Abstract
This paper aims to study the knowledge and technology transfer processes taking place in cooperation between academia and industry cooperation through an EU-funded R & D project. We follow a qualitative research methodology through a case study, incorporating interviews with the institutional actors involved (university, industry and government) in the cooperation project. While this study is limited to a case study, it does, however, highlight the importance of Triple Helix networks in order to develop research, development and innovation (RDI) initiatives and their commercialization and correspondingly enabling the identification of both potential opportunities and constraints in the process. Through the practical perspective of a successful Triple Helix cooperation case study, we were able to develop an innovative and continuous olive harvesting machine in order to satisfy a real need in the Mediterranean market. Inserted within the context of the triangulation of the Triple Helix model, this paper demonstrates the importance of RDI cooperation networks and the consequent commercialization of new tradable products with positive consequences to regional competitiveness.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., Di Costa, F., & Solazzi, M. (2009). University–industry collaboration in Italy: a bibliometric examination. Technovation, 29(6–7), 498–507. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2008.11.003.
Aguirre, I. D. P., Parellada, F. S., & Campos, H. M. (2006). University spin-off programmes: how can they support the NTBF creation? International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 2(2), 157–172. doi:10.1007/s11365-006-8682-2.
Aloysius, J. a. (2002). Research joint ventures: a cooperative game for competitors. European Journal of Operational Research, 136(3), 591–602. doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00064-9.
Arranz, N., & Fdez de Arroyabe, J. C. (2008). The choice of partners in R&D cooperation: an empirical analysis of Spanish firms. Technovation, 28(1-2), 88–100. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2007.07.006.
Audretsch, D. B. (2004). Sustaining innovation and growth: public policy support for entrepreneurship. Industry & Innovation, 11(3), 167–191. doi:10.1080/1366271042000265366.
Audretsch, D. B., Hülsbeck, M., & Lehmann, E. E. (2012). Regional competitiveness, university spillovers, and entrepreneurial activity. Small Business Economics, 39(3), 587–601. doi:10.1007/s11187-011-9332-9.
Awazu, Y. (2006). Managing technology alliances: the case for knowledge management. International Journal of Information Management, 26(6), 484–493. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2006.07.005.
Barratt, M., Choi, T. Y., & Li, M. (2011). Qualitative case studies in operations management: trends, research outcomes, and future research implications. Journal of Operations Management, 29(4), 329–342. doi:10.1016/j.jom.2010.06.002.
Baxter, J., & Chua, W. F. (2003). Alternative management accounting research—whence and whither. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28, 97–126.
Beach, R., Muhlemann, A. P., Price, D. H. R., Paterson, A., & Sharp, J. A. (2001). The role of qualitative methods in production management research. International Journal of Production Economics, 74(1-3), 201–212. doi:10.1016/S0925-5273(01)00127-X.
Bernasconi, A. (2005). University entrepreneurship in a developing country: the case of the P. Universidad Católica de Chile, 1985–2000. Higher Education, 50(2), 247–274. doi:10.1007/s10734-004-6353-1.
Bjerregaard, T. (2010). Industry and academia in convergence: micro-institutional dimensions of R&D collaboration. Technovation, 30(2), 100–108. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2009.11.002.
Bruneel, J., D’Este, P., & Salter, A. (2010). Investigating the factors that diminish the barriers to university–industry collaboration. Research Policy, 39(7), 858–868. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.03.006.
Budd, L., & Hirmisf, K. (2004). Conceptual framework for regional competitiveness. Regional Studies, 38(9), 1015–1028. doi:10.1080/tl034340042000292).
Carayannis, E. G., Barth, T. D., & Campbell, D. F. (2012). The quintuple Helix innovation model: global warming as a challenge and driver for innovation. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 1(1), 2. doi:10.1186/2192-5372-1-2.
Carlsson, B., & Mudambi, R. (2003). Globalization, entrepreneurship, and public policy: a systems view. Industry & Innovation, 10(1), 103–116. doi:10.1080/1366271032000068122.
Chesbrough, H. (2007). Business model innovation: it’s not just about technology anymore. Strategy & Leadership, 35(6), 12–17. doi:10.1108/10878570710833714.
Crespo, M., & Dridi, H. (2006). Intensification of university–industry relationships and its impact on academic research. Higher Education, 54(1), 61–84. doi:10.1007/s10734-006-9046-0.
Dayasindhu, N. (2002). Embeddedness, knowledge transfer, industry clusters and global competitiveness : a case study of the Indian software industry. Technovation, 22, 551–560.
Doganova, L., & Eyquem-renault, M. (2009). What do business models do ? Innovation devices in technology entrepreneurship, 38, 1559–1570. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2009.08.002.
Etzkowitz, H. (2003a). Research groups as ““quasi-firms””: the invention of the entrepreneurial university. Research Policy, 32, 109–121.
Etzkowitz, H. (2003b). Innovation in innovation: the Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Social Science Information, 42(3), 293–337. doi:10.1177/05390184030423002.
Etzkowitz, H., & Dzisah, J. (2008). Rethinking development: circulation in the triple helix. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 20(6), 653–666. doi:10.1080/09537320802426309.
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and ““Mode 2”” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Science And Technology, 109–123.
Farinha, L., & Ferreira, J. (2012). Triangulation of the Triple Helix: a conceptual framework for regional competitiveness focused on innovation and local entrepreneurship. In Triple Helix 10th Internacional Conference 2012 (Ed.), Emerging Triple Helix Models for Developing Countries (pp. 487–501). Bandung, Indonesia: Penerbit ITB.
Giuliani, E., & Arza, V. (2009). What drives the formation of “valuable” university–industry linkages? Research Policy, 38(6), 906–921. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2009.02.006.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1965). Discovery of substantive theory: a basic strategy underlying qualitative research. American Behavioral Scientist, 8(6), 5–12. doi:10.1177/000276426500800602.
Greve, C. (2013). Ideas in public management reform for the 2010s. Digitalization, value creation and involvement. Public Organization Review. doi:10.1007/s11115-013-0253-8.
Horowitz Gassol, J. (2007). The effect of university culture and stakeholders’ perceptions on university–business linking activities. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 32(5), 489–507. doi:10.1007/s10961-007-9035-1.
Johnson, W. (2008). Roles, resources and benefits of intermediate organizations supporting triple helix collaborative R&D: the case of Precarn. Technovation, 28(8), 495–505. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2008.02.007.
Kelley, D., Bosma, N., & Amorós, J. E. (2010). The global competitiveness report 2010-2011. Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (p. 85). Geneva. Retrieved from www.gemconsortium.org
Ketels, C. H. M. (2006). Michael Porter’s competitiveness framework—recent learnings and new research priorities. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 6(2), 115–136. doi:10.1007/s10842-006-9474-7.
Klofsten, M., & Jones-evans, D. (2000). Comparing academic entrepreneurship in Europe—the case of Sweden and Ireland. Small Business Economics, 14, 299–309.
Landry, R., Amara, N., & Rherrad, I. (2006). Why are some university researchers more likely to create spin-offs than others? Evidence from Canadian universities. Research Policy, 35(10), 1599–1615. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.020.
Lawton Smith, H., & Bagchi-Sen, S. (2010). Triple helix and regional development: a perspective from Oxfordshire in the UK. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 22(7), 805–818. doi:10.1080/09537325.2010.511143.
Leydesdorff, L. (2011). The Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix, and an N-Tuple of Helices: explanatory models for analyzing the knowledge-based economy? Journal of the Knowledge Economy. doi:10.1007/s13132-011-0049-4.
Leydesdorff, L., & Meyer, M. (2006). Triple Helix indicators of knowledge-based innovation systems—introduction to the special issue. Research Policy, 35(10), 1441–1449. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.016.
Lundberg, H., & Andresen, E. (2012). Cooperation among companies, universities and local government in a Swedish context. Industrial Marketing Management, 41(3), 429–437. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2011.06.017.
Luukkonen, T. (1998). The difficulties in assessing the impact of EU framework programmes. Research Policy, 27(6), 599–610. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00058-4.
Malmström, M. (2014). Typologies of bootstrap financing behavior in small ventures. Venture Capital, 16(1), 27–50. doi:10.1080/13691066.2013.863064.
Marques, J. P. C., Caraça, J. M. G., & Diz, H. (2006). How can university–industry–government interactions change the innovation scenario in Portugal?—the case of the University of Coimbra. Technovation, 26(4), 534–542. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2005.04.005.
Meyer, M. S., & Tang, P. (2007). Exploring the “value” of academic patents: IP management practices in UK universities and their implications for third-stream indicators. Scientometrics, 70(2), 415–440. doi:10.1007/s11192-007-0210-9.
Mueller, P. (2006). Exploring the knowledge filter: how entrepreneurship and university–industry relationships drive economic growth. Research Policy, 35(10), 1499–1508. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.023.
Nijkamp, P. (2003). Entrepreneurship in a modern network economy. Regional Studies, 37(4), 395–405. doi:10.1080/0034340032000074424.
Nilsson, A. S., Rickne, A., & Bengtsson, L. (2009). Transfer of academic research: uncovering the grey zone. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 35(6), 617–636. doi:10.1007/s10961-009-9124-4.
Nishimura, J., & Okamuro, H. (2011). Subsidy and networking: the effects of direct and indirect support programs of the cluster policy. Research Policy, 40(5), 714–727. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.01.011.
Nissan, E., Galindo Martín, M.-Á., & Méndez Picazo, M.-T. (2011). Relationship between organizations, institutions, entrepreneurship and economic growth process. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 7(3), 311–324. doi:10.1007/s11365-011-0191-2.
Nordqvist, M., & Melin, L. (2010). Entrepreneurial families and family firms. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 22(3–4), 211–239. doi:10.1080/08985621003726119.
Ojewale, B. A., Ilori, M. O., Oyebisi, T. O., & Akinwumi, I. O. (2001). Industry–academic relation: utilization of idle capacities in polytechnics, universities and research organizations by entrepreneurs in Nigeria. Technovation, 21, 695–704.
Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., Broström, A., D’Este, P., & Sobrero, M. (2013). Academic engagement and commercialisation: a review of the literature on university–industry relations. Research Policy, 42(2), 423–442. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.09.007.
Porter, M. E., & Stern, S. (2001). Innovation: location matters. Management.
Ranga, L. M., Debackere, K., & von Tunzelmann, N. (2003). Entrepreneurial universities and the dynamics of academic knowledge production: a case study of basic vs. applied research in Belgium. Scientometrics, 58(2), 301–320.
Salvador, E. (2010). Are science parks and incubators good “brand names” for spin-offs? The case study of Turin. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 36(2), 203–232. doi:10.1007/s10961-010-9152-0.
Sarkar, S., & Costa, A. (2008). Dynamics of open innovation in the food industry. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 19(11), 574–580. doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2008.09.006.
Schwab, K. (2011). The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012. (G. E. Monitor, Ed.)World Economic Forum (pp. 1–554). Geneva: World Economic Forum.
Semlinger, K. (2008). Cooperation and competition in network governance: regional networks in a globalised economy. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 20(6), 547–560. doi:10.1080/08985620802462157.
Sharabati-Shahin, M. H. N., & Thiruchelvam, K. (2013). The role of Diaspora in university–industry relationships in globalised knowledge economy: the case of Palestine. Higher Education, 65, 613–629. doi:10.1007/s10734-012-9566-8.
Soete, B., & Stephan, A. (2004). Introduction: entrepreneurship, innovation and growth. Industry & Innovation, 11(3), 161–165. doi:10.1080/1366271042000265357.
Solleiro, J. L., & Castañón, R. (2005). Competitiveness and innovation systems: the challenges for Mexico’s insertion in the global context. Technovation, 25(9), 1059–1070. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2004.02.005.
Spithoven, A., Clarysse, B., & Knockaert, M. (2011). Building absorptive capacity to organise inbound open innovation in traditional industries. Technovation, 31(1), 10–21. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2010.10.003.
Spithoven, A., Vanhaverbeke, W., & Roijakkers, N. (2013). Open innovation practices in SMEs and large enterprises. Small Business Economics, 41, 537–562. doi:10.1007/s11187-012-9453-9.
Storbacka, K. (2011). Industrial marketing management a solution business model: capabilities and management practices for integrated solutions. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(5), 699–711. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2011.05.003.
Strand, Ø., & Leydesdorff, L. (2013). Where is synergy indicated in the Norwegian innovation system? Triple-Helix relations among technology, organization, and geography. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(3), 471–484. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2012.08.010.
Tee, N. P. (2005). Innovation and enterprise in Singapore schools. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 3(3), 183–198. doi:10.1007/s10671-004-8240-z.
Tödtling, F., Prud, P., & Reine, V. (2011). Open innovation and regional culture—findings from different industrial and regional settings. European Planning Studies, 19(11), 1885–1907.
Turok, I. (2004). Cities, regions and competitiveness. Regional Studies, 38(9), 1069–1083. doi:10.1080/0034340042000292647.
Wessner, C. W. (2002). Entrepreneurial finance and the new economy. Venture Capital, 4(4), 349–355. doi:10.1080/1369106022000024987.
Wong, C.-Y., & Goh, K.-L. (2012). The sustainability of functionality development of science and technology: papers and patents of emerging economies. Journal of Informetrics, 6(1), 55–65. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2011.07.001.
Wong, P. K., Ho, Y. P., & Autio, E. (2005). Entrepreneurship, innovation and economic growth: evidence from GEM data. Small Business Economics, 24(3), 335–350. doi:10.1007/s11187-005-2000-1.
Wong, P.-K., Ho, Y.-P., & Singh, A. (2007). Towards an “entrepreneurial university” model to support knowledge-based economic development: the case of the National University of Singapore. World Development, 35(6), 941–958. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2006.05.007.
Zeng, S. X., Xie, X. M., & Tam, C. M. (2010). Relationship between cooperation networks and innovation performance of SMEs. Technovation, 30(3), 181–194. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2009.08.003.
Zerbinati, S. (2012). Multi-level governance and EU structural funds: an entrepreneurial local government perspective. Local Government Studies, 38(5), 577–597. doi:10.1080/03003930.2011.649914.
Zhou, J. (2013). Digitalization and intelligentization of manufacturing industry. Advances in Manufacturing, 1(1), 1–7. doi:10.1007/s40436-013-0006-5.
Zott, C., & Amit, R. (2010). Business model design: an activity system perspective. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), 216–226. doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.004.
Acknowledgments
We would like to take this opportunity to acknowledge the valuable collaboration of the following University of Évora MCCA_II project working group members: Professors Oliveira Peça, António Dias and Anacleto Pinheiro. We would also like to express our sincere thanks to Mr. Falcão, entrepreneur and owner of the farm “Torre das Figueiras,” the site of product testing, as well as to Mr. Miguel Ferreira and Mr. Vitor Cardoso, managers of Vicort Company. Lastly, but in the same sense of recognition, our thanks also go to Professor Carlos Zorrinho, interviewed on behalf of policy decision makers in Portugal.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Farinha, L., Ferreira, J. & Gouveia, B. Networks of Innovation and Competitiveness: A Triple Helix Case Study. J Knowl Econ 7, 259–275 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-014-0218-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-014-0218-3