pit Operation in Western Australia. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci., 40(6): 929–937

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, J., 1997. Joint Surface Matching and Shear Strength, Part B: JRC-JMC Shear Strength Criterion. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. Geomech. Abstr., 34(2): 179–185

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yunjin Hu  (胡云进).

Additional information

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 40672186, 50809059), and the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (No. Y505008), China.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Du, S., Hu, Y., Hu, X. et al. Comparison between empirical estimation by JRC-JCS model and direct shear test for joint shear strength. J. Earth Sci. 22, 411–420 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12583-011-0193-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12583-011-0193-6

Key Words

Navigation