Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Distance error for determining the acoustic velocity of standing tree using tree morphological, physical and anatomical properties

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of the Indian Academy of Wood Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Time-of-flight (ToF) acoustic tools is one of the most practical nondestructive methods for predicting tree stiffness. In the literature, 120 cm between probes has been adopted as the standard for the assessment of tree acoustic velocity. However, there is no empirical study supporting this assertion, hence this study is aimed at determining the effect of distance on error for a common ToF acoustic tool. Twenty-five trees each were randomly selected from four loblolly pine plantations. Seven distances from 120 to 10 cm between probes were used to measure velocity. The morphological characteristics, physical and anatomical properties of the selected trees were also determined. The results indicated, at distances below 60 cm, the waveform is dominated by the fundamental frequency of the transmitter probe hence the velocities determined within 10–60 cm are not statistically different. Consequently, distances from 80 to 120 cm constitute the optimum range for velocity determination for this ToF acoustic tool. Furthermore, velocity determined at 40 cm is significantly higher than that determined at 120 cm suggesting velocity is dependent on the between probes distance. Using 120 cm as a standard distance, the dynamic stiffness is overestimated by 13, 50, 102, and 197 MPa respectively for 100, 80, 60, and 40 cm. Finally, microfibril angle and the fiber wall thickness are the main anatomical properties driving the signal at the micro-level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amarasekara H, Denne MP (2002) Effects of crown size on wood characteristics of Corsican pine in relation to definitions of juvenile wood, crown formed wood and core wood. Forestry 75:51–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antony F, Schimleck LR, Jordan L, Daniels RF, Clark A (2012) Modeling the effect of initial planting density on within tree variation of stiffness in loblolly pine. Ann For Sci 69:614–650. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-011-0180-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ASTM Standards D2395-07 (2007) Standard methods for specific gravity of wood and wood-based materials. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA. Available at www.astm.org. Accessed 11 Mar 2017

  • Beall FC (2002) Overview of the use of ultrasonic technologies in research on wood properties. Wood Sci Technol 36(3):197–212

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bodig J, Jayne BA (1982) Mechanics of wood and wood composites. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Briggs DG, Thienel G, Turnblom EC, Lowell E, Dykstra D, Ross RJ, Wang X, Carter P (2007) Influence of thinning on acoustic velocity of Douglas fir trees in Western Washington and Western Oregon. In: Proceedings of the 15th international symposium on nondestructive testing of wood, September 10–12, 2007, Duluth, MN, USA, pp 113–123

  • Cato S, McMillan L, Donaldson L, Richardson T, Echt C, Gardner R (2006) Wood formation from the base to the crown in Pinus radiata: gradients of tracheid wall thickness, wood density, radial growth rate and gene expression. Plant Mol Biol 60:565–581

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cave ID (1966) Theory of X-ray measurement of microfibril angle in wood. For Prod J 16:37–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Essien C (2011) Physical, anatomical and treatment characteristics of the wood of Cola gigantea and Ficus sur. Master of Philosophy thesis, Submitted to Faculty of Renewable Natural Resource, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana, p 196

  • Essien C, Cheng Q, Via BK, Loewenstein EF, Wang X (2016) An acoustic operations study for loblolly pine standing saw timber with different thinning history. BioResources 11(3):7512–7521. https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.11.3.7512-7521

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Essien C, Via KB, Cheng Q, Gallagher T, McDonald T, Wang X, Eckhardt LG (2017a) Multivariate modeling of acoustomechanical response of 14-year old suppressed loblolly pine to variation in wood chemistry, microfibril angle, and density. Wood Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00226-017-0894-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Essien C, Via KB, Acquah G, Gallagher T, McDonald T, Eckhardt LG (2017b) Effect of genetic sources on anatomical, morphological, and mechanical properties of 14-year-old genetically improved loblolly pine families from two sites in the southern United States. J For Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-017-0584-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans R, Ilic J (2001) Rapid prediction of wood stiffness from microfibril angle and density. For Prod J 51(3):53–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesegawa M, Takata M, Matsumura J, Oda K (2011) Effect of wood properties on within-tree variation in ultrasonic wave velocity in softwood. Ultrasonics 51(3):296–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivkovic M, Gapare WJ, Abarquez A, Illic J, Powell MB, Wu HX (2009) Prediction of stiffness, strength, and shrinkage in juvenile wood of radiate pine. Wood Sci Technol 43:237–257

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kang H, Booker RE (2002) Variation in stress wave velocity with MC and temperature. Wood Sci Technol 36:41–54

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kuprevicius A, Anty D, Alexis Achim, Caspersen JP (2014) Quantifying the influence of live crown ratio on the mechanical properties of clear wood. Forestry 86:361–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lasserre JP, Mason EG, Watt MS (2007) Assessing corewood acoustic velocity and modulus of elasticity with two impact based instruments in 11-year-old trees from a clonal-spacing experiment of Pinus radiata D. Don. For Ecol Manag 239:217–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenz P, Anty D, Achim A, Beaulieu J, Mackay J (2013) Genetic improvement of White Spruce mechanical wood traits—early screening by means of acoustic velocity. Forest 4(3):575–594. https://doi.org/10.3390/f4030575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield SD, Parish R, Goudie JW, Kang KY, Ott P (2007) The effects of crown ratio on the transition from juvenile to mature wood production in lodgepole pine in western Canada. Can J For Res 37:1450–1459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mora CR, Schimleck LR, Isik F, Mahon JM Jr, Clark A III, Daniels RF (2009) The relationship between the acoustic variable and different measures of stiffness in standing Pinus taeda trees. Can J For Res 39(8):1421–1429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peter GF, Benton DM, Bennett K (2003) A simple direct method for measurement of microfibril angle in single fibers using differential interference contrast microscopy. J Pulp Pap Sci 29:274–280

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ross RJ (ed) (2015) Nondestructive evaluation of wood: second edition. General Technical Report FPL-GTR-238. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, Madison

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth BE, Li X, Huber DA, Peter GF (2007) Effects of management intensity, genetics and planting density on wood stiffness in a plantation of juvenile loblolly pine in the southeastern USA. For Ecol Manage 246:155–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2007.03.028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schimleck LR, Jones PD, Clark A III, Daniels RF, Peter GF (2005) Near infrared spectroscopy for the nondestructive estimation of clear wood properties of Pinus taeda L. from the southern United States. For Prod J 55:21–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Schomaker ME, Zarnoch SJ, Bechtold WA, Latelle DJ, Burkman WG, Cox SM (2007) Crown-condition classification: a guide to data collection and analysis. USDA Southern Research Station General Technical report SRS-102

  • Senalik CA, Schueneman G, Ross RJ (2014) Ultrasonic-based nondestructive evaluation methods for wood: a primer and historical review. General Technical Report FPL-GTR-235. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, Madison

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sundberg B, Uggla C, Tuominen H (2000) Cambial growth and auxin gradients. In: Savidge R, Barnett JR, Napier R (eds) Cell and molecular biology of wood formation. Bios Scientific Publishers Ltd, Oxford, pp 169–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Via BK, So CL, Shupe TF, Groom LH, Wikaira J (2009) Mechanical response of longleaf pine to variation in microfibril angle, chemistry associated wavelengths, density and radial position. Compos A 40(1):60–66

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X (2013) Acoustic measurement on trees and logs: a review and analysis. Wood Sci Technol 47(5):965–975

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Ross RJ, Carter P (2007) Acoustic evaluation of wood quality I standing tree. Part 1: acoustic behavior in standing tree. Wood Fiber Sci 39(1):28–38

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Winandy JE, Rowell RM (2005) Chemistry of wood strength. In: Rowell RM (ed) Handbook of chemistry and wood composite. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 305–343

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe R (2000) Research challenges for structural use of small-diameter round timbers. For Prod J 50(2):21–29

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charles Essien.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Essien, C., Via, B.K., Gallagher, T. et al. Distance error for determining the acoustic velocity of standing tree using tree morphological, physical and anatomical properties. J Indian Acad Wood Sci 15, 52–60 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13196-018-0208-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13196-018-0208-3

Keywords

Navigation