Skip to main content
Log in

A comparative study on abrasive wear behavior of semisolid–liquid processed Al–Si matrix reinforced with coated B4C reinforcement

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Transactions of the Indian Institute of Metals Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A comparative study on abrasive wear behavior of the sol–gel coated B4C particulate reinforced aluminum metal matrix composite has been carried out in the present investigation. In general, composites offer superior wear resistance as compared to the alloy irrespective of applied load and B4C particles volume fraction. This is primarily due to the presence of the hard dispersoid which protects the matrix from severe contact with the counter surfaces, and thus results in less wear, lower coefficient friction and temperature rise in composite as compared to that in the alloy. The wear sliding test disclosed that the weight loss of the coated B4C reinforced composites decreases with increasing volume fraction of B4C particulates. The wear rate in all the samples increases marginally with applied load prior to reaching the critical load. It is ascribed to the increase in fracture of reinforcement, the penetration of hard asperities of the counter surface into the softer pin surface and micro cracking tendency of the subsurface. After the critical load there is a transition from smooth linear increase wear rate to sudden increase in wear rate. This is attributed to the significantly higher frictional heating and thus the localized adhesion and softening of the surface with the counter surface.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Vieira E A, and Ferrante M, Acta Mater 53 (2005) 5379.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Shabani M O, and Mazahery A, Int J Appl Math Mech 7 (2011) 89.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bindumadhavan P N, Chia T K, Chandrasekaran M, Wah H K, Lam L N, and Prabhakar O, Mater Sci Eng A 315 (2001) 217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chung S, and Hwang B H, Tribol Int 27 (1994) 307.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lim S C, Gupta M, Ren L, and Kwok J K M, J Mater Process Technol 89/90 (1999) 591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Roy M, Venkataraman B, Bhanuprasad V V, Mahajan Y R, and Sundararajan G, Metall Trans A 23 (1992) 2833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Skolianos S, and Kattamis T Z, Mater Sci Eng A 163 (1993) 107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Surappa M K, Prasad S V, and Rohatgi P K, Wear 77 (1982) 295.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Mazahery A, and Shabani M O, Russ Metall (Metally) (2011) 699.

  10. Quaak C J, and Kool W H, Mater Sci Eng A 188 (1994) 277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hashim J, Looney L, and Hashmi M S J, J Mater Process Technol 123 (2002) 251.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bindumadhavan P N, Wah H K, and Prabhakar O, Wear 248 (2001) 112.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kwok J K M, and Lim S C, Compos Sci Technol 59 (1999) 55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Das S, Mondal D P, and Dixit G, Metall Mater Trans A 32 (2001) 633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Shabani M O, Mazahery A, Rahimipour M R, and Razavi M, J King Saud Univ Eng Sci (2011). doi:10.1016/j.jksues.2011.05.001.

  16. Blumenthal W R, Gray G T, and Claytor T N, J Mater Sci 29 (1994) 4567.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Pyzik A J, Aksay I A, and Sarikaya M, Mater Sci Res 21 (1986) 45.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pyzik A J, and Aksay I A, in Proceedings of the International Symposium on Advances in Processing of Ceramic and Metal Matrix Composites, New York, NY (1989), p 269.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Pyzik A J, and Beaman D R, J Am Ceram Soc 78 (1995) 305.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Rhee S K, J Am Ceram Soc 53 (1970) 386.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Vugt L V, and Froyen L, J Mater Process Technol 104 (2000) 133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Irons G A, and Owusu-Boahen K, Metall Mater Trans B 26 (1995) 980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gowri S, and Samuel F H, Metall Trans A 23 (1992) 3369.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Gupta M, Lu L, and Ang S E, J Mater Sci 32 (1997) 1261.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Karnezis P A, Durrant G, and Cantor B, Mater Charact 40 (1998) 97.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Shabani M O, and Mazahery A, Synth Met 161 (2011) 1226.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Razavizadeh K, and Tyre T S, Wear 79 (1982) 325.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Lim S C, and Ashby M F, Acta Meta 35 (1987) l.

  29. Shabani M O, and Mazahery A, J Mater ScI 46 (2011) 6700.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Ludema K C, Wear 100 (1984) 315.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohsen Ostad Shabani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mazahery, A., Shabani, M.O. A comparative study on abrasive wear behavior of semisolid–liquid processed Al–Si matrix reinforced with coated B4C reinforcement. Trans Indian Inst Met 65, 145–154 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-011-0116-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-011-0116-3

Keywords

Navigation