Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Consciousness for sustainable consumption: scale development and new insights in the economic dimension of consumers’ sustainability

  • Published:
AMS Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The “triple bottom line” concept (planet, people, and profit) represents an important guideline for the sustainable, hence future-oriented, development of societies and for the behaviors of all societal members. For institutions promoting societal change, as well as for companies being confronted with growing expectations regarding compelling contributions to sustainable changes, it is of great importance to know if, and to what extent, consumers have already internalized the idea of sustainability. Against the background of existing research gaps regarding a comprehensive measurement of the consciousness for sustainable consumption (CSC), the authors present the result of a scale development. Consciousness was operationalized by weighting personal beliefs with the importance attached by consumers to sustainability dimensions. Four separate tests of the CSC scale indicated an appropriate psychometric quality of the scale and provided support for this new measurement approach that incorporates the environmental, social and economic dimensions of sustainability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Auger, P., Burke, P., Devinney, T. M., & Louviere, J. J. (2003). What will consumers pay for social product features? Journal of Business Ethics, 42(3), 281–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balderjahn, I. (1988). Personality variables and environmental attitudes as predictors of ecologically responsible consumption patterns. Journal of Business Research, 17(1), 51–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balderjahn, I., Peyer, M., & Paulssen, M. (2013). Consciousness for fair consumption: conceptualization, scale development and empirical validation. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 37(5), 546–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bamberg, S., & Möser, G. (2007). Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: a new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27(1), 14–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bansal, P. (2005). Evolving sustainably: a longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development. Strategic Management Journal, 26(3), 197–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bardhi, F., & Eckhardt, G. M. (2012). Access-based consumption: the case of car sharing. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(4), 881–898.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, C., Cafaro, P., & Newholm, T. (2005). Philosophy and ethical consumption. In R. Harrison, T. Newholm, & D. Shaw (Eds.), The ethical consumer. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Botsman, R., & Rogers, R. (2010). What’s mine is yours: The rise of collaborative consumption. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caruana, R., & Crane, A. (2008). Constructing consumer responsibility: exploring the role of corporate communications. Organization Studies, 29(12), 1495–1519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castaldo, S., Perrini, F., Misani, N., & Tencati, A. (2009). The missing link between corporate social responsibility and consumer trust: the case of fair trade products. Journal of Business Ethics, 84(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, K. (1999). Market segmentation of green consumers in Hong Kong. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 12(2), 7–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Churchill, G. A., Jr. (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16(1), 64–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, L., & Watson, D. (1995). Constructing validity: basic issues in objective scale development. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 309–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, J., & Prothero, A. (2003). Sustainable consumption: consumption, consumers and the commodity discourse. Consumption Markets & Culture, 6(4), 275–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, J., & Shaw, D. S. (2006). Identifying fair trade in consumption choice. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 14(4), 353–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Pelsmacker, P., & Janssens, W. (2007). A model for fair trade buying behaviour: the role of perceived quantity and quality of information and of product-specific attitudes. Journal of Business Ethics, 75(4), 361–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devinney, T. M., Auger, P., Eckhardt, G., & Birtchnell, T. (2006). The other CSR: consumer social responsibility. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 4(3), 30–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devinney, T. M., Auger, P., & Eckhardt, G. M. (2010). The myth of the ethical consumer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dittmar, H. (2005). Compulsive buying – a growing concern? An examination of gender, age, and endorsement of materialistic values as predictors. British Journal of Psychology, 96(4), 467–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap, R. E., Van Liere, K. D., Mertig, A. G., & Jones, R. E. (2000). measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: a revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 425–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, N., & Mussen, P. H. (1989). The roots of prosocial behavior in children. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. London: Capstone Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerbing, D. W., & Anderson, J. C. (1988). An updated paradigm for scale development incorporating unidimensionality and its assessment. Journal of Marketing Research, 25(2), 186–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilg, A., Barr, S., & Ford, N. (2005). Green consumption or sustainable lifestyles? Identifying the sustainable consumer. Futures, 37(6), 481–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill, J. D., Crosby, L. A., & Taylor, J. R. (1986). Ecological concern, attitudes, and social norms in voting behavior. Public Opinion Quarterly, 50(4), 537–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haws, K. L., Winterich, K. P., & Naylor, R. W. (2010). Green consumer value. In W. O. Bearden, K. L. Haws, & R. G. Netemeyer (Eds.), Handbook of marketing scales: Multi-items measures for marketing and consumer behavior. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 424–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huneke, M. E. (2005). The face of the un-consumer: an empirical examination of the practice of voluntary simplicity in the United States. Psychology & Marketing, 22(7), 527–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hustvedt, G., & Bernard, J. (2010). Effects of social responsibility labelling and brand on willingness to pay for apparel. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 27(1), 87–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iwata, O. (2006). An evaluation of consumerism and lifestyle as correlates of a voluntary simplicity lifestyle. Social Behavior and Personality, 34(5), 557–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iyer, R., & Muncy, J. A. (2009). Purpose and object of anti-consumption. Journal of Business Research, 62(2), 160–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, T. (2005). Live better by consuming less? Is there a “double dividend” in sustainable consumption? Journal of Industrial Ecology, 9(1/2), 19–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansson, J., Marell, A., & Nordlund, A. (2010). Green consumer behavior: determinants of curtailment and eco-innovation adoption. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 27(4), 358–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, F. G., Wölfing, S., & Fuhrer, U. (1999). Environmental attitude and ecological behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19(1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y., & Choi, S. M. (2005). Antecedents of green purchase behavior: an examination of collectivism, environmental concern, and PCE. Advances in Consumer Research, 32(1), 592–599.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, G. S., Lee, G. Y., & Park, K. (2010). A cross-national investigation on how ethical consumers build loyalty toward fair trade brands. Journal of Business Ethics, 96(4), 589–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinnear, T. C., Taylor, J. R., & Ahmed, S. A. (1974). Ecologically concerned consumers: who are they? Journal of Marketing, 38(2), 20–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laroche, M., Bergeron, J., & Barbaro-Forleo, G. (2001). Targeting consumers who are willing to pay more for environmentally friendly products. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18(6), 503–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lastovicka, J. L., Bettencourt, L. A., Hughner, R. S., & Kuntze, R. J. (1999). Lifestyle of the tight and frugal: theory and measurement. Journal of Consumer Research, 26(1), 85–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubin, D. A., & Esty, D. C. (2010). The sustainability imperative – lessons for leaders from previous game-changing megatrends. Harvard Business Review, 88, 42–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazis, M. B., Ahtola, O. T., & Klippel, R. E. (1975). A comparison of four multi-attribute models in the prediction of consumer attitudes. Journal of Consumer Research, 2(1), 38–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, S., Oates, C., Thyne, M., Alevizou, P., & McMorland, L.-A. (2009). Comparing sustainable consumption patterns across product sectors. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 33(2), 137–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Micheletti, M. (2003). Political virtue and shopping. Individuals, consumerism, and collective action. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Micheletti, M., Follesdal, A., & Stolle, D. (Eds.). (2004). Politics, products and markets. Exploring political consumerism past and present. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minton, A. P., & Rose, R. L. (1997). The effects of environmental concern on environmentally friendly consumer behavior: an exploratory study. Journal of Business Research, 40(1), 37–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohr, L. A., Webb, D. J., & Harris, K. E. (2001). Do consumers expect companies to be socially responsible? The impact of corporate social responsibility on buying behaviour. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 35(1), 45–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mont, O. (2004). Institutionalization of sustainable consumption patterns based on shared use. Ecological Economics, 50(1–2), 135–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, P. E., Öberseder, M., & Laczniak, G. R. (2013). Corporate societal responsibility in marketing: normatively broadening the concept. AMS Review, 3(2), 86–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newholm, T., & Shaw, D. (2007). Studying the ethical consumer: a review of research. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 6(5), 253–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory. Hillsdales: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peattie, K. (2010). Green consumption: behavior and norms. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 35, 195–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pepper, M., Jackson, T., & Uzzell, D. (2009). An examination of the values that motivate socially conscious and frugal consumer behaviours. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 33(2), 125–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, R. (1994). A meta-analysis of Cronbach’s coefficient alpha. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(2), 381–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peyer, M., Balderjahn, I., & Paulssen, M. (2012). Towards the development of a scale for consciousness for fair consumption. Proceedings of the International Conference on Contemporary Marketing Issues 2012, 520–526.

  • Pickett, G. M., Kangun, N., & Grove, S. (1993). Is there a general conserving consumer? A public concern. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 12(2), 234–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prothero, A., Dobscha, S., Freund, J., Kilbourne, W. E., Luchs, M. G., Ozanne, L. K., & Thøgersen, J. (2011). Sustainable consumption: opportunities for consumer research and public policy. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 30(1), 31–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quelch, J. A., & Jocz, K. E. (2007). Greater good: How good marketing makes for better democracy. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, J. A. (1996). Green consumers in the 1990s: profile and implications for advertising. Journal of Business Research, 36(3), 217–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, J. A., & Bacon, D. R. (1997). Exploring the subtle relationships between environmental concern and ecologically conscious consumer behavior. Journal of Business Research, 40(1), 79–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sears, D. O. (1986). College sophomores in the laboratory: influences of a narrow data base on social psychology’s view of human nature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(3), 515–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, S., & Bhattacharya, C. (2001). Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(2), 225–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, D., & Newholm, T. (2002). Voluntary simplicity and the ethics of consumption. Psychology & Marketing, 19(2), 167–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheth, J. N., Sethia, N. K., & Srinivas, S. (2011). Mindful consumption: a customer-centric approach to sustainability. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(1), 21–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, B. J. K, & Radford, S. K. (2011). Consumer perceptions of sustainability: A free elicitation study. Proceedings of the 36th Annual Macromarketing Conference, 267–279.

  • Stern, P. C., & Dietz, T. (1994). The value basis of environmental concern. Journal of Social Issues, 50(3), 65–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, G., Barnes, J. H., & Montgomery, C. (1995). Ecoscale: a scale for the measurement of environmentally responsible consumers. Psychology & Marketing, 12(7), 595–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, D. N., Bryant, S. M., & Wier, B. (2010). Why are financial incentive effects unreliable? An extension of self-determination theory. Behavioural Research in Accounting, 22(2), 105–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanner, C., & Wölfing Kast, S. (2003). Promoting sustainable consumption: determinants of green purchases by swiss consumers. Psychology & Marketing, 20(10), 883–902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thøgersen, J. (1996). Recycling and morality: a critical review of the literature. Environment and Behavior, 28(4), 536–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thøgersen, J. (2005). How may consumer policy empower consumers for sustainable lifestyles? Journal of Consumer Policy, 28(2), 143–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thøgersen, J. (2010). Country differences in sustainable consumption: the case of organic food. Journal of Macromarketing, 30(2), 171–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thøgersen, J., & Ölander, F. (2002). Human values and the emergence of a sustainable consumption pattern: a panel study. Journal of Economic Psychology, 23(5), 605–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb, D. J., Green, C., & Brashear, T. (2000). Development and validation of scales to measure attitudes influencing monetary donations to charitable organizations. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(2), 299–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster, F. E., Jr., & Lusch, R. F. (2013). Elevation marketing: marketing is dead! Long live marketing! Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 41(4), 389–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED). (1987). Our common future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Marketing, University of Potsdam, August-Bebel-Straße 89, 14482, Potsdam, Germany

    Ingo Balderjahn & Mathias Peyer

  2. Marketing Management, HHL Leipzig Graduate School of Management, Jahnallee 59, 04109, Leipzig, Germany

    Anja Buerke & Manfred Kirchgeorg

  3. Institute of Marketing, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Abt-Jerusalem-Straße 4, 38106, Braunschweig, Germany

    Barbara Seegebarth

  4. Institute of Marketing and Management, Leibniz University of Hannover, Koenigsworther Platz 1, 30167, Hannover, Germany

    Klaus-Peter Wiedmann

Authors
  1. Ingo Balderjahn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Anja Buerke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Manfred Kirchgeorg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mathias Peyer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Barbara Seegebarth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Klaus-Peter Wiedmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ingo Balderjahn.

Additional information

Besides the unknown reviewers we would like to especially thank the editor for her proposals and professional support.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Balderjahn, I., Buerke, A., Kirchgeorg, M. et al. Consciousness for sustainable consumption: scale development and new insights in the economic dimension of consumers’ sustainability. AMS Rev 3, 181–192 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-013-0057-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-013-0057-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation