Skip to main content
Log in

Controllability of an aircraft with active high-lift system using a segmentwise controllable flap system

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
CEAS Aeronautical Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Active high-lift aircraft needs exceptional aerodynamic control performance to operate at low airspeed. In this study, a new concept for the improvement of controllability is investigated, incorporating the special capabilities of a blown Coandă flap system. The blowing system along the flaps is divided into 12 independently controllable segments. This provides the opportunity to influence the lift distribution along the wingspan by individual blowing performance settings for each segment without changing the flap deflection. This offers the chance to control the airplane in the final approach phase with fully deflected flaps using only the blowing system and to dedicate specific control tasks to particular segments. A model for the blowing system influence on the local wing aerodynamics is implemented in an existing nonlinear full aircraft flight mechanics model. The system capabilities in terms of roll control and the climb performance are investigated by criteria’ evaluation and dynamic simulation assessment. The ability to fly turn/altitude change maneuvers by utilizing the active high-lift system is proven and a corresponding control concept is presented. It also includes the compensation of different blowing failure cases, which leads to acceptable but still improvable aircraft reactions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

\(C_{L}, \tilde{C}_{L}\) :

Lift coefficient, with segment failure

\(C_{\mu }, \bar{C}_{\mu }\) :

Jet momentum coefficient, global

dC :

Local coefficient

E :

Failure factor

g :

Gravitational acceleration, m/s\(^2\)

\(H, \dot{H}\) :

Altitude, m, vertical speed, m/s

K :

Gain

k :

Gradient

\(m, \dot{m}\) :

Mass, kg, massflow, kg/s

\(\dot{p}\) :

Roll acceleration, \(^\circ\)/s\(^2\)

pqr :

Rotational rates, \(^\circ\)/s

\(q_{\infty }\) :

Free stream dynamic pressure, N/m\(^2\)

S :

Reference wing area, m\(^2\)

s :

Half wing span, m

t :

Time, s

\(t_{\Delta \Phi 30}\) :

Time to reach bank angle of \(\Phi =30^\circ\), s

T :

Throttle setting, %

\(T_{\mathrm{R}}\) :

Roll time constant, s

V :

Velocity, m/s

\(v_{\mathrm{jet}}\) :

Velocity of blowing airflow, m/s

Y :

Normalized half wingspan

\(\alpha\) :

Angle of attack, \(^\circ\)

\(\beta\) :

Sideslip angle, \(^\circ\)

\(\zeta\) :

Rudder deflection, \(^\circ\)

\(\delta _{\mathrm{fl}}\) :

Flap deflection, \(^\circ\)

\(\Delta\) :

Difference

\(\eta\) :

Elevator deflection, \(^\circ\)

\(\theta\) :

Pitch angle, \(^\circ\)

\(\kappa\) :

Scaling factor

\(\xi\) :

Aileron deflection, \(^\circ\)

\(\Phi\) :

Bank angle, \(^\circ\)

\(\chi , \dot{\chi }\) :

Flight-path azimuth, \(^\circ\), -rate \(^\circ\)/s

\(\omega _{0}\) :

Eigen frequency, rad/s

AC:

Aircraft

c:

Command

FF:

Feed-forward

fli:

Flap segment i

in:

Input values

j :

Normalized wing span coordinate

jet:

Blowing system

L:

Lift

l:

Rolling moment

lift:

HLS lift control input

max:

Maximum

n:

Aerodynamic data preset

roll:

HLS roll control input

WF:

Wing-fuselage

BLC:

Boundary layer control

CFD:

Computational fluid dynamics

DoF:

Degrees of freedom

HLS:

High-lift system

MAC:

Mean aerodynamic chord

MIL-HDBK:

Military handbook

MTOW:

Maximum take-off weight

NAL:

National Aerospace Laboratory of Japan

NASA:

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

PID:

Proportional-integral-derivative (controller)

PrADO:

Preliminary aircraft design and optimization (tool)

SC:

Super circulation

SFB:

Sonderforschungsbereich (Collaborative research center)

SHP:

Shaft horsepower

STOL:

Short take-off and landing

References

  1. Lachmann, G.V. (ed.): Boundary Layer and Flow Control. Pergamon Press, Oxford (1961)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Englar, R.J., Circulation control pneumatic aerodynamics: Blown force and moment augmentation and modification; past, present & future. In: Fluids 2000 Confercence and Exhibit, AIAA 2000–2541 (2000). https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2000-2541

  3. Werner-Spatz, C., Heinze, W., Horst, P., Radespiel, R.: Multidisciplinary conceptual design for aircraft with circulation control high-lift systems. CEAS Aeronaut. J. 3(2), 145–164 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13272-012-0049-5

  4. Werner-Westphal, C., Heinze, W., Horst, P.: Multidisciplinary integrated preliminary design applied to future green aircraft configurations. In: 45th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit (American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2007). https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2007-655

  5. Coandă, H.: Device for deflecting a stream of elastic fluid projected into an elastic fluid. US Patent 2,052,869 (1936)

  6. Quigley, H.C., Innis, R.C.: Handling qualities and operational problems of a large four-propeller STOL airplane. Technical Note D-1647, NASA (1963)

  7. Quigley, H.C., Lawson, H.F.: Simulator study of the lateral-directional handling qualities of a large four-propellered STOL transport airplane. Technical Note D-1773, NASA (1963)

  8. Quigley, H.C., Innis, R.C., Vomaske, R.F., Ratcliff, J.W.: A flight and simulator study of directional augmentation criteria for a four-propellered STOL airplane. Technical Note D-3909, NASA (1967)

  9. Holzhauser, C.A., Innis, R.C., Vomaske, R.F.: A flight and simulator study of the handling qualities of a deflected slipstream STOL seaplane having four propellers and boundary-layer control. Technical Note D-2966, NASA (1965)

  10. Dansby, T., Garrard, W.C.J., Ryle, D.M., Sullivan, L.J.: V/STOL development of the C-130 Hercules. AIAA J. Aircr. 1(5), 242–252 (1964)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Holzhauser, C.A., Deckert, W.H., Quigley, H.C., Kelly, M.W.: Design and operating considerations of commercial STOL transports. AIAA J. Aircr. 2(2), 87–93 (1965)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. May, F., Widdison, C.: STOL High-Lift Design Study Volume 1. State-of-the-Art Review of STOL Aerodynamic Technology. Institutsbericht AFFDL-TR-71-26-Vol. 1, The Boeing Company, Air Force Flight Dynamics Laboratory, Air Force Systems Command, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio (1971)

  13. Cook, M.V., Buannanno, A., Erbslöh, S.D.: A circulation control actuator for flapless flight control. RAS Aeronaut. J. 112(1134), 483–89 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Burnazzi, M., Radespiel, R.: Synergies between suction and blowing for active high-lift flaps. CEAS Aeronaut. J. 6(2), 305–318 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13272-014-0146-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Keller, D., Rudnik, R.: Numerical investigation of engine effects on a transport aircraft with circulation control. J. Aircr. 52(2), 421–438 (2015). https://doi.org/10.2514/1.C032724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Diekmann, J.H.: Analysis of trimmable conditions for a civil aircraft with active high-lift system. CEAS Aeronaut. J. 6(1), 109–120 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13272-014-0132-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Diekmann, J.H., Hahn, K.U.: Effect of an active high-lift system failure during landing approaches. CEAS Aeronaut. J. 6(2), 181–196 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Diekmann, J.H.: Flight mechanical challenges of STOL aircraft using active high-lift. In: AVIATION AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, AIAA-2017-3561. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Denver (2017)

  19. Diekmann, J.H., Keller, D., Faez, E., Rudnik, R., Gollnick, V.: Flight mechanics model for spanwise lift and rolling moment distributions of a segmented active high-lift wing. CEAS Aeronaut. J. 8(4), 625–635 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13272-017-0261-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pichler, M.: Steuerbarkeit eines Flugzeugs mit aktivem Hochauftriebssystem mithilfe eines entlang der Spannweite segmentweise kontrollierbaren Klappensystems. Internal Report DLR-IB-FT-BS-2017-21, Institut für Flugsystemtechnik, DLR & Institut für Flugführung, TU Braunschweig. Masterthesis (2017)

  21. MIL-HDBK-1797A.: Flying qualities of piloted aircraft. Military Handbook, Department of Defense (1997)

  22. Brockhaus, R., Alles, W., Luckner, R.: Flugregelung. Springer, Berlin (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Teichel, S., Verstraete, T., Seume, J.: Optimised multidisciplinary design of a small transonic compressor for active high-lift systems. In: International Gas Turbine Congress. GTSJ, Tokyo (2015)

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work has been supported by CFD results from DLR’s Tau code generated by Dennis Keller [Institute of Aerodynamics and Flow Technology (AS), DLR (German Aerospace Center)]. The reference aircraft design has been developed by Wolfgang Heinze [Institute of Aircraft Design and Lightweight Structures (IFL), TU Braunschweig] with the preliminary aircraft design tool PrADO.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jobst Henning Diekmann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Diekmann, J.H., Pichler, M., Steen, M. et al. Controllability of an aircraft with active high-lift system using a segmentwise controllable flap system. CEAS Aeronaut J 9, 461–474 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13272-018-0304-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13272-018-0304-5

Keywords

Navigation