Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Increasing the adaptive capacity of organic farming systems in the face of climate change using action research methods

  • Published:
Organic Agriculture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Adapting agricultural systems to the effects of climate change requires farm-specific innovations and adaptive measures. Such innovative measures were developed for organic farming systems in the federal state of Brandenburg, Germany by a regional innovation network using an action research approach. The goal of the presented approach was to address climate change-related farm-specific problems, develop specific adaptation measures and learn new approaches such as proactive risk management and strategic adaptive behaviour. In a cyclical process of analysis, planning, action and reflection, the network of researchers and organic farmers repeatedly used SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats) analyses to structure the transdisciplinary innovation and adaption process. First, the organic farmers identified as main weaknesses the water and nitrogen supply likely to be worsened by climate change; then, farm-specific adaption measures were identified and tested by conducting on-farm experiments at six organic farms. By evaluating and thus adjusting and retesting the measures in consecutive trials, new farming methods were developed to increase diversification and decrease risk in organic farming practices. Along with the iterative process, the network was expanding and the collective learning process led to changes in attitudes and behaviour. A clear example is the stakeholders’ initially positive view of reduced tillage, which they later questioned and changed. The participating organic farmers proved to be active partners; their openness to innovation and their approach to problem solving make them well suited to action research. In adapting regions to climate change, these kinds of stakeholders will play a decisive role.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aase TH, Chapagain PS, Tiwari PC (2013) Innovation as an expression of adaptive capacity to change in Himalayan farming. Mt Res Dev 33:4–10. doi:10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-12-00025.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloch R, Bachinger J, Häring AM (2014) Praxisversuche zur Erhöhung der Anpassungskapazität im Ökolandbau. In: Bloch R, Bachinger J, Fohrmann R, Pfriem R (eds) Land- und Ernährungswirtschaft im Klimawandel. Auswirkungen, Anpassungsstrategien und Entscheidungshilfen. oekom verlag, München, pp 93–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloch R, Wechsung F, Heß J, Bachinger J (2015) Climate change impacts of legume-grass swards: implications for organic farming in the Federal State of Brandenburg, Germany. Reg Environ Chang 15:405–414. doi:10.1007/s10113-014-0656-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Checkland P, Holwell S (1998) Action research: its nature and validity. Syst Pract Action Res 11:9–21. doi:10.1023/A%3A1022908820784

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chmielewski F, Köhn W (1999) Impact of weather on yield components of spring cereals over 30 years. Agric Forest Meteorol 96:49–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darnhofer I, Bellon S, Dedieu B, Milestad R (2010) Adaptiveness to enhance the sustainability of farming systems. Rev Agron Sustain Dev 30:545–555. doi:10.1051/agro/2009053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety (2009) Combating climate change: the German adaptation strategy. http://www.germany.info/contentblob/2293498/Daten/426241/Adaptation_DD.pdf. Accessed 25 Jan 2015

  • Fichter K, Gleich A von, Pfriem R, Siebenhüner B (eds) (2010) Theoretische Grundlagen für erfolgreiche Klimaanpassungsstrategien. nordwest2050 – Berichte. http://www.nordwest2050.de/index_nw2050.php?obj=page&id=136&unid=6d644613feafeb6bd819e6ee4d84198f. Accessed 25 Jan 2015

  • Gerber A, Hoffman V (2007) Aktionsforschung. In: Kirchner-Heßler R, Gerber A, Konold W (eds) Nachhaltige Landnutzung durch Kooperation von Wissenschaft und Praxis. Gemeinsam gestalten. Oekom, München, pp 114–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerstengarbe F-W, Badeck F-W, Hattermann F, Krysanova V, Lahmer W, Lasch P, Stock M, Suckow F, Wechsung F, Werner PC (2003) Studie zur klimatischen Entwicklung im Land Brandenburg bis 2055 und deren Auswirkungen auf den Wasserhaushalt, die Forst- und Landwirtschaft sowie die Ableitung erster Perspektiven. Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), Potsdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendlmeier, K (2015) HEKO-Landmaschinen. http://www.heko-landmaschinen.de/index.php?l=180. Accessed 24 Mar 2015

  • Knierim A, Nowicki P (2010) SWOT analysis: appraisal of a new tool in European rural development policies. Outlook Agric 39:65–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • König B, Kuntosch A, Bokelmann W, Doernberg A, Schwerdtner W, Busse M, Siebert R, Koschatzky K, Stahlecker T (2012) Nachhaltige innovationen in der landwirtschaft: komplexe herausforderungen im innovationssystem. Q J Econ Res 81:71–91. doi:10.3790/vjh.81.4.71

    Google Scholar 

  • Krasny ME, Lundholm C, Plummer R (eds) (2011) Resilience in social-ecological systems. The role of learning and education. Routledge, Abingdon

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroma MM (2006) Organic farmer networks: facilitating learning and innovation for sustainable agriculture. J Sustain Agric 28:5–28. doi:10.1300/J064v28n04_03

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Läpple D (2013) Comparing attitudes and characteristics of organic, former organic and conventional farmers: evidence from Ireland. Renew Agric Food Syst 28:329–337. doi:10.1017/S1742170512000294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laukkonen J, Blanco PK, Lenhart J, Keiner M, Cavric B, Kinuthia-Njenga C (2009) Combining climate change adaptation and mitigation measures at the local level. Habitat Int 33:287–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin K (2000) Resolving social conflicts and field theory in social science, 2nd edn. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Lüscher A, Hartwig UA, Suter D, Nösberger J (2000) Direct evidence that symbiotic N2 fixation in fertile grassland is an important trait for a strong response of plants to elevated atmospheric C02. Glob Chang Biol 6:655–662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNiff J (2013) Action research: principles and practice, 3rd edn. Routledge, Abingdon

    Google Scholar 

  • Milestad R, Darnhofer I (2003) Building farm resilience: the prospects and challenges of organic farming. J Sustain Agr 22:81–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan K, Murdoch J (2000) Organic vs. conventional agriculture: knowledge, power and innovation in the food chain. Geoforum 31:159–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlowsky B, Gerstengarbe F, Werner P (2008) A resampling scheme for regional climate simulations and its performance compared to a dynamical RCM. Theor Appl Climatol 92(3–4):209–223. doi:10.1007/s00704-007-0352-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Padel S (2001) Conversion to organic farming: a typical example of the diffusion of an innovation? Sociol Rural 41:40–61. doi:10.1111/1467-9523.00169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piercy N, Giles W (1989) Making SWOT analysis work. Mark Intell Plan 7:5–7. doi:10.1108/EUM0000000001042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen LB (2004) Action research—Scandinavian experiences. AI & Soc 18(1):21–43. doi:10.1007/s00146-003-0269-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reason P, Bradbury H (eds) (2008) The Sage handbook of action research: participative inquiry and practice, 2nd edn. London, Sage Publications

    Google Scholar 

  • Reidsma P, Ewert F, Lansink AO, Leemans R (2010) Adaptation to climate change and climate variability in European agriculture: the importance of farm level responses. Eur J Agron 32:91–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reyer C, Bachinger J, Bloch R, Hattermann FF, Ibisch PL, Kreft S et al (2012) Climate change adaptation and sustainable regional development: a case study for the Federal State of Brandenburg, Germany. Reg Environ Chang 12:523–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rusch HP (2004) Bodenfruchtbarkeit. Eine Studie des biologischen Denkens, 7th edn. OLV Organischer Landbau-Verlag, Xanten

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandhu HS, Wratten SD, Cullen R (2010) Organic agriculture and ecosystem services. Environ Sci Pol 13:1–7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schäfer M, Nölting B, Engel A (2009) Organic agriculture as a new player in sustainable regional development? Case studies of rural areas in Eastern Germany. Int J Agric Resour Gov Ecol (IJARGE) 8:158–179

  • Siart S, Knierim A, Bloch R, Bachinger J (2012) Development of agricultural innovations in organic agriculture to adapt to climate change—results from a transdisciplinary R&D project in North-Eastern Germany. In: Producing and Reproducing Farmings Systems: New modes of organisation for sustainable food systems of tomorrow. Book of Abstracts 55. http://www.ifsa2012.dk/downloads/WS3_1/Sonja_Siart.pdf. Accessed 25 Jan 2015

  • Smit B, Wandel J (2006) Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability. Glob Environ Chang 16:282–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein-Bachinger K, Fuchs S (2012) Protection strategies for farmland birds in legume-grass leys as trade-offs between nature conservation and farmers’ needs. Org Agric 2:145–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stolze M (1998) Organisationsformen ostdeutscher landwirtschaftlicher Grossbetriebe nach der Umstellung auf ökologischen Landbau. Agribusiness & food, vol 2. Agrimedia, Bergen

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsung F, Gerstengarbe F-, Lasch P, Lüttger A (2008) Die Ertragsfähigkeit ostdeutscher Ackerflächen unter Klimawandel. PIK-Report, Potsdam. http://www.pik-potsdam.de/research/publications/pikreports/.files/pr112.pdf. Accessed 25 Jan 2015

  • Yohe G, Tol RSJ (2002) Indicators for social and economic coping capacity—moving toward a working definition of adaptive capacity. Glob Environ Chang 12:25–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadoks J, Chang T, Konzak C (1974) A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Res 14:415–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zapf W (1989) Über soziale Innovationen. Soz Welt 40:170–183

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was made possible with the support of all practitioners who participated in the INKA BB network, and without whom this research would have not been possible. Though it is not possible to list all the names, we would like to extend our special thanks to the farmers Sascha Philipp, Stefan Palme and Peter Krentz who carried out the on-farm experiments. We would also like to thank the two reviewers and Professor Gerold Rahmann for their thoughtful and insightful comments and helpful feedback. This study was financed by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research, Germany and the Brandenburg Ministry of Sciences, Research and Cultural Affairs.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ralf Bloch.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bloch, R., Knierim, A., Häring, AM. et al. Increasing the adaptive capacity of organic farming systems in the face of climate change using action research methods. Org. Agr. 6, 139–151 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13165-015-0123-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13165-015-0123-5

Keywords

Navigation