Abstract
Eight hundred and twenty-nine adults, drawn from 12 locations in all four parts of India, participated in a study that explored the joint effects of Indians’ discrepant mindset, context sensitivity, and quality of environment on their modes of behavior. Respondents also predicted how a person is likely to change his behavior when the conditions in which he works change from disabling to enabling. The findings showed that the two most dominant modes of behavior-self-serving calculative and achieving high positive goal — coexisted, but were differently caused. Context sensitivity facilitated both modes of behavior; but adequate infrastructure and friendly and helpful people in the neighborhood encouraged only achieving high positive goal behavior. On the contrary, duplicity in professing desirable but acting under realistic compulsions, poor quality of environment, and low levels of development were conducive to self-serving calculative behavior. As a situation changed from disabling to enabling, a person was likely to shift towards more positive behavior.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adler F, Laufer WS & Merton RK (2000). The legacy of anomie theory. New York: Transaction Publishers.
Allen MW, Ng SH, Ikeda K, Jawan JA, Sufi AH, Wilson M & Yang KS (2007). Two decades of change in cultural values and economic development in eight East Asian and Pacific island nations. J Cross-Cultural Psychol, 38:247–269.
Bharti A (1985). The self in Hindu thought and action. In Marsella AJ & DeVos G Hsu FLK (Eds.), Culture and self: Asian and western perspectives (pp 185–230). New York: Tavistock Publications.
Bhawuk DPS (2008). Science of culture and culture of science: Worldview and choice of conceptual models and methodology. The Social Engineer, 11(2):26–43.
Boucher HC, Peng K, Shi J & Wang L (2009). Culture and implicit self-esteem: Chinese are “good” and “bad” at the same time. Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, 40:24–45.
Carstairs GM (1971). The twice born. Bombay: Asia Publishers.
Chie N (1964). Logic and the smile: When Japanese meet Indians. Japan Quarterly, 11:434–438.
Choi I & Choi Y (2002). Culture and self-concept flexibility. Personality and Social Psychological Bulletin, 28:1508–1517.
Dumont L (1970). Homo hierarchicus. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hofstede G (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Kaiser HF (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20:141–151.
Kumar R (2004). Brahmanical idealism, anarchical individualism, and dynamics of Indian negotiating behavior. International Journal of Cross-Cultural Management, 4:39–58.
Kumar R & Sethi A (2005). Doing business in India. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Marriott K (Ed.), (1990). India through Hindu categories. New Delhi: Sage.
Merton RK (1938). Social structure and anomie. American Sociological Review, 3:672–82.
Peng K & Nisbett RE (1999). Culture, dialectics, and reasoning about contradiction. American Psychologist, 54:741–754.
Radhakrishnan S & Moore CA (1954). A source book in Indian philosophy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Ramanujan AK (1989). Is there an Indian way of thinking? An informal essay. Contributions to Indian Sociology, 25:41–58.
Roland A (1988). In search of self in India and Japan: Towards a cross-cultural psychology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Roland A (2005). Multiple mothering and the familial self. Paper presented during an international conference on understanding India, at the Aarhus School of Business, Aarhus, Denmark, November 3–5.
Schulberg L (1968). Historic India, great ages of man: A history of the world culture series. Amsterdam: Time-life international.
Sen A (2006). The argumentative Indian: Writings on Indian history, culture and identity. New York: Oxford University Press.
Sinha D & Tripathi RC (1994). Individualism in a collectivist culture: A case of coexistence of opposites. In U Kim, HC Triandis, C Kagitcibasi, SC Choi & G Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method and application (pp 123–136). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Sinha JBP (1970). Development through behavior modification. Bombay: Allied Publishers.
Sinha JBP (1990). The salient Indian values and their socio-ecological roots. Indian Journal of Social Sciences, 3:477–488.
Sinha JBP (2009, in press). The shifting mindset of Indians. In G Misra (Ed.), Discipline of psychology in the series “The History of Indian Science, Philosophy and Culture” (General Editor DP Chattopadhyaya).
Sinha JBP, Daftuar CN, Gupta RK, Mishra RC, Jayseetha R Jha, SS Verma J & Vijayakumar VSR (1994). Regional similarities and differences in people’s beliefs, practices, and preferences. Psychology and Developing Societies, 6:131–150.
Sinha JBP, Gupta P, Singh S, Sriniwas ES & Vijaykumar VSR (2001). Social beliefs, organizational climate and managers self-perception. Vikalpa, 26(1):33–47.
Sinha JBP & Kanungo RN (1997). Context sensitivity and balancing in organizational behavior. International Journal of Psychology, 32:93–105.
Sinha JBP & Pandey A (2007). Indians mindsets and the conditions that evoke them. Psychological Studies, 52:1–13.
Sinha JBP, Sinha RBN, Bhupatkar AP, Anand Gupta P, Gupta R Panda A, Singh S, Singh-SenGupta S & Srinivas ES (2004). Facets of societal and organizational cultures and managers work related thoughts and feelings. Psychology and Developing Societies, 16:1–25.
Sinha JBP, Sinha TN, Verma J & Sinha RBN (2001). Collectivism coexisting with individualism: An Indian scenario. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 4:133–145.
Sinha JBP & Verma J (1987). Structure of collectivism. In C Kagitcibasi (Ed.), Growth and progress in cross-cultural psychology (pp 123–129). Lisse: Swets and Zeitlinger.
Sinha JBP, Vohra N, Singhal S, Sinha RBN & Ushashree S (2002). Normative predictions of collectivist-individualist intentions and behavior of Indians. International Journal of Psychology, 37:309–319.
Triandis HC & Bhawuk DPS (1997). Culture theory and meaning of relatedness. In PC Earley & M Erez (Eds.), New perspectives on international industrial/organizational psychology (pp 13–54). San Francisco: New Lexington Press.
Varma PK (2004). Being Indian: The truth about why the 21st century will be India’s. New Delhi: Viking.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sinha, J.B.P., Singh, S., Gupta, P. et al. An exploration of the Indian mindset. Psychol Stud 55, 3–17 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-010-0001-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-010-0001-x