Skip to main content
Log in

Multi-criteria trapezoidal valued intuitionistic fuzzy decision making with Choquet integral based TOPSIS

  • Theoretical Article
  • Published:
OPSEARCH Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A generalized trapezoidal-valued intuitionistic fuzzy geometric aggregation operator is proposed which is then used to aggregate decision makers’ opinions in group decision making process. An extension of TOPSIS, a multi-criteria trapezoidal-valued intuitionistic fuzzy decision making technique, to a group decision environment is also proposed, where inter-dependent or interactive characteristics among criteria and preference of decision makers are under consideration. Furthermore, Choquet integral-based distance between trapezoidal-valued intuitionistic fuzzy values is defined. Combining the trapezoidal-valued intuitionistic fuzzy geometric aggregation operator with Choquet integral-based distance, an extension of TOPSIS method is developed to deal with a multi-criteria trapezoidal-valued intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making problems. Finally, an illustrative example is provided to understand the proposed method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Angilella, S., Greco, S., Lamantia, F., Matarazzo, B.: Assessing non-additive utility for multicriteria decision aid. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 158, 734–744 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Angilella, S., Greco, S., Matarazzo, B.: Non-additive robust ordinal regression: A multiple criteria decision model based on the Choquet integral. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 201, 277–288 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ashtiani, B., Haghighirad, F., Makui, A., Montazer, G.: Extension of fuzzy TOPSIS method based on interval-valued fuzzy sets. Appl. Soft. Comput. 9, 457–461 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Atanassov, K.: Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 20, 87–96 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Atanassov, K.: Operators over interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 64(2), 159–174 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Atanassov, K.: Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Theory and applications. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg (1999)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Atanassov, K., Gargov, G.: Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 31, 343–349 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Boran, F.E., Gen, S., Kurt, M., Akay, D.: A multi-criteria intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making for supplier selection with TOPSIS method. Expert Syst. Appl. 36, 11363–11368 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Büyüközkan, G., Ruan, D.: Choquet integral based aggregation approach to software development risk assessment. Inf. Sci. 180, 441–451 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen, C.T.: Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 114, 1–9 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen, S.J., Hwang, C.L.: Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making. Springer, Berlin (1992)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen, T.-Y., Tsao, C.-Y.: The interval-valued fuzzy TOPSIS method and experimental analysis. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 159, 1410–1428 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Choquet, G.: Theory of capacities. Annales del Institut Fourier 5, 131–295 (1953)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chu, T.-C., Lin, Y.-C.: An interval arithmetic based fuzzy TOPSIS model. Expert Syst. Appl. 36, 10870–10876 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Demirel, T., Demirel, N.C., Kahraman, C.: Multi-criteria warehouse location selection using Choquet integral. Expert Syst. Appl. 37, 3943–3952 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Grabisch, M., Labreuche, C.: A decade of application of the Choquet and Sugeno integrals in multi-criteria decision aid. Ann. Oper. Res. 175(1), 247–286 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Grabisch, M.: Fuzzy integral in multicriteria decision making. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 69, 279–298 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Grabisch, M.: A new algorithm for identifying fuzzy measures and its application to pattern recognition. In: International joint conference 4th IEEE international conference on fuzzy systems and the 2nd international fuzzy engineering symposium, Yokohama, pp. 145–150 (1995)

  19. Grabisch, M.: The representation of importance and interaction of features by fuzzy measures. Pattern Recogn. Lett. 17, 567–575 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Grabisch, M.: The application of fuzzy integrals in multicriteria decision making. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 89, 445–456 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Grabisch, M.: Alternative representations of discrete fuzzy measures for decision making. Int. J. Uncertain Fuzziness Knowl. Based Syst. 5, 587–607 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Grabisch, M., Murofushi, T., Sugeno, M.: Fuzzy measure and integrals. Physica-Verlag, New York (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Herrera, F., Herrera-Viedma, E., Martinez, L.: A fusion approach for managing multi-granularity linguistic term sets in decision making. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 114, 43–58 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hu, Y.C.: Classification performance evaluation of single-layer perceptron with Choquet integral-based TOPSIS. Appl. Intell. 29(3), 204–215 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hwang, C.L., Yoon, K.: Multiple attributes decision making methods and applications. Berlin. Springer, Heidelberg (1981)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  26. Ishii, K., Sugeno, M.: A model human evaluation process using fuzzy measure. Int. J. Man. Mach. Stud. 22, 19–38 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Jahanshahloo, G.R., Hosseinzadeh, L.otfi., F., Izadikhah, M.: Extension of the TOPSIS method for decision-making problems with fuzzy data. Appl. Math. Comput. 181, 1544–1551 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Keeney, R.L., Raiffa, H.: Decision with multiple objectives. Wiley, New York (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Klement, E.P., Mesiar, R., Pap, E.: Triangular norms. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2000)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  30. Kojadinovic, I.: Modeling interaction phenomena using fuzzy measures: on the notions of interaction and independence. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 135, 317–340 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kuo, M.S., Tzeng, G.H., Huang, W.C.: Group decision-making based on concepts of ideal and anti-ideal points in a fuzzy environment. Math. Comput. Model. 45, 324–339 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Labreuche, C., Grabisch, M.: The Choquet integral for the aggregation of interval scales in multicriteria decision making. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 137, 11–26 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Labreuche, C., Grabisch, M.: Generalized Choquet-like aggregation functions for handling bipolar scales. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 172(3), 931–955 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Liginlal, D., Ow, T.T.: Modeling attitude to risk in human decision processes: An application of fuzzy measures. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 157, 3040–3054 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Li, D.F., Wang, Y.C., Liu, S., Shan, F.: Fractional programming methodology for multi-attribute group decision making using IFS. Appl. Soft Comput. 8(1), 219–225 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Mahdavi, I., Mahdavi-Amiri, N., Heidarzade, A., Nourifar, R.: Designing a model of fuzzy TOPSIS in multiple criteria decision making. Appl. Math. Comput. 206, 607–617 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Meyer, P., Roubens, M.: On the use of the Choquet integral with fuzzy numbers in multiple criteria decision support. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 157, 927–938 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Negi, D.S.: Fuzzy analysis and optimization. PhD thesis. Department of Industrial Engineering, Kansas State University (1989)

  39. Onisawa, T., Sugeno, M., Nishiwaki, Y., Kawai, H., Harima, Y.: Fuzzy measure analysis of public attitude towards the use of nuclear energy. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 120, 259–289 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Roubens, M.: Interaction between criteria and definition of weights in MCDA problems. In: Proceedings of the 44th meeting of the european working group multicriteria aid for decisions, Brussels, Belgium (1996)

  41. Saad, I., Hammadi, S., Benrejeb, M., Borne, P.: Choquet integral for criteria aggregation in the flexible job-shop scheduling problems. Math. Comput. Simul. 76, 447–462 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Schnatter, S.F.: On statistical inference for fuzzy data with applications to descriptive statistics. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 50, 143–165 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Shieh, J.I., Wu, H.H., Liu, H.C.: Applying a complexity-based Choquet integral to evaluate students’ performance. Expert Syst. Appl. 36, 5100–5106 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Su, Z.X., Xia, G.P., Chen, M.Y., Wang, L.: Induced generalized intuitionistic fuzzy OWA operator for multi-attribute group decision making. Expert Syst. Appl. 39, 1902–1920 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Sugeno, M.: Theory of fuzzy integral and its application. Tokyo Institute of Technology, Doctorial Dissertation (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Tan, C., Zhang, Q.: Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. In: Proceeding of the 2006 IEEE international conference on system, man, and cybernetics, October, Taipei, pp. 1404–1407 (2006)

  47. Tan, C.: A multi-criteria interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making with Choquet integral-based TOPSIS. Expert Syst. Appl. 38, 3023–3033 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Tan, C.Q., Chen, X.H.: Intuitionistic fuzzy Choquet integral operator for multi-criteira decision making. Expert Syst. Appl. 37, 149–157 (2010a)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Tan, C.Q., Chen, X.H.: Induced Choquet ordered averaging operator and its application to group decision making. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 25, 59–82 (2010b)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Tseng, M.L., Chiang, J.H., Lan, L.W.: Selection of optimal supplier in supply chain management strategy with analytic network process and Choquet integral. Comput. Ind. Eng. 57, 330–340 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Tseng, M.L., Yang, Y.P.O., Lin, C.T., Chen, C.B.: Hierarchical MADM with fuzzy integral for evaluating enterprise intranet web sites. Inf. Sci. 169(3–4), 409–426 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Wakker, P.: Additive representations of preferences. Kluwer Academic Publishers (1999)

  53. Wang, J.H., Hao, J.Y.: A new version of 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 14(3), 435–445 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Wang, T.C., Chang, T.H.: Application of TOPSIS in evaluating initial training aircraft under a fuzzy environment. Expert Syst. Appl. 33, 870–880 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Wang, Y.J., Lee, H.S.: Generalizing TOPSIS for fuzzy multiple-criteria group decision-making. Comput. Math. Appl 53, 1762–1772 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Wang, Z., Klir, G.: Fuzzy measure theory. Plenum press, New York (1992)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  57. Wei, G.W.: Some geometric aggregation functions and their application to dynamic multiple attribute decision making in the intuitionistic fuzzy setting. International Journal of Uncertainty. Fuzziness Knowl.-Based Sys. 17(2), 179–196 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Xu, Z.S.: Methods for aggregating interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy information and their application to decision making. Control and Decision 22(2), 215–219 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  59. Xu, Z.S.: Correlated linguistic information aggregation. Int. J. Uncertainty Fuzziness Knowl.-Based Syst. 17(5), 633–647 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Xu, Z.S.: Choquet integrals of weighted intuitionistic fuzzy information. Inf. Sci. 180, 726–736 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Xu, Z., Xia, M.: Induced generalized intuitionistic fuzzy operators. Knowl.-Based Syst. 24, 197–209 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Yager, R.R.: Induced aggregation operators. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 137, 59–69 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Yager, R.R.: OWA aggregation of intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Int. J. Gen. Syst. 38(6), 617–641 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Yang, W., Chen, Z.: The quasi-arithmetic intuitionistic fuzzy OWA operators. Knowl.-Based Syst. 27, 219–233 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Yeh, C.H., Deng, H.: A practical approach to fuzzy utilities comparison in fuzzy multicriteria analysis. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 35, 179–194 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Yeh, C.H., Deng, H., Chang, Y.H.: Fuzzy multicriteria analysis for performance evaluation of bus companies. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 126, 459–473 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control. 8, 338–356 (1965)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Zimmermann, H.J.: Fuzzy Set Theory and Its Applications. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1991)

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Authors are grateful to the editor and referees for their valuable suggestions and critical remarks for improving this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ismat Beg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Beg, I., Rashid, T. Multi-criteria trapezoidal valued intuitionistic fuzzy decision making with Choquet integral based TOPSIS. OPSEARCH 51, 98–129 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12597-013-0134-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12597-013-0134-5

Keywords

Navigation