Abstract
The study is focused on the application of maintainability analysis in a jet fighter aircraft in order to point out weaknesses of maintenance operations. Descriptive statistics of the repair data were carried out and both maintainability and repair rate modes for the entire aircraft were calculated. Maintainability for different time periods for aircraft’s principal subsystems has been estimated on the basis of fitted distribution models. Quality function deployment (QFD) method was applied to link customer requirements and maintenance characteristics in military squadron, revealing the relationship among the prevailing factors affecting maintenance operations. The QFD is proposed as a quality planning methodology to reduce aircraft repair time increasing at the same time squadron’s combat readiness. The highest maintainabilities were associated with the engine, the communication/navigation and the fuel subsystems, whereas the airplane general, the flight control and the structure subsystems bottomed out in maintainability performance. Furthermore, top management involvement, resources availability, maintenance procedures, maintenance planning as well as technical experience were the main factors responsible for the current maintainability level of this aircraft. The paper is based on practical actions being undertaken in an Airforce and therefore, is demonstrated to be practical in an aviation environment. This study may be used for long‐term, strategic assessment and planning decisions in order to sustain unit availability and overall air force combat readiness at a high level.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahmadi A, Kumar U, Söderholm P (2010) On aircraft scheduled maintenance program development. J Qual Maint Eng 16(3):229–255. doi:10.1108/13552511011072899
Bazargan M, McGrath RN (2003) Discrete event simulation to improve aircraft availability and maintainability. In: Reliability and maintainability symposium, annual. IEEE, pp 63–67. doi:10.1109/RAMS.2003.1181903
Block J, Ahmadi A, Tyrberg T, Söderholm P (2014) Part-out-based spares provisioning management: a military aviation maintenance case study. J Qual Maint Eng 20(1):76–95. doi:10.1108/JQME-09-2013-0060
Dhillon BS (2006) Maintainability, maintenance and reliability for engineers. Taylor & Francis, New York
Ebeling C (2008) An introduction to reliability and maintainability engineering, 10th edn. Tata McGraw-Hill, New Delhi
Francois P, Noyes D (2003) Evaluation of a maintenance strategy by the analysis of the rate of repair. Qual Reliab Eng Int 19(2):129–148. doi:10.1002/qre.515
Freeze DE, Aaron HB (1988) Customer requirements planning process CRPII (beyond QFD). In: Proceedings of the SME international conference, Detroit, Michigan, USA
Haiqiao W, Yi L, Yunliang D, Jia L (2004) Methods to reduce direct maintenance costs for commercial aircraft. Aircr Eng Aerosp Technol 76(1):15–18. doi:10.1108/00022660410514964
Hauser JR, Clausing D (1988) The house of quality. Harv Bus Rev 66(3):63–73
Kumar UD (1999) New trends in aircraft reliability and maintenance measures. J Qual Maint Eng 5(4):287–295. doi:10.1108/13552519910298046
Madu NC (2005) Strategic value of reliability and maintainability management. Int J Qual Reliab Manag 22(3):317–328. doi:10.1108/02656710510582516
Makrygianni M, Besseris G, Stergiou K (2011) Reliability analysis and TQM problem solving tools for improving the maintenance operations in modern jet fighters. In: Proceedings of the international conference of quality and reliability, 14–17 Sept, Bangkok, Thailand, pp 413–420. doi:10.1109/ICQR.2011.6031752
Meeker W, Escobar L (1998) Statistical methods for reliability data. Wiley, New York
Middleton DH (1993) Aircraft maintenance management part 3. Aircr Eng Aerosp Technol 65(2):6–9. doi:10.1108/eb037340
MIL-HDBK-189 (1981) Relibility growth management. Headquartes, US Army Communication Research and Development Command, ATTN: DRDCO-PT, Fort Monmouth, NJ, USA
Pettersen KA, Ase K (2008) Explaining safe work practices in aviation line maintenance. Saf Sci 46(3):510–519. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2007.06.020
Pryor WE (1964) Reliability and performance of aircraft transparencies in military service. Aircr Eng Aerosp Technol 36(12):386–402. doi:10.1108/eb033958
Rajpal PS, Shishodia KS, Sekhon GS (2006) An artificial neural network for modeling reliability, availability and maintainability of a repairable system. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 91(7):809–819. doi:10.1016/j.ress.2005.08.004
Ruiz-Torres JA, Zhang J, Zapata E, Pennathur A, Rhode R, McCleskey C, Cowen M (2010) A reliability, maintainability, and safety model to support the assessment of space vehicles. Int J Qual Reliab Manag 27(4):486–504. doi:10.1108/02656711011035165
Shen A, Guo J, Li J (2014) Research on system level maintenance operation sample allocation method validation. In: Wang J (ed) Proceedings of the first symposium on aviation maintenance and management-volume II. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 117–124. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-54233-6_12
Sikos L, Kleme J (2010) Evaluation and assessment of reliability and availability software for securing an uninterrupted energy supply. Clean Technol Environ Policy 12(2):137–146. doi:10.1007/s10098-009-0243-2
Srinivasan NK (2012) Availability estimation using simulation for military systems. Int J Qual Reliab Manag 29(8):937–952. doi:10.1108/02656711211270360
Sukhwinder SJ, Bikram JS (2014) An approach to enhance availability of repairable systems: a case study of SPMs. Int J Qual Reliab Manag 31(9):1031–1051. doi:10.1108/IJQRM-02-2014-0016
Thornton J (2001) Maintainability drives Fort Worth’s joint strike fighter design: blending simulation and ingenuity, Lockheed Martin up-ends design methods in $320 billion program. Assem Autom 21(3):204–209. doi:10.1108/EUM0000000005617
Tsarouhas HP (2014) Maintainability analysis in the yogurt industry. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 6(2):119–128. doi:10.1007/s13198-014-0254-1
Tsarouhas PH, Fourlas G (2015a) Reliability and maintainability analysis of a robotic system for industrial applications: a case study. Int J Perform Eng 11(5):453–462
Tsarouhas PH, Fourlas G (2015b) Maintainability analysis of the mobile robot. In: 16th IEEE International symposium on computational intelligence and informatics, 19–21 November, Budapest, Hungary, pp 47–52. doi:10.1109/CINTI.2015.7382951
Tsarouhas PH, Fourlas G (2015c) Mission reliability estimation of mobile robot system. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 7(2):220–228
Upadhya KS, Srinivasan NK (2003) Availability of weapon systems with multiple failures and logistic delays. Int J Qual Reliab Manag 20(7):836–846. doi:10.1108/02656710310491249
Vassilakis E, Besseris G (2009) An application of TQM tools at a maintenance division of a large aerospace company. J Qual Maint Eng 15(1):31–46. doi:10.1108/13552510910943877
Wan Mohd SWH (2012) Maintainability prediction for aircraft mechanical components utilizing aircraft feedback information. Appl Mech Mater 225(8):528–533. doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.225.528
Wani MF, Gandhi OP (1999) Development of maintainability index for mechanical systems. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 65(3):259–270. doi:10.1016/S0951-8320(99)00004-6
Xiaodong T, Jing Q, Guanjun L, Kehong L (2013) Health-state evaluation for aerospace systems. Aircr Eng Aerosp Technol 85(2):115–125. doi:10.1108/00022661311302724
Younus B, Iqbal A (2011) Leveraging quality function deployment to enhance the productivity of an aviation maintenance repair and overhaul organization. In: Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE ICQR, pp 115–119. doi:10.1109/ICQR.2011.6031692
Zhou D, Kang L, Chuan L (2013) A virtual reality-based maintenance time measurement methodology for complex products. Assem Autom 33(3):221–230. doi:10.1108/AA-12-2013-048
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to acknowledge financial support provided by the research committee of the Technological Educational Institute of Central Macedonia under Grant SMF/DL/200116-1/01.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tsarouhas, P., Makrygianni, M. A framework for maintenance and combat readiness management of a jet fighter aircraft. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 8 (Suppl 2), 1895–1909 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-016-0481-8
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-016-0481-8