Abstract
A comparative study on abrasive wear behavior of the sol–gel coated B4C particulate reinforced aluminum metal matrix composite has been carried out in the present investigation. In general, composites offer superior wear resistance as compared to the alloy irrespective of applied load and B4C particles volume fraction. This is primarily due to the presence of the hard dispersoid which protects the matrix from severe contact with the counter surfaces, and thus results in less wear, lower coefficient friction and temperature rise in composite as compared to that in the alloy. The wear sliding test disclosed that the weight loss of the coated B4C reinforced composites decreases with increasing volume fraction of B4C particulates. The wear rate in all the samples increases marginally with applied load prior to reaching the critical load. It is ascribed to the increase in fracture of reinforcement, the penetration of hard asperities of the counter surface into the softer pin surface and micro cracking tendency of the subsurface. After the critical load there is a transition from smooth linear increase wear rate to sudden increase in wear rate. This is attributed to the significantly higher frictional heating and thus the localized adhesion and softening of the surface with the counter surface.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Vieira E A, and Ferrante M, Acta Mater 53 (2005) 5379.
Shabani M O, and Mazahery A, Int J Appl Math Mech 7 (2011) 89.
Bindumadhavan P N, Chia T K, Chandrasekaran M, Wah H K, Lam L N, and Prabhakar O, Mater Sci Eng A 315 (2001) 217.
Chung S, and Hwang B H, Tribol Int 27 (1994) 307.
Lim S C, Gupta M, Ren L, and Kwok J K M, J Mater Process Technol 89/90 (1999) 591.
Roy M, Venkataraman B, Bhanuprasad V V, Mahajan Y R, and Sundararajan G, Metall Trans A 23 (1992) 2833.
Skolianos S, and Kattamis T Z, Mater Sci Eng A 163 (1993) 107.
Surappa M K, Prasad S V, and Rohatgi P K, Wear 77 (1982) 295.
Mazahery A, and Shabani M O, Russ Metall (Metally) (2011) 699.
Quaak C J, and Kool W H, Mater Sci Eng A 188 (1994) 277.
Hashim J, Looney L, and Hashmi M S J, J Mater Process Technol 123 (2002) 251.
Bindumadhavan P N, Wah H K, and Prabhakar O, Wear 248 (2001) 112.
Kwok J K M, and Lim S C, Compos Sci Technol 59 (1999) 55.
Das S, Mondal D P, and Dixit G, Metall Mater Trans A 32 (2001) 633.
Shabani M O, Mazahery A, Rahimipour M R, and Razavi M, J King Saud Univ Eng Sci (2011). doi:10.1016/j.jksues.2011.05.001.
Blumenthal W R, Gray G T, and Claytor T N, J Mater Sci 29 (1994) 4567.
Pyzik A J, Aksay I A, and Sarikaya M, Mater Sci Res 21 (1986) 45.
Pyzik A J, and Aksay I A, in Proceedings of the International Symposium on Advances in Processing of Ceramic and Metal Matrix Composites, New York, NY (1989), p 269.
Pyzik A J, and Beaman D R, J Am Ceram Soc 78 (1995) 305.
Rhee S K, J Am Ceram Soc 53 (1970) 386.
Vugt L V, and Froyen L, J Mater Process Technol 104 (2000) 133.
Irons G A, and Owusu-Boahen K, Metall Mater Trans B 26 (1995) 980.
Gowri S, and Samuel F H, Metall Trans A 23 (1992) 3369.
Gupta M, Lu L, and Ang S E, J Mater Sci 32 (1997) 1261.
Karnezis P A, Durrant G, and Cantor B, Mater Charact 40 (1998) 97.
Shabani M O, and Mazahery A, Synth Met 161 (2011) 1226.
Razavizadeh K, and Tyre T S, Wear 79 (1982) 325.
Lim S C, and Ashby M F, Acta Meta 35 (1987) l.
Shabani M O, and Mazahery A, J Mater ScI 46 (2011) 6700.
Ludema K C, Wear 100 (1984) 315.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mazahery, A., Shabani, M.O. A comparative study on abrasive wear behavior of semisolid–liquid processed Al–Si matrix reinforced with coated B4C reinforcement. Trans Indian Inst Met 65, 145–154 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-011-0116-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-011-0116-3