Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Quality Assurance Driving Factors as Antecedents of Knowledge Management: a Stakeholder-Focussed Perspective in Higher Education

  • Published:
Journal of the Knowledge Economy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Similar to many other types of organisations, the successful development of higher education institutions generally depends on proactive multi-stakeholder management strategy. As a social responsibility of universities, quality assurance (QA) of higher education is already an established research domain. However, the issues that serve as driving factors in higher education’s quality are acknowledged in this vast knowledge stream in a dispersed way. An objective of this paper is to provide a quick snapshot of the major QA driving factors in higher education. Another objective here is to discuss the significance of these existing QA driving factors in higher education as prospective antecedents of knowledge management among the key stakeholders in the higher education sector and beyond. An inductive constructivist approach is followed to review the relevant QA driving factors from the extant scholarly views. A number of relevant factors are précised from the literature that would be instrumental to uphold quality in higher education. The discussion demonstrates that these factors are also significant to transfer and share knowledge between the key stakeholders not only for universities, but also for businesses, governments and other organisational stakeholders. The paper proposes a framework of the QA drivers’ application for meaningful knowledge transfer between diverse stakeholders and clarifies the framework’s managerial implications. This conceptual framework specifies different scenarios and perspectives of QA drivers’ application in the global education sector. The academic novelty is based on the inductive approach applied in the paper. QA practitioners will be able to follow these factors as steering phenomena to effectively assure quality, in relation to their multi-stakeholder relationships in higher education and beyond.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, D., Johnson, R., & Milligan, B. (2000). Quality assurance and accreditation in Australian higher education: An assessment of Australian and international practice. http://www.voced.edu.au/content/ngv%3A26672. Accessed 28 May 2015.

  • Belyaeva, Z. (2015). Entrepreneurial innovation and stakeholder relationship management. In H. Kaufmann & S. M. R. Shams (Eds.), Entrepreneurial challenges in the 21 st century: Creating stakeholder value co-creation (pp. 120–132). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Belyaeva, Z. (2016). Entrepreneurial innovation and stakeholder relationship management. Entrepreneurial Challenges in the 21St Century: Creating Stakeholder Value Co-Creation, pp. 120–132.

  • Bengoa, D. S., & Kaufmann, H. R. (2016). The influence of trust on the trilogy of knowledge creation, sharing, and transfer. Thunderbird Int'l Bus Rev, 58, 239–249. doi:10.1002/tie.21743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berner, A., & Tonder, C. L. V. (2003). The postmodern consumer: Implications of changing customer expectations for organisational development in service organisation. Journal of Industrial Psychology, 29(3), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campanella, F., Peruta, M. R. D., & Giudice, M. D. (2013). The role of sociocultural background on the characteristics and the financing of youth entrepreneurship. An exploratory study of university graduates in Italy. J Knowl Econ, 4(3), 244–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2011). Open innovation diplomacy and a 21st century fractal research, education and innovation (FREIE) ecosystem: Building on the quadruple and quintuple helix innovation concepts and the “mode 3” knowledge production system. J Knowl Econ, 2(3), 327–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardoso, S., Tavares, O., & Sin, C. (2015). The quality of teaching staff: Higher education institutions’ compliance with the European standards and guidelines for quality assurance – The case of Portugal. Educ Assess Eval Account, 27(3), 205–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caroll, M. L. (1997). Self-audit of quality in academic and service departments: A practical experience. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 22(2), 225–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cave, M., Hanney, S., Kogan, M., & Trevett, G. (1988). The use of performance indicators in higher education. London: Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chase, J., & Evert, J. (2011). Global health training in graduate medical education: A guidebook (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Global Health Education Consortium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Y. C. (2003). Quality assurance in education: Internal, interface, and future. Qual Assur Educ, 11(4), 202–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, M. (2011). Transforming the learner versus passing the exam: Understanding the gap between academic and student definitions of quality. Qual High Educ, 17(1), 3–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, J. A., Nelson, K. J., & Stoodley, I. D. (2013). The place of higher education institutions in assessing student engagement, success and retention: A maturity model to guide practice. Paper presented at the Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia, 1–4 July, Auckland, New Zealand.

  • Cowley, W. H., & Williams, D. (1991). International and historical roots of American higher education. New York: Garland Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Del Giudice, M., & Peruta, M. R. D. (2016). The impact of IT-based knowledge management systems on internal venturing and innovation: A structural equation modeling approach to corporate performance. J Knowl Manag, 20(3), 484–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Del Giudice, M., Carayannis, E. G., & Peruta, M. R. D. (2011). Culture and cooperative strategies: Knowledge management perspectives. Cross-Cultural Knowledge Management, 11, 49–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Del Giudice, M., Peruta, M. R. D., & Maggioni, V. (2013). Collective knowledge and organizational routines within academic communities of practice: An empirical research on science-entrepreneurs. J Knowl Econ, 4(3), 260–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Del Giudice, M., Peruta, M. R. D., & Maggioni, V. (2015). A model for the diffusion of knowledge sharing technologies inside private transport companies. J Knowl Manag, 19(3), 611–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dell’Anno, D., Evangelista, F., & Giudice, M. D. (2016). Internationalization of science-based start-ups: Opportunity or requirement? Journal of the Knowledge Economy Published online ahead of print. doi:10.1007/s13132-016-0352-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickerson, K. (2015). NASA’s visit to Pluto: Has scientists debating the definition of a planet again? http://www.businessinsider.com.au/new-horizons-pluto-photos-definition-of-a-planet-debate-2015-7. Accessed 15 Oct 2015.

  • Dill, D. D. (2000). Capacity building as an instrument of institutional reform: Improving the quality of higher education through academic audits in the UK, New Zealand, Sweden, and Hong Kong. Comparative Policy Analysis, 2(2), 211–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dill, D. D., & Beerkens, M. (2013). Designing the framework conditions for assuring academic standards: Lessons learned about professional, market, and government regulation of academic quality. High Educ, 65(3), 341–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dinham, S., & Crowther, F. (2011). Sustainable school capacity building – One step back, two step forward? J Educ Adm, 49(6), 616–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Acad Manag Rev, 14(4), 532–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enders, J., de Boer, H., & Weyer, E. (2013). Regulatory autonomy and performance: The reform of higher education re-visited. High Educ, 65(1), 5–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ENQA (2013). ENQA as a partner. Available at: http://www.enqa.eu/index.php/cras-ultricies-arcu-id-lectus/. (Accessed 18 July 2016).

  • Fallshaw, E. M. (2003). Overseas partnerships – a case study in quality. Paper presented at the HERSA 2003 Conference, 6–9 July, Christchurch, New Zealand.

  • Fullan, M. (2009). Large-scale reform comes of age. J Educ Chang, 10(2–3), 101–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, P. (2011). Finding quality in ‘being good enough’ conversations. Qual High Educ, 17(2), 139–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gide, E., & Shams, S. M. R. (2011). The role of web-based promotion on the development of a relationship marketing model to enable sustainable growth. Procedia Computer Science, 3, 1060–1073.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies in qualitative research. London: Wiedenfeld and Nicholson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, C. (2003). The transition from mode-1 to mode-2 society: The implications for education. http://www.futures1.net/docs/Mode-2%20Paper.doc.pdf. Accessed 15 May 2011.

  • Green, D. (1994). What is quality in higher education? (1st ed.). Buckingham: The Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gynnild, V. (2007). Quality assurance reconsidered: A case study. Qual High Educ, 13(3), 263–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallier, J., & Forbes, T. (2004). In search of theory development in grounded investigations: Doctor’s experiences of managing as an example of fitted and prospective theorizing. J Manag Stud, 41(8), 1379–1410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, L., & Green, D. (1993). Defining quality. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 18(1), 9–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hazelkorn, Ellen (2014). Rankings and the Reconstruction of Knowledge during the Age of Austerity In: Zinaida Fadeeva, Galkute L., Mader C., Scott G., Sustainable Development and Quality Assurance in Higher Education – Transformation of Learning and Society, Palgrave Macmillan, 25–48.

  • Healey, N. M. (2008). Is higher education in really ‘internationalising’? High Educ, 55(3), 333–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hénard, F., & Roseveare, D. (2012). Fostering quality teaching in higher education: Policies and practices: An IMHE guide for higher education institutions. http://www.oecd.org/edu/imhe/QT%20policies%20and%20practices.pdf. Accessed 23 May 2015.

  • Houston, D., & Paewai, S. (2013). Knowledge, power and meanings shaping quality assurance in higher education: A systemic critique. Qual High Educ, 19(3), 261–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Izzrech, K., Giudice, M. D., & Peruta, M. R. D. (2013). Investing entrepreneurship among Algerian youth: Is it a knowledge-intensive factory? J Knowl Econ, 4(3), 319–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez, D. J., Costa, M. M., & Valle, R. S. (2014). Knowledge management practices for innovation: A multinational corporation’s perspective. J Knowl Manag, 18(5), 905–918.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnes, J., & Taylor, J. (1990). Performance indicators in higher education. Milton Keynes: SRHE and Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, H., & Shams, S. M. R. (Eds.). (2015). Entrepreneurial challenges in the 21 st century: Creating stakeholder value co-creation. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keay, J., May, H., & O’Mahony, J. (2014). Improving learning and teaching in transnational education: Can communities of practice help? J Educ Teach, 40(3), 251–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kettunen, J. (2012). External and internal quality audits in higher education. The TQM Journal, 24(6), 518–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krause, K.-L., & Coates, H. (2008). Students’ engagement in first-year university. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(5), 493–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kristensen, B. (2010). Has external quality assurance actually improved quality in higher education over the course of 20 years of the ‘quality revolution’? Qual High Educ, 16(2), 153–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lagrosen, S., Seyyed-Hashemi, R., & Leitner, M. (2004). Examination of the dimensions of quality in higher education. Qual Assur Educ, 12(2), 61–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim, F. C. B. (2009). Education hub at a crossroads: The development of quality assurance as a competitive tool for Singapore’s private tertiary education. Qual Assur Educ, 17(1), 79–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, S. (2015). Higher education quality assessment in China: An impact study. Higher Education Policy, 28(2), 175–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lombardi, R., Giudice, M. D., Caputo, A., Evangelista, F., & Russo, G. (2016). Governance and assessment insights in information technology: The Val IT model. J Knowl Econ, 7(1), 292–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lusch, R. F., & Vargo, S. L. (2006). Service-dominant logic: Reactions, reflections and refinements. Mark Theory, 6(3), 281–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maassen, P. A. M. (1997). Quality in European higher education: Recent trends and their historical roots. Eur J Educ, 32(2), 111–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marginson, S. (2013). The impossibility of capitalist markets in higher education. Journal of Education Policy, 28(3), 353–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mårtensson, K., Roxå, T., & Stensaker, B. (2014). From quality assurance to quality practices: An investigation of strong microcultures in teaching and learning. Stud High Educ, 39(4), 534–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morley, L. (2003). Quality and power in higher education (1st ed.). Maidenhead: Higher Education & Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naidoo, V., & Wu, T. (2014). Innovations in marketing of higher education: Foreign market entry mode of not-for-profit universities. J Bus Ind Mark, 29(6), 546–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NASA (2012). What is Pluto? http://www.nasa.gov/audience/forstudents/k-4/stories/what-is-pluto-k4_prt.htm. Accessed 26 Sept 2015.

  • Nenadál, J. (2015). Comprehensive quality assessment of Czech higher education institutions. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 7(2–3), 138–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newton, J. (2002). Views from below: Academics coping with quality. Qual High Educ, 8(1), 39–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nightingale, P., & O’Neil, M. (1994). Achieving quality learning in higher education. London: Kogan Page Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Mahony, K., & Garavan, T. N. (2012). Implementing a quality management framework in a higher education organisation. Qual Assur Educ, 20(2), 184–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2012). Fostering quality teaching in higher education: Policies and practices. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/edu/imhe/QT%20policies%20and%20practices.pdf. (Accessed June 2016).

  • O'Rafferty, S., Curtis, H., & O'Connor, F. (2014). Mainstreaming sustainability in design education – A capacity building framework. Int J Sustain High Educ, 15(2), 69–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osman, H., Johns, N., & Lugosi, P. (2014). Commercial hospitality and destination experiences: McDonald’s and tourists’ consumption of space. Tour Manag, 42, 238–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peruta, M. R. D., Giudice, M. D., Lombardi, R., & Soto-Acosta, P. (2016). Open innovation, product development, and inter-company relationships within regional knowledge clusters. Journal of the Knowledge Economy. Published online ahead of print. doi:10.1007/s13132-016-0356-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettersen, I. J. (2015). From metrics to knowledge? Quality assessment in higher education. Financial Accountability & Management, 31(1), 23–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Randall, W. S., & Mello, J. E. (2012). Grounded theory: An inductive method for supply chain research. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics, 42(8–9), 863–880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romano, M., Manlio Del Giudice, M. D., & Nicotra, M. (2014). Knowledge creation and exploitation in Italian universities: The role of internal policies for patent activity. J Knowl Manag, 18(5), 952–970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shah, M. (2012). Ten years of external quality audit in Australia: Evaluating its effectiveness and success. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(6), 761–772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shams, S. M. R. (2011). A relationship marketing model to enable sustainable growth of the Bangladesh Cricket Board: A stakeholder causal scope analysis. Doctoral dissertation, Central Queensland University, Australia.

  • Shams, S. M. R. (2012). Implications of relationship marketing indicators to enable organisational growth: A stakeholder causal scope analysis. In H. Kaufmann, & M. F. A. K. Panni (Eds.), Customer centricmarketing strategies: Tools for building organizational performance (pp. 214–244). Hershey, PA: Business Science Reference.

  • Shams, S. M. R. (2013). A multi-campus approach of mobility and quality assurance of higher education: The synthesis of an Australian case. International Journal of Technology and Educational Marketing, 3(2), 38–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shams, S. M. R. (2015). Stakeholders’ perceptions and reputational antecedents: A review of stakeholder relationship, reputation and brand positioning. Journal of Advances in Management Research, 12(3), 314–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shams, S. M. R. (2016a). Sustainability issues in transnational education service: A conceptual framework and empirical insights. J Glob Mark, 29(3), 139–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shams, S. M. R. (2016b). Branding destination image: A stakeholder causal scope analysis for internationalisation of destinations. Tourism Planning & Development, 13(2), 140–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shams, S. M. R. (2016c). Capacity building for sustained competitive advantage: A conceptual framework. Mark Intell Plan, 34(5), 671–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shams, S. M. R., & Kaufmann, H. R. (2016). Entrepreneurial co-creation: A research vision to be materialised. Manag Decis, 54(6), 1250–1268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shams, S. M. R., & Lombardi, R. (2016). Socio-economic value co-creation and sports tourism: Evidence from Tasmania. World Review of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 12(2–3), 218–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smart, K. L., Witt, C., & Scott, J. P. (2012). Toward learner-centred teaching: An inductive approach. Bus Commun Q, 75(4), 392–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stalmeijer, R., Whittingham, J., de Grave, W., & Dolmans, D. (2014). Strengthening internal quality assurance process: Facilitating student evaluation committees to contribute. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(1), 53–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stensaker, B., Langfeldt, L., Harvey, L., Huisman, J., & Westerheijden, D. (2011). An in-depth study on the impact of external quality assurance. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(4), 465–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson, J., & Yorke, M. (1998). Capability and quality in higher education. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinto, V. (2010). From theory to action: Exploring the institutional conditions for student retention. In J. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and practice (pp. 51–89). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Van Vught, F. A., & Westerheijden, D. F. (1994). Towards a general model of quality assessment in higher education. High Educ, 28(3), 355–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viverg, O., & Grönlund, A. (2013). Cross-cultural analysis of users’ attitudes toward the use of mobile devices in second and foreign language learning in higher education: A case from Sweden and China. Comput Educ, 69(12), 169–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waheed, B., Khan, F. I., & Veitch, B. (2011). Developing a quantitative tool for sustainability assessment of HEIs. Int J Sustain High Educ, 12(4), 355–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wahlen, S. (2004). Does national quality monitoring make a difference? Qual High Educ, 10(2), 139–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weusthof, P. J. M. (1995). Internal quality assurance in Dutch universities: An empirical analysis of characteristics and results of self-evaluation. Qual High Educ, 1(3), 235–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodhouse, D. (1999). Quality and quality assurance. In H. de Wit & J. Knight (Eds.), Quality and internationalisation in higher education (pp. 29–43). Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Ural Federal University, Yekaterinburg, Sverdlovskaya oblast’, 620002, Russia

    S. M. Riad Shams

  2. Graduate School of Economics and Management, International Economics and International Business, External Academic Relations, Research Unit for Global Social Responsibility Excellence, BRICS Study Center, EMRBI, Ural Federal University, Yekaterinburg, Russia

    Zhanna Belyaeva

Authors
  1. S. M. Riad Shams
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zhanna Belyaeva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. M. Riad Shams.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Riad Shams, S.M., Belyaeva, Z. Quality Assurance Driving Factors as Antecedents of Knowledge Management: a Stakeholder-Focussed Perspective in Higher Education. J Knowl Econ 10, 423–436 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-017-0472-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-017-0472-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation