Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A Model of a Firm’s Innovation and Growth in a Knowledge-Based Economy

  • Published:
Journal of the Knowledge Economy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Knowledge-based economies use knowledge as an input of production to produce knowledge-intensive products and services. In such economies, a firm’s growth crucially depends on knowledge accumulation, technical change and the resulting innovation activities. To achieve sustained growth, a firm must keep on innovating. A firm’s core competence and its refinement and development over time play a crucial role in a firm’s innovation activities and its growth. In this paper, a conceptual framework of a firm’s innovation and growth in knowledge-based economy is presented. This framework is based on a firm’s core competence and its development over time within a firms’ cluster. This model is empirically estimated and evaluated, in a pilot study, via a data set from a manufacturing cluster of 128 firms operating in the North East England. The empirical results provide some support for the proposed framework. In particular, it is found that the conditional probability that a firm undertakes R&D activity to innovate in such a cluster of firms is over 70 %.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Antonelli, C. (2001). The microeconomics of technological systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J., & Hostelry, W. S. (2009). Strategic management and competitive advantage: concepts and cases (3rd edn). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinkley, I (2006) Defining knowledge economy. Knowledge economy programme report. The Work Foundation, London

  • Brnysonsson, J., & Hitt, R. (2003). Computing productivity: firm level evidence. Cambridge: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Child, J., & Faulkener, D. (1998). Strategies of co-operation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collis, D. (1996). Organisational learning and comparative advantage. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Combes, P., & Overman, M. (2004). The spatial distribution of economic activities in the European Union. In V. Henderson & J. F. Thissee (Eds.), Handbook of urban and regional economics. Amsterdam: Elsevier-North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Combs, R. (1996). Core competencies and the strategic management of R&D. R&D Management, 26(4), 345–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comin, D. (2004). R&D: a small contribution to growth. Journal of Economic Growth, 2(3), 34–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Wit, B., & Meyer, R. (2010). Strategy process, content, context: an international perspective (4th ed.). Andover: South-Western Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, A. J., & Seddighi, H. R. (1996). An analysis of R&D activities in North East England manufacturing firms: the results of a sample survey. Regional Studies, 30(3), 287–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drejer, A. (2001). How can we define and understand competencies and their development? Technovation, 21(3), 135–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R. (1996). Towards a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 109–122. Winter special issue.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griliches, Z. (1991). The search for R&D spillovers. NBER Working Paper, No. 3768.

  • Grossmann, G. M., & Helpman, E. (1991). Innovation and growth in the global economy. Cambridge: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, E. W., & Brennan, J. F. (2000). A methodology for identifying the drivers of industrial clusters: the foundation of regional competitive advantage. Economic Development Quarterly, 14(1), 65–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, A. (1986). Technological opportunity and spillovers from R&D: evidence from firms' patents, profits and market value. American Economic Review, 76, 984–1001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, A., Trajtenberg, M., & Henderson, R. (1993). Geographic localisation of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108, 577–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, G., Whittington, R., & Scholes, K. (2011). Exploring strategy: texts and cases (9th ed.). London: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malerba, F. (1992). Learning by firms and incremental technical change. The Economic Journal, 102, 845–859.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. (1993). National systems of innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (1981). The contributions of industrial organization to strategic management. Academy of Management Review, 6, 609–620.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (2000). Location, competition, and economic development: local clusters in a global economy. Economic Development Quarterly, 14(1), 15–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reay, P., & Seddighi, H. R. (2012). An empirical evaluation of management and operational capabilities for innovation via co-creation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 15(2), 259–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous technical change. Journal of Political Economy, 98, 71–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitz, H. (2000). Does local co-operation matter? Evidence from industrial clusters in South Asia and Latin America. Oxford Development Studies, 28(3), 323–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seddighi, H. R. (2012). Introductory econometrics: a practical approach. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seddighi, H. R., & Huntley, P. (2007). R&D activities in a peripheral region: an empirical study with special reference to the North East region of the UK. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 16(3), 211–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seddighi, H. R., Nutall, M. W., Evans, J., & Lawler, K. A. (2002). R&D activities and firms characteristics: some evidence from North East England. Global Business & Economics Review, 4(2), 261–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solow, R. M. (1957). Technical change and the aggregate production function. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 39, 312–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suekum, J., & Bline, W. (2005). Local economic structure and industry development in Germany, 1993–2001. Economic Bulletin, 15(N0.17), 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swann, P., & Prevezer, M. (1996). A comparison of the dynamics of industrial clustering in computing and biotechnology. Research Policy, 25, 1139–1157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, H., & Pollock, T. (1999). From I-O Economics’ S-C-P paradigm through strategic groups to competence-based competition: reflections on the puzzle of competitive strategy. British Journal of Management, 10, 127–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Sunderland Business school, Faculty of Business and Law, University of Sunderland, Sunderland, UK

    Hamid R. Seddighi

Authors
  1. Hamid R. Seddighi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hamid R. Seddighi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Seddighi, H.R. A Model of a Firm’s Innovation and Growth in a Knowledge-Based Economy. J Knowl Econ 6, 215–227 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-012-0136-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-012-0136-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation