Abstract
This paper presents a de-noising method for speckle noise removal called de-speckling, retinal optical coherence tomography image by combining the features of wavelet transform, statistical modeling, Bayesian estimators and Gaussianization procedure. De-speckling methods based on statistical modeling of wavelet coefficients depend on the correct estimation of probability density function (PDF). The density estimation problem has been solved by using the Gaussianization procedure. The dynamic range capability of Gaussian PDF has been used for sharp estimation of density. A Cauchy PDF is used for modeling wavelet coefficients and finding the cumulative distribution function (CDF) of wavelet coefficients. This CDF is used as the input to the Gaussianization procedure, where it equalizes with the Gaussian CDF to estimate the density function of wavelet coefficients. Finally, the wavelet coefficients are recovered using Bayesian minimum mean square error estimator. Both visual and quantitative comparisons are performed for demonstrating the prominence of the proposed method. From simulation result it is seen that the proposed method outperforms the state-of-the-art methods in terms of peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), structural similarity, correlation coefficient (CoC) and edge preservation index (EPI). The proposed method has been achieved improvement of 5.13% in PSNR, 2.44% in SSIM, 2.11% in CoC and 3.45% in EPI over the well accepted existing method.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abdallah MB, Malek J, Azar AT, Belmabrouk H, Monreal JE, Krissian K (2016) Adaptive noise-reducing anisotropic diffusion filter. Neural Comput Appl 27(5):1273–1300
Amini Z, Rabbani H (2016) Statistical modeling of retinal optical coherence tomography. IEEE Trans Med Imag 35(6):1544–1554
Anantrasirichai N, Nicholson L, Morgan JE, Erchova I, Mortlock K. North RV et al (2014) Adaptive-weighted bilateral filtering and other pre-processing techniques for optical coherence tomography. Comput Med Imaging Graph 38(6):526–539
Avanaki MR, Marques MJ, Bradu A, Hojjatoleslami A, Podoleanu AG (2014) A new algorithm for speckle reduction of optical coherence tomography images. Optical Coherence Tomography and Coherence Domain Optical Methods in Biomedicine XVIII 8934:p 893437
Baghaie A, D’souza RM, Yu Z (2016) Application of Independent Component Analysis techniques in speckle noise reduction of retinal OCT images. Optik-Int J Light Electr Optics 127(15):5783–5791
Bhuiyan MIH, Ahmad MO, Swamy MNS (2007) Spatially adaptive wavelet-based method using the Cauchy prior for denoising the SAR images. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst Video Technol 17(4):500–507
Bian L, Suo J, Chen F, Dai Q (2015) Multiframe denoising of high-speed optical coherence tomography data using interframe and intraframe priors. J Biomed Optics 20(3):036006
Bussel II, Wollstein G, Schuman JS (2014) OCT for glaucoma diagnosis, screening and detection of glaucoma progression. Br J Ophthalmol 98(Suppl 2):ii15-ii19
Chang SG, Yu B, Vetterli M (2000) Adaptive wavelet thresholding for image denoising and compression. IEEE Trans Image Process 9(9):1532–1546
Chen SS, Gopinath RA (2001) Gaussianization. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp 423–429
Chen Q, de Sisternes L, Leng T, Rubin DL (2015) Application of improved homogeneity similarity-based denoising in optical coherence tomography retinal images. J Digit Imag 28(3):346–361
Cheng J, Duan L, Wong DWK, Akiba M, Liu J (2014) Speckle reduction in optical coherence tomography by matrix completion using bilateral random projection. In: Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), 2014 36th annual international conference of the IEEE, pp 186–189
Cheng J, Tao D, Quan Y, Wong DWK, Cheung GCM, Akiba M, Liu J (2016) Speckle reduction in 3D optical coherence tomography of retina by A-scan reconstruction. IEEE Trans Med Imag 35(10):2270–2279
Donoho DL (1995) De-noising by soft-thresholding. IEEE Trans Inform Theory 41(3):613–627
Erdogmus D, Jenssen R, Rao YN, Principe JC (2006) Gaussianization: an efficient multivariate density estimation technique for statistical signal processing. J VLSI Signal Process Syst Signal Image Video Technol 45(1–2):67–83
Esmaeili M, Dehnavi AM, Rabbani H, Hajizadeh F (2017) Speckle noise reduction in optical coherence tomography using two-dimensional curvelet-based dictionary learning. J Med Signals Sens 7(2):86
Freiberg FJ, Pfau M, Wons J, Wirth MA, Becker MD, Michels S (2016) Optical coherence tomography angiography of the foveal avascular zone in diabetic retinopathy. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 254(6):1051–1058
Ghafaryasl B, Baart R, de Boer JF, Vermeer KA, van Vliet LJ (2017) Automatic estimation of retinal nerve fiber bundle orientation in SD-OCT images using a structure-oriented smoothing filter. Med Imag 10133:101330C
Gonzalez RC, Woods RE (2002) Digital image processing, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River
Grzywacz NM, De Juan J, Ferrone C, Giannini D, Huang D, Koch G et al (2010) Statistics of optical coherence tomography data from human retina. IEEE Trans Med Imag 29(6):1224–1237
Hee MR, Puliafito CA, Wong C, Duker JS, Reichel E, Rutledge B et al (1995) Quantitative assessment of macular edema with optical coherence tomography. Arch Ophthalmol 113(8):1019–1029
Iftimia N, Bouma BE, Tearney GJ (2003) Speckle reduction in optical coherence tomography by “path length encoded” angular compounding. J Biomed Optics 8(2):260–264
Kato Y, Kuroki N, Hirose T, Numa M (2016) Locally weighted averaging for denoising of medical tomographic images. J Signal Process 20(4):217–220
Kim J, Miller DT, Kim EK, Oh S, Oh JH, Milner TE (2005) Optical coherence tomography speckle reduction by a partially spatially coherent source. J Biomed Optics 10(6):064034
Kobayashi M, Hanafusa H, Takada K, Noda J (1991) Polarization-independent interferometric optical-time-domain reflectometer. J Lightwave Technol 9(5):623–628
Laparra V, Camps-Valls G, Malo J (2011) Iterative gaussianization: from ICA to random rotations. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 22(4):537–549
Lasmar N, Stitou Y, Jouini S, Berthoumieu Y, Najim M (2008) Parametric Gaussianization procedure of wavelet coefficients for texture retrieval. In: 2008 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing. Las Vegas, NV, pp 749–752
Mallat SG (1989) A theory for multiresolution signal decomposition: the wavelet representation. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mac Intell 11(7):674–693
Mezghani-Marrakchi I, Mahe G, Djaziri-Larbi S, Jaidane M, Alouane MTH (2014) Nonlinear audio systems identification through audio input Gaussianization. IEEE/ACM Trans Audio Speech Lang Process 22(1):41–53
Mihcak MK, Kozintsev I, Ramchandran K (1999) Spatially adaptive statistical modeling of wavelet image coefficients and its application to denoising. In: Proceedings of the acoustics, speech, and signal processing 6:3253–3256
Pircher M, Gotzinger E, Leitgeb RA, Fercher AF, Hitzenberger CK (2003) Speckle reduction in optical coherence tomography by frequency compounding. J Biomed Optics 8(3):565–570
Ren H, Qin L, Zhu X (2016) Speckle reduction and cartoon-texture decomposition of ophthalmic optical coherence tomography images by variational image decomposition. Optik-Int J Light Electr Optics 127(19):7809–7821
Sahu S, Singh HV, Kumar B, Singh AK (2017) De-noising of ultrasound image using Bayesian approached heavy-tailed Cauchy distribution. Multimed Tools Appl 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-017-5221-9
Sahu S, Singh HV, Kumar B, Singh AK (2018) A Bayesian multiresolution approach for noise removal in medical magnetic resonance images. J Intell Syst. https://doi.org/10.1515/jisys-2017-0402
Schmitt JM, Xiang SH, Yung KM (1999) Speckle in optical coherence tomography. J Biomed Optics 4(1):95–106
Shah AA, Malik MM, Akram MU, Bazaz SA (2016) Comparison of noise removal algorithms on Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) image. In: 2016 IEEE International Conference on Imaging Systems and Techniques. Chania, Greece, pp 166–170
Sudeep PV, Niwas SI, Palanisamy P, Rajan J, Xiaojun Y, Wang X et al (2016) Enhancement and bias removal of optical coherence tomography images: an iterative approach with adaptive bilateral filtering. Comput biology Med 71:97–107
Thapa D, Raahemifar K, Lakshminarayanan V (2014) A new efficient dictionary and its implementation on retinal images. In: Digital signal processing (DSP), 19th international conference on, pp 841–846
Wang YG, Zhu G, Shi YQ (2018) Transportation spherical watermarking. IEEE Trans Image Process 27(4):2063–2077
Wong A, Mishra A, Bizheva K, Clausi DA (2010) General Bayesian estimation for speckle noise reduction in optical coherence tomography retinal imagery. Optics Express 18(8):8338–8352
Xu J, Ou H, Lam EY, Chui PC, Wong KK (2013) Speckle reduction of retinal optical coherence tomography based on contourlet shrinkage. Optics Lett 38(15):2900–2903
Zhang A, Xi J, Sun J, Li X (2017) Pixel-based speckle adjustment for noise reduction in Fourier-domain OCT images. Biomed Optics Express 8(3):1721–1730
Zhang S, Wang H, Huang W, You Z (2018a) Plant diseased leaf segmentation and recognition by fusion of superpixel, K-means and PHOG. Optik-Int J Light Electr Optics 157:866–872
Zhang S, Wang H, Huang W, Zhang C (2018) Combining modified LBP and weighted SRC for palmprint recognition. SIViP 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11760-018-1246-4
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Dr. MK Singh, Department of Ophthalmology, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University (BHU), Varanasi, India, for providing the valuable data and insight. We are sincerely thankful to the potential/ anonymous reviewer’s for their critical comments and suggestions to improve the quality of the paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sahu, S., Singh, H.V., Kumar, B. et al. Statistical modeling and Gaussianization procedure based de-speckling algorithm for retinal OCT images. J Ambient Intell Human Comput 15, 1125–1138 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-018-0823-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-018-0823-2