Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Electrokinetic removal of mixed heavy metals from a contaminated low permeable soil by surfactant and chelants

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents the experimental findings of electrokinetic (EK) studies conducted to remove cadmium (Cd++) and copper (Cu++) present together as contaminants in clayey soil. Competitive sorption between cadmium and copper has been studied, which provides an insight into selection of Cd++ and Cu++ concentrations for maximum contamination of soil in the EK study. To explore the effect of pH on the desorption of both Cd++ and Cu++ and to compare the efficacy of different agents in enhancing the removal of these ions during the EK remediation process, the desorption studies have also been conducted using ammonium citrate (1 M), sodium citrate (1 M) and non-ionic surfactant Tween-20 (0.2 % v/v) at pH 2, pH 7, and pH 12. It was found that maximal sorption capacity of the soil for Cd++ and Cu++ was 8.34 and 12.1 mg g−1, respectively. The desorption of both Cd++ and Cu++ influenced by pH for all desorbing agents is considered in the study. Overall desorption values for both Cd++ and Cu++ have been observed to be higher when ammonium citrate (1 M) was used as desorbing agent in the study. The results indicate the possibility of competition of complexation of Cd++ and Cu++ leading to desorption mechanism in the presence of desorbing agents. The EK tests on the Cd++ and Cu++ contaminated soil are carried out at a voltage of 35 V (1.0 V/cm) DC for 5 days. Sequential extraction experiments were conducted to determine fractionation of Cd++ and Cu++ in the EK-treated soil using deionized water at pH values of 2, 7 and 12. It is observed that current, electroosmotic flow and mobilization of Cd++ and Cu++ depend on pH, zeta potential (ς) and specific conductance. Removal of these heavy metals was observed to be higher when ammonium citrate was used both for saturation as well as flushing solution during EK process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AC:

Ammonium citrate

SC:

Sodium citrate

F:

Non-ionic surfactant tween-20

Cd++ :

Cadmium

Cu++ :

Copper

EK:

Electrokinetic

VS:

Virgin soil

CdCuS:

Soil contaminated with Cd++ and Cu++ together

EKCdCuD:

Electrokinetic remediation of Cd++ and Cu++ contaminated soil using de-ionized water

EKCdCuF:

Electrokinetic remediation of Cd++ and Cu++ contaminated soil using Tween-20

EKCdCuSC:

Electrokinetic remediation of Cd++ and Cu++ contaminated soil using sodium citrate

EKCdCuAC:

Electrokinetic remediation of Cd++ and Cu++ contaminated soil using ammonium citrate

EKCdCuAA:

Electrokinetic remediation of Cd++ and Cu++ contaminated soil saturated with ammonium citrate and also, the same being used as flushing agent

EDTA:

Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid

k e :

EO permeability (cm2/V-s)

XRD:

X-ray diffraction

XRF:

X-ray fluorescence

References

  • Acar YB, Alshawabkeh AN (1993) Principles of electrokinetic remediation. Environ Sci Technol 27(13):2638–2647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adriano DC (2001) Trace elements in terrestrial environments. Biogeochemistry, bioavailability and risks of metals. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Almeira, JO, Peng C, Li PP (2010) Effect of electrode configuration on the distribution of Cu during electrokinetic soil remediation. J Korean Soc Urban Environ 10:169–177

  • Anderson RJ, Davies BE (1980) Dental caries prevalence and trace elements in soil, with special reference to lead. J Geol Soc Lond 137(5):547–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asadi A, Moayedi H, Huat BBK, Parsaie A (2011) Probable electrokinetic phenomena in tropical peat: a review. Int J Phys Sci 6(9):2184–2188

    Google Scholar 

  • Aydinalp C, Marinova S (2003) Distribution and forms of heavy metals in some agricultural soils. Pol J Environ Stud 12(5):629–633

    Google Scholar 

  • Brynhildrem L, Rosswall T (1989) Effects of copper, magnesium and zinc on decomposition of citrate by a Klebsiella Sp. Appl Environ Microbiol 55:1375–1379

    Google Scholar 

  • Castellote M, Botija S (2011) Electrokinetic decontamination of heavy metals in construction materials: contribution of the different parameters to the global efficiency. J Appl Electrochem 41:695–703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang PW, Tan YC, Wang IS (2008) On-farm remediation and fertility enhancement of cadmium-contaminated silt loam by electrokinetic treatment process in Taiwan. Irrig Drain 57(2):187–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung CW, Porter JF, McKay G (2000) Elovich equation and modified second- order equation for adsorption of cadmium ions onto bone char. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 75(11):963–970

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dudley LM, McLean JE, Sims RC, Jurinak JJ (1988) Sorption of copper and cadmium from the water soluble fraction of an acid mine waste by two calcareous soils. Soil Sci 145(3):207–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dudley LM, McLean JE, Furst TH, Jurinak JJ (1991) Sorption of Cd and Cu from an acid mine waste extract by two calcareous soils: column studies. Soil Sci 151(2):121–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao YZ, He JZ, Ling WT, Hu HQ, Liu F (2003) Effects of organic acids on copper and cadmium desorption from contaminated soils. Environ Int 29(5):613–618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glusker JP (1980) Citrate conformation and chelation: enzymatic implications. Acc Chem Res 13(10):345–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray CW, McLaren RG, Roberts AHC, Condron LM (1998) Sorption and desorption of cadmium from some New Zealand soils: effect of pH and contact time. Aust J Soil Res 36:199–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang J-Y, Liao W-P, Lai S-M (2013) Removal of 2,4-dichlorophenol and pentachlorophenol from aqueous media by electrochemical process. Environ Earth Sci 68(8):2281–2288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inskeep WP, Baham J (1983) Competitive complexation of Cd(II) and Cu(II) by water-soluble organic ligands and Na-Montmorillonite. Soil Sci Soc Am J 47(6):1109–1115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalandadze B (2003) Influence of the ore mining and processing enterprise on soil types in adjoining areas. Agron Res 1(2):131–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaya A, Yukselen Y (2005a) Zeta potential of clay minerals and quartz contaminated by heavy metals. Can Geotech J 42(5):1280–1289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaya A, Yukselen Y (2005b) Zeta potential of soils with surfactants and its relevance to electrokinetic remediation. J Hazard Mater B 120:119–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishna AK, Govil PK (2007) Soil contamination due to heavy metals from an industrial area of Surat, Gujarat, Western India. Environ Monit Assess 124:263–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar MP, Reddy TM, Nithila P, Reddy SJ (2005) Distribution of toxic trace metals Zn, Cd, Pb, and Cu in Tirupati soils, India. Soil Sedim Contam Int J 14(6):471–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos J, Ulmanu M, Anger I, Snape CE (2003) Comparison of sorption of Cu (II), Cr(III) and Cr(VI) on inorganic and organic sorbents. In: Proceedings, of the 1st international conference on environmental research and assessment, Bucharest, pp 123–132

  • Loganathan P, Mackay AD, Lee J, Hedley MJ (1995) Cadmium distribution in hill pastures as influenced by 20 years of phosphate fertilizer application and sheep grazing. Aust J Soil Res 33(5):859–871

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGrath SP (1987) Long-term studies of metal transfers following application of sewage sludge. In: Coughtrey PJ, Martin MH, Unsworth MH (eds) Pollutants transport and fate in ecosystems. Blackwell Scientific Publications, London, pp 301–317

    Google Scholar 

  • Nystrøm GM, Ottosen LM, Villumsne A (2005) Test of experimental set-ups for electrodialytic removal of Cu, Zn, Pb and Cd from different contaminated harbour sediments. Eng Geol 77:349–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortuño-López MB, Sotelo-Lerma M, Mendoza-Galván A, Ramírez-Bon R (2004) Chemically deposited CdS films in an ammonia free cadmium–sodium citrate system. Thin Solid Films 457(2):278–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ottosen LM, Hansen HK, Hansen L, Kliem BK, Bech-Nielsen G, Villumsen A (1998) Electrodialytic soil remediation: improved conditions and acceleration of the process by addition of desorbing agents to the soil. In: Proceedings, of the sixth international FZK/TNO conference on contaminated soil, contaminated soil ‘98. vol 1, pp 471–478. Edinburgh

  • Ottosen LM, Hansen HK, Ribeiro AB, Villumsen A (2001) Removal of Cu, Pb and Zn in an applied electric field in calcareous and non-calcareous soils. J Hazard Mater B 85:291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ottosen LM, Pedersen AJ, Ribeiro AB, Hansen HK (2005) Case study on the strategy and application of enhancement solutions to improve remediation of soils contaminated with Cu, Pb and Zn by means of electrodialysis. Eng Geol 77:317–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paramkusam BR, Srivastava RK, Dwivedi SB (2011) Experimental studies on heavy metals extraction from contaminated soil using alkaline chelate, ammonium citrate during electrokinetic process. ASCE J Hazard Toxic Radioact Waste Manag 15(4):296–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen AJ (2002) Evaluation of assisting agents for electrodialytic removal of Cd, Pb, Zn, Cu and Cr from MSWI fly ash. J Hazard Mater B95:185–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen AJ (2003) Characterization and electrodialytic treatment of wood combustion fly ash for the removal of cadmium. Bimass Bioenergy 25:447–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng C, Almeira JO, Gu Q (2013) Effect of electrode configuration on pH distribution and heavy metal ions migration during soil electrokinetic remediation. Environ Earth Sci 69(1):257–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puls RW, Bohn HL (1988) Sorption of cadmium, nickel, and zinc by kaolinite and montmorillonite suspensions. Soil Sci Soc Am J 52(5):1289–1292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramachandran V, Souza TJD (1999) Adsorption of cadmium by Indian soils. Water Air Soil Pollut 111:225–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy KR (2002) Assessment of remediation of contaminated site. In: Proceedings, of the Indian geotechnical conference on geotechnical engineering: environmental challenges, vol II, pp 735–746. Allahabad

  • Reddy KR, Chinthamreddy S, Al-Hamdan A (2001) Synergistic effects of multiple metal contaminants on electrokinetic remediation of soils. Remediat Summ 11(3):85–109

  • Reddy KR, Cameselle C, Ala P (2010) Integrated electrokinetic-soil flushing to remove mixed organic and metal contaminants. J Appl Electrochem 40:1269–1279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sivapullaiah PV, Prakash BSN (2007) Electroosmotic flow behaviour of metal contaminated expansive soil. J Hazard Mater 143:682–689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava P, Singh B, Angove M (2005) Competitive adsorption behavior of heavy metals on kaolinite. J Colloid Interface Sci 290(1):28–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava RK, Tiwari RP, Bala Ramudu P (2008) Enhanced removal of cadmium from alkaline soil by electromigration. Land Contam Reclam 16(3):199–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor MD (1997) Accumulation of cadmium derived from fertilisers in New Zealand soils. Sci Total Environ 208(1):123–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu J, Lu J, Chen TH, He Z, Su Y, Jin X, Yao XY (2010) In situ biotreatment of acidic mine drainage using straw as sole substrate. Environ Earth Sci 60(2):421–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yadav IC, Devi NL, Mohan D, Shihua Q, Singh S (2013) Assessment of groundwater quality with special reference to arsenic in Nawalparasi district, Nepal using multivariate statistical techniques. Environ Earth Sci. doi:10.1007/s12665-013-2952-4

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang GCC, Long YW (1999) Removal and degradation of phenol in a saturated flow by in situ electrokinetic remediation and fenton-like process. J Hazard Mater 69(3):259–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan S, Xi Z, Jiang Y, Wan J, Wu C, Zheng Z, Lu X (2007) Desorption of copper and cadmium from soils enhanced by organic acids. Chemosphere 68:1289–1297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu S, Zhang J, Dong T (2009) Removal of fluorine from contaminated field soil by anolyte enhanced electrokinetic remediation. Environ Earth Sci 59(2):379–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the help extended by the Wadia Institute of Himalayan Geology, Dehradun, India, for XRF analysis; Nanophosphor Application Center, University of Allahabad, Allahabad for XRD analysis; and Department of Science and Technology (Govt. of India) for providing Zeta Meter 4.0 at Civil Engineering Department, Indian Institute of Technology (Banaras Hindu University), Varanasi.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bala Ramudu Paramkusam.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Paramkusam, B.R., Srivastava, R.K. & Mohan, D. Electrokinetic removal of mixed heavy metals from a contaminated low permeable soil by surfactant and chelants. Environ Earth Sci 73, 1191–1204 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-014-3474-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-014-3474-4

Keywords

Navigation