Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Business & Information Systems Engineering 2/2018

22.01.2018 | Catchword

Platform Launch Strategies

verfasst von: Prof. Dr. Christian Stummer, Prof. Dr. Dennis Kundisch, Prof. Dr. Reinhold Decker

Erschienen in: Business & Information Systems Engineering | Ausgabe 2/2018

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Excerpt

Today, digital platforms mediating between independent groups of users account for a total market value of about US-$4.3 trillion and an employment base of several million direct and indirect employees (Evans and Gawer 2016). A multi-sided platform (MSP) – in the literature also referred to as two-sided platform, two-sided market, or multi-sided market – constitutes a market that enables interaction between at least two sets of users through an intermediary, where the decisions of each group of users on either side of the market affects the outcomes of the users on the other side(s) (Rochet and Tirole 2004; Rysman 2009; Hagiu and Wright 2015). MSPs have impressively demonstrated their disruptive potential in well-established global industries. Airbnb, for instance, leads the CNBC disruptor 50 list (CNBC 2017) and, with a market valuation of US-$31 billion, comes second after the Marriott group in the lodging industry (Bensinger 2017). Its two-sided platform mediates between traveling people who seek accommodation and hosts willing to share their accommodation. The exponential growth of its platform started around 2011, when the critical inflection point (in respect of the number of users) was reached and network effects started to kick in (Hagiu and Rothman 2016). As the first in its industry, Airbnb has been able to solve one of the critical early-stage challenges of MSPs, namely the mutual baiting problem, which often is referred to as the ‘chicken-and-egg dilemma’ of multi-sided digital platforms. …

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Weitere Produktempfehlungen anzeigen
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Ackerberg DA, Gowrisankaran G (2006) Quantifying equilibrium network externalities in the ACH banking industry. RAND J Econ 37(3):738–761CrossRef Ackerberg DA, Gowrisankaran G (2006) Quantifying equilibrium network externalities in the ACH banking industry. RAND J Econ 37(3):738–761CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Anderson EG, Parker GG, Tan B (2014) Platform performance investment in the presence of network externalities. Inf Syst Res 25(1):152–172CrossRef Anderson EG, Parker GG, Tan B (2014) Platform performance investment in the presence of network externalities. Inf Syst Res 25(1):152–172CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Armstrong M (2006) Competition in two-sided markets. RAND J Econ 37(3):668–691CrossRef Armstrong M (2006) Competition in two-sided markets. RAND J Econ 37(3):668–691CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Armstrong M, Wright J (2007) Two-sided markets, competitive bottlenecks and exclusive contracts. Econ Theory 32(2):353–380CrossRef Armstrong M, Wright J (2007) Two-sided markets, competitive bottlenecks and exclusive contracts. Econ Theory 32(2):353–380CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bakos Y, Katsamakas E (2008) Design and ownership of two-sided networks: implications for internet platforms. J Manag Inf Syst 25(2):171–202CrossRef Bakos Y, Katsamakas E (2008) Design and ownership of two-sided networks: implications for internet platforms. J Manag Inf Syst 25(2):171–202CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Binken J, Stremersch S (2009) The effect of superstar software on hardware sales in system markets. J Market 73(2):88–104CrossRef Binken J, Stremersch S (2009) The effect of superstar software on hardware sales in system markets. J Market 73(2):88–104CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bohn N, Kundisch D (2018) Much more than “same solution using a different technology”: antecedents and consequences of technology pivots in software startups. In: Proceedings of the Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik, Lüneburg Bohn N, Kundisch D (2018) Much more than “same solution using a different technology”: antecedents and consequences of technology pivots in software startups. In: Proceedings of the Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik, Lüneburg
Zurück zum Zitat Caillaud B, Jullien B (2003) Chicken & egg: competition among intermediation service providers. RAND J Econ 34(2):309–328CrossRef Caillaud B, Jullien B (2003) Chicken & egg: competition among intermediation service providers. RAND J Econ 34(2):309–328CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cennamo C, Santalo J (2013) Platform competition: strategic trade-offs in platform markets. Strateg Manag J 34(11):1331–1350CrossRef Cennamo C, Santalo J (2013) Platform competition: strategic trade-offs in platform markets. Strateg Manag J 34(11):1331–1350CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Chao Y, Derdenger T (2013) Mixed bundling in two-sided markets in the presence of installed base effects. Manag Sci 59(8):1904–1926CrossRef Chao Y, Derdenger T (2013) Mixed bundling in two-sided markets in the presence of installed base effects. Manag Sci 59(8):1904–1926CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Chu J, Manchanda P (2016) Quantifying cross and direct network effects in online consumer-to-consumer platforms. Market Sci 35(6):870–893CrossRef Chu J, Manchanda P (2016) Quantifying cross and direct network effects in online consumer-to-consumer platforms. Market Sci 35(6):870–893CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Clements MT, Ohashi H (2005) Indirect network effects and the product cycle: video games in the US, 1994–2002. J Ind Econ 53(4):515–542CrossRef Clements MT, Ohashi H (2005) Indirect network effects and the product cycle: video games in the US, 1994–2002. J Ind Econ 53(4):515–542CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dou G, He P, Xu X (2016) One-side value-added service investment and pricing strategies for a two-sided platform. Int J Prod Res 54(13):3808–3821CrossRef Dou G, He P, Xu X (2016) One-side value-added service investment and pricing strategies for a two-sided platform. Int J Prod Res 54(13):3808–3821CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Eisenmann TR, Parker G, Van Alstyne M (2006) Strategies for two-sided markets. Harv Bus Rev 84(10):92–101 Eisenmann TR, Parker G, Van Alstyne M (2006) Strategies for two-sided markets. Harv Bus Rev 84(10):92–101
Zurück zum Zitat Eisenmann TR, Parker G, Van Alstyne M (2008) Opening platforms: how, when and why? Working Paper 09-030, Harvard Business School Eisenmann TR, Parker G, Van Alstyne M (2008) Opening platforms: how, when and why? Working Paper 09-030, Harvard Business School
Zurück zum Zitat Eisenmann TR, Parker G, Van Alstyne M (2011) Platform envelopment. Strateg Manag J 32(12):1270–1285CrossRef Eisenmann TR, Parker G, Van Alstyne M (2011) Platform envelopment. Strateg Manag J 32(12):1270–1285CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Evans DS (2003) Some empirical aspects of multi-sided platform industries. Rev Netw Econ 2(3):191–209CrossRef Evans DS (2003) Some empirical aspects of multi-sided platform industries. Rev Netw Econ 2(3):191–209CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Evans A, Gawer PC (2016) The rise of the platform enterprise: a global survey. Center for Global Enterprise, New York Evans A, Gawer PC (2016) The rise of the platform enterprise: a global survey. Center for Global Enterprise, New York
Zurück zum Zitat Fath G, Sarvary M (2003) Adoption dynamics in buyer-side exchanges. Quant Market Econ 1(3):305–335CrossRef Fath G, Sarvary M (2003) Adoption dynamics in buyer-side exchanges. Quant Market Econ 1(3):305–335CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gazé P, Vaubourg AG (2011) Electronic platforms and two-sided markets: a side-switching analysis. J High Technol Manag Res 22(2):158–165CrossRef Gazé P, Vaubourg AG (2011) Electronic platforms and two-sided markets: a side-switching analysis. J High Technol Manag Res 22(2):158–165CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hagiu A (2009) Two-sided platforms: product variety and pricing structures. J Econ Manag Strateg 18(4):1011–1043CrossRef Hagiu A (2009) Two-sided platforms: product variety and pricing structures. J Econ Manag Strateg 18(4):1011–1043CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hagiu A, Eisenmann T (2007) A staged solution to the Catch-22. Harv Bus Rev 85(11):25–26 Hagiu A, Eisenmann T (2007) A staged solution to the Catch-22. Harv Bus Rev 85(11):25–26
Zurück zum Zitat Hagiu A, Rothman S (2016) Network effects aren’t enough. Harv Bus Rev 94(4):65–71 Hagiu A, Rothman S (2016) Network effects aren’t enough. Harv Bus Rev 94(4):65–71
Zurück zum Zitat Hagiu A, Spulber D (2013) First-party content and coordination in two-sided markets. Manag Sci 59(4):933–949CrossRef Hagiu A, Spulber D (2013) First-party content and coordination in two-sided markets. Manag Sci 59(4):933–949CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hagiu A, Wright J (2015) Multi-sided platforms. Int J Ind Organ 43:162–174CrossRef Hagiu A, Wright J (2015) Multi-sided platforms. Int J Ind Organ 43:162–174CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Katz ML, Shapiro C (1985) Network externalities, competition, and compatibility. Am Econ Rev 75(3):424–440 Katz ML, Shapiro C (1985) Network externalities, competition, and compatibility. Am Econ Rev 75(3):424–440
Zurück zum Zitat Kiesling E, Günther M, Stummer C, Wakolbinger LM (2012) Agent-based simulation of innovation diffusion: a review. Cent Eur J Oper Res 20(2):183–230CrossRef Kiesling E, Günther M, Stummer C, Wakolbinger LM (2012) Agent-based simulation of innovation diffusion: a review. Cent Eur J Oper Res 20(2):183–230CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kuek SC, Paradi-Guilford CM, Fayomi T, Imaizumi S, Ipeirotis P (2015) The global opportunity in online outsourcing. World Bank Group, Washington Kuek SC, Paradi-Guilford CM, Fayomi T, Imaizumi S, Ipeirotis P (2015) The global opportunity in online outsourcing. World Bank Group, Washington
Zurück zum Zitat Landsman V, Stremersch S (2011) Multihoming in two-sided markets: an empirical inquiry in the video game console industry. J Market 75(6):39–54CrossRef Landsman V, Stremersch S (2011) Multihoming in two-sided markets: an empirical inquiry in the video game console industry. J Market 75(6):39–54CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Liebowitz SJ, Margolis SE (1994) Network externalities: an uncommon tragedy. J Econ Perspect 8(2):133–150CrossRef Liebowitz SJ, Margolis SE (1994) Network externalities: an uncommon tragedy. J Econ Perspect 8(2):133–150CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Muzellec L, Ronteau S, Lambkin M (2015) Two-sided internet platforms: a business model lifecycle perspective. Ind Market Manag 45:139–150CrossRef Muzellec L, Ronteau S, Lambkin M (2015) Two-sided internet platforms: a business model lifecycle perspective. Ind Market Manag 45:139–150CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Nambisan S, Lyytinen K, Majchrzak A, Song M (2017) Digital innovation management: reinventing innovation management research in a digital world. MIS Q 41(1):223–238CrossRef Nambisan S, Lyytinen K, Majchrzak A, Song M (2017) Digital innovation management: reinventing innovation management research in a digital world. MIS Q 41(1):223–238CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Parker GG, Van Alstyne MW (2005) Two-sided network effects: a theory of information product design. Manag Sci 51(10):1494–1504CrossRef Parker GG, Van Alstyne MW (2005) Two-sided network effects: a theory of information product design. Manag Sci 51(10):1494–1504CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Parker GG, Van Alstyne MW, Choudrary SP (2016) Platform revolution: how networked markets are transforming the economy and how to make them work for you. Norton, New York Parker GG, Van Alstyne MW, Choudrary SP (2016) Platform revolution: how networked markets are transforming the economy and how to make them work for you. Norton, New York
Zurück zum Zitat Porter ME (1980) Competitive strategy: techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. The Free Press, New York Porter ME (1980) Competitive strategy: techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. The Free Press, New York
Zurück zum Zitat Ries E (2011) The lean startup: how today’s entrepreneurs use continuous innovation to create radically successful businesses. Crown Business, New York Ries E (2011) The lean startup: how today’s entrepreneurs use continuous innovation to create radically successful businesses. Crown Business, New York
Zurück zum Zitat Rochet JC, Tirole J (2003) Platform competition in two-sided markets. J Eur Econ Assoc 1(4):990–1029CrossRef Rochet JC, Tirole J (2003) Platform competition in two-sided markets. J Eur Econ Assoc 1(4):990–1029CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rochet JC, Tirole J (2004) Two-sided markets: an overview. Working paper, Institut d’Economie Industrielle, France Rochet JC, Tirole J (2004) Two-sided markets: an overview. Working paper, Institut d’Economie Industrielle, France
Zurück zum Zitat Rochet JC, Tirole J (2006) Two-sided markets: a progress report. RAND J Econ 37(3):645–667CrossRef Rochet JC, Tirole J (2006) Two-sided markets: a progress report. RAND J Econ 37(3):645–667CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rysman M (2004) Competition between networks: a study of the market for yellow pages. Rev Econ Stud 71(2):483–512CrossRef Rysman M (2004) Competition between networks: a study of the market for yellow pages. Rev Econ Stud 71(2):483–512CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rysman M (2009) The economics of two-sided markets. J Econ Perspect 23(3):125–143CrossRef Rysman M (2009) The economics of two-sided markets. J Econ Perspect 23(3):125–143CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Schilling M (2003) Winning the standards race: building installed base and the availability of complementary goods. Eur Manag J 17(3):265–274CrossRef Schilling M (2003) Winning the standards race: building installed base and the availability of complementary goods. Eur Manag J 17(3):265–274CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Shankar V, Bayus BL (2003) Network effects and competition: an empirical analysis of the home video game industry. Strateg Manag J 24(4):375–384CrossRef Shankar V, Bayus BL (2003) Network effects and competition: an empirical analysis of the home video game industry. Strateg Manag J 24(4):375–384CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Stremersch S, Tellis GJ, Franses PH, Jeroen LG (2007) Indirect network effects in new product growth. J Market 71(3):52–74CrossRef Stremersch S, Tellis GJ, Franses PH, Jeroen LG (2007) Indirect network effects in new product growth. J Market 71(3):52–74CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tucker C, Zhang J (2010) Growing two-sided networks by advertising the user base: a field experiment. Market Sci 29(5):805–814CrossRef Tucker C, Zhang J (2010) Growing two-sided networks by advertising the user base: a field experiment. Market Sci 29(5):805–814CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Veit D, Clemons E, Benlian A, Buxmann P, Hess T, Kundisch D, Leimeister JM, Loos P, Spann M (2014) Business models: an information systems research agenda. Bus Inf Syst Eng 6(1):45–53CrossRef Veit D, Clemons E, Benlian A, Buxmann P, Hess T, Kundisch D, Leimeister JM, Loos P, Spann M (2014) Business models: an information systems research agenda. Bus Inf Syst Eng 6(1):45–53CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Voigt S, Hinz O (2015) Network effects in two-sided markets: why a 50/50 user split is not necessarily revenue optimal. Bus Res 8(1):139–170CrossRef Voigt S, Hinz O (2015) Network effects in two-sided markets: why a 50/50 user split is not necessarily revenue optimal. Bus Res 8(1):139–170CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wilbur KC (2008) A two-sided, empirical model of television advertising and viewing markets. Market Sci 27(3):356–378CrossRef Wilbur KC (2008) A two-sided, empirical model of television advertising and viewing markets. Market Sci 27(3):356–378CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wilson C, Boe B, Sala A, Puttaswamy K, Zhao BY (2009) User interactions in social networks and their implications. In: Proceedings of the 4th ACM European Conference, Nuremberg, pp 205–218 Wilson C, Boe B, Sala A, Puttaswamy K, Zhao BY (2009) User interactions in social networks and their implications. In: Proceedings of the 4th ACM European Conference, Nuremberg, pp 205–218
Zurück zum Zitat Yoo B, Choudhary V, Mukhopadhyay T (2002) A model of neutral B2B intermediaries. J Manag Inf Syst 19(3):43–68CrossRef Yoo B, Choudhary V, Mukhopadhyay T (2002) A model of neutral B2B intermediaries. J Manag Inf Syst 19(3):43–68CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zhu F, Iansiti M (2012) Entry into platform-based markets. Strateg Manag J 33(1):88–106CrossRef Zhu F, Iansiti M (2012) Entry into platform-based markets. Strateg Manag J 33(1):88–106CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Platform Launch Strategies
verfasst von
Prof. Dr. Christian Stummer
Prof. Dr. Dennis Kundisch
Prof. Dr. Reinhold Decker
Publikationsdatum
22.01.2018
Verlag
Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden
Erschienen in
Business & Information Systems Engineering / Ausgabe 2/2018
Print ISSN: 2363-7005
Elektronische ISSN: 1867-0202
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-018-0520-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2018

Business & Information Systems Engineering 2/2018 Zur Ausgabe