Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Entrepreneurship in global innovation ecosystems

  • Published:
AMS Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Established companies in countless industries have recognized the need to access globally dispersed knowledge networks to develop and acquire innovations necessary to better serve their customers. To maximize and coordinate their access to this diverse knowledge, some incumbents have developed innovation platforms whereby new ventures and smaller companies contribute their discoveries and innovations. These platforms allow incumbents to shape and control their ecosystems. These ecosystems have been fertile grounds for the creation of new ventures of different types. In this article, we explore the role of innovation ecosystems in birthing and supporting new ventures and inducing heterogeneity among them; discuss how these ventures’ entrepreneurial activities within these innovation ecosystems are likely to vary from those in other contexts; and consider the implications of such ecosystems for the strategic shifts that new ventures might experience in the course of their evolution. We pay special attention to the managerial challenges new ventures may encounter in developing, leveraging, and balancing their technological and marketing capabilities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adner, R., & Kapoor, R. (2010). Value creation in innovation ecosystems: how the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations. Strategic Management Journal, 31, 306–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agarwal, R., Audretsch, D., & Sarkar, M. B. (2007). The Process of creative construction: knowledge spillovers, entrepreneurship and economic growth. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1(2), 263–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, H. E., & Ruef, M. (2006). Organizations evolving (2nd ed.). New York: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Almirall, E., & Casadesus-Masanell, R. (2010). Open vs. integrated innovation: a model of discovery and divergence. Academy of Management Review, 35(1), 27–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez, S. A., & Barney, J. B. (2007). Discovery and creation: alternative theories of entrepreneurial action. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1(1–2), 11–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez, S., Ireland, R., & Reuer, J. (2006). Entrepreneurship and strategic alliances. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(4), 401–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arend, R. J. (1999). Emergence of entrepreneurs following exogenous technological change. Strategic Management Journal, 20(1), 31–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. (1995). Innovation and industry evolution. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Autio, E., Sapienza, H. J., & Almeida, J. G. (2000). Effects of age at entry, knowledge intensity, and imitability on international growth. Academy of Management Journal, 43(5), 909–924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, T., & Nelson, R. E. (2005). Creating something from nothing: resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, 329–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. A. (2006). Opportunity recognition as pattern recognition: how entrepreneurs “connect the dots” to identify new business opportunities. Academy of Management Perspectives, 20(1), 104–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1997). The art of continuous change: linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 1–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. (1992). Structural holes. Boston: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkinshaw, J., Bessant, J., & Delbridge, R. (2007). Finding, forming, and performing: creating networks for discontinuous innovation. California Management Review, 49(3), 67–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birley, S. (1985). The role of networks in the entrepreneurial process. Journal of Business Venturing, 1, 107–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boland, R. J., Lyytinen, K., & Yoo, Y. (2007). Wakes of innovation in project networks: the case of digital 3-D representations in architecture, engineering, and construction. Organization Science, 18(4), 631–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boudreau, K., & Lakhani, K. (2009). How to manage outside innovation: competitive markets or collaborative communities? Sloan Management Review, 50(4), 69–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlile, P. R. (2002). A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: boundary objects in new product development. Organization Science, 13, 442–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlile, P. R. (2004). Transferring, translating, and transforming: an integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organization Science, 15(5), 555–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catmull, E. (2008). How Pixar fosters collective creativity. Harvard Business Review, 86(9), 64–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Thriving in an era of open innovation. Sloan Management Review, 44(3), 35–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 15, 128–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital and the creation of human capital. The American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, H. (2004). Interactional expertise as a third kind of knowledge. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 3, 125–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J. H., Gregersen, H. B., & Christensen, C. M. (2009). The innovator’s DNA. Harvard Business Review, 87(12), 60–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Carolis, D. M., Litzkey, B. E., & Eddleston, K. A. (2009). Why networks enhance the progress of new venture creation: the influence of social capital and cognition. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(2), 527–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhanaraj, C., & Parkhe, A. (2006). Orchestrating innovation networks. Academy of Management Review, 31(3), 659–669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felin, T., Zenger, T. R., & Tomsik, J. (2009). The knowledge economy: emerging organizational forms, missing microfoundations, and key considerations for managing human capital. Human Resource Management, 48(4), 555–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, L., & Waguespack, D. M. (2007). Brokerage, boundary spanning, and leadership in open innovation communities. Organization Science, 18(2), 165–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galunic, D. C., & Rodan, S. (1998). Resource combinations in the firm: knowledge structures and the potential for schumpeterian innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 1193–1201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gawer, A., & Cusumano, M. (2002). Platform leadership. Cambridge: HBS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, M., Limoges, H., Nowotny, S., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, P. H., & Meister, D. B. (2004). Knowledge sourcing effectiveness. Management Science, 50(6), 821–834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, M. T. (2002). Knowledge networks: explaining effective knowledge sharing in multiunit companies. Organization Science, 13(3), 232–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, M. T., & Birkinshaw, J. (2007). The innovation value chain. Harvard Business Review, 85(6), 121–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargadon, A. B. (2002). Brokering knowledge: linking learning and innovation. Research in Organizational Behavior, 24, 41–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hargadon, A. B., & Douglas, Y. (2001). When innovations meet institutions: Edison and the design of the electric light. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 476–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henfridsson, O., & Lindgren, M. (2005). Multi-contextuality in ubiquitous computing: investigating the car case through action research. Information and Organization, 15(2), 95–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iansiti, M., & Levien, R. (2004). The keystone advantage. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, P. G. (2008). Opportunity discovery, entrepreneurial action, and economic organization. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 2(3), 175–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, B., & Zander, I. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3(3), 383–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kressel, H., & Lento, T. V. (2007). Competing for the future: How digital innovations have changed the world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Publisher.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Livingston, J. (2007). Founders at work: Stories of startups’ early days. Berkeley: Apress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J. F. (1993). Predators and prey: A new ecology of competition. Harvard Business Review, 71(3), 75–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luksha, P. (2008). Niche construction: the process of opportunity creation in the environment. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 2, 269–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nambisan, S., & Sawhney, M. (2007). The global brain: Your roadmap for innovating faster and smarter in a networked world. Wharton: Wharton School Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nambisan, S., & Sawhney, M. (in press). Orchestration processes in network-centric innovation: evidence from the field. Academy of Management Perspectives.

  • Nelson, R. R. (1993). National innovation systems: A comparative analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nohria, N., & Ghoshal, S. (1997). The differentiated network: Organizing multinational corporations for value creation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge creating company. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Normann, R. (2001). Reframing business: When the map changes the landscape. Chichester, New Sussex: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2009). Business model generation. New Jersey: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarasvathy, S. D., & Dew, N. (2005). New market creation through transformation. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 15, 533–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shah, S. K., & Tripsas, M. (2007). The accidental entrepreneur: the emergent and collective process of user entrepreneurship. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1, 123–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S. (2000). Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organizational Science, 11, 448–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szulanski, G. (1996). Exploring internal stickiness: impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(1), 27–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J. (2009). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tripsas, M. (1997). Surviving radical technological change through dynamic capability: evidence from the typesetter industry. Industrial and Corporate Change, 6(2), 341–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tripsas, M., & Gavetti, G. (2000). Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: evidence from digital imaging. Strategic Management Journal, 21(10/11), 1147–1161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Hippel, E. (2005). Democratizing innovation. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoo, Y., Henfridsson, O., & Lyytinen, K. (2010). The new organizing logic of digital innovation: an agenda for information systems research. Information Systems Research, 21(4), 724–735.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S. A. (2005). A theory of international new ventures: a decade of research. Journal of International Business Studies, 36, 20–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S. A. (2008). The virtuous cycle of discovery and creation of entrepreneurial opportunities. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 2(3), 243–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: a review, reconceptualization and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27, 185–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S. A., van deVelde, E., & Larrenta, B. (2007). Knowledge conversion capability and the performance of corporate and university spin-offs. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16, 569–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Strategy and Organization & Gary S. Holmes Center for Entrepreneurship Center, Carlson School of Management, University of Minnesota, Room 3–430, 321 19th Ave. South, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA

    Shaker A. Zahra

  2. Lally School of Management & Technology, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, 110 & 8th Street, Troy, NY, 12180, USA

    Satish Nambisan

Authors
  1. Shaker A. Zahra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Satish Nambisan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shaker A. Zahra.

Additional information

We have benefited from the comments of seminar participants in Copenhagen Business School (Denmark), University of Twente (the Netherlands), Athens Economic and Business School (Greece), and Tsinghua University (PRC). The support of the Robert E. Buuck Chair, Carlson School of Management, University of Minnesota and the Chair of International Entrepreneurship at University of Twente (The Netherlands) is greatly appreciated.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zahra, S.A., Nambisan, S. Entrepreneurship in global innovation ecosystems. AMS Rev 1, 4–17 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-011-0004-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-011-0004-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation