Abstract
This article examines self-relevant processes that sustain behaviors that have little or no direct implications for people’s well-being. When outcomes are low in direct personal relevance, far in the future, or only weakly linked to one’s present behavior, imagined personal incentives may not be enough to motivate behavior. Under such circumstances, people may nonetheless perform actions that are linked to their identity, self-evaluation, or public image. Using pro-environmental behavior as an exemplar, we examine self-processes that are involved when people engage in behaviors that do not directly affect their personal self-interest.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alicke, M. D., & Govorun, O. (2005). The better-than-average effect. In M. D. Alicke, D. A. Dunning, & J. I. Krueger (Eds.), The self in social judgment: Studies in self and identity (pp. 85–106). New York: Psychology Press.
Anderson, C., Miller, R., Riger, A., Dill, J., & Sedikides, C. (1994). Behavioral and characterological attributional styles as predictors of depression and loneliness: Review, refinement and test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 549–558.
Aron, A., Aron, E. N., & Smollan, D. (1992). Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 596–612.
Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Muraven, M., & Tice, D. M. (1998). Ego depletion: Is the active self a limited resource? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1252–1265.
Bradley, G. W. (1978). Self-serving biases in the attribution process: A reexamination of the fact or fiction question. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 56–71.
Bragg, E. (1996). Towards ecological self: Deep ecology meets constructionist self- theory. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 16, 93–108.
Bratt, C. (1999). Consumers’ environmental behavior: Generalized, sector-based, or compensatory? Environment and Behavior, 31, 28–44.
Carrus, G., Passafaro, P., & Bonnes, M. (2008). Emotions, habits and rational choices in ecological behaviours: The case of recycling and use of public transportation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28, 51–62.
Carver, C., & Scheier, M. (1982). Control theory: A useful conceptual framework for personality–social, clinical, and health psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 111–135.
Cheek, J. M. (1989). Identity orientations and self-interpretation. In D. M. Buss & N. Cantor (Eds.), Personality psychology: Recent trends and emerging directions (pp. 275–285). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Cialdini, R. B., Demaine, L., Sagarin, B. J., Barrett, D. W., Rhoads, K., & Winter, P. L. (2006). Managing social norms for persuasive impact. Social Influence, 1, 3–15.
Cialdini, R. B., Reno, R. R., & Kallgren, C. A. (1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 1015–1026.
Clayton, S. (1996). What is fair in the environmental debate? In L. Montada & M. J. Lerner (Eds.), Current societal concerns about justice (pp. 195–211). New York: Plenum.
Clayton, S. (2003). Environmental identity: A conceptual and an operational definition. In S. Clayton & S. Opotow (Eds.), Identity and the natural environment: The psychological significance of nature (pp. 45–65). Cambridge, MA and London: The MIT Press.
Cooper, J. (2007). Cognitive dissonance: Fifty years of a classic theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Costanzo, M., Archer, D., Aronson, E., & Pettigrew, T. (1986). Energy conservation behavior: The difficult path from information to action. American Psychologist, 41, 521–528.
Davis, J., Green, J., & Reed, A. (2009). Interdependence with the environment: Commitment, interconnectedness, and environmental behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 173–180.
DeLeon, I. G., & Fuqua, R. W. (1995). The effects of public commitment and group. feedback on curbside recycling. Environment and Behavior, 27, 233–250.
Diekmann, A., & Preisendörfer, P. (1998). Environmental behavior: Discrepancies between aspirations and reality. Rationality and Society, 10, 79–102.
Dovidio, J. F. (1984). Helping behavior and altruism: An empirical and conceptual overview. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 16, pp. 362–427). New York: Academic Press.
Dutcher, D., Finley, J., Luloff, A., & Johnson, J. (2007). Connectivity with nature as a measure of environmental values. Environment and Behavior, 39, 474–493.
Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Gardner, G., & Stern, C. (2008). The short list: The most effective actions U.S.households can take to curb climate change. Environment Magazine, 50, 12–24.
Gifford, R., Scannell, L., Kormos, C., Smolova, L., Biel, A., Boncu, S., et al. (2009). Temporal pessimism and spatial optimism in environmental assessments: An 18-nation study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 1–12.
Global Humanitarian Forum. (2009). 2009 Forum: Human impact of climate change. M. McKinnon (Ed.). Geneva, Switzerland: ATAR Roto Presse SA.
Goldstein, N. J., Cialdini, R. B., & Griskevicius, V. (2008). A room with a viewpoint: Using social norms to motivate environmental conservation in hotels. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 472–482.
Higgins, E. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94, 319–340.
Holland, R., Meertens, R., & Van Vugt, M. (2002). Self-justification among car drivers: Processes that undermine policy measures. In G. Bartels & W. Nelissen (Eds.), Marketing for sustainability: Towards transactional policy-making (pp. 334–342). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: IOS Press.
Humphrey, N. (1986). The inner eye. London: Faber & Faber.
Hume, B. (2005, March 04). Demanding an apology. Retrieved November 16th, 2009, from Fox News website: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,149423,00.html
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2007). Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Solomon, S., D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K.B. Averyt, M. Tignor and H. L. Miller (Eds.). Cambridge, UK and New York:Cambridge University Press.
Janoff-Bulman, R. (1979). Characterological versus behavioral self-blame: inquiries into depression and rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1798–1809.
Kaiser, F. G., Schultz, P. W., Berenguer, J., Corral-Verdugo, V., & Tankha, G. (2008). Extending planned environmentalism: Anticipated guilt and embarrassment across cultures. European Psychologist, 13, 288–297.
Kaurza, J., & Carey, T. O. (1984). Relative preference and adaptiveness of behavioral blame for observers of rape victims. Journal of Personality, 52, 249–260.
Kempton, W., & Holland, D. C. (2003). Identity and sustained environmental practice. In S. Clayton & S. Opotow (Eds.), Identity and the natural environment: The psychological significance of nature (pp. 45–65). Cambridge, MA and London: The MIT Press.
Leary, M. R. (1995). Self-presentation: Impression management and interpersonal behavior. Boulder, CO: Westview.
Leary, M. R., & Buttermore, N. (2003). The evolution of the human self: Tracing the natural history of self-awareness. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 33, 365–404.
Leary, M. R., Estrada, M. J., & Allen, A. B. (2009). The Analogue-I and the Analogue-Me: The Avatars of the Self. Self and Identity, 8, 147–161.
Leary, M. R., & Kowalski, R. (1990). Impression management: A literature review and two-component model. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 34–47.
Leary, M. R., & Tangney, J. P. (Eds.). (2003). Handbook of self and identity. New York: Guilford Press.
Leary, M. R., Tipsord, J., & Tate, E. B. (2007). Allo-inclusive identity: Incorporating the natural and social worlds into one's sense of self. In H. Wayment & J. Bauer (Eds.), Quieting the ego: Psychological benefits of transcending egotism. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Markus, H., & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41, 954–969.
Martin, K., & Leary, M. R. (1999). Would you drink after a stranger? The influence of self presentational motives on willingness to take a health risk. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1092–1100.
Mayer, F., & Frantz, C. (2004). The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals' feeling in community with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 503–515.
Meneses, G. D. (2009). Refuting fear in heuristics and in recycling promotion. Journal of Business Research.
Pieters, R., Bijmolt, T., Van Raaij, W. F., & Kruijk, M. D. (1998). Consumers' attributions of proenvironmental behavior, motivation, and ability to self and others. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 17, 215–225.
Sanna, L. J., Chang, E. C., Parks, C. D., & Kennedy, L. A. (2009). Construing collective concerns: Increasing cooperation by broadening construals in social dilemmas. Psychological Science, 20, 1319–1321.
Schultz, P. W. (2000). New environmental theories. Empathizing with nature: The effects of perspective taking on concern for environmental issues. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 391–406.
Schultz, P. W., & Oskamp, S. (1996). Effort as a moderator of the attitude-behavior relationship: General environmental concern and recycling. Social Psychology Quarterly, 59, 375–383.
Skogen, K. (2009). Another look at culture and nature: How culture patterns influence environmental orientation among Norwegian youth. Acta Sociologica, 42, 223–249.
Swann, W. B., Jr. (1983). Self-verification: Bringing social reality into harmony with the self. In J. Suls & A. G. Greenwald (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on the self, vol. 2 (pp. 33–66). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Swim, J., Clayton, S., Doherty, T., Gifford, R., Howard, G., Reser, J., et al. (2009). Psychology and global climate change: Addressing a multi-facetedphenomenon and set of challenges. A report by the American PsychologicalAssociation’s task force on the interface between psychology and global climatechange. Washington: American Psychological Association.
Tangney, J. P., & Dearing, R. (2002). Shame and guilt. New York: Guilford Press.
Tangney, J. P., Stuewig, J., & Mashek, D. J. (2007). What's moral about the self- conscious emotions? In J. L. Tracy, R. W. Robins, & J. P. Tangney (Eds.), The self-conscious emotions: Theory and research (pp. 21–37). New York: Guilford Press.
Tedeschi, J. T., Schlenker, B. R., & Bonoma, T. V. (1971). Cognitive dissonance: Private ratiocination or public spectacle? American Psychologist, 26, 685–695.
Thøgersen, J. (2004). A cognitive dissonance interpretation of consistencies and inconsistencies in environmentally responsible behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 93–103.
Vallacher, R., & Wegner, D. (1987). What do people think they're doing? Action identification and human behavior. Psychological Review, 94, 3–15.
Van Raiij, W. F. (2002). Stages of behavioural change: Motivation, ability and opportunity. In G. Bartels & W. Nelissen (Eds.), Marketing for sustainability: Towards transactional policy-making (pp. 321–333). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: IOS Press.
Verplanken, B., Walker, I., Davis, A., & Jurasek, M. (2008). Context change and travel mode choice: Combining the habit discontinuity and self-activation hypotheses. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28, 121–127.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Leary, M.R., Toner, K. & Gan, M. Self, Identity, and Reactions to Distal Threats: The Case of Environmental Behavior. Psychol Stud 56, 159–166 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-011-0060-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-011-0060-7