Skip to main content
Log in

Uncertainty quantification of the finite element model of existing bridges for dynamic analysis

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With increasing number of aging civil structures including bridges, the finite element (FE) analysis assumes key roles in the use of the maintenance and repair design, and structural health monitoring. Despite the changes in dynamic characteristics of the aging structures from the nominal condition due to deteriorations or possible damages, limited attention has generally been paid to the verification and validation (V&V) of the numerical models used in the dynamic analysis. In this paper, we describe some practical considerations on the systematic V&V especially for the modeling of existing and aging bridges by applying a series of V&V procedure to the bridge FE model. The applied V&V procedure includes: (1) experimental data acquisition by impact tests, (2) model verification using grid convergence index, (3) sensitivity analysis to extract influential parameters to the comparative feature, namely the modal parameters, and (4) uncertainty quantification based on Bayesian inference. Posterior probability distributions of uncertain parameters in the FE model, especially material properties of the girders and slab, were then successfully derived in the uncertainty quantification procedure. The study also discusses some important considerations to improve implementation of V&V for the modeling of existing structures in terms of the verification procedure for complex FE models, the choice of comparative features, and the appropriate experimental data acquisition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Oberkampf WL, Truncano T (2002) Verification and validation in computational fluid dynamics. Prog Aerosp Sci 38:209–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Alvin K, Oberkampf WL, Dieger K, Rutherford B (1998) Uncertainty quantification in computational structural dynamics: a new paradigm for model validation. In: Proceedings of the 16th international modal analysis conference

  3. Atamturktur S, Hemez F, Unal C (2010) Calibration under uncertainty for finite element models of masonry monuments. Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Mollineaux M, Van Buren K, Hemez, F (2011) Simulating the dynamics of wind turbine blades: part I, model development and verification. In: 13th AIAA nondeterministic approaches conference

  5. Van Buren K, Mollineaux M, Hemez F (2011) Simulating the dynamics of wind turbine blades: part II, model validation and uncertainty quantification. In: 13th AIAA non-deterministic approaches conference

  6. Jalayer F, Iervolino I, Manfredi G (2010) Structural modeling uncertainties and their influence on seismic assessment of existing RC structures. Struct Saf 32:220–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Higdon D, Gattiker J, Williams B, Rightley M (2008) Computer model calibration using high-dimensional output. J Am Stat Assoc 103:570–583

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Dinh H, Nagayama T, Fujino Y (2011) Structural parameter identification by use of additional known mass and its experimental application. Struct Control Health Monit 19:436–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Juang JN, Pappa RS (1984) An eigensystem realization algorithm for modal parameter identification and model reduction. NASA/JPL workshop on identification and control of flexible structures

  10. ABAQUS/CAE user’s manual (2008) Dassault systemes

  11. ABAQUS verification manual (2008) Dassault systemes

  12. Roache PJ (1998) Verification and validation in computational science and engineering. Hermosa publishers, Albuquerque

    Google Scholar 

  13. Saltelli A et al (2008) Global sensitivity analysis, the primer. Wiley, London

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Guideline of stability design of steel structures (1990) Japanese Society of Civil Engineers (in Japanese)

  15. Kennedy M, O’Hagan A (2000) Predicting the output from a complex computer code when fast approximations are available. Biometrika 87:1–13

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Nishio M, Hemez F, Worden K, Park G, Takeda N, Farrar C (2011) Feature extraction for structural dynamics model validation. In: Proceedings of the 29th international modal analysis conference

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the research group in Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) for the use of GPM/SA software in the uncertainty quantification procedure, and especially grateful to Dr. Francois Hemez and Dr. Charles Farrar from LANL for meaningful discussions and many advices. The authors also appreciate the kind support by Dr. Dionysius Siringoringo from University of Tokyo in preparing the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mayuko Nishio.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nishio, M., Marin, J. & Fujino, Y. Uncertainty quantification of the finite element model of existing bridges for dynamic analysis. J Civil Struct Health Monit 2, 163–173 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-012-0026-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-012-0026-z

Keywords

Navigation