Abstract
While conventional equal channel angular pressing (ECAP) has been widely investigated as the prominent severe plastic deformation method, no detailed work has been carried out on the modified ECAP techniques. So, this work deals with the numerical characterization of 7075 aluminum billet processed by conventional and modified ECAP methods. It has been found that T-shaped ECAP is the best technique to choose from the effective plastic strain point of view. Also, the highest plastic strain distribution uniformity and concomitant least required pressing load belong to the cross-ECAP condition. Moreover, conventional ECAP process should be selected if the minimum temperature rise and damage have been considered. Eventually, shear plane mode of oblique, V-shape, and X-shape is attained for the conventional, T-shaped, and cross-ECAP conditions, respectively.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Xun Y, Mohamed F A, Mater Sci Eng A 528 (2011) 5446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2011.03.015.
Valiev R Z, Estrin Y, Horita Z, Langdon T G, Zehetbauer M J, Zhu Y T, JOM 58 (2006) 33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-006-0213-7.
Valiev R Z, Langdon T G, Prog Mater Sci 51 (2006) 881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2006.02.003.
Djavanroodi F, Daneshtalab M, Ebrahimi M, Mater Sci Eng A 535 (2012) 115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2011.12.050.
Shaeri M H, Salehi M T, Seyyedein S H, Abutalebi M R, Park J K, Mater Des 57 (2014) 250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2014.01.008.
Miyamoto H, Harada K, Mimaki T, Vinogradov A, Hashimoto S, Corros Sci 50 (2008) 1215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2008.01.024.
Pande C S, Cooper K P, Prog Mater Sci 54 (2009) 689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2009.03.008.
Djavanroodi F, Ebrahimi M, Rajabifar B, Akramizadeh S, Mater Sci Eng A 528 (2010) 745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2010.09.080.
Ebrahimi M, Gode C, Prog Nat Sci Mater Int 27 (2017) 244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnsc.2017.03.002.
Han S Z, Goto M, Lim C, Kim C J, Kim S, J Alloys Compd 434–435 (2007) 304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2006.08.179.
Djavanroodi F, Omranpour B, Ebrahimi M, Sedighi M, Prog Nat Sci Mater Int 22 (2012) 452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnsc.2012.08.001.
Shaeri M H, Salehi M T, Seyyedein S H, Abutalebi M R, Park J K, J Alloys Compd 576 (2013) 350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2013.05.182.
Wei W, Zhang W, Wei K X, Zhong Y, Cheng G, Hu J, Mater Sci Eng A 516 (2009) 111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2009.03.001.
Yoon S C, Kim H S, Mater Sci Eng A 490 (2008) 438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2008.01.066.
Azushima A, Aoki K, Mater Sci Eng A 337 (2002) 45. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0921-5093(02)00005-9.
Nagasekhar A V, Kim H S, Met Mater Int 14 (2008) 565. https://doi.org/10.3365/met.mat.2008.10.565.
Djavanroodi F, Ebrahimi M, Mater Sci Eng A 527 (2010) 7593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2010.08.022.
Rosochowski A, Olejnik L, Int J Mater Form 1 (2008) 483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-008-0108-y.
Shaban Ghazani M, Eghbali B, Comput Mater Sci 74 (2013) 124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2013.02.006.
Xiong Y, He T, Guo Z, He H, Ren F, Volinsky A A, Mater Sci Eng A 563 (2013) 163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2012.11.068.
Zhang X, Hua L, Liu Y, Mater Sci Eng A 535 (2012) 153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2011.12.057.
Yoon S C, Jeong H-G, Lee S,S Kim H , Comput Mater Sci 77 (2013) 202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2013.04.054.
Xu S, Zhao G, Ma X, Ren G, J Mater Process Technol 184 (2007) 209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.11.025.
Kim H S, Seo M H, Hong S I, J Mater Process Technol 130 (2002) 497.
Kim H S, Mater Sci Eng A 315 (2001) 122.
Li S, Bourke M A M, Beyerlein I J, Alexander D J, Clausen B, Mater Sci Eng A 382 (2004) 217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2004.04.067.
Luis-Pérez C J, Luri-Irigoyen R, Gastón-Ochoa D, J Mater Process Technol 153–154 (2004) 846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.04.115.
Lee H H, Gangwar K D, Park K T, Woo W, Kim H S, Mater Sci Eng A 682 (2017) 691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2016.11.094.
Hu H J, J Manuf Process 14 (2012) 181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2011.10.004.
Yoon S C, Seo M H, Krishnaiah A, Kim H S, Mater Sci Eng A 490 (2008) 289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2008.01.037.
Kumar P, Panda S S, Mater Today Proc 4 (2017) 2419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2017.02.092.
Nagasekhar A V, Kim H S, Comput Mater Sci 43 (2008) 1069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2008.02.030.
Djavanroodi F, Ebrahimi M, Mater Sci Eng A 527 (2010) 1230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2009.09.052.
Ma Z Y, Pilchak A L, Juhas M C, Williams J C, Scr Mater 58 (2008) 361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.09.062.
Shaeri M H, Shaeri M, Ebrahimi M, Salehi M T, Seyyedein S H, Prog Nat Sci Mater Int 26 (2016) 182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnsc.2016.03.003.
Ebrahimi M, Shaeri M H, Naseri R, Gode C, Mater Sci Eng A 731 (2018) 569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2018.06.080.
Ebrahimi M, Metall Mater Trans A 48 (2017) 6126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-017-4375-4.
Su J-Q, Nelson T W, Sterling C J, Mater Sci Eng A 405 (2005) 277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2005.06.009.
Sakai T, Belyakov A, Kaibyshev R, Miura H, Jonas J J, Prog Mater Sci 60 (2014) 130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2013.09.002.
Rhodes C G, Mahoney M W, Bingel W H, Calabrese M, Scr Mater 48 (2003) 1451. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1359-6462(03)00082-4.
Acknowledgements
The author would like to acknowledge Iran National Science Foundation (INSF) for the financial support of this work under the Grant Number of 94810544.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ebrahimi, M. Numerical Analysis of Conventional and Modified Equal Channel Angular Pressing. Trans Indian Inst Met 72, 2263–2273 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-019-01675-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-019-01675-3