nach oben

Environmental Earth Sciences

Erschienen in:

01.12.2013 | International View point and News

Fact-based communication: the Shale Gas Information Platform SHIP

verfasst von: Andreas Hübner, Brian Horsfield, Ingo Kapp

Erschienen in: Environmental Earth Sciences | Ausgabe 8/2013

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

In response to an increasingly expressed need for factual information, a science-based information web portal, the Shale Gas Information Platform SHIP, was developed. At the core of the project is the shale gas expert network. It’s an international and interdisciplinary group composed of mainly scientists that share their specific knowledge with the public. With a strong focus on factual information, this initiative also strives to serve the scientific community as a publication and knowledge exchange platform. SHIP relies upon the basic principles of being science-based, transparent and balanced. The GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences coordinates this initiative.

Vorheriger Artikel Proposal for applying a component-based mixture approach for ecotoxicological assessment of fracturing fluids

Nächster Artikel Geothermal energy systems: research perspective for domestic energy provision

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Ashworth P, Gardner J (2006) Final report: understanding and incorporating stakeholder perspectives to low emission technologies in New South Wales (No. P2007/61). Centre for Low Emission Technology, CSIRO Pullenvale, Australia

Ashworth P, Boughen N, Mayhew M, Millar F (2010) From research to action: now we have to move on CCS communication. Int J Greenh Gas Con 4(2):426–433CrossRef

Ashworth P, Bradbury J, Wade S, Feenstra CFJY, Greenberg S, Hund G, Mikunda T (2012) What’s in store: lessons from implementing CCS. Int J Greenh Gas Con 9:402–409CrossRef

Broomfield M (2012) Support to the identification of potential risks for the environment and human health arising from hydrocarbons operations involving hydraulic fracturing in Europe. Report, European Commission DG Environment, http://ec.europa.eu/environment/integration/energy/pdf/fracking%20study.pdf. Accessed 28 Feb 2013

Dowd AM, Boughen N, Ashworth P, Carr-Cornish S (2011) Geothermal technology in Australia: investigating social acceptance. Energ Policy 39:6301–6307CrossRef

Editorial in Nature (2012) Unfortunate oversight. Nature 488. doi:10.1038/488005a. http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v488/n7409/full/488005a.html. Accessed 28 Feb 2013

EurActive (2012) Hollande deals setback to nuclear, shale gas industries. http://www.euractiv.com/energy/hollande-deals-blow-nuclear-shal-news-514819. Accessed 28 Feb 2013

Ewen C, Borchardt D, Richter S, Hammerbacher R (2012) Risikostudie Fracking—Sicherheit und Umweltverträglichkeit der Fracking-Technologie für die Erdgasgewinnung aus unkonventionellen Quellen (Übersichtsfassung). Report. http://dialog-erdgasundfrac.de/sites/dialog-erdgasundfrac.de/files/Ex_Risikostudie_Fracking_120518_webansicht.pdf. Accessed 28 Feb 2013

Gegen Gasbohren (2012) Von Exxon bezahlte Experten sollen für Fracking grünes Licht geben! http://www.gegen-gasbohren.de/2012/04/04/von-exxon-bezahlte-experten-sollen-fuer-fracking-gruenes-licht-geben. Accessed 28 Feb 2013

Green CA, Styles P, Baptie BJ (2012) Preese Hall shale gas fracturing review and recommendations for induced seismic mitigation. Report, UK DECC. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/preese-hall-shale-gas-fracturing-review-and-recommendations-for-induced-seismic-mitigation. Accessed 28 Feb 2013

Gregory KB, Vidic RD, Dzombak DA (2011) Water management challenges associated with the production of shale gas by hydraulic fracturing. Elements 7:181–186CrossRef

Haluszczak LO, Rose AW, Kump LR (2013) Geochemical evaluation of flowback brine from Marcellus gas wells in Pennsylvania, USA. Appl Geochem 28:55–61CrossRef

Holstun J, McCluskey M, Halpern S (2012) Transparency urged for shale institute. Open Letter, UB Reporter. http://www.buffalo.edu/ubreporter/2012_08_23/letters?s=latest_letters. Accessed 28 Feb 2013

Hübner A, Kollersberger T, Pilz P, Tesmer M, Kühn M (2013) Public outreach. In: Kühn M, Münch U (ed) CLEAN CO2 large-scale enhanced gas recovery in the Altmark natural gas field—GEOTECHNOLOGIEN science report no. 19. Springer, Berlin, pp 187–196

Jacquet JB (2012) Landowner attitudes toward natural gas and wind farm development in northern Pennsylvania. Energ Policy 50:677–688CrossRef

Koppelman B, Walker A, Woods E (2012) Shale gas extraction in the UK: a review of hydraulic fracturing. Report, The Royal Society and The Royal Academy of Engineering. http://royalsociety.org/policy/projects/shale-gas-extraction/report. Accessed 28 Feb 2013

Montgomery CT, Smith MB (2010) Hydraulic fracturing: history of an enduring technology. J Petrol Technol 62:26–41CrossRef

Renn O, Webler T, Kastenholz H (1996) Perceptions of uncertainty: lessons for risk management and communication. In: Sublet VH, Covello VT, Tinker TL (eds) Scientific uncertainty and its influence on the public communication process, NATO science series D, 86. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 163–181CrossRef

Shemata J, Goodway B, Willis M, Heigl W (2012) An introduction to this special section: passive seismic and microseismic—part 2. Lead Edge 31:1428–1435CrossRef

Shepherd E (2012) Shale gas—an EU analysis. Shale Gas Information Platform. http://www.shale-gas-information-platform.org/areas/the-debate/shale-gas-an-eu-analysis.html. Accessed 28 Feb 2013

SHIP (2012) Scientific study on shale gas under scrutiny. http://www.shale-gas-information-platform.org/areas/news/detail/article/london-university-workshop-on-shale-gas-and-renewable-energy.html. Accessed 28 Feb 2013

Stephens JC, Bielicki J, Rand GM (2009) Learning about carbon capture and storage: changing stakeholder perceptions with expert information. Energy Procedia 1:4655–4663CrossRef

Stevens P (2012) The ‘Shale Gas Revolution’: developments and changes. Chatham House. http://www.chathamhouse.org/publications/papers/view/185311. Accessed 28 Feb 2013

ter Mors E, Weenig M, Ellemers N, Daamen D (2006) The influence of (in) congruence of communicator expertise and trustworthiness on acceptance of CCS technologies. In: 8th international conference on greenhouse gas control technologies, Trondheim, Norway, 18–22 June. http://www.co2-cato.org/publications/publications/the-influence-of-incongruence-of-communicator-expertise-and-trustworthiness. Accessed 26 Mar 2013

Theodori GL, Jackson-Smith D (2010) Public perception of the oil and gas industry: the good, the bad, and the ugly. In: Proceedings of the 2010 Society of Petroleum Engineers annual technical conference and exhibition. Richardson, TX, SPE 134253

Weber CL, Clavin C (2012) Life cycle carbon footprint of shale gas: review of evidence and implications. Environ Sci Tech 46:5688–5695CrossRef

Wolsink M (2007) Planning of renewables schemes: deliberative and fair decision-making on landscape issues instead of reproachful accusations of non-cooperation. Energ Policy 35:2692–2704CrossRef

Titel: Fact-based communication: the Shale Gas Information Platform SHIP
verfasst von: Andreas Hübner
Brian Horsfield
Ingo Kapp
Publikationsdatum: 01.12.2013
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Environmental Earth Sciences / Ausgabe 8/2013
Print ISSN: 1866-6280
Elektronische ISSN: 1866-6299
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-013-2504-y

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2013

Modelling of fractured carbonate reservoirs: outline of a novel technique via a case study from the Molasse Basin, southern Bavaria, Germany

Regional modeling of geothermal energy systems in shallow aquifers: the Leibnitzer Feld case study (Austria)

Alteration of fluid properties during the initial operation of a geothermal plant: results from in situ measurements in Groß Schönebeck

Numerical simulations of CO2 arrival times and reservoir pressure coincide with observations from the Ketzin pilot site, Germany

Unconventional reservoir potential of the upper Permian Zechstein Group: a slope to basin sequence stratigraphic and sedimentological evaluation of carbonates and organic-rich mudrocks, Northern Germany

The deep thermal field of the Glueckstadt Graben