Abstract
This paper presents the results of an investigation of Passivated Emitter Rear Cell (PERC) solar cell technology and the current understanding of the fundamental device physics. The research work has been focused on the influence of the bulk lifetime, the incident angle of the solar radiation, and temperature dependence on electrical properties of the considered PERC solar cell by using TCAD-ATLAS Silvaco. Also, this paper shows the best results obtained recently and some guidelines to improve still more the efficiency of the devices. The optimization at 300 K led to the following results Jsc = 41.70 mA/cm2, Voc = 0.727 V, FF = 80.53 %, P\(_{{\max }} =\) 244.439 W/m− 2, and η = 24.44 % which are close with those found in different research works. This technology provides a better electrical control over the cell and thus leads to valuable improvements in device performance.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Swanson RM (2005) Approaching the 29% limit efficiency of silicon solar cells, Conference Record of the 31st IEEE PVSC, Orlando, FL, 889
Guney MS (2016) Solar power and application methods. Renew Sust Energ Rev 57:776–785
Boukortt N, Patanè S, Hadri B (2018) Electrical Characterization of n-ZnO/c-Si 2D Heterojunction Solar Cell by Using TCAD Tools Silicon 10:1, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-017-9750-7
Dullweber T, et al (2014) Fine line printed 5 busbar PERC solar cells with conversion efficiencies beyond 21%, 29th EU PV Solar Energy Conference, pp 621
Ye F, et al (2016) 22.13% Efficient Industrial p-Type Mono PERC Solar Cell Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC), 2016 IEEE 43rd, 3360–3365
Green MA, Blakers AW, Kurianski J, Narayanan S, Shi J, Szpitalak T, Taouk M, Wenham SR, Willison MR (1984) Ultimate performance silicon solar cells, Final Report, NERDDP Project 81/1264, 83
Blakers AW, Wang A, Milne AM, Zhao J, Green MA (1989) 22.8% efficient silicon solar cell. Appl Phys Lett 55:1363–1365
Green MA (2015) The Passivated Emitter and Rear Cell (PERC): From conception to mass production. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 143:190–197
Mat Desa MK et al (2016) Silicon back contact solar cell configuration: A pathway towards higher efficiency. Renew Sust Energ Rev 60:1516–1532
Rawat A et al (2014) Numerical simulations for high efficiency HIT solar cells using microcrystalline silicon as emitter and back surface field (BSF) layers. Sol Energy 110:691–703
Silvaco International (2016) Atlas user’s manual device simulation software (Santa Clara: Silvaco International)
Stem N, Cid M (2001) Studies of phosphorus gaussian profile emitter silicon solar cells. Mat Res 4(2):143–148
Kløwa F, Hauga H, Erik Fossa S (2013) Surface recombination velocity measurements of metallized surfaces by photoluminescence imaging. Enrgy Proced 43:18–26
Chen Z et al (1993) Plasma-enhanced chemical-vapor-deposited oxide for low surface recombination velocity and high effective lifetime in silicon. J of Appl Phys 74:2856. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.354638
Schultz O et al (2004) Short communication: Accelerated publication: Multicrystalline silicon solar cells exceeding 20% efficiency. Prog Photovolt Res Appl 12:553–558. https://doi.org/10.1002/pip.583
Cuevas A, Macdonald D (2004) Measuring and interpreting the lifetime of silicon wafers. Sol Energy 76:255–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2003.07.033
Smets AH et al (2016) Solar energy: The physics and engineering of photovoltaic conversion, technologies and systems UIT Cambridge Ltd
Gérenton F et al (2015) Pattern of partial rear contacts for silicon solar cells. Enrgy Proced 77:677–686
Diouf D, Kleidera JP, Desruesb T, Ribeyronb P-J (2010) Effects of the front surface field in n-type interdigitated back contact silicon heterojunctions solar cells. Enrgy Proced 2:59–64
Dahlinger M, Carstens K (2016) Optimized laser doped back surface field for IBC solar cells. Enrgy Proced 92:450–456
Wolf A et al (2010) Comprehensive analytical model for locally contacted rear surface passivated solar cells. J APPL PHYS 108:124510
Yang G et al (2016) IBC c-Si solar cells based on ion-implanted poly-silicon passivating contacts. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 158:84–90
Shaker A, Zekry A (2010) A new and simple model for plasma- and doping-induced band gap narrowing. J Electron Devices 8:293–299
Mat Desa MK et al (2016) Silicon back contact solar cell configuration: A pathway towards higher efficiency. Renew Sust Energ Rev 60:1516–1532
Hernández Como N, Morales Acevedo A (2010) Simulation of heterojunction silicon solar cells with AMPS-1D. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 94:62–67
Renewable Resource Data Center (2004) National Renewable Energy Laboratory http://rredc.nrel.gov/solar/spectra/am1.5/
Deng W, et al (2015) 20.8% Efficient PERC Solar Cell on 156 mmx156 mmp-Type Multi-Crystalline Silicon Substrate Photovoltaic Specialist Conference (PVSC), 2015 IEEE 42nd
Kiefer F et al (2013) Influence of solder pads to PERC solar cells for module integration. Enrgy Proced 38:368–374
Yang G et al (2016) IBC c-Si solar cells based on ion-implanted poly-silicon passivating contacts. Sol Energ Mat Sol C 158:84–90
Antonius R (2015) FFE IBC cells: Impact of busbars on cell performance with circuit modelling. Enrgy Proced 77:21–28
Wiley J, Sons I (2001) Physics of semiconductor devices. 2nd ed
Acknowledgments
This work was partially supported by Semiconductor Laboratory (GE01/08), Kuwait University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Boukortt, N., Patanè, S. & Hadri, B. Development of High-Efficiency PERC Solar Cells Using Atlas Silvaco. Silicon 11, 145–152 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-018-9838-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-018-9838-8