Skip to main content
Log in

Categorising without Concepts

  • Published:
Review of Philosophy and Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A strong claim, often found in the literature, is that it is impossible to categorize perceptual properties unless one possesses the related concepts. The evidence from visual perception reviewed in this paper however questions this claim: Concepts, at least canonically defined, are ill-suited to explain perceptual categorisation, which is a fast, and crucially a largely involuntary and unconscious process, which rests on quickly updated probabilistic calculations. I suggest here that perceptual categorisation rests on non-conceptual sorting principles. This changes the claim that categorisation cannot occur without concepts: It does not preclude that the concepts remain necessary for categorisation, but opens the possibility that they are not and that those sorting principles could be here sufficient.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. See Machery 2009 for discussion.

  2. Thought is here considered mostly as rational thought or reasoning, but the use of concepts might also other kinds of thinking processes, like conscious mind wandering and associative thinking.

  3. See Moors and De Houwer ( 2006 ) .

  4. Separating perceptual from verbal categorisation is non-trivial. This is discussed below, but see Davidoff ( 2001 ) for a more comprehensive review.

  5. See Davidoff ( 2001 ) for a much more detailed discussion.

  6. See Davidoff ( 2001 ) ; Harnad ( 2003 ) ; Jraissati ( 2012 )

  7. The question of timing also bears on the interpretation of the effect as a top-down effect, but this matter is orthogonal to the present concern (see Firestone and Scholl 2015 for a review).

  8. As pointed by a reviewer, one needs to underscore the difficulty to control for stimuli and be reminded that the effects are usually observed at the green-blue boundary but not with other color sets.

  9. Durgin ( 2000 ) .

  10. As pointed by a reviewer, the lack of control comes from perceivers being unable to refrain from using these principles, not from perceivers not being able to voluntarily apply them.

References

  • Ashby, F.G., J.M. Ennis, and B.J. Spiering. 2007. A neurobiological theory of automaticity in perceptual categorisation. Psychological Review 114 (3): 632–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bird, C.M., S.C. Berens, A.J. Horner, and A. Franklin. 2014. Categorical encoding of colour in the brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111 (12): 4590–4595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brouwer, G.J., and D.J. Heeger. 2013. Categorical clustering of the neural representation of colour. Journal of Neuroscience 33 (39): 15454–15465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidoff, J. 2001. Language and perceptual categorisation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 5 (9): 382–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durgin, D.H. 2000. The reverse Stroop effect. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 7 (1): 121–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Earl, F. (2017) Concepts. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firestone, C., and B.J. Scholl. 2015. Can you experience ‘top-down effects on perception?: The case of race categories and perceived lightness. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 22 (3): 694–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fonteneau, E., and J. Davidoff. 2007. Neural correlates of colour category processing. Journal of Vision 7 (9): 461–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forder, L., X. He, and A. Franklin. 2017. Colour categories are reflected in sensory stages of colour perception when stimulus issues are resolved. PLoS One 12 (5): e0178097.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gärdenfors, P. (2000). The geometry of thought. Boston: MIT Press.

  • Greene, M.R., and L. Fei-Fei. 2014. Visual categorization is automatic and obligatory: Evidence from the Stroop-like paradigm. Journal of Vision 14 (1): 14–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harnad, S. (2003). Categorical perception. In Encyclopedia of cognitive science (Vol. 67, No. 4). MacMillan: Nature Publishing Group.

  • Jraissati, Y. 2012. Categorical perception of color: Assessing the role of language. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 12 (3): 439–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, D.T., and M.R. Banaji. 2006. Distortions in the perceived lightness of faces: The role of race categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 135 (4): 501–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Machery, E. 2009. Doing without concepts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mandelbaum, E. 2017. Seeing and conceptualizing: Modularity and the shallow contents of perception. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 97: 267–283. https://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.12368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moors, A. 2016. Automaticity: Componential, causal, and mechanistic explanations. Annual Review of Psychology 67: 263–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moors, A., and J. De Houwer. 2006. Automaticity: A theoretical and conceptual analysis. Psychological Bulletin 132 (2): 297–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne, B.K. 2001. Prejudice and perception: The role of automatic and controlled processes in misperceiving a weapon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 81: 181–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Travers, E., M.T. Fairhurst, and O. Deroy. 2017. Racial biases in social perception: Fast, unconscious, but still surmountable. PsyArXiv 28. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/je7j4

  • White, T.P., R.L. Wigton, D.W. Joyce, T. Bobin, C. Ferragamo, N. Wasim, S. Lisk, and S.S. Shergill. 2014. Eluding the illusion? Schizophrenia, dopamine and the McGurk effect. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8.

  • Winawer, J., N. Witthoft, M.C. Frank, L. Wu, A.R. Wade, and L. Boroditsky. 2007. Russian blues reveal effects of language on colour discrimination. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104 (19): 7780–7785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ophelia Deroy.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Deroy, O. Categorising without Concepts. Rev.Phil.Psych. 10, 465–478 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-019-00431-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-019-00431-2

Navigation