Abstract
Phragmites australis is the major component of reed stands covering some 8200 ha along the shores of Lake Burullus (Egypt). We applied a published temperate zone reed model to assess growth and cycling of C and nutrients among the various organs of P. australis in this sub-tropical lake. We aim to quantify the role of reed stands for the C balance and nutrients cycling in the south Mediterranean wetland. Above-ground biomass was 3.5 times higher than the below-ground biomass. Root biomass represented 13% of the total below-ground, while leaves and panicles represented 16 and 3% of the above-ground biomass, respectively. Remobilization from rhizomes (15%) and reallocation from leaves (1%) were of little importance as assimilated sources. Nutrients accumulation by total above-ground biomass ranged between 2.7 to 46.8 g m−2 yr−1 for P and K, respectively. We calculated a C sequestration rate of 38.4 g C m−2 yr−1 for the dead rhizomes in the sediments. This value stresses the importance of P. australis stands for C sequestration in Lake Burullus. Further, as much as 254 t P and 5527 t N could potentially be removed annually from Lake Burullus by harvesting P. australis at maximum total above-ground biomass.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ailstock MS, Norman CM, Bushmann PJ (2001) Common reed Phragmites australis: control and effects upon biodiversity in freshwater nontidal wetlands. Restoration Ecology 9:49–59
Allen S, Grimshaw HM, Parkinson JA, Quarmby C (1989) Chemical analysis of ecological materials, 4th edn. Blackwell Scientific Publications, London
Asaeda T, Karunaratne S (2000) Dynamic modeling of the growth of Phragmites australis: model description. Aquatic Botany 67:301–318
Bernal B, Mitsch WJ (2008) A comparison of soil carbon pools and profiles in wetlands in Costa Rica and Ohio. Ecological Engineering 34:311–323
Bridgham SD, Megonigal JP, Keller JK, Bliss NB, Trettin C (2006) The carbon balance of North American wetlands. Wetlands 26:889–916
Brix H (1997) Do macrophytes play a role in constructed treatment wetlands? Water Science and Technology 35(5):11–17
Brix H, Schierup H (1989) The use of aquatic macrophytes in water pollution control. Ambio 18:100–107
Brun R, Reichert P, Künsch HR (2001) Practical identifiability analysis of large environmental simulation models. Water Resources Research 37:1015–1030
Chmura GL, Anisfeld SC, Cahoon DR, Lynch JC (2003) Global carbon sequestration in tidal, saline wetland soils. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 17:1111–1132
Cooper PF, Findlater BC (1990) Constructed wetlands in water pollution control. Pergamon Press, Oxford
Eid EM (2009) Population biology and nutrient cycle of Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. ex Steud. in Lake Burullus. Dissertation, University of Tanta, Tanta
El-Shinnawy I (2002) Al-Burullus wetland’s hydrological study. MedWetCoast, Global Environmental Facility (GEF) and Egyptian Environmental Affairs Agency (EEAA), Cairo
Goudriaan J, van Laar HH (1994) Modelling potential crop growth processes. Textbook with exercises. Current issues in production ecology, vol. 2. Kluwer, Dordrecht
Hammer DA (1989) Constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment: municipal, industrial and agricultural. Lewis Publishers Inc., Chelsea, MI
Ho YB (1979) Shoot development and production studies of Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. ex Steud. in Scottish Lochs. Hydrobiologia 64:215–222
Hocking PJ (1989a) Seasonal dynamics of production and nutrient accumulation and cycling by Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. ex Steudel in a nutrient-enriched swamp in Inland Australia. II. Individual shoots. Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 40:445–464
Hocking PJ (1989b) Seasonal dynamics of production and nutrient accumulation and cycling by Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. ex Steudel in a nutrient-enriched swamp in Inland Australia. I. Whole plants. Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 40:421–444
Holm LG, Plucknett DL, Pancho JV, Herberger JP (1977) Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. (=P. communis Trin.) and Phragmites karka (Retz.) Trin. In: The world’s worst weeds “distribution and biology”. The University Press of Hawaii, Honolulu
Howe AJ, Rodriguez JF, Saco PM (2009) Surface evolution and carbon sequestration in disturbed and undisturbed wetland soils of the Hunter estuary, southeast Australia. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 84:75–83
Karunaratne S, Asaeda T (2000) Verification of a mathematical growth model of Phragmites australis using field data from two Scottish lochs. Folia Geobotanica 35:419–432
Kassas M (2002) Management plan for Burullus Protectorate Area. MedWetCoast, Global Environmental Facility (GEF) and Egyptian Environmental Affairs Agency (EEAA), Cairo
Khalil MT, El-Dawy FA (2002) Ecological survey of Burullus Nature Protectorate: fishes and fisheries. MedWetCoast, Global Environmental Facility (GEF) and Egyptian Environmental Affairs Agency (EEAA), Cairo
Květ J, Svoboda J, Fiala K (1969) Canopy development in stands of Typha latifolia L. and Phragmites communis Trin. in South Moravia. Hydrobiologia 10:63–75
Lal R (2007) Carbon sequestration. Philosophical Transaction of the Royal Society 363:815–830
Lessmann JM, Brix H, Bauer V, Clevering OA, Comín F (2001) Effect of climatic gradients on the photosynthetic responses of four Phragmites australis populations. Aquatic Botany 69:109–126
Mendelssohn IA, Slocum MG (2004) Relationship between soil cellulose decomposition and oil contamination after an oil spill at Swanson Creek, Maryland. Marine Pollution Bulletin 48:359–370
Mitra S, Wassmann R, Vlek PLG (2005) An appraisal of global wetland area and its organic carbon stock. Current Science 88:25–35
Mitsch WJ, Gosselink JG (2007) Wetlands, 4th edn. Wiley, New York
Murphy KL, Klopatek JM, Klopatek CC (1998) The effects of litter quality and climate on decomposition along an elevation gradient. Ecological Applications 8:1061–1071
de Vries Penning FWT, van Laar HH (1982) Simulation of plant growth and crop production. Simulation monographs. Pudoc, Wageningen
Price WL (1979) A controlled random search procedure for global optimization. The Computer Journal 20:367–370
Reddy KR, Smith WH (1987) Aquatic plants for wastewater treatment and resource recovery. Magnolia Publishing Inc., Orlando, Fl
Rooth JE, Stevenson JC, Cornwell JC (2003) Increased sediment accretion rates following invasion by Phragmites australis: the role of litter. Estuaries 26:475–483
Sakurai Y, Matsumoto Y, Miyairi M (1985) Growth rate and productivity of emergent plants in Lake Biwa, Lake Kasumigaura and Chikuma River. Proceedings of the annual meeting of Japanese Society of Limnology, Kantho-Koshinetsu Branch, pp 10:20–21 (in Japanese)
Shaltout KH, Al-Sodany YM (2008) Vegetation analysis of Burullus Wetland: a RAMSAR site in Egypt. Wetlands Ecology and Management 16:421–439
Shaltout KH, Al-Sodany YM, El-Sheikh MA (2004) Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. ex Steud. in Lake Burullus, Egypt: is it an expanding or retreating population. Proc. 3 rd International Conference on Biological Sciences (ICBS), Faculty of Science, Tanta University, Tanta, pp 83–96
Shaltout KH, Khalil MT (2005) Lake Burullus: Burullus Protected Area. Publication of National Biodiversity Unit No. 13, Egyptian Environmental Affairs Agency (EEAA), Cairo
Slak AS, Bulc TG, Vrhovsek D (2005) Comparison of nutrient cycling in a surface-flow constructed wetland and in a facultative pond treating secondary effluent. Water Science and Technology 51(12):291–298
Soetaert K, deClippele V, Herman P (2002) Femme, a flexible environment for mathematically modeling the environment. Ecological Modelling 151:177–193
Soetaert K, Hoffmann M, Meire P, Starink M, van Oevelen D, van Regenmortel S, Cox T (2004) Modeling growth and carbon allocation in two reed beds (Phragmites australis) in the Scheldt estuary. Aquatic Botany 79:211–234
Struyf E, Van Damme S, Gribsholt B, Bal K, Beauchard O, Middelburg JJ, Meire P (2007) Phragmites australis and silica cycling in tidal wetlands. Aquatic Botany 87:134–140
Täckholm V (1974) Students’ flora of Egypt, 2nd edn. Cairo University Press, Cairo
Urbanc-Bercic O, Gaberscik A (2004) The relationship of the processes in the rhizosphere of common reed Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. ex Steudel to water fluctuation. International Review of Hydrobiology 89:500–507
Verhoeven JT, van der Toorn J (1990) Management of marshes with special reference to wastewater treatment. In: Patten BC (ed) Wetlands and shallow continental water bodies, vol I. Academic Publishing, The Hague, pp 571–585
Xiaonan D, Xiaoke W, Lu F, Zhiyun O (2008) Primary evaluation of carbon sequestration potential of wetlands in China. Acta Ecologica Sinica 28:463–469
Zahran MA, Willis AJ (2009) The Vegetation of Egypt, 2nd edn. Springer, Heidelberg
Zhao HY, Leng XT, Wang SZ (2002) Distribution, accumulation of peat in the Changhaishan Mountains and climate change in Holocene. Journal of Mountain Science 20:513–518
Acknowledgements
We thank Mr. F. El-Shamly, Manager of Burullus Protected Area for the facilities who offered during the field study, Profs. F.I. Zein and A.A. El-Leithi, Soil, Water and Environment Research Institute, Agriculture Research Center, Sakha, Egypt for their help during the water analysis, and Dr. Hans Luthardt, Max-Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany for providing us with the solar radiation data. The Egyptian Ministry of Higher Education provided the senior author with funding for a two-year visit at Hamburg University (Hamburg, Germany) and a one-week visit to NIOO-CEME (Yerseke, The Netherlands), where part of this work was conducted.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix 1. List of A) Equations and B) Parameters used in the Reed Model to Simulate Growth and Carbon Distribution in a Phragmites australis Population in Lake Burullus, Egypt
Appendix 1. List of A) Equations and B) Parameters used in the Reed Model to Simulate Growth and Carbon Distribution in a Phragmites australis Population in Lake Burullus, Egypt
A)
Rates of change (mol C m−2 per day) of the state variables (mol C m−2) |
\( \left( {{{\left( {\partial \,Rhizomes} \right)} \mathord{\left/{\vphantom {{\left( {\partial \,Rhizomes} \right)} {\left( {\partial \,t} \right)}}} \right.} {\left( {\partial \,t} \right)}}} \right) \)=Growth–Rhizome Basal Respiration–Rhizome Mortality–Rhizome Mobilization |
\( \left( {{{\left( {\partial \,Roots} \right)} \mathord{\left/{\vphantom {{\left( {\partial \,Roots} \right)} {\left( {\partial \,t} \right)}}} \right.} {\left( {\partial \,t} \right)}}} \right) \)=Root Growth–Root Basal Respiration–Root Mortality |
\( \left( {{{\left( {\partial \,Dead\,below - ground} \right)} \mathord{\left/{\vphantom {{\left( {\partial \,Dead\,below - ground} \right)} {\left( {\partial \,t} \right)}}} \right.} {\left( {\partial \,t} \right)}}} \right) \)=Root Mortality+Rhizome Mortality–Below-ground Decay |
\( \left( {{{\left( {\partial \,Leaves} \right)} \mathord{\left/{\vphantom {{\left( {\partial \,Leaves} \right)} {\left( {\partial \,t} \right)}}} \right.} {\left( {\partial \,t} \right)}}} \right) \)=Leaf Growth–Leaf Basal Respiration–Leaf Mortality–Leaf Reallocation |
\( \left( {{{\left( {\partial \,Stems} \right)} \mathord{\left/{\vphantom {{\left( {\partial \,Stems} \right)} {\left( {\partial \,t} \right)}}} \right.} {\left( {\partial \,t} \right)}}} \right) \)=Stem Growth–Stem Basal Respiration–Stem Mortality–Stem Reallocation |
\( \left( {{{\left( {\partial \,Panicles} \right)} \mathord{\left/{\vphantom {{\left( {\partial \,Panicles} \right)} {\left( {\partial \,t} \right)}}} \right.} {\left( {\partial \,t} \right)}}} \right) \)=Panicle Growth–Panicle Basal Respiration–Panicle Mortality–Panicle Reallocation |
\( \left( {{{\left( {\partial \,Dead\,leaves} \right)} \mathord{\left/{\vphantom {{\left( {\partial \,Dead\,leaves} \right)} {\left( {\partial \,t} \right)}}} \right.} {\left( {\partial \,t} \right)}}} \right) \)=Leaf Mortality–Dead leaf Decay–Dead leaf Abscission |
\( \left( {{{\left( {\partial \,Dead\,stems} \right)} \mathord{\left/{\vphantom {{\left( {\partial \,Dead\,stems} \right)} {\left( {\partial \,t} \right)}}} \right.} {\left( {\partial \,t} \right)}}} \right) \)=Stem Mortality+Panicle Mortality–Dead stem Decay |
Main processes (mol C m−2 per day)a |
Rhizome Mobilization=Remobilization rate20 . Rhizomes . f (T) |
Organ Reallocation=Reallocation rate20 . Organ . f (T) |
Glucose Production=Photosynthesis+Rhizome Mobilization+(Leaf, Panicle and Stem) Reallocation |
Organ Growth=pOrgan . Glucose Production . (1–Respiration Fraction) |
Organ Basal Respiration=Respiration rate20 . Organ . f (T) |
Organ Mortality=Mortality rate20 . Organ . f (T) |
Dead Organ Decay=Decay rate20 . Dead Organ . f (T) |
Dead Leaves Abscission=Abscission rate20 . Dead Leaves . f (T) |
Functionsb |
\( f(T) = {\theta^{\left( {T - 20} \right)}} \) |
Photosynthesis (mol C m−2 per day)=integral \( \left( {Px,t.LAI.\,\partial \,x,x = 0,x = \infty } \right) \) |
\( {P_{x,t}}\left( {mol\,C\,{m^{ - 2}}\,{\hbox{leaf}}\,{\hbox{per}}\,{\hbox{day}}} \right) = {\hbox{P}}{\max_{20}}.\,f(T).\,\left( {1 - {{\exp }^{ - {1_{x,t.}}{{\rm{LUE}} \mathord{\left/{\vphantom {{\rm{LUE}} {\left( {{\rm{P}}{{\max }_{20}}.\,f\,(T)} \right)}}} \right.} {\left( {{\rm{P}}{{\max }_{20}}.\,f\,(T)} \right)}}}}} \right) \) |
\( {I_{x,t}}\left( {W\,{m^{ - 2}}{\hbox{leaf}}} \right) = f\left( {{I_{0,\,\rho }}\lambda } \right) \) |
LAI (m2 leaf m−2 soil)=SLAc . Leaves |
Remobilization rate20 (mol C m−2 per day)=aRh . RhizomesbRh |
B)
Parameter | Value |
Initial rhizomes biomass (g DW m−2) | 2024 a |
Initial roots biomass (g DW m−2) | 316 a |
θ | 1.07 b |
Tcrit (oC_days) | 488 d |
T2 (stop rhizome remobilization) (days) | 202 d |
T3 (start flowering) (days) | 247 d |
T4 (start senescence) (days) | 350 d |
Max. assimilation rate (mol C (m2 leaf)−1 per day) | 7.7 d |
LUE (Light use efficiency) (mol C W−1 per day) | 0.012 c |
Specific leaf area (m2 leaf mol C−1) | 0.60 a |
λ (m2 leaf m−2 soil)−1 | 0.40 b |
Ρ | 0.20 b |
Leaves reallocation rate (senescence) (per day) | 0.001 d |
Stems reallocation rate (senescence) (per day) | 0.001 d |
aRh | 0.58 c |
bRh | −0.50 c |
Roots respiration rate20 (per day) | 0.0018 d |
Rhizomes respiration rate20 (per day) | 0.002 c |
Above-ground respiration rate20 (per day) | 0.001 d |
Roots respiration fraction (mol C mol C−1) | 0.15 c |
Rhizomes respiration fraction (mol C mol C−1) | 0.15 c |
Leaves respiration fraction (mol C mol C−1) | 0.15 c |
Stems respiration fraction (mol C mol C−1) | 0.11 c |
Panicles respiration fraction (mol C mol C−1) | 0.18 c |
Leaves mortality rate20 (growth phase) (per day) | 0.0069 d |
Stems mortality rate20 (growth phase) (per day) | 0.0011 d |
Leaves mortality rate20 (senescence) (per day) | 0.20 c |
Stems mortality rate20 (senescence) (per day) | 0.20 c |
Below-ground mortality rate20 (per day) | 0.00015c |
Abscission rate20 (per day) | 0.05 c |
Above-ground decay rate20 (per day) | 0.0077 c |
Below-ground decay rate20 (per day) | 0.0020 c |
ShapeBelow | 0.15 c |
cRoots | 0.063 d |
cPanicles | 0.70 c |
cLeaves | 0.504 d |
Leaf coefficient (per day) | −0.035 c |
Leaves N contents (mg N g DW−1) | 14.9 a |
Stems N contents (mg N g DW−1) | 5.8 a |
Below-ground N contents (mg N g DW−1) | 7.8 a |
Leaves C contents (g C g DW−1) | 0.43 b |
Stems C contents (g C g DW−1) | 0.41 b |
Panicles C contents (g C g DW−1) | 0.45 b |
Below-ground C contents (g C g DW−1) | 0.43 b |
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Eid, E.M., Shaltout, K.H., Al-Sodany, Y.M. et al. Modeling Growth, Carbon Allocation and Nutrient Budgets of Phragmites australis in Lake Burullus, Egypt. Wetlands 30, 240–251 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-010-0023-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-010-0023-0