Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The DNA of Tourism Service Innovation: A Quadruple Helix Approach

  • Published:
Journal of the Knowledge Economy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper adds to the emerging discussion of the Quadruple Helix framework by arguing for a clear distinction between the intermediators (“consortia”) that coordinate public, academic, industrial, and civil society resources and those actors that belong to the Civil Society Helix. The resources for innovations to be positioned in this, the fourth, helix are mostly unclear. Furthermore, the governance aspects of the helix framework have received little academic research attention despite their decisive role in service innovation systems. The case-based research findings presented in this study give reason to develop the helix framework into a DNA model for tourism innovation systems, thus emphasizing the dynamic nature of innovation processes. An action research approach was applied, and the Finnish Travel and Relax project scrutinized for data. Based on field notes, desk research, observations, and personal interviews, we conclude that innovation systems for tourism development work well with a mixture of governance structures. We find that actors from different helixes participate in different processes with different intentions and objectives throughout the process, but they are seldom present at the same time. Further, the findings prove that service concept development progressed as best in unplanned pop-up networks in the Industry Helix.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Angelopoulus, S., Kitsios, F., & Papadopoulos, T. (2010). New service development in e-governance: identifying critical success factors. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 4(1), 95–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bitran, G., & Pedrosa, L. (1998). A structured product development perspective for service operations. European Management Journal, 16(2), 169–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Björk, P. (2009). Tourist entrepreneurship, the Viking of the tourism innovation system. Research paper presented at the 18th Nordic Symposium in Tourism and Hospitality, 22–25 October, Esbjerg, Denmark.

  • Björk, P. (2011). Well-being tourism, perspectives and strategies. Research paper presented at the 20th Nordic Symposium in Tourism and Hospitality, 21–24 September, Rovaniemi, Finland.

  • Björk, P., & Sfandla, C. (2009). A tripartite model of tourist experience. Finnish Journal of Tourism Research, 5(2), 5–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Björk, P., & Virtanen, H. (2005). What tourism project managers need to know about co‐operation facilitators. Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, 5(3), 212–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brännback, M., Carsrude, A., Krueger, N., & Elfving, J. (2008). Challenging the Triple Helix model of regional innovation systems: a venture-centric model. International Journal of Technoentrepreneurship, 1(3), 257–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2009). ‘Mode 3’ and ‘Quadruple Helix’: toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management, 46(3/4), 201–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2010). Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix and Quintuple Helix and how do knowledge, innovation and the environment relate to each other? A proposed framework for trans-disciplinary analysis of sustainable development and social ecology. International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development, 1(1), 41–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2011). Open innovation diplomacy and a 21st century fractal research, education and innovation (FREIE) ecosystem: building on the Quadruple and Quintuple Helix innovation concepts and the “Mode 3” knowledge production system. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 2(3), 327–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis, E. G., Barth, T. D., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2012). The Quintuple Helix innovation model: global warming as a challenge and driver for innovation. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 1(2), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrubbo, L., Tartaglione, A., Di Nauta, P., & Bilotta, A. (2012). A service science view of a sustainable destination management. China-USA Business Review, 11(11), 1460–1477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. (1998). Stylized facts and close dialogue: method in economic geography. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 88(1), 73–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R. (1990). State-gate systems: a new tool for managing new products. Business Horizons, 33(3), 44–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R. (1994). Third generation new product processes. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 11(1), 3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crouch, G., & Ritchie, J. (1999). Tourism, competitiveness, and social prosperity. Journal of Business Research, 44(3), 137–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dick, B. (2002). Postgraduate programs using action research. The Learning Organization, 9(4), 159–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, L., & Kim, C. (2003). Destination competitiveness: determinants and indicators. Current Issues in Tourism, 6(5), 369–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edget, S., & Jones, S. (1991). New product development in the financial service industry: a case study. Journal of Marketing Management, 7, 271–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edvardsson, B., & Olsson, J. (1996). Key concepts for new service development. The Service Industries Journal, 16(2), 140–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edvardsson, B., Haglund, L., & Mattson, J. (1995). Analysing, planning, improvisation and control in the development process of new services. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 6(2), 24–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and ‘Mode2’ to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fazenda, N., da Silva, F., & Costa, C. (2010). Douro Valley tourism plan, the plan as part of a sustainable tourist destination development process. Worldwide Hospitality and Tourism Themes, 2(4), 428–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forsman, H. (2008). Business development success in SMEs: a case study approach. Journal of Small Business Enterprise Development, 15(3), 606–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • French, S. (2009). Action research for practicing managers. Journal of Management Development, 28(3), 187–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Froehle, C., & Roth, A. (2007). A resource-process framework of new service development. Production and Operations Management, 16(2), 169–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fyall, A., Garrod, B., & Wang, Y. (2012). Destination collaboration: A critical review of theoretical approaches to a multi-dimensional phenomenon. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 1(1/2), 10–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, J., & Johnson, P. (2002). Research methods for managers. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grönroos, C. (2000). Service management and marketing: a customer relationship approach 2 nd ed. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grönroos, C. (2006). Adopting a service logic for marketing. Marketing Theory, 6(3), 317–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grönroos, C. (2008). Service logic revisited: who creates value? And who co-creates? European Business Review, 20(4), 298–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grönroos, C. (2011). A service perspective on business relationships: the value creation, interaction and marketing interface. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(2), 240–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haugland, S., Ness, H., Gronseth, B.-O., & Aarstad, J. (2011). Development of tourism destinations, an integrated multilevel perspective. Annals of Tourism Research, 38(1), 268–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hjalager, A.-M. (2000). Tourism destinations and the concept of industrial districts. Tourism and Hospitality Research, 2(3), 199–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hjalager, A.-M. (2010). Regional innovation systems: the case of angling tourism. Tourism Geographies, 12(2), 192–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hjalager, A.-M., Konu, H., Huijbens, E., Björk, P., Flagestad, A., Nordin, S. (2011). Innovating and re-branding Nordic well-being tourism. Report, Nordic Innovation Centre.

  • Isard, W. (1956). Location and space-economy: a general theory relating to industrial location, market areas, land use, trade, and urban structure. Technology press book in social science. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, C., & Trädgårdh, B. (2004). Narrating the Triple Helix in “weak” regions: lessons from Sweden. International Journal of Technology Management, 27(5), 513–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S., Menor, A., Roth, R., & Chase, B. (2000). A critical evaluation of the new service development process. In J. Fitzsimmons & M. Fitzsimmons (Eds.), New Service Development (pp. 1–32). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohli, A., & Jaworski, B. (1990). Market orientation: the construct, research propositions, and managerial implications. Journal of Marketing, 45(April), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohli, A., Jaworski, B., & Kumar, A. (1993). MARKOR: a measure of market orientation. Journal of Market Research, 30(4), 467–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krathwohl, D. (1998). Educational & social research: an integrated approach. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindberg, M., Lindgren, M., Packendorff, J. (2012). Quadruple Helix as a way to bridge the gender gap in entrepreneurship: the case of an innovation system project in the Baltic Sea region. Journal of the Knowledge Economy June Published online.

  • Lindberg, M., Danilda, I., & Torstensson, B-M. (2012b). Women resource centres – a creative knowledge environment of Quadruple Helix. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 3, 36–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, B. Å. (1992). National systems of innovation. London: Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lusch, R., Vargo, S., & Tanniru, M. (2010). Service, value networks and learning. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 38(1), 19–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacGregor, S. P., Marques-Gou, P., & Simon-Villar, A. (2010). Gauging readiness for the Quadruple Helix: a study of 16 European organizations. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 1(3), 173–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maglio, P., & Spohrer, J. (2008). Special issue on service science. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 18–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maglio, P., Kieliszewski, C., & Spohrer, J. (2010). Handbook of service science. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Maldonaldo, V., Lobera, J., Escrigas, C. (2009). The role of higher education in a new Quadruple Helix context. Paper presented at Triple Helix VII, 17–19 June 2009, Glasgow, UK.

  • Malerba, F. (2004). Sectoral systems of innovation: basic concepts. In F. Malerba (Ed.), Sectoral systems of innovation. concepts, issues and analyses of six major sectors in Europe (pp. 9–41). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, A. (1920). Principles of economics: an introductory volume. London: Macmillan & Co.

  • Matthing, J., Sandén, B., & Edvardsson, B. (2004). New service development learning from and with customers. International Journal of service Management, 15(5), 479–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattsson, J., Sundbo, J., & Fussin-Jensen, C. (2005). Innovation systems in tourism: the role of attractors and scene-takers. Industry and Innovation, 12(3), 357–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazanec, J., Wöber, K., & Zins, A. (2007). Tourism destination competitiveness: from definition to explanation? Journal of Travel Research, 46(1), 86–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melian-Gonzales, D., & Garcia-Falcon, J. (2003). Competitive potentials of tourism in destination. Annals of Tourism Research, 30(3), 720–740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melton, H., & Hartline, M. (2010). Customer and frontline employee influence on new service development performance. Journal of Service Research, 13(4), 411–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narver, J., & Slater, S. (1990). The effect of a market orientation on business profitability. Journal of Marketing, 54(Oct.), 20–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordin, S., & Svensson, B. (2007). Innovative destination governance. Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 8(1), 53–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novelli, M., Schmitz, B., & Spencer, T. (2006). Networks, clusters and innovation in tourism: a UK experience. Tourism Management, 27(6), 1141–1152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, E. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, C., & Zuber-Skerritt, O. (1991). Action research in graduate management research programs. The First World Congress on Action Research & Process Management, 1(6), 67–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pine, J., & Gilmor, J. (1999). The experience economy: work is theater & every business a stage. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. Harvard Business Review, 68(2), 73–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C., Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review.

  • Prahalad, C., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004). The future of competition co-creating unique value with customers. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prats, L., Guia, I., & Molina, F.-X. (2008). How tourism destinations evolve: the notion of tourism local innovation systems. Tourism and Hospitality Research, 8(3), 178–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reidenback, R., & Moak, D. (1986). Exploring retail bank performance and new product development: a profile of industry practice. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 3(3), 187–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. (1943). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. London: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selznick, P. (1957). Leadership in administration; a sociological interpretation. Evanston, IL

  • Shostack, G. (1984) Service design in the operating environment in developing new services. In: W. George & C. Marshall (Eds.), Chicago: American Marketing Association, IL, 27–43.

  • Smith, S. (2010). Practical tourism research. Oxfordshire: CABI International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins, R. A. (2001). Exploratory research in the social sciences. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, E., & Dimitriadis, S. (2005). Managing the new service development process: towards a systematic model. European Journal of Marketing, 39(1/2), 175–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sundbo, J. (1998). The organisation of innovation in services. Copenhagen: Roskilde University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundbo, J., & Gallaouj, F. (1999). Innovation in services – in seven European countries, centre of service studies, Report 99:1. Roskilde: Centre of Service Studies, Roskilde University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundbo, J., Johnston, R., Mattsson, J., & Millet, B. (2001). Innovation in service internationalization: the crucial role of the frantrepreneur. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 13, 247–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vargo, S., & Lusch, R. (2004). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vargo, S., & Lusch, R. (2008). Service dominant logic: continuing the evolution. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vargo, S., Maglio, P., & Akaka, M. (2008). On value and value co-creation: a service system and service logic perspective. European Management Journal, 26(3), 145–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Hippel, E. (2005). Democratizing innovation. Boston: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voss, C., Johnston, R., Silvestro, L., Fitzgerald, T., & Brignall, J. (1992). Measurement of innovation and design performance in services. Design Management Journal, 3(winter), 40–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vuoristo, K.-V., Vesterinen, N. (2009). Lumen ja suven maa. Suomen matkailumaantiede. WSOY Kirjakeskus, Porvoo. Finland.

  • Whyte, W. (1991). Participatory action research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Marketing, Hanken School of Economics, Vaasa, Finland

    Peter Björk

Authors
  1. Peter Björk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Björk.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Björk, P. The DNA of Tourism Service Innovation: A Quadruple Helix Approach. J Knowl Econ 5, 181–202 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-014-0183-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-014-0183-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation